Amen.
-Jack

On Jan 24, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Peter Rich wrote:

> So, I've been a long-time Skim user and have experienced many ups and downs 
> with the software, but I have to keep coming back to it as it has long been 
> one of the best pdf annotation tools out there.  Though I have found 
> Christiaan's replies to often be somewhat put-offish, I have also found him 
> to be an incredibly active developer and more than willing to respond to 
> anyone's reply about the software.  In light of the fact that he has done 
> this for free, his dedication is commendable. 
> 
> The reason that so many of us find this "developer's" behavior to be 
> despicable is that he clearly is trying to profit off of someone else's 
> hard-earned work without so much as a nod to those who did the work.  Their 
> reason for making the software "free" is so that it can be the best software 
> possible (that's my guess, anyhow), and anyone who wants to contribute to its 
> progress may do so.  When this developer can't be bothered to so much as 
> change the graphic, it communicates that the evolution of the product is not 
> what's on his mind.  It then becomes incumbent upon us to warn anyone who 
> would purchase such software that the developer has behaved unscrupulously.  
> If I suspected a developer had done next to nothing with a product s/he is 
> selling, I would run away quickly, as I would doubt any concerns or support 
> needs would be met, should they arise in the future. 
> 
> I find Patrik's comments to be both enlightening and problematic.  They are 
> enlightening because it highlights that there are a lot of enterprising folks 
> out there that don't believe there is a problem with such behavior if the law 
> allows it.  Surprisingly, these people often make what many see as "good" 
> businessmen.  This is problematic because it is exactly that attitude that 
> leads to the decline of civilization.  Some believe their morals need only go 
> so far as what society deems to be ethical and puts into law.  That is a 
> dangerous attitude because it suggest that we need to depend on government to 
> regulate all our rights and wrongs.  Laws are clearly needed, as people's 
> beliefs about what is right/wrong are going to differ, and we need a clear 
> protocol for how to operate in and regulate society so people know what to 
> expect and how to interact with each other.  But if we go no further in our 
> treatment of each other, society quickly degenerates into a "me-first" 
> society.  Laws are only needed to regulate people who refuse to regulate 
> themselves.  I tell this to my children all the time.  If they cannot control 
> their temper toward each other, someone else will have to control it for 
> them—and that just introduces restrictions, the opposite of freedom.
> 
> So, yes, Patrik, you are right; there are people who will take advantage of 
> others.  In my experience living in 4 different countries, though, I have 
> seen entire societies that believe if you can take advantage of another and 
> you don't, then you are a fool.  Funny thing is, those are the societies that 
> I never see progress.  They end up in a constant cycle of corruption and the 
> introduction of stricter laws and enforcement.  Morality transcends laws and 
> leads to greater freedom.  Abuse of trust leads to more restrictions and 
> slows progress.
> 
> This is why I personally deplore this developer's actions.  I am all for 
> people being paid for their hard work.  The Skim developers could use a good, 
> business-minded PR-guy who can bring it to the fore.  In my mind, though, 
> Someone else mindlessly ripping off their product does little to benefit 
> anyone but that developer.
> 
> /soapbox
> 
> -Peter- 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Patrik Jonsson 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Christiaan Hofman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > There's also a small matter of behavior. The fact that, strictly speaking, 
> > you;re allowed to does not mean you should take advantage of that. There's 
> > no cost in asking, and he didn't. Not even in the most minimal and legally 
> > required way. Quite frankly, this freeloading behavior I find the most 
> > upsetting, and if we can punish him for that maximally for this by removing 
> > it from the App Store I support that.
> 
> With all due respect, I think you have an unrealistic view of
> humanity. To many people, "the fact that strictly speaking you are
> allowed to" means exactly that: you are allowed to, and expecting
> otherwise will just cause you to get upset.
> 
> Moreover, apart from the fact that he's violating the terms of the
> license by not retaining the copyright, I really fail to see what this
> is about. The Skim license allows redistribution, commercial or not,
> and one of the fundamental rights given to users of free software is
> the right do do whatever they want with it, within the terms of he
> license, *without asking for permission*.
> 
> If you look in chapter 8 of RMS's  "free software, free society"
> (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fsfs/rms-essays.pdf) he says:
> 
> "Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU project is that you
> should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
> you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover the cost.
> Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge
> as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to you, please
> read on.
> The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
> either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software,” we’re
> talking about freedom, not price. Specifically, it means that a user is
> free to run the program, change the program, and redistribute the
> program with or without changes."
> 
> It seems to me that this is *exactly* what he's talking about.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> /Patrik
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Skim-app-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Peter Rich, PhD
> peter_rich [at] byu [dot] edu
> Instructional Psychology & Technology
> Brigham Young University
> Provo, Ut 84602
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d_______________________________________________
> Skim-app-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Skim-app-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/skim-app-users

Reply via email to