EDITED FROM PREVIOUS MESSAGE: Amen *to Peter Rich’s comments below*

Also, I am a Marketing Projects Coordinator for a startup company and though we 
are not a software company I certainly would not mind being involved with some 
marketing of the Free, Legitimate version of the Skim software I know and love 
(it got me through my Philosophy major at UCSD with its simple but effective 
annotation features) and I greatly enjoy its TeX functionality. Don’t know how 
the remote control bit works but this is no spot for that kind of question. I’m 
sure - as our fearless leader Christiaan would say - 'it’s in the Wiki'  ;)

-Jack
JackAReis [at] gmail [dot] com

> 
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Peter Rich wrote:
> 
>> So, I've been a long-time Skim user and have experienced many ups and downs 
>> with the software, but I have to keep coming back to it as it has long been 
>> one of the best pdf annotation tools out there.  Though I have found 
>> Christiaan's replies to often be somewhat put-offish, I have also found him 
>> to be an incredibly active developer and more than willing to respond to 
>> anyone's reply about the software.  In light of the fact that he has done 
>> this for free, his dedication is commendable. 
>> 
>> The reason that so many of us find this "developer's" behavior to be 
>> despicable is that he clearly is trying to profit off of someone else's 
>> hard-earned work without so much as a nod to those who did the work.  Their 
>> reason for making the software "free" is so that it can be the best software 
>> possible (that's my guess, anyhow), and anyone who wants to contribute to 
>> its progress may do so.  When this developer can't be bothered to so much as 
>> change the graphic, it communicates that the evolution of the product is not 
>> what's on his mind.  It then becomes incumbent upon us to warn anyone who 
>> would purchase such software that the developer has behaved unscrupulously.  
>> If I suspected a developer had done next to nothing with a product s/he is 
>> selling, I would run away quickly, as I would doubt any concerns or support 
>> needs would be met, should they arise in the future. 
>> 
>> I find Patrik's comments to be both enlightening and problematic.  They are 
>> enlightening because it highlights that there are a lot of enterprising 
>> folks out there that don't believe there is a problem with such behavior if 
>> the law allows it.  Surprisingly, these people often make what many see as 
>> "good" businessmen.  This is problematic because it is exactly that attitude 
>> that leads to the decline of civilization.  Some believe their morals need 
>> only go so far as what society deems to be ethical and puts into law.  That 
>> is a dangerous attitude because it suggest that we need to depend on 
>> government to regulate all our rights and wrongs.  Laws are clearly needed, 
>> as people's beliefs about what is right/wrong are going to differ, and we 
>> need a clear protocol for how to operate in and regulate society so people 
>> know what to expect and how to interact with each other.  But if we go no 
>> further in our treatment of each other, society quickly degenerates into a 
>> "me-first" society.  Laws are only needed to regulate people who refuse to 
>> regulate themselves.  I tell this to my children all the time.  If they 
>> cannot control their temper toward each other, someone else will have to 
>> control it for them—and that just introduces restrictions, the opposite of 
>> freedom.
>> 
>> So, yes, Patrik, you are right; there are people who will take advantage of 
>> others.  In my experience living in 4 different countries, though, I have 
>> seen entire societies that believe if you can take advantage of another and 
>> you don't, then you are a fool.  Funny thing is, those are the societies 
>> that I never see progress.  They end up in a constant cycle of corruption 
>> and the introduction of stricter laws and enforcement.  Morality transcends 
>> laws and leads to greater freedom.  Abuse of trust leads to more 
>> restrictions and slows progress.
>> 
>> This is why I personally deplore this developer's actions.  I am all for 
>> people being paid for their hard work.  The Skim developers could use a 
>> good, business-minded PR-guy who can bring it to the fore.  In my mind, 
>> though, Someone else mindlessly ripping off their product does little to 
>> benefit anyone but that developer.
>> 
>> /soapbox
>> 
>> -Peter- 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Patrik Jonsson 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> > There's also a small matter of behavior. The fact that, strictly speaking, 
>> > you;re allowed to does not mean you should take advantage of that. There's 
>> > no cost in asking, and he didn't. Not even in the most minimal and legally 
>> > required way. Quite frankly, this freeloading behavior I find the most 
>> > upsetting, and if we can punish him for that maximally for this by 
>> > removing it from the App Store I support that.
>> 
>> With all due respect, I think you have an unrealistic view of
>> humanity. To many people, "the fact that strictly speaking you are
>> allowed to" means exactly that: you are allowed to, and expecting
>> otherwise will just cause you to get upset.
>> 
>> Moreover, apart from the fact that he's violating the terms of the
>> license by not retaining the copyright, I really fail to see what this
>> is about. The Skim license allows redistribution, commercial or not,
>> and one of the fundamental rights given to users of free software is
>> the right do do whatever they want with it, within the terms of he
>> license, *without asking for permission*.
>> 
>> If you look in chapter 8 of RMS's  "free software, free society"
>> (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fsfs/rms-essays.pdf) he says:
>> 
>> "Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU project is that you
>> should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
>> you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover the cost.
>> Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge
>> as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to you, please
>> read on.
>> The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
>> either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software,” we’re
>> talking about freedom, not price. Specifically, it means that a user is
>> free to run the program, change the program, and redistribute the
>> program with or without changes."
>> 
>> It seems to me that this is *exactly* what he's talking about.
>> 
>> cheers,
>> 
>> /Patrik
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
>> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
>> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
>> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> Skim-app-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Peter Rich, PhD
>> peter_rich [at] byu [dot] edu
>> Instructional Psychology & Technology
>> Brigham Young University
>> Provo, Ut 84602
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
>> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
>> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
>> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d_______________________________________________
>> Skim-app-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Skim-app-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users

Reply via email to