Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-23 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 23.02.2009 17:20 Uhr, Simon Michael wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> Everyone is invited to actively participate (means: get an account
>> and add content
> 
> That needs a little more. First it's not clear how to get an account
> (currently, add /join_form to the url). Second, after submitting the
> join form I just got a login form and the account doesn't seem to be
> created.

I will create the accounts manually on request. I'll create an account
for you.

Andreas


- -- 
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: i...@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK
- 
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkmizxwACgkQCJIWIbr9KYyy9ACgh6F9b1YwG1KnYa+oNqmiPMks
uYUAoI6nBXyEX85PmVz8ZZ6IZD2NLDVe
=/HPk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-23 Thread Simon Michael
Andreas Jung wrote:
> Everyone is invited to actively participate (means: get an account
> and add content

That needs a little more. First it's not clear how to get an account 
(currently, add /join_form to the url). Second, after submitting the 
join form I just got a login form and the account doesn't seem to be 
created.

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-22 Thread robert rottermann
 hi andreas,
thank you very much for your efforts

> Concerning the look & feel: unless someone volunteers for taking over
> the responsibility for providing a Plone theme, I will step forward
> trying to coordinate this with the design efforts that are currently
> in progress for the relaunch of www.zope.de.
> 

Assuming the consent of my colleagues (which I am sure to get) I would like to
offer cooperation with design of the new site.
such work should in any case be done on the base of what dzug is doing for the
dzug site.
I am sure we can take over responsibility at least during development. later
things might be reassigned.


robert
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-22 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 21.02.2009 5:09 Uhr, Martin Aspeli wrote:

> 
> I basically gave up trying to get volunteers to provide content, and the 
> timings conspired so that I didn't have time to do any more of it 
> myself. We still have a Plone 3 theme, a visual design, and a server. If 
> someone wants to pick this up, I'd love to see it happen. I'd even 
> contribute. But I came to the conclusion that virtually no-one cares 
> enough (or can prioritise this highly enough) to actually provide any 
> content. Perhaps Andreas is changing that now, though.
> 

I started over with the microsite approach on my own server (for the
development phase where I have things under my own control right now):

http://zope2.zopyx.de

Everyone is invited to actively participate (means: get an account
and add content, update existing content etc.). The motto of this
project is: getting things done by actually doing them.

Concerning the look & feel: unless someone volunteers for taking over
the responsibility for providing a Plone theme, I will step forward
trying to coordinate this with the design efforts that are currently
in progress for the relaunch of www.zope.de.

I just want to point out that I don't proceed with this project
single-handedly but it is now time gettings things done and any kind of
active help will be highly appreciated.

Regards,
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkmhTOcACgkQCJIWIbr9KYyktgCdE+4+eOwgA9i+rRSQX6tw2lVa
VSYAoJo3LDt2VO2d+9pW+hGWTDi9jprQ
=YdEo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. 
>> Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?
> 
> Let's say both.
> 
> I basically gave up trying to get volunteers to provide content, and the 
> timings conspired so that I didn't have time to do any more of it 
> myself. We still have a Plone 3 theme, a visual design, and a server. If 
> someone wants to pick this up, I'd love to see it happen. I'd even 
> contribute. But I came to the conclusion that virtually no-one cares 
> enough (or can prioritise this highly enough) to actually provide any 
> content. Perhaps Andreas is changing that now, though.

The designer's desire to impose restrictions on reuse of the design have
killed that portion of your list:  the Foundation won't accept the
design on such terms.



Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"http://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJoDfM+gerLs4ltQ4RAge4AJ0YNkZeySkN488zbFuo+ZE30BEhnACgvZW/
ads8OQwHZ/eziReH7okWTXg=
=vVid
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 14:11, Martin Aspeli  wrote:
> IMHO, the way the Zope community is structured, it's very hard to get
> people to contribute this kind of thing. I hope things are different
> now. The work that happened with the Zope book is encouraging, for
> example. However, most people who care enough about Zope to want the
> website to be better are too busy or too much into coding. Unlike, say,
> Rails, there isn't a large community of "fanboys" who want to contribute
> and have time on their hands and the right "soft" skills.

