-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.02.2009 17:20 Uhr, Simon Michael wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> Everyone is invited to actively participate (means: get an account
>> and add content
>
> That needs a little more. First it's not clear how to get an account
> (currently, add /jo
Andreas Jung wrote:
> Everyone is invited to actively participate (means: get an account
> and add content
That needs a little more. First it's not clear how to get an account
(currently, add /join_form to the url). Second, after submitting the
join form I just got a login form and the account d
hi andreas,
thank you very much for your efforts
> Concerning the look & feel: unless someone volunteers for taking over
> the responsibility for providing a Plone theme, I will step forward
> trying to coordinate this with the design efforts that are currently
> in progress for the relaunch of w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.02.2009 5:09 Uhr, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>
> I basically gave up trying to get volunteers to provide content, and the
> timings conspired so that I didn't have time to do any more of it
> myself. We still have a Plone 3 theme, a visual design,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
>> Is this failure official or is there
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 14:11, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> IMHO, the way the Zope community is structured, it's very hard to get
> people to contribute this kind of thing. I hope things are different
> now. The work that happened with the Zope book is encouraging, for
> example. However, most people wh
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> We
>
> Yes. But not *I*. And you asked if *I* could get it done. :) Perhaps
> you meant if I could nag people into doing it. I doubt that I could.
> I'm not good at making people do things for free. :)
>
> I think th
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> We
Yes. But not *I*. And you asked if *I* could get it done. :) Perhaps
you meant if I could nag people into doing it. I doubt that I could.
I'm not good at making people do things for free. :)
I think the way your formulated this is indicati
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 08:55 , Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>> - - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we
>> want to
>> make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
>> made some tr
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:14, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Please go make this happen if you can. It's very important. I can't anymore.
>
> As far as I can see, it's a question of
> - setting up a server, I would recommend a Plone site with the new Zope theme.
We have this a
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:14, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Please go make this happen if you can. It's very important. I can't anymore.
As far as I can see, it's a question of
- setting up a server, I would recommend a Plone site with the new Zope theme.
- creating a zodb.zope.org DNS record and point
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 21, 2009, at 08:55 , Andreas Jung wrote:
> - - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we
> want to
> make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
> made some trouble when it came to discussion about
Andreas Jung wrote:
> I just checked new.zope.org and I think that your idea appears
> reasonable. The only thing I dislike about the new.zope.org design is
> the navigation tree at the bottom of the page. All other parts of the
> design could be re-used directly - perhaps with some slightly modif
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:14, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> The new.zope.org initiative died because no-one could write any content.
>> Even then 5-10 pages of content requires for a very basic microsite was
>> too much, and several separate calls for volunteers produced almost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.02.2009 5:14 Uhr, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>
> We already have all the infrastructure and code we need. If you can
> accept that a 'microsite' is a folder (zope.org/projects/zope2 or /zodb
> or /whatever), then we already have skeletal microsites
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21.02.2009 8:16 Uhr, Lennart Regebro wrote:
> About wiki/vs microsite, I also would hope for a microsite. Wikis are
> good for community generated docs/howtos and stuff, which we already
> have for Zope2. And a pretty good one at that:
> http://wik
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:14, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> The new.zope.org initiative died because no-one could write any content.
> Even then 5-10 pages of content requires for a very basic microsite was
> too much, and several separate calls for volunteers produced almost no
> actual content, even i
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:49, Andreas Jung wrote:
> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. The
> goal is having up some pages with the downloads, basic pointers and
> links with the final release of
Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 20.02.2009 15:23 Uhr, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> I really hope someone provides the resources to create a microsite
>> instead of "the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org". Grok is doing two
>> things: a Plone-based site wh
Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
>
> Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?
Let's say both.
I basically gave up trying to
Simon Michael wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN.
>
> +1 of course,
>
>> Anyway, overall I'm a big supporter of the "microsite" approach. It's
>> the only approach that actually got us to new web sites over the last years.
>
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN.
+1 of course,
> Anyway, overall I'm a big supporter of the "microsite" approach. It's
> the only approach that actually got us to new web sites over the last years.
I must quibble: I agree with you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20.02.2009 15:23 Uhr, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
> I really hope someone provides the resources to create a microsite
> instead of "the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org". Grok is doing two
> things: a Plone-based site where people can contribute do
Hey Andreas,
Andreas Jung wrote:
> There are basically two options: create a dedicated microsite (similar
> to grok.zope.org) or follow the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org. Unless
> someone provides enough resources in helping, I would like to go with
> the wiki approach since it is much easier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19.02.2009 22:14 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> See this thread:
>>
>> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2009-January/thread.html
>
> Shame, oh well, I think dictatorship is the way to go and I think you'd
> make a pretty
Andreas Jung wrote:
> See this thread:
>
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2009-January/thread.html
Shame, oh well, I think dictatorship is the way to go and I think you'd
make a pretty good dictator, so go for it :-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Hey Andreas.. yay, thank you for taking this on. I'd like to help
however I can.
You asked about write access on wiki.zope.org - assuming you mean zope
manager access, I've added an account for you, see private mail. (For
the record, other manager accounts on wiki.zope.org at this time are:
ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19.02.2009 19:16 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
>
> Is this failure official or is there
Andreas Jung wrote:
> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
29 matches
Mail list logo
