Just jumping in on the TiddlyFox issue, there will be an update to TiddlyFox that works with the new architecture. It’s an update I prepared last year but pulled at the last minute because it doesn’t work on Firefox for Android; those users will be able to stick with the current version.
Best wishes Jeremy. > On 1 Dec 2016, at 16:09, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Responses to various points -- > > There probably need to be 3 document paths: User, Advanced User, Developer. > > Each bit of documentation could include the version it was written for. Then > the reader could decide if what they're reading is applicable. > > Adding better use-cases would be much more tempting with a MediaWiki (or some > other Wiki/Blogging tool). > > Github is a pain, but not as much as waiting 6 to 12 weeks to see your stuff > submitted. > > A MediaWiki type solution would allow people to get stuff out there while > attention spans are still focused. Then no one could deny they said > (promised?) it. > > When TiddlyFox stops working, you should be able to save with the fall-back > mechanism, which operates as a series of downloads. For any one session it > feels just like it does now. But when you start a new session, you need to > copy over the last TW you saved to your starting folder/site. I can imagine a > script of some type helping to automate the process. > > Probably coming up with a good workflow will be important for beginners when > the changes occur. The thing to understand is that, since the very beginning, > TW has been doing something that's considered a no-no in the security world: > Saving copies of itself to the hard drive. In the past it used various > loop-holes, developer's backdoors, java code and extensions. Over time the > browser developers have become more serious about security and having been > closing the loop-holes. > > I doubt the confusing code elements are going to change, because too much of > the system has been built on them. But having documentation that highlights > these ambiguities would allow users to more readily thread their way through > DIY solutions. > > Pax, > Mark > > > On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 6:56:02 AM UTC-8, David Gifford wrote: > I want to affirm Josiah and Riz's frustration, from someone who has done > introductory documentation for TW classic (TiddlyWiki for the rest of us) and > the current TiddlyWiki (which you can still find on tiddlywiki.com > <http://tiddlywiki.com/>, and which I added via Github, and Github was a > miserable experience for me. I still don't get it). > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki > <https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/50be35f7-0e6c-447c-b5e0-8751f0500c84%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/50be35f7-0e6c-447c-b5e0-8751f0500c84%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/F90B28DB-5E53-440D-B404-4166B02C7FFF%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