This is absolutely true. I'll put up "Zope.org" as a possible
discussion item for the OpenSpace, maybe somebody has some bright
idea.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Martin Aspeli
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59, Martin Aspeli  wrote:
>> We
> 
> Yes. But not *I*. And you asked if *I* could get it done. :) Perhaps
> you meant if I could nag people into doing it. I doubt that I could.
> I'm not good at making people do things for free. :)
> 
> I think the way your formulated this is indicative of the problems.
> It's a case of "Somebody is not working here". I.e. "This should be
> done" or "Somebody needs to do X". Well, there isn't anybody called
> Somebody here, so as long as "Somebody" needs to do it, it won't get
> done. :) 

Sure. This wasn't the approach when I was actually trying to get 
something done. I specifically asked for volunteers for specific tasks. 
It didn't work at the time.

> This is one of the common obstacles of committee work, and it
> seems zope-web unfortunately got a dose of it. Maybe we are getting
> out of the slump thanks to Andreas, but if not I again suggest the
> Zope Foundation appoints a Web Tsar with full access to everything
> that gets completely free hands to do whatever he wants (after the
> foundation has taken a backup of everything) and see what happens. :)

The problem is not giving people decision making power. The problem is 
getting content. Somebody has to write it. We had carte blanche on what 
messages to put out there and how to structure things.

>  I'm also lazy, which are the reasons I haven't volunteered for the
> role of Web Tsar already, as being bad at getting people to work for
> free would mean I have to do everything myself, and I'm too lazy for
> that. :)

IMHO, the way the Zope community is structured, it's very hard to get 
people to contribute this kind of thing. I hope things are different 
now. The work that happened with the Zope book is encouraging, for 
example. However, most people who care enough about Zope to want the 
website to be better are too busy or too much into coding. Unlike, say, 
Rails, there isn't a large community of "fanboys" who want to contribute 
and have time on their hands and the right "soft" skills.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:59, Martin Aspeli  wrote:
> We

Yes. But not *I*. And you asked if *I* could get it done. :) Perhaps
you meant if I could nag people into doing it. I doubt that I could.
I'm not good at making people do things for free. :)

I think the way your formulated this is indicative of the problems.
It's a case of "Somebody is not working here". I.e. "This should be
done" or "Somebody needs to do X". Well, there isn't anybody called
Somebody here, so as long as "Somebody" needs to do it, it won't get
done. :) This is one of the common obstacles of committee work, and it
seems zope-web unfortunately got a dose of it. Maybe we are getting
out of the slump thanks to Andreas, but if not I again suggest the
Zope Foundation appoints a Web Tsar with full access to everything
that gets completely free hands to do whatever he wants (after the
foundation has taken a backup of everything) and see what happens. :)
 I'm also lazy, which are the reasons I haven't volunteered for the
role of Web Tsar already, as being bad at getting people to work for
free would mean I have to do everything myself, and I'm too lazy for
that. :)

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Martin Aspeli
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 08:55 , Andreas Jung wrote:
> 
>> - - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we  
>> want to
>> make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
>> made some trouble when it came to discussion about the briefs and
>> donouts on the new.zope.org frontpage.
> 
> Yes there are. In essence, do not use the design, period.
> 
> Here are the reasons I had for voting against continuing new.zope.org:
> 
>   - the design is not free and re-usable
> 
>   - the designer has stopped providing any support for the design, and  
> the person who found and tasked the designer with the design work,  
> Jodok, has given up on the whole issue because he is frustrated as well
> 
>   - the website structure and presentation is too Zope 3-centric.  
> Zope2 is basically hidden away. IMHO this may reflect the original  
> creators' thinking, but doesn't reflect the world out there, which  
> still uses mainly Zope2.
> 
>   - no one has given any thought to migration issues (old URLs will  
> fail, zope.org users with login will complain that there is no login  
> anymore)
> 
> The ZF board vote was to stop supporting the project on the current  
> path. Everyone still wants to see a new zope.org site, but this  
> particular project wasn't going anywhere anymore. Several project  
> managers came, spent much effort trying to make it work, and left  
> again. It's better to start with a clean slate, and maybe with a  
> smaller set of goals.

I wasn't aware of this vote, but I'm happy to abide by it. I think they 
are sensible decisions. I also think that the Zope world and the role of 
Zope 3 and eggs and all that has changed in the last year to the point 
where some of the original vision (and the role of Grok etc) is not 
necessarily correct.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Martin Aspeli
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:14, Martin Aspeli  wrote:
>> Please go make this happen if you can. It's very important. I can't anymore.
> 
> As far as I can see, it's a question of
> - setting up a server, I would recommend a Plone site with the new Zope theme.

