trans

Messages by Date

2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Newsletter - August 2015 Tom Ritter
2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] [ct-policy] Re: Certificate Transparency Newsletter - August 2015 Rob Stradling
2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] Certificate Transparency Newsletter - August 2015 Tom Ritter
2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] Certificate Transparency Newsletter - August 2015 Rob Stradling
2015/10/19 [Trans] [trans] #110 (rfc6962-bis): Reorganize requirements into appropriate sections trans issue tracker
2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #109 (rfc6962-bis): log shutdown timeline and behavior trans issue tracker
2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #100 (gossip): Review in light of blocking trans issue tracker
2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #98 (gossip): Update gossip-ct for 6962bis trans issue tracker
2015/10/19 Re: [Trans] [trans] #98 (gossip): Update gossip-ct for 6962bis trans issue tracker
2015/10/18 Re: [Trans] [trans] #107 (rfc6962-bis): Struct-ify STH trans issue tracker
2015/10/18 [Trans] [trans] #109 (rfc6962-bis): log shutdown timeline and behavior trans issue tracker
2015/10/13 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Stephen Kent
2015/10/13 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-09.txt internet-drafts
2015/10/08 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Rob Stradling
2015/10/06 [Trans] really posted the update this time Stephen Kent
2015/10/06 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-03.txt internet-drafts
2015/10/06 [Trans] whoops? Stephen Kent
2015/10/06 Re: [Trans] Long-term: scalable collective signing (of certs, log-heads, and/or SCTs) Stephen Kent
2015/10/06 [Trans] new version of threat/attack model Stephen Kent
2015/10/06 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-02.txt internet-drafts
2015/10/05 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Stephen Kent
2015/10/04 Re: [Trans] Long-term: scalable collective signing (of certs, log-heads, and/or SCTs) Tom Ritter
2015/10/02 [Trans] architecture document Stephen Kent
2015/10/01 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Rob Stradling
2015/09/30 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata Stephen Kent
2015/09/30 Re: [Trans] Long-term: scalable collective signing (of certs, log-heads, and/or SCTs) Katriel Cohn-Gordon
2015/09/30 Re: [Trans] Long-term: scalable collective signing (of certs, log-heads, and/or SCTs) Eran Messeri
2015/09/29 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Stephen Kent
2015/09/29 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Rob Stradling
2015/09/29 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Ben Laurie
2015/09/29 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Stephen Kent
2015/09/29 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Stephen Kent
2015/09/29 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2015/09/29 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata Stephen Kent
2015/09/28 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Rob Stradling
2015/09/28 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Rob Stradling
2015/09/28 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Stephen Kent
2015/09/28 [Trans] Please review the attack model draft Melinda Shore
2015/09/28 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Stephen Kent
2015/09/28 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Stephen Kent
2015/09/28 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STHspecneedstodefinetop-levelextension syntax Stephen Kent
2015/09/24 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Paul Wouters
2015/09/23 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Karen Seo
2015/09/23 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Karen Seo
2015/09/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #107 (rfc6962-bis): Struct-ify STH trans issue tracker
2015/09/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #106 (rfc6962-bis): Include LogID in the STH structure (TreeHeadSignature) trans issue tracker
2015/09/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? trans issue tracker
2015/09/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5 trans issue tracker
2015/09/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): SCT spec needs to define top-level extension syntax trans issue tracker
2015/09/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #5 (rfc6962-bis): Add extensions to STH trans issue tracker
2015/09/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #108 (rfc6962-bis): TLS session resumption: Server MUST NOT send SCTs trans issue tracker
2015/09/22 [Trans] [trans] #108 (rfc6962-bis): TLS session resumption: Server MUST NOT send SCTs trans issue tracker
2015/09/21 Re: [Trans] FYI: Certificate Transparency catches Symantec Matt Palmer
2015/09/21 [Trans] FYI: Certificate Transparency catches Symantec Paul Wouters
2015/09/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #107 (rfc6962-bis): Struct-ify STH trans issue tracker
2015/09/21 [Trans] [trans] #107 (rfc6962-bis): Struct-ify STH trans issue tracker
2015/09/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): SCT spec needs to define top-level extension syntax (was: STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax) trans issue tracker
2015/09/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #5 (rfc6962-bis): Add extensions to STH trans issue tracker
2015/09/15 Re: [Trans] [trans] #5 (rfc6962-bis): Add extensions to STH trans issue tracker
2015/09/15 Re: [Trans] [trans] #5 (rfc6962-bis): Add extensions to STH trans issue tracker
2015/09/15 Re: [Trans] [trans] #106 (rfc6962-bis): Include LogID in the STH structure (TreeHeadSignature) trans issue tracker
2015/09/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Rob Stradling
2015/09/11 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Rob Stradling
