[ZWeb] Running zope site using ReST

2006-02-09 Thread baiju m
Hi, How to run a webstie using these ReST files ? http://codespeak.net/svn/z3/zopeweb/trunk/ I think worldcookery.com and tiks.org are running using ReST and Zope 3. Are we planning to use any of these? Thanks, Baiju M ___ Zope-web maillist -

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Mark Pratt
On Feb 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Mark Pratt wrote: [snip] If the idea is to deliver the message that Zope 3 is great, clutting the message with Zope 2 cruft (not the same as if we have some really great zope 2 documentation, but what's there has rotted quite a bit)

Re: [ZWeb] Running zope site using ReST

2006-02-09 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
baiju m wrote: Hi, How to run a webstie using these ReST files ? http://codespeak.net/svn/z3/zopeweb/trunk/ I think worldcookery.com and tiks.org are running using ReST and Zope 3. Are we planning to use any of these? Some thoughts on what you could do localy with the SVN checkout ::

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Chris Withers
Tonico Strasser wrote: IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity, is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and the whole TTW content management system. I think it's much easier to add and update content with SVN. (This would also

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Max M
Chris Withers wrote: Tonico Strasser wrote: IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity, is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and the whole TTW content management system. I think it's much easier to add and update content with SVN.

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 2/9/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still hopeful we can at least swap out zope.org's frontpage and initial pages with something better that describes both Zope 2, Zope 3, and its relationship. Quite a bit of text is already written that attempts that which is in codespeak

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 2/9/06, Andrew Sawyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:28 +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: But other than that, I think we should focus on having a zope3.org. A zope.org and zope3.org? Yup. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Martin Aspeli
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 13:00:43 -, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tonico Strasser wrote: IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity, is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and the whole TTW content management system. I think

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Martin Aspeli
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:28:22 -, Andrew Sawyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:09 +0100, Max M wrote: Chris Withers wrote: If we cannot make it work in Zope 2 or 3, maybe we should use rails ;-) I know Max is kidding; but to comment to Chris. One of the main

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread bakhtiar a hamid
On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:17, Martijn Faassen wrote: Yes. Let's make a procedure for that: * find the document you think would be good to have * propose it on this list http://www.jrandolph.com/blog/?p=23#comment-324 has a good comment with good links.