Horses for courses. I map what I'm interested in, which maybe considered
selfish by some, but it still adds relevant data.
Websites provide current data on establishment.
Surely, by your logic, churn will also mean the names of establishment
will disappear? Comparing a newly issued fhrs database with its
predecessor is a relatively easy way to double-check that churn.
An fhrs:id tag provides a link to the addresses.
Dave F.
On 03/10/2016 14:01, SK53 wrote:
I'd really strongly disagree here. Getting address data into OSM is
important; the shop/amenity stuff is the sugar which coats that pill.
In 5 years time (see my figures) many of the fhrs:id will have
disappeared from the website.
Jerry
On 3 October 2016 at 13:13, Dave F <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
For me, fhrs:id is obviously needed. ATM I'm only adding 'website'
as an additional tag. From that an end user can ascertain info
such as an establishments address & the services it provides.
Adding full addresses is something I might get around to doing
later id there not anything more exciting to map.
If it's decided to do all fhrs:id tag, maybe show details of the
databases subsets such as restaurants,cafes; pubs,bars;
supermarkets. etc.
Dave F.
On 02/10/2016 15:38, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
Which tags would you like me to set up a tag-info script for? We
can then track these throughout the quarter.
*Rob*
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
