Hi,
- to unify the whole Zope/CMS-involved community to drastically reduce
waste of resources (doing twice or more equivalent components /
features).
How do you plan to keep the project apart from the interests of Nuxeo?
All the community has been waiting for a Zope3 based ECM far too long.
On 5/17/05, Maik Röder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > - to unify the whole Zope/CMS-involved community to drastically reduce
> >waste of resources (doing twice or more equivalent components /
> >features).
>
> How do you plan to keep the project apart from the interests of Nuxeo?
Hi Lennart,
(I'm sending a copy of this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _nuxeo_ .com. I'd
prefer discussing this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] though.)
- to unify the whole Zope/CMS-involved community to drastically reduce
waste of resources (doing twice or more equivalent components /
features).
How do you
Maik Röder wrote:
[snip]
This project is in the interest of Nuxeo, and the success of it is
important for our future. There is no way we can keep that separate.
What you probably mean is to ask how we can make sure that Nuxeo does
not stop OTHER peoples interests from being vested in the project. A
Maik Röder wrote:
Hi,
- to unify the whole Zope/CMS-involved community to drastically reduce
waste of resources (doing twice or more equivalent components /
features).
How do you plan to keep the project apart from the interests of Nuxeo?
Although Julien's intro said Paris and on behalf of
On 5/17/05, Maik Röder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you plan to make sure that people don't get the impression that
> this is a Nuxeo project?
There is no way we can make sure that people don't misunderstand this.
We can only try to avoid it.
> How do you make sure that people don't get th
Paul Everitt wrote:
> Maik Röder wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> - to unify the whole Zope/CMS-involved community to drastically reduce
>>>waste of resources (doing twice or more equivalent components /
>>>features).
>>
>>
>>
>> How do you plan to keep the project apart from the interests of Nuxeo
Hi,
Here we are supposed to have the notion of cooperation diluted in some
sort of undefined abstract notion of cooperation between anonymous
participants that have to leave their badge at the entrance.
When I say neutral, I mean "not dominated by the interests of one
company".
I could rephrase my
Can someone please explain tome the rationale concerning the
near-anymosity and suspicion this endeavour arises?
Is it all about NotInventedHere(tm) or are there deeper issues behind
this? Perhaps economical reasons?
I must say that I am very surprised by the amount of time and energy
spent on
Maik Röder wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Here we are supposed to have the notion of cooperation diluted in some
>> sort of undefined abstract notion of cooperation between anonymous
>> participants that have to leave their badge at the entrance.
>
>
Hi!
> When I say neutral, I mean "not dominated by the int
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Maik Röder wrote:
Before endorsing the project I just need to be sure that there is
a healthy community.
catch-22 :-) to have a healthy community you need a project that is not
just vapourware and more than just people with good intentions who'll
wait until others do s
Ho Jean-Marc,
When I say neutral, I mean "not dominated by the interests of one
company".
This won't happen if different partners are willing to commit and have
their logo displayed --- not as an advertisement, but as an
endorsement.. Everyone does that in the Java world, why should it be
differen
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 08:43, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
> > Maik Röder wrote:
> >>Before endorsing the project I just need to be sure that there is
> >>a healthy community.
> >
> > catch-22 :-) to have a healthy community you need a project that is not
> > just vapourware
(Resent to zope3-dev because I was not subscribed).
Maik Röder wrote:
Hi,
Here we are supposed to have the notion of cooperation diluted in some
sort of undefined abstract notion of cooperation between anonymous
participants that have to leave their badge at the entrance.
When I say neutral, I mea
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
I must say that I am very surprised by the amount of time and energy
spent on discussing this...
Come on ... a few emails trying to get clarification about the nature of
the beast is hardly a large amount.
--
hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark
http://www.mxm.dk/
IT's Mad Sci
On 17 May 2005, at 14:54, Stephan Richter wrote:
Oh, I almost forgot. Even though I have said this many times
before, please
have a look at Tiks. It is a Zope 3 based CMS that is already in
production.
It might not be what you want, but I am pretty sure it has solved
some tricky
problems alre
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
The project is already in the hands of a community - we have already
commitments from Nuxeo, Infrae, Chalmers University.
Sorry, I forgot to mention that the project owes a lot to the work of
Paul Everitt, working on behalf of both the Zope Europe Association and
the Plo
Max M wrote:
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
I must say that I am very surprised by the amount of time and energy
spent on discussing this...
Come on ... a few emails trying to get clarification about the nature of
the beast is hardly a large amount.
The discussion has been going on a lot longer on z
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 09:29, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> On 17 May 2005, at 14:54, Stephan Richter wrote:
> > Oh, I almost forgot. Even though I have said this many times
> > before, please
> > have a look at Tiks. It is a Zope 3 based CMS that is already in
> > production.
> > It might not be
Stefane Fermigier wrote:
The project is already in the hands of a community - we have already
commitments from Nuxeo, Infrae, Chalmers University.
Sorry, I forgot to mention that the project owes a lot to the work of
Paul Everitt, working on behalf of both the Zope Europe Association and
the Plone
Hi!
the front page is going to be updated with the logos of companies /
universities / associations ... that are taking part in the project.
please send a logo and a link (url)!
the recommended size is approx 160x80 px:
regards
/JM
___
Zope3-dev m
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 08:43, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
It's indeed a chicken and egg situation; healthy communities give people
enough trust to do a commitment and commitment from people and
organizations tends to build healthy communities.
I think the easiest way to ear
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 08:43, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Maik Röder wrote:
Before endorsing the project I just need to be sure that there is
a healthy community.
catch-22 :-) to have a healthy community you need a project that is not
just vapourware an
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Can someone please explain tome the rationale concerning the
near-anymosity and suspicion this endeavour arises?
Is it all about NotInventedHere(tm) or are there deeper issues behind
this? Perhaps economical reasons?
I must say that I am very surprised by the amount of
Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
Log message for revision 30377:
Fixed a typo.
-This probably because the class' module,
+This probably because the class module,
I don't think the apostrophe was misplaced, but there should probably
be an "is" in there. How about this:
This is probably because
Benji York wrote:
Gintautas Miliauskas wrote:
Log message for revision 30377:
Fixed a typo.
-This probably because the class' module, +This probably because
the class module,
I don't think the apostrophe was misplaced, but there should probably be
an "is" in there. How about this:
This
Hi Florent
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Florent Guillaume
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 12:29 AM
> To: Dylan Reinhardt
> Cc: zope3-users@zope.org
> Subject: Re: [Zope3-Users] LDAP support -- current status?
>
> I haven't work
Hello,
can I help?
I've to integrate Zope3 in an existent ldap-environment
here - and, in my opinion, ldap is a "main-feature"
(e.g. in Identity Management).
That's worth thinking about, or?
Markus
On Wednesday 18 May 2005 00:41 Roger Ineichen wrote:
> Hi Florent
>
> > -Original Message--
28 matches
Mail list logo