We have this already.

> - creating a zodb.zope.org DNS record and pointing it at that Zope site.

This can get done quickly. We got new.zope.org in a week.

> - pasting in the content.

The problem is having the content.

> - giving zodb people manager access to the plone site.

They've had that for over a year. :-)

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:14, Martin Aspeli  wrote:
> Please go make this happen if you can. It's very important. I can't anymore.

As far as I can see, it's a question of
- setting up a server, I would recommend a Plone site with the new Zope theme.
- creating a zodb.zope.org DNS record and pointing it at that Zope site.
- pasting in the content.
- giving zodb people manager access to the plone site.

I can not technically do any of that, as I don't have a server to put
it on, no access to the Zope.org dns and no content. The rest I can
do. :)

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On Feb 21, 2009, at 08:55 , Andreas Jung wrote:

> - - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we  
> want to
> make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
> made some trouble when it came to discussion about the briefs and
> donouts on the new.zope.org frontpage.

Yes there are. In essence, do not use the design, period.

Here are the reasons I had for voting against continuing new.zope.org:

  - the design is not free and re-usable

  - the designer has stopped providing any support for the design, and  
the person who found and tasked the designer with the design work,  
Jodok, has given up on the whole issue because he is frustrated as well

  - the website structure and presentation is too Zope 3-centric.  
Zope2 is basically hidden away. IMHO this may reflect the original  
creators' thinking, but doesn't reflect the world out there, which  
still uses mainly Zope2.

  - no one has given any thought to migration issues (old URLs will  
fail, zope.org users with login will complain that there is no login  
anymore)

The ZF board vote was to stop supporting the project on the current  
path. Everyone still wants to see a new zope.org site, but this  
particular project wasn't going anywhere anymore. Several project  
managers came, spent much effort trying to make it work, and left  
again. It's better to start with a clean slate, and maybe with a  
smaller set of goals.

jens


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmfyMoACgkQRAx5nvEhZLK5ggCgidiMHbx/uhwvNmXMyXl8t+Ka
PRsAnRZu7Lg4zz91OnFGTVszatw9rjt+
=spJH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Martin Aspeli
Andreas Jung wrote:

> I just checked new.zope.org and I think that your idea appears
> reasonable. The only thing I dislike about the new.zope.org design is
> the navigation tree at the bottom of the page. All other parts of the
> design could be re-used directly - perhaps with some slightly modifications.

Er... it's not supposed to be there. It wasn't there last time I looked 
- it was on the left. Seems to be some problem with the CSS.

> Two questions:
> - - how can grant me access to the new.zope.org Plone site in order to
> look at the stuff and for playing around?

Check your mail. I've created you an account and made you Manager.

> - - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we want to
> make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
> made some trouble when it came to discussion about the briefs and
> donouts on the new.zope.org frontpage.

I don't think he had any problems with changing them, but he wanted to 
have some oversight if we changed the design or re-used it elsewhere. 
Speak to Lovely Systems.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-21 Thread Martin Aspeli
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:14, Martin Aspeli  wrote:
>> The new.zope.org initiative died because no-one could write any content.
>> Even then 5-10 pages of content requires for a very basic microsite was
>> too much, and several separate calls for volunteers produced almost no
>> actual content, even if several people showed an interest.
> 
> Where did you ask for volunteers? I don't remember seeing in on
> zope-web, but I could have missed it or just forgot.

zope-web and this list.

> My attitude has always been, and is still: Build it and they will
> come. We don't need content, we need a site. Besides, the current
> state is, and has for a long time been, almost worse than having no
> site at all, and definitely worse than having a couple of microsites
> even if these have almost no content.

That was the idea. It wasn't supposed to be big at all. I'm just saying 
that at the time, no-one seemed to put it high enough on their list of 
priorities to actually write any content. I really hope that's changed.

>> Another observation: the thing that most people seem to want to make a
>> site about was the ZODB. We nearly had enough content for a ZODB
>> microsite thanks to Christian Theune and a few others.
> 
> If there is one page, then that's enough. Hence, there should have
> been a zodb.zope.org by now.

:-/

Please go make this happen if you can. It's very important. I can't anymore.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 21.02.2009 5:14 Uhr, Martin Aspeli wrote:

> 
> We already have all the infrastructure and code we need. If you can 
> accept that a 'microsite' is a folder (zope.org/projects/zope2 or /zodb 
> or /whatever), then we already have skeletal microsites for Zope 2, Zope 
> 3 or whatever else. If you'd rather have zope2.zope.org, then that'd be 
> a matter of VHM configuration.

