There is a new theory of gravity that ties quantum entanglement to gravity
where entanglement is the glue that keeps space time together and is the
source of all the fundamental forces.

Causing or breaking quantum entanglement will produce counter forces that
can add to or diminish the four fundamental forces.

For example, the concentration of matter inside a galaxy will add force to
gravity and cause the galaxy to rotate facted then Einstein's theory

In the Sweet device, the creation and breaking of magnon entanglement
produces the thrust force seen in the Sweet device.

In the EmDrive, microwave interference creates and breaks the quantum
entanglement inherent is all space/time thus producing an adiabatic
reaction force.

Magnetism is a mechanism that can manipulate entanglement thus producing
changes in the forces of nature.

See here for the theoretical background

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Chris Zell <> wrote:

> I am compelled to put this out there, even if it seems speculative and
> unpopular:
> There is something about spin and energy that is unrecognized.  If you
> read information by Kanarev, Linevich, and Vialle , it follows this theme.
> Somehow mass is being manipulated such that an object can be accelerated
> for less energy cost than is thought.  I understand, for example, that the
> Aspden effect was replicated by researchers in eastern Europe.  These
> effects could also be the cause behind outrageous claims by Schauberger,
> Searl and Clem.
> So, the Sweet device also showed weight loss?  Yes, that would follow the
> pattern here.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones Beene []
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 5:29 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
> Whenever purported "free energy" phenomena turn up with no apparent source
> of excess energy, there are a limited number of candidates which seem to
> rear their ugly heads.
> This only applies to LENR in the absence of real nuclear energy, but the
> nucleus can be part of a combined MO. In rough order of scientific validity
> and usefulness, these candidates for the source of gain are:
> 1) ZPE (aether, raumenergie, dynamical Casimir effect, space energy,
> vacuum energy, quantum energy, Hotson epo field, quantum foam, etc)
> 2) CMB cosmic microwave background (3K-CMB)
> 2) neutrinos
> 4) Schumann resonance
> 5) Fair weather field
> 6) Magnetic field of earth
> 7) Ambient heat (plus deep heat sink)
> 8) Below absolute zero (deeper heat sink)
> 9) Anti-gravity effect
> There are more but they tend to be different wording or combinations of
> the above ... and even more incredulous. Many combinations are possible.
> The main reason for bringing this up is that recently CMB has been
> estimated to be slightly more robust than once thought and with new ways to
> couple to it. The CMB is probably a subset of ZPE but the energy density of
> space in terms of the microwave-only spectrum is the equivalent of 0.261 eV
> per cubic cm, though the actual temperature of
> 2.7 K is much less than that would indicate - and the peak of the spectrum
> is at a frequency of 160.4 GHz. ZPE as a whole may be more robust, but CMB
> is adequate for many uses.
> The peak intensity of the background is about... ta ad.. a whopping 385
> MJy/Sr (that's MegaJanskys per Steradian (I kid you not) which is a
> candidate for the oddest metric in all of free energy, maybe all of physics
> ... along with furlongs per fortnight).
> At any rate, if one could invent the way to couple to CMB easily, it would
> be possible to see an effective temperature equivalent in an excellent
> range for thermionics, for instance. The ~2 mm wavelength is interesting
> too. There have been fringe reports of anomalies with 13 gauge wire but
> anything with the number 13 is going to bring out the worst ...

Reply via email to