On Nov 16, 2007 8:13 AM, Tom Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
> > This actually worries me quite a lot. If there is no clear consensus
> > that PSARC materials can be opened, then the whole endorsement
> > discussion is premature. It is the *Open*Solaris storage community
> > after all.
> >
>
> Whether or not the PSARC materials can be opened is orthogonal to
> endorsing the project.
Well, that is your opinion. I happen to disagree.
> Consider that we have already endorsed the CIFS server. We also need to
> realize that
> there is no strong relationship between the CIFS server and the VSCAN
> framework.
> We need to examine each on their own merits.
Sure thing.
>
> The question at hand is whether we, the OpenSolaris Storage community,
> want to endorse
> a project for code which is shipping today in OpenSolaris?
That's an easy question - I see no reason why not. I'd say that
it is orthogonal to whether we want to endorse the project.
> We need to divorce that from the question of how it got there. (And we
> need to work
> to make sure that this doesn't happen again.)
Yup. 100% with you.
>
> Joyce provided a great response on why we should be interested in VSCAN.
> And we've started to see interest already in the functionality.
>
> So, do we want to create a resource for it on opensolaris.org and foster
> open dicussion?
I, personally, wouldn't put it like that. I see not connection between fostering
open discussion and having project resources formally registered under os.org
That said and to make my intention clear
+1 for endorsing this (VSCAN) project by storage community.
--
Regards,
Cyril
_______________________________________________
storage-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/storage-discuss
