Doesn't the decision to let it burn or not belong to the owner (he that gets to pay if it does), the insurer (he that gets to pay if involved) and the AHJ (he that looks out for the public's interest as defined by law)? Then there's the architect, the owner's paid expert, that's supposed to consult with him regarding requirements, options and best solutions. Unless you're being paid to be one of these your only consideration should be as to how much your nether regions are hanging in the wind and if the breeze is too cold to play.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a canola crushing facility that uses no solvents in the extraction > process. Any ideas on the hazard classification? NFPA 36 is for solvent > based extraction. > I say that the delivery and load out areas should also be protected. as > well as the cooling tower and storage tanks. They say let it burn. > > Thank you > Robert Thompson > > DAKOTA > FIRE PROTECTION > 1710 N. Washington Street > Grand Forks ND 58206-5327 > Phone # (701) 772-8820 > Fax # (701) 772-7932 > Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum > > To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) > -- Ron Greenman at home.... _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