2015/09/10 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Stephen Kent
2015/09/10 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID Stephen Kent
2015/09/10 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/09 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/09 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Rob Stradling
2015/09/08 Re: [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Linus Nordberg
2015/09/08 [Trans] Usage of Private Information Retrieval (PIR) in CT? Matt Palmer
2015/09/08 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/08 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/08 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/08 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/07 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/07 Re: [Trans] Certificate Transparency Newsletter - August 2015 Rob Stradling
2015/09/04 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/09/03 Re: [Trans] Tutorial on how to deploy an internal CT log server? Ronald del Rosario
2015/09/03 [Trans] Tutorial on how to deploy an internal CT log server? Ronald del Rosario
2015/09/03 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/08/28 [Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-gossip-00.txt internet-drafts
2015/08/26 [Trans] Tracking via multiple STHs (was Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct) Tom Ritter
2015/08/25 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Ben Laurie
2015/08/21 [Trans] [trans] #106 (rfc6962-bis): Include LogID in the STH structure (TreeHeadSignature) trans issue tracker
2015/08/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/08/21 [Trans] [trans] #105 (rfc6962-bis): Shrink LogID trans issue tracker
2015/08/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #81 (rfc6962-bis): OIDs and IANA Considerations trans issue tracker
2015/08/21 Re: [Trans] [trans] #104 (rfc6962-bis): Add SCT Inclusion Proof extension trans issue tracker
2015/08/18 [Trans] [trans] #104 (rfc6962-bis): Add SCT Inclusion Proof extension trans issue tracker
2015/08/17 [Trans] Certificate Transparency Newsletter - August 2015 Adam Eijdenberg
2015/08/14 [Trans] CT "Lite" idea (was Re: Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct) Rob Stradling
2015/08/12 Re: [Trans] Gossip draft CFA closed Tom Ritter
2015/08/12 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Tom Ritter
2015/08/12 [Trans] [trans] #103 (gossip): Evaluate if we need tighter requirements around STHs when we take into account multiple logs. trans issue tracker
2015/08/12 Re: [Trans] TRANS Draft minutes for IETF-93 Paul Wouters
2015/08/11 Re: [Trans] TRANS Draft minutes for IETF-93 Salz, Rich
2015/08/11 Re: [Trans] TRANS Draft minutes for IETF-93 Stephen Kent
2015/08/10 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Rob Stradling
2015/08/09 Re: [Trans] Gossip draft CFA closed Bryan Ford
2015/08/08 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Bryan Ford
2015/08/08 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Bryan Ford
2015/08/07 [Trans] Gossip draft CFA closed Melinda Shore
2015/08/06 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Karen Seo
2015/08/06 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Tom Ritter
2015/08/06 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Bryan Ford
2015/08/05 Re: [Trans] TRANS Draft minutes for IETF-93 Daniel Kahn Gillmor
2015/08/03 Re: [Trans] Fwd: Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Tim Wicinski
2015/08/03 Re: [Trans] Fwd: Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Leif Johansson
2015/08/03 Re: [Trans] Fwd: Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Salz, Rich
2015/08/03 [Trans] Fwd: Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Melinda Shore
2015/07/31 [Trans] [trans] #102 (rfc6962-bis): "root" should be "trust anchor" trans issue tracker
2015/07/29 Re: [Trans] Review of draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-02 Tom Ritter
2015/07/28 [Trans] [trans] #101 (gossip): Handle Shutdown Log Case trans issue tracker
2015/07/28 [Trans] [trans] #100 (gossip): Review in light of blocking trans issue tracker
2015/07/27 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): Should the response size to get-entries be a part of the log metadata? trans issue tracker
2015/07/25 Re: [Trans] [trans] #87 (rfc6962-bis): Add reference to threat analysis document trans issue tracker
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] Review of draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-02 Tom Ritter
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? Ben Laurie
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate Stephen Kent
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate trans issue tracker
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? Stephen Kent
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata Stephen Kent
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] [trans] #94 (rfc6962-bis): Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this? Stephen Kent
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Tom Ritter
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Rob Stradling
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Ben Laurie
2015/07/24 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Dmitry Belyavsky
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #94 (rfc6962-bis): Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this? Stephen Kent
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] TRANS Draft minutes for IETF-93 Melinda Shore
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Bryan Ford
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Rob Stradling
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Eran Messeri
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Salz, Rich
2015/07/23 [Trans] TRANS Draft minutes for IETF-93 Salz, Rich