I just checked new.zope.org and I think that your idea appears
reasonable. The only thing I dislike about the new.zope.org design is
the navigation tree at the bottom of the page. All other parts of the
design could be re-used directly - perhaps with some slightly modifications.

Two questions:
- - how can grant me access to the new.zope.org Plone site in order to
look at the stuff and for playing around?

- - are there any legal issues with the design & layout in case we want to
make modifications? I know that the designer of new.zope.org theme
made some trouble when it came to discussion about the briefs and
donouts on the new.zope.org frontpage.

Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkmfs1sACgkQCJIWIbr9KYwvWACgsSjRuiP2oLt0fyaYZFi8j2Ew
S2gAoN88CBZsfRlRk41hdqvF5MsfSMyP
=fcrn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 21.02.2009 8:16 Uhr, Lennart Regebro wrote:

> About wiki/vs microsite, I also would hope for a microsite. Wikis are
> good for community generated docs/howtos and stuff, which we already
> have for Zope2. And a pretty good one at that:
> http://wiki.zope.org/zope2/Zope2Wiki

After Martin's posting I will re-check if we can re-use something
from the new.zope.org.

> 
> Also, there is alos now the Zope2Book and Zope Developers guide on
> docs.zope.org, looking good there.

Jup, and Hanno and I  reST-ified the Z2 docs folder yesterday so we
can use Sphinx for generating HTML/PDF.


> 
> But we do need a Zope2 overview site, that explains what it is and how
> to get started, and has links to all of the above places. I assume
> that's what you intend to create?

The first goal is bringing a site up in order to get people
away from the old zope.org site and providing basic technical
documentation etc. Since I am only an average
technical write and definitely not a story-teller, I will focus on the
technical stuff (in the hope people contributing pieces for the Zope
'evangelism' part of the site).

> 
> A similar site should be created for Zope 3, and then we should trash
> the current Zope org for a new frontpage that basically only points to
> the different microsites.

Basically yes. I don't think it is a good idea to recommend any particular
Zope framework on the front-page. Instead each individual project should
make clear its own focus and strength. Perhaps it is not the best
approach for giving n00bs an answer to "wtf is Zope? What shall I use".
So I agree that the front-page should be in some way neutral, not
selling a particular Zope project but leading you directly to the
different projects. This approach does not require much discussion and
fighting between the individual projects and each project can represent
itself. It is hard getting all the people under one hood - so the
microsite approach looks reasonable for me. I think this worked out
pretty well for grok.zope.org (which is really a useful site).

Andreas


- -- 
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: i...@zopyx.com - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, Handelsregister A 381535
Geschäftsführer/Gesellschafter: ZOPYX Limited, Birmingham, UK
- 
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkmfrlQACgkQCJIWIbr9KYwqqQCgiHN7NZOydG7qLkeq+CrkxoTF
mYcAnA1sFm2NVQQInMUOCl4m1pjYMabR
=wEIO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:14, Martin Aspeli  wrote:
> The new.zope.org initiative died because no-one could write any content.
> Even then 5-10 pages of content requires for a very basic microsite was
> too much, and several separate calls for volunteers produced almost no
> actual content, even if several people showed an interest.

Where did you ask for volunteers? I don't remember seeing in on
zope-web, but I could have missed it or just forgot.

My attitude has always been, and is still: Build it and they will
come. We don't need content, we need a site. Besides, the current
state is, and has for a long time been, almost worse than having no
site at all, and definitely worse than having a couple of microsites
even if these have almost no content.

> Another observation: the thing that most people seem to want to make a
> site about was the ZODB. We nearly had enough content for a ZODB
> microsite thanks to Christian Theune and a few others.

If there is one page, then that's enough. Hence, there should have
been a zodb.zope.org by now.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 18:49, Andreas Jung  wrote:
> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. The
> goal is having up some pages with the downloads, basic pointers and
> links with the final release of Zope 2.12 later this year.

This is, as others have pointed out, great stuff!

> There are basically two options: create a dedicated microsite (similar
> to grok.zope.org) or follow the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org. Unless
> someone provides enough resources in helping, I would like to go with
> the wiki approach since it is much easier to handle. Volunteers that
> have the same interest in Zope 2 and getting this thing done are invited
> to join the effort. Based on the new.zope.org experienced I am
> interested in effective work and not so much in interested in
> discussions about briefs, mission statements and other less important
> stuff :-)

I absolutely agree.

