On 10/8/07, David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dieter. Zope 2 is one application among many dependent upon zope 3.
Zope 3 is different software than zope 2. It has a community of pure
zope 3 developers (that I don't believe the suggestion of folding the
lists together adequately
Hi Lennart
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Lennart Regebro
[...]
Again, these lists are about the development of, not development with.
Can you explain why do you think this makes a difference?
Regards
Roger Ineichen
On 10/8/07, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lennart
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Lennart Regebro
[...]
Again, these lists are about the development of, not development with.
Can you explain why do you
On 2007-10-05 14:30:14 +0200, Fred Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Meant to send this to the list...
On 9/18/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing is, no I'm not going to register every file in ZCML. I
want to use the zc.resourcelibrary.
The follwoing makes it
Hi Lennart
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] I'd lobe to merge the zope3-dev
andzope-dev lists
[...]
Can you explain why do you think this makes a difference?
Because developing WITH Zope2 and Zope 3 are very different.
The development OF Zope 2 and Zope 3 are not, sincem as
mentioned, the
Oliver Marx wrote:
Here is what I told my mother:
Zope 3 is a web development technology that focuses on code reuse,
automated testing and security.
- Code reuse: we can do more in less time.
- Automated testing: Code reuse makes it a much have.
- And with automated testing we can actually
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007 17:13, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm not saying an ecosystem approach is bad, if that's what Zope 3 wants
to be. I do think that such an approach needs to be supplemented by a
framework approach (and I've been putting work into one way to do that).
I'm not sure that library or collection of libraries is the right
term for what we want to be. I think we've been using it because it
stands in sharp contrast to application, which, BTW, isn't exactly
what Zope 2 is. I think these terms were useful to make some points,
but neither is
Yup. Now let's drop the 3 in that sentence, because all of this
applies to Zope software as a whole. This is, in fact, one way to sum
up the way the Zope project as a whole works.
I have no problem with that. The simpler the better. As long as the new
comers learn Zope 3 and not Zope 2.
Martijn Faassen skrev:
We've worked with eggs for a few months now, with Grok. I can report
that I believe the egg situation is currently massively unusable for
almost all Zope 3 users except, from now on, Grok users, as two people
spent half the week in resolving this problem and figuring
On 8 Oct 2007, at 13:30 , Oliver Marx wrote:
Yup. Now let's drop the 3 in that sentence, because all of this
applies to Zope software as a whole. This is, in fact, one way to
sum up the way the Zope project as a whole works.
I have no problem with that. The simpler the better. As long as the
Oliver Marx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have looked at Grok. I love the ideas. But it feels like its a little
too much convention over configuration. I do not hate zcml. I hate to
write zcml. If there was a way to auto generate zcml and way to
overwrite that zcml when needed - then I would be a
Hi Uwe. I have been thinking of something similar and posted on the list
a couple of weeks back:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-September/023653.html
I want the zcml to be generated with a switch on zc.buildout so all
configuration is auto generated. Currently site.zcml is done
On 8 Oct 2007, at 15:14 , David Pratt wrote:
Hi Uwe. I have been thinking of something similar and posted on the
list a couple of weeks back:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-September/023653.html
I want the zcml to be generated with a switch on zc.buildout so all
On Monday 08 October 2007 06:56, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Because we have endless confusion between Zope 3 the ecosystem and Zope
3 the web application framework.
For me it is exactly the same. Zope 3 is a Web application server. Zope 2 uses
many components of the Zope 3 Web application server.
Hi Philipp
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: The elevator speech for Zope 3
[...]
Soon, we will change Grok so that it emits configuration
actions, rather than doing the registrations right away. That
way, you will still be able to inspect what exactly Grok is
doing (for example by dumping
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Philipp
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: The elevator speech for Zope 3
[...]
Soon, we will change Grok so that it emits configuration
actions, rather than doing the registrations right away. That
way, you will still be able to inspect what exactly Grok is
doing (for
Hi Martijn
Betreff: [Zope3-dev] Re: AW: Re: The elevator speech for Zope 3
[...]
Grok *aims* to support reusing bits of it. It hasn't reached
this goal yet as we focused on making it work first, but has
been an explicit seocndary goal from the beginning last year.
We need to do some
Hey,
Stephan, I tried to reply to your points but I realized I was getting
lost in a sea of semantics and that it wasn't useful.
The Zope 3 web application server is not primarily what the Zope 3
project appears to be developing. I strongly suspect there are more
users of Zope 3 technology
On 10/8/07, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your mail also means, we can't avoid to have
Zope 2 topics on the zope3-dev list because Zope 2 is
going to move to Zope 3 and we have to exchange
information. Doesn't matter how the list is called.
Exactly.
--
Lennart Regebro:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Any objections?
This would basically involve retiring the zope3-dev list and moving
zope3 developers to the zope-dev list.
+1.
Tres.
- --
===
Tres Seaver
On 8 Oct 2007, at 15:52 , Roger Ineichen wrote:
Betreff: Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: The elevator speech for Zope 3
[...]
Soon, we will change Grok so that it emits configuration
actions, rather than doing the registrations right away. That
way, you will still be able to inspect what exactly Grok is
Hey,
On 10/8/07, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
... emit configuration actions instead of component
registrations directly. This is underway, started at the sprint last
week by Godefroid Chapelle.
Great! Where can this work be seen?
Good
Since it has come up a few times on the checkins list recently, I'd like
to reiterate an important point:
When you split files or packages, you should always use 'svn cp' and not
simply copy the bare files. Because if you simply copy the files from a
checkout to another one, version history
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Another point of feedback:
I saw Stephan's mail on a (partially new) toolchain and somewhat
extensive workflow on using it. I'm a bit surprised a toolchain is
necessary and that the workflow is so involved. With
David Pratt wrote at 2007-10-8 00:21 -0300:
Zope 2 is one application among many dependent upon zope 3.
Zope 3 is different software than zope 2.
I do not argue with you that Zope3 is different software than Zope 2.
What I argue about is Zope 2 is an application.
I have seen hundreds of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Oct 7, 2007, at 6:25 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 10/6/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- We need to decide what a Zope 3 release is (or maybe multiple
flavors). I favor copying the linux experiences, but have an
On Monday 08 October 2007 11:06, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Stephan, I tried to reply to your points but I realized I was getting
lost in a sea of semantics and that it wasn't useful.
I agree
I'd like to see a separation between what you consider to be not only
closely allied but *identical*:
On Monday 08 October 2007 15:09, Tres Seaver wrote:
Presuming agreement on the known good set (KGS) term, I would think
that we have two candidates for what makes up platform releases
Frozen Releases
I started commenting this section until I saw the one below. I personally
Hi Tres
Cc: zope3-dev Development
Betreff: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 releases?
[...]
A frozen release would consist of:
- A single, frozen KGS (index pages cannot change after release).
Can we use a flag on the server side e.g. in the index page, so
nobody is able to upload files if we use
Dieter Maurer wrote:
David Pratt wrote at 2007-10-8 00:21 -0300:
Zope 2 is one application among many dependent upon zope 3.
Zope 3 is different software than zope 2.
I do not argue with you that Zope3 is different software than Zope 2.
What I argue about is Zope 2 is an application.
I have
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Waiting-for-this-discussion-to-die-down-ly
I just counted votes here, there was 11 positive votes
and 2 negative votes.
+1 (Baiju M)
+100 (Philipp von Weitershausen)
+1 (Michael R. Bernstein)
+1 Lennart Regebro
+1 Andreas Jung
+1 Jens Vagelpohl
+1 Chris
32 matches
Mail list logo