Well I stand corrected. There is a reason finally articulated - a WA warm and fuzzy. WAWAF or is that WAWF or WAWUZZY? How far do ya think that'll get us on code change proposals - well NFPA 13 Committee we think this a good idea based on the concept of WAWUZZY.
Chris -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Gyp Board to Bottom of TJI I can't believe you could say such a thing, especially considering that when we have a 4 head residential design we have NO such increase. This isn't a WAG. It's a criteria intended to provide a warm and fuzzy feeling. Roland On Mar 30, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Chris Cahill wrote: > > BUT the whole 3000 sq. ft. thing is IMHO one of the biggest WAGs in > the > code. I've been to fires above the ceiling without sprinklers (as > allowed > and not 3000 sq.ft.) I don't remember exactly how many heads went > off but it > was less then the remote area. A lot of skipping though. Short > version, > the FD couldn't get a handle on the fire until the sprinklers were > shut off! > I'm thinking this had more value with the old style heads as far as > benefit > in controlling the fire. > > > Chris Cahill, P.E. _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