About wiki/vs microsite, I also would hope for a microsite. Wikis are
good for community generated docs/howtos and stuff, which we already
have for Zope2. And a pretty good one at that:
http://wiki.zope.org/zope2/Zope2Wiki

Also, there is alos now the Zope2Book and Zope Developers guide on
docs.zope.org, looking good there.

But we do need a Zope2 overview site, that explains what it is and how
to get started, and has links to all of the above places. I assume
that's what you intend to create?

A similar site should be created for Zope 3, and then we should trash
the current Zope org for a new frontpage that basically only points to
the different microsites.

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Martin Aspeli
Andreas Jung wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 20.02.2009 15:23 Uhr, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> I really hope someone provides the resources to create a microsite 
>> instead of "the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org". Grok is doing two 
>> things: a Plone-based site where people can contribute documentation, 
>> and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN.
>>
>> The Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org is hardly a shining example of web 
>> presence for a web framework that's attractive to users. I'd say overall 
>> it's an anti-example (though it's has much improved compared to what it 
>> was before - as of quite recently it chased users away saying it was 
>> really a site for the developers of Zope 3). Hearing of plans to 
>> replicate its approach therefore worry me a little. :)
> 
> If there are volunteer for taking over the support for microsite
> approach, I am definitely +1. Othweise I will go with the wiki approach
> (basically because of time constraints). I hope someone steps forward
> for the task its life :-)

We already have all the infrastructure and code we need. If you can 
accept that a 'microsite' is a folder (zope.org/projects/zope2 or /zodb 
or /whatever), then we already have skeletal microsites for Zope 2, Zope 
3 or whatever else. If you'd rather have zope2.zope.org, then that'd be 
a matter of VHM configuration.

The new.zope.org initiative died because no-one could write any content. 
Even then 5-10 pages of content requires for a very basic microsite was 
too much, and several separate calls for volunteers produced almost no 
actual content, even if several people showed an interest.

I'm also +1 on a microsite. History suggests that Zope wikis bitrot very 
quickly.

Another observation: the thing that most people seem to want to make a 
site about was the ZODB. We nearly had enough content for a ZODB 
microsite thanks to Christian Theune and a few others.

Oh... and If the Plone site approach is too much overhead to set up 
(again?), then Sphinx would be another option. It seems we have a few 
people who may be willing to maintain a Sphinx based static site, in 
which case, all the better.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Martin Aspeli
Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. 
> 
> Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?

Let's say both.

I basically gave up trying to get volunteers to provide content, and the 
timings conspired so that I didn't have time to do any more of it 
myself. We still have a Plone 3 theme, a visual design, and a server. If 
someone wants to pick this up, I'd love to see it happen. I'd even 
contribute. But I came to the conclusion that virtually no-one cares 
enough (or can prioritise this highly enough) to actually provide any 
content. Perhaps Andreas is changing that now, though.

Martin

-- 
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Martijn Faassen
Simon Michael wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN.
> 
> +1 of course,
> 
>> Anyway, overall I'm a big supporter of the "microsite" approach. It's 
>> the only approach that actually got us to new web sites over the last years.
> 
> I must quibble: I agree with you, if by "microsite" you include the zope 
> wikis. Those new web sites were deployed and answering real-world zope 
> questions long before the others. :)

Sure, I'm not saying the wikis aren't useful. But they're not the same 
as a website either, unless the wiki is maintained very aggressively 
indeed (and historically at least the Zope 3 wiki wasn't, though I must 
say it's a lot better than it was). At least the Zope 3 web presence 
through the wiki was for a very long time quite absymal. Perhaps because 
there was *something* we didn't do enough to make it a proper presentation.

Anyway, the Zope world's changing and it seems we're finally picking up 
momentum in presenting ourselves and documenting ourselves after a long 
period of lackluster activity. I think that's great! What's more, I 
actually have some hopes we'll see an actual Zope Framework website 
appear in the course of the coming year as well (where the Zope 
Framework is the framework bits in Zope 3).

Regards,

Martijn

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Simon Michael
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN.

+1 of course,

> Anyway, overall I'm a big supporter of the "microsite" approach. It's 
> the only approach that actually got us to new web sites over the last years.

