On Thursday, 1 December 2016 21:39:15 UTC+5:30, Mark S. wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Responses to various points --
> There probably need to be 3 document paths: User, Advanced User, Developer.
> Each bit of documentation could include the version it was written for.
> Then the reader could decide if what they're reading is applicable.
> Adding better use-cases would be much more tempting with a MediaWiki (or
> some other Wiki/Blogging tool).
So what are we waiting for? Jeremy's green signal?
Miraheze sounds like a it is not having much strings attached to it. Free,
no ads and I did not read about a space limitation. We can always have
backups. People back up entire wikipedia at times.
We would need a board of moderators just to review the submissions. In
addition to Mark, I nominate Mat, being the mod of WikiDocs, if he is
A style guide should be specified for the submissions. Within the outline
Mark just said -User, Advanced User and Developer, there should be both
noun based (what is this and what is its syntax) and verb based submissions
(how to achieve "this" using "that"), interlinking to each other.
Last but not least, being someone who has very little trust in sustained
enthusiasm of human kind for anything that will not immediately profit them
or entertain them, I suggest that people who ask for help in the group, if
they found a satisfactory solution, should be asked to document it and
submit. A little give back to the community and it will ensure steady flow
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.