On Friday 11 November 2005 12:15, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> > Log message for revision 40048:
> > use a specific revision of the Zope 3 trunk for now until we have some
> > sort of tag available (e.g. a Zope 3.2 beta tag).
>
> We should have cut a Zope3-3.2 beta tag
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 21:12, Mikhail Kashkin wrote:
> I'm also want to offer me as fresh meat in this effort.
>
> My proposition for site plan, index pages *mark*::
Hi Mikhail,
the outline is nice, but contains items that we do not have already; for
example it has a huge documentation secti
On Thursday 20 October 2005 11:19, Bernd Dorn wrote:
> in my testcase http://svn.zope.org/cxoracleda/trunk/tests/
> test_adapter.py?rev=39515&view=auto
You need to bug Jim, so that this directory is part of the Zope3-Checkins
mailing list. ;-)
> i need to somehow get the connection information
On Sunday 23 October 2005 03:12, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> So, is there or would this qualify as a bug? There is a test that
> seems to point to some use with regard to namespaces, but I don't see
> how this wouldn't work just as well with AttributeError.
I definitely think this is a bug. I gue
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:27, Grégoire Weber wrote:
> 2005/10/24, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > class IFoo(zope.interface.Interface):
> >
> > attr = zope.interface.Attribute('doc string')
> > ITaggedValues(attr).someVariable = value
> >
> > Any comments before I spend time writi
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 05:10, Simon Hang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm happen to find out call Storage only do cleanup when new Entry comes
> and do nothing when entries get from storage. So entries will be next
> expired if there are only read activities.
I agree with your analysis and solution
On Monday 07 November 2005 10:18, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > Please don't check this in yet, I want to review the problem before you
> > do, because I think specific interfaces are just nuts unless we have a
> > very good reason.
>
> Sure;)
>
> The guts of the issue are how to know what type of SQ
On Friday 04 November 2005 11:50, Adam Groszer wrote:
> I think I have something for tomorrow's bug day. It is not working
> again. I have the current trunk and brand new instance.
Could you add it to the issue collector please?
Thanks!
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistr
On Friday 04 November 2005 14:07, Adam Groszer wrote:
> I think (that may be stupid, because I'm not an expert) that the
> module is not 100% consistent, once it is checking on the passed
> folder's SiteManager (in ensureUtility) and then tries to add the
> utility to a maybe completely different S
On Sunday 06 November 2005 03:23, baiju m wrote:
> I am developing small Zope3 app using Zope 3.1,
> today when I installed Zope svn trunk, I got two conflict errors.
>
> I used a 'title' which is same as that used in zwiki (addMenuItem
> directive). and 'name' in addform directive.
The proble
On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:17, rubberduckee wrote:
> I know that this might be too general a question (or perhaps a dumb
> one) but I'm hoping that someone could help guide me in the right
> direction.
Please send those types of questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> How does one go about designin
On Friday 11 November 2005 12:00, jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
> I could now manage to have a relatively simple test (see attached file).
No file attached in my E-mail. :-(
> I also found and fixed some other problems I encountered with the
> utility registration.
>
> Can you please have a look at th
Ups, sorry here is the attachment.
Jürgen
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2005 12:00, jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
>
>>I could now manage to have a relatively simple test (see attached file).
>
>
> No file attached in my E-mail. :-(
>
>
>>I also found and fixed some other problems
On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:12, jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
> Ups, sorry here is the attachment.
Very nice work! Check it in!
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 21:12, Mikhail Kashkin wrote:
I'm also want to offer me as fresh meat in this effort.
My proposition for site plan, index pages *mark*::
Having said this, I really wish someone would take ownership in developing our
zope3.org site. Unf
Forwarding ...
related to the current [ zope3 website report? ] thread
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I find that most pages about Zope3 end sometime mid 2004. A lot has
happened in the meantime, and I'd like to see updated material on the
site.
Since I'm rather new to Zope3, I feel not qualified
We have a *simple* facility for managing references between objects
extrinsically. See:
http://svn.zope.org/Sandbox/zc/extrinsicreference/extrinsicreference.txt?view=markup
If there is sufficient interest, we plan to move this (tiny) project
to the zope repository.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 12:15, Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 40048:
use a specific revision of the Zope 3 trunk for now until we have some
sort of tag available (e.g. a Zope 3.2 beta tag).
We should have cut a Zope3-3
Helmut Merz wrote:
>Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 18:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
>
>
>
>>I was thinking more about the policy of assigning unique ids
>>to objects in a relation. It's the application that really
>>should decide about that policy.
>>
>>
>
>in fact the unique ids aren't "as
Hello Stephan,
done that, it's issue No 485
Saturday, November 12, 2005, 12:54:21 PM, you wrote:
SR> On Friday 04 November 2005 11:50, Adam Groszer wrote:
>> I think I have something for tomorrow's bug day. It is not working
>> again. I have the current trunk and brand new instance.
SR> Could y
Am Samstag, 12. November 2005 18:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
> The good thing about IntIds is that it leaves the objects
> untouched, the bad thing is that it creates a hard coupling
> between the integer id that is used to *refer* to the object
> and the key that is used to *represent* the ob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2005 12:15, Tres Seaver wrote:
>
>>Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>>
>>>Log message for revision 40048:
>>> use a specific revision of the Zope 3 trunk for now until we have some
>>>sort of tag availa
Helmut Merz wrote:
>Am Samstag, 12. November 2005 18:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
>
>
>
>>My
>>impression is that you are thinking of a reference engine
>>rather than a relation engine
>>
>>
>
>Maybe I just don't see the difference... (There is one, of
>course, but I doubt it is really
Am Samstag, 12. November 2005 20:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
> Helmut Merz wrote:
> >Am Samstag, 12. November 2005 18:00 schrieb Jean-Marc
Orliaguet:
> >>My
> >>impression is that you are thinking of a reference engine
> >>rather than a relation engine
> >
> >Maybe I just don't see the differe
As I'm digging through zope.app.form.browser to fix the
CustomWidgetFactory collector issue, I found the following:
IWidget has no __init__ defined
class Widget(object):
def __init__(self, context, request):
class ItemsWidgetBase(TranslationHook, SimpleInputWidget):
def __init__(self, fi
Helmut Merz wrote:
>
>OK - then I'm not talking about references, though we still mean
>different things when talking about 'relation':
>
>Mine goes like this: A relation object R providing
>ITriadicRelation and connecting A, B and C involves three
>references:
>
>R with A
>R with B
>R with C
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:53:23AM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday 07 November 2005 10:18, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > > Please don't check this in yet, I want to review the problem before you
> > > do, because I think specific interfaces are just nuts unless we have a
> > > very good rea
Thanks Stephan,
Here is the test:(test_ramcache.py)
class TestStorage(TestCase):
def test_getEntry(self):
--snipped--
def test_getEntry_do_cleanup(self):
from zope.app.cache.ram import Storage
s = Storage(cleanupInterval=300, maxAge=300)
object = 'object'
FYI (this is mostly for the benefit of the Five folks), I've created a
Zope 2.9 branch from the trunk as of about 10 minutes ago. This branch
is frozen for feature work; it may need some changing of externals to
reflect what we want the initial version of Zope 3 that we want 2.9 to
ship with. I d
--On 12. November 2005 22:08:38 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
FYI (this is mostly for the benefit of the Five folks), I've created a
Zope 2.9 branch from the trunk as of about 10 minutes ago. This branch
is frozen for feature work; it may need some changing of externals t
30 matches
Mail list logo