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #87 (rfc6962-bis): Add reference to threat analysis document trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 [Trans] [trans] #99 (rfc6962-bis): Clearer definition of when a certificate is CT-compliant needed trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #98 (gossip): Update gossip-ct for 6962bis trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 [Trans] [trans] #98 (gossip): Update gossip-ct for 6962bis trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #78 (rfc6962-bis): algorithm agility discussion is inadequate Stephen Kent
2015/07/23 [Trans] Call for adoption, draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct Melinda Shore
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #64 (rfc6962-bis): remove specification of signature and hash lags from section 2 trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? Ben Laurie
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #76 (rfc6962-bis): Normative client behavior specified in Section 3.4 trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #94 (rfc6962-bis): Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this? trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #94 (rfc6962-bis): Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this? trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #93 (rfc6962-bis): Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4 trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STHspecneedstodefinetop-levelextension syntax Rob Stradling
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] Review of draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-02 Ben Laurie
2015/07/23 [Trans] [trans] #97 (rfc6962-bis): Allocate an OID for CMS precertificates trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): Should the response size to get-entries be a part of the log metadata? (was: The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata) trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? Stephen Kent
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #93 (client-behavior): Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4 Stephen Kent
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] Review of draft-linus-trans-gossip-ct-02 Linus Nordberg
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 [Trans] [trans] #96 (rfc6962-bis): Metadata: Should it be dynamic? trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #95 (rfc6962-bis): The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 [Trans] [trans] #95 (client-behavior): The response size to get-entries should be a part of the log metadata trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 Re: [Trans] [trans] #93 (client-behavior): Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4 trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 [Trans] [trans] #94 (client-behavior): Fetching of inclusion proofs: Why and when are clients expected to do this? trans issue tracker
2015/07/23 [Trans] [trans] #93 (client-behavior): Monitor description: Inconsistency between intro and section 5.4 trans issue tracker
2015/07/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #79 (rfc6962-bis): Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate trans issue tracker
2015/07/22 Re: [Trans] [trans] #83 (rfc6962-bis): CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA trans issue tracker
2015/07/22 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH specneedstodefinetop-levelextension syntax Stephen Kent
2015/07/20 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH specneedstodefinetop-levelextension syntax Rob Stradling
2015/07/20 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needstodefinetop-levelextension syntax Rob Stradling
2015/07/20 Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax trans issue tracker
2015/07/20 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative clientbehaviorspecified in Section 5 Stephen Kent
2015/07/20 Re: [Trans] [trans] #75 (rfc6962-bis): run on sentence in section 3 trans issue tracker
2015/07/20 Re: [Trans] [trans] #75 (rfc6962-bis): run on sentence in section 3 trans issue tracker
2015/07/17 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs todefinetop-levelextension syntax Melinda Shore
2015/07/17 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs todefinetop-levelextension syntax Rob Stradling
2015/07/17 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to definetop-levelextension syntax Stephen Kent
2015/07/16 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to definetop-levelextension syntax Rob Stradling
2015/07/16 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-levelextension syntax Stephen Kent
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative clientbehaviorspecified in Section 5 Rob Stradling
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-levelextension syntax Rob Stradling
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #73 (rfc6962-bis): Section 3 textrelogcertvalidationis ambiguous Rob Stradling
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behaviorspecified in Section 5 Rob Stradling
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5 Robin Wilton
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5 Paul Wouters
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behaviorspecified in Section 5 Stephen Kent
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5 Stephen Kent
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #73 (rfc6962-bis): Section 3 text relogcertvalidationis ambiguous Stephen Kent
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax Stephen Kent
2015/07/14 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5 Stephen Kent
2015/07/12 [Trans] Long-term: scalable collective signing (of certs, log-heads, and/or SCTs) Bryan Ford
2015/07/10 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5 Melinda Shore
2015/07/10 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behaviorspecified in Section 5 Rob Stradling
2015/07/10 Re: [Trans] [trans] #77 (rfc6962-bis): normative client behavior specified in Section 5 Stephen Kent