I must quibble: I agree with you, if by "microsite" you include the zope 
wikis. Those new web sites were deployed and answering real-world zope 
questions long before the others. :)

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 20.02.2009 15:23 Uhr, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> 
> I really hope someone provides the resources to create a microsite 
> instead of "the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org". Grok is doing two 
> things: a Plone-based site where people can contribute documentation, 
> and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN.
> 
> The Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org is hardly a shining example of web 
> presence for a web framework that's attractive to users. I'd say overall 
> it's an anti-example (though it's has much improved compared to what it 
> was before - as of quite recently it chased users away saying it was 
> really a site for the developers of Zope 3). Hearing of plans to 
> replicate its approach therefore worry me a little. :)

If there are volunteer for taking over the support for microsite
approach, I am definitely +1. Othweise I will go with the wiki approach
(basically because of time constraints). I hope someone steps forward
for the task its life :-)

> 
> Anyway, overall I'm a big supporter of the "microsite" approach. It's 
> the only approach that actually got us to new web sites over the last years.

*sigh* yes :-)

Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkme2ncACgkQCJIWIbr9KYy0JACgtTTTS9RqVrEv9VmS6n3W6P5f
L9cAoKmNbzbOKvOiKCRwGgYx1P++1pT0
=SeFG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey Andreas,

Andreas Jung wrote:

> There are basically two options: create a dedicated microsite (similar
> to grok.zope.org) or follow the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org. Unless
> someone provides enough resources in helping, I would like to go with
> the wiki approach since it is much easier to handle. Volunteers that
> have the same interest in Zope 2 and getting this thing done are invited
> to join the effort. 

I'm really happy about this initiative.

I really hope someone provides the resources to create a microsite 
instead of "the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org". Grok is doing two 
things: a Plone-based site where people can contribute documentation, 
and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN.

The Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org is hardly a shining example of web 
presence for a web framework that's attractive to users. I'd say overall 
it's an anti-example (though it's has much improved compared to what it 
was before - as of quite recently it chased users away saying it was 
really a site for the developers of Zope 3). Hearing of plans to 
replicate its approach therefore worry me a little. :)

Anyway, overall I'm a big supporter of the "microsite" approach. It's 
the only approach that actually got us to new web sites over the last years.

Regards,

Martijn

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-20 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 19.02.2009 22:14 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> See this thread:
>>
>> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2009-January/thread.html
> 
> Shame, oh well, I think dictatorship is the way to go and I think you'd
> make a pretty good dictator, so go for it :-)

There is no dictator - only a Shepard for the herd of Zope lemmings :-)

Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkmeuNoACgkQCJIWIbr9KYxQ4wCfeE3SDLW2FYgcU3k6u/aVGQQ9
FQEAnRe45jPgqbvsOBmeDSH8FjuCTIJv
=VVEs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-19 Thread Chris Withers
Andreas Jung wrote:
> See this thread:
> 
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2009-January/thread.html

Shame, oh well, I think dictatorship is the way to go and I think you'd 
make a pretty good dictator, so go for it :-)

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-19 Thread Simon Michael
Hey Andreas.. yay, thank you for taking this on. I'd like to help 
however I can.

You asked about write access on wiki.zope.org - assuming you mean zope 
manager access, I've added an account for you, see private mail. (For 
the record, other manager accounts on wiki.zope.org at this time are: 
baijum, betabug, d2m, fred, jim, wheat.)

I wonder if you mean to repurpose an existing wiki, start a new one, or 
install some new thing on the filesystem. Looking forward to finding out 
more.

-Simon

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-19 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 19.02.2009 19:16 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
>> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. 
> 
> Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?
>

See this thread:

http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2009-January/thread.html

- -aj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkmdoo8ACgkQCJIWIbr9KYyYEACg43/pkq02G0GFXfQur1OJk4q7
cMMAoIkWvO1Oq/3DGkYR7eQ8fKsyVMV/
=tAsc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
begin:vcard
fn:Andreas Jung
n:Jung;Andreas
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
adr;quoted-printable:;;Charlottenstr. 37/1;T=C3=BCbingen;;72070;Germany
email;internet:i...@zopyx.com
title:CEO
tel;work:+49-7071-793376
tel;fax:+49-7071-7936840
tel;home:+49-7071-793257
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.zopyx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Overhauling the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org

2009-02-19 Thread Chris Withers
Andreas Jung wrote:
> because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
> the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. 

Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )