I am compelled to put this out there, even if it seems speculative and 


There is something about spin and energy that is unrecognized.  If you read 
information by Kanarev, Linevich, and Vialle , it follows this theme.  Somehow 
mass is being manipulated such that an object can be accelerated for less 
energy cost than is thought.  I understand, for example, that the Aspden effect 
was replicated by researchers in eastern Europe.  These effects could also be 
the cause behind outrageous claims by Schauberger, Searl and Clem.   

So, the Sweet device also showed weight loss?  Yes, that would follow the 
pattern here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 5:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon

Whenever purported "free energy" phenomena turn up with no apparent source of 
excess energy, there are a limited number of candidates which seem to rear 
their ugly heads.

This only applies to LENR in the absence of real nuclear energy, but the 
nucleus can be part of a combined MO. In rough order of scientific validity and 
usefulness, these candidates for the source of gain are:

1) ZPE (aether, raumenergie, dynamical Casimir effect, space energy, vacuum 
energy, quantum energy, Hotson epo field, quantum foam, etc)
2) CMB cosmic microwave background (3K-CMB)
2) neutrinos
4) Schumann resonance
5) Fair weather field
6) Magnetic field of earth
7) Ambient heat (plus deep heat sink)
8) Below absolute zero (deeper heat sink)
9) Anti-gravity effect

There are more but they tend to be different wording or combinations of the 
above ... and even more incredulous. Many combinations are possible.

The main reason for bringing this up is that recently CMB has been estimated to 
be slightly more robust than once thought and with new ways to couple to it. 
The CMB is probably a subset of ZPE but the energy density of space in terms of 
the microwave-only spectrum is the equivalent of 0.261 eV per cubic cm, though 
the actual temperature of
2.7 K is much less than that would indicate - and the peak of the spectrum is 
at a frequency