See bellow

If you have the time, this video explains how the cooling occurs:

magnetic cooling<>
Notes, playlist:

With the additional info provided by Brian Ahern upthread, my best guess now is 
that magnetic flux produces electron movement. These changes in the magnetic 
field produced by the magnetic billet are induced by the magnetic flux change 
produced when the input current flows through the input coil.

What I would like to know is what coils of the three coils are the input and 
output coils. We do not know.

The random motion of the magnetic domains in the crystal structure of the 
billet due to both the uncertainty principle and thermal movement of magnetic 
domains might be where excess magnetic flux is coming from. This input magnetic 
flux might induce that "magnetic noise" to increase.

Just by flipping a few spins on the outside edge of the billet using the weak 
input magnetic flux might produce and avalanche of spin movement throughout the 
billet in many surrounding spins throughout the billet. I think you are making 
sense ,especially the cascading at a resonant frequency.

The key to producing more output than input is to adjust the input to the 
minimum amount necessary to produce an increase in magnetic noise from the 

How the three coils are layered: first applied, then second, then finally third 
would be nice to know.

My guess is the the coil applied to the edge would be the input coil. The 
output coils are the length and width coils. The output coils would be full 
wave rectified.

If magnetic amplification is coming from spin flipping, then using separate 
magnets might not work since the spin flipping would encounter discontinuity 
going from one magnet to another. The avalanche would stop at the edge of each 
individual magnet.

Here is a image of how a slight disturbance in a spin wave can produce lots of 
magnetic flux.

Spin Wave Animation<>
This animation shows spin waves propagating through an antiferromagnetic 
material, in which neighboring atoms (balls) have opposite spins (arrows). When 
a photon, or ...

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:22 PM, David Roberson 
<<>> wrote:

That is the most interesting characteristic to me as well.  It seems logical 
that if the outside surface is cooler than the ambient that heat energy must be 
entering the Billet.  Where this energy goes is the main question I would like 
to see answered.  Of course we realize that energy is also entering the Billet 
and surrounding components from the external battery via the drive pulses.

Apparently, you are an eye witness to the observation that an electric light is 
illuminated and the battery is receiving charge for an extended period of time. 
 This observation implies that energy is coming from some source while the 
device is in operation.  The obvious first guess is that heat energy is 
extracted from the ambient region and converted into electrical energy.

We should not be willing to give up on the thermodynamic laws too readily 
however.  Keeping that thought, one might believe that a magnetic form of heat 
pump is taking place, except it is not clear where the pumped heat is being 
exhausted, while there appears to be electrical energy generated.  Magnetic 
refrigeration has been around for a while and it is actually a form of heat 
pumping.  And, magnetic refrigeration obeys the thermodynamic laws.

So Brian, did you notice any portion of the Billet and surrounding materials 
becoming warmer than the ambient?  If not, you have a really interesting 
phenomena to pursue.


-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Ahern <<>>
To: vortex-l <<>>
Sent: Wed, Feb 22, 2017 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

The magnetocaloric cooling keeps my interest high.

From: Chris Zell <<>>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

I swear to God if I ever stumble into anything overunity, I’m gonna rectify the 
bejeezus out of it.  Pure DC in and pure DC out, none of this apparent power 
Magnetic amps bring up Bearden’s MEG – which I don’t think ever worked. I 
suspect its output was apparent and not real, as above.

Reply via email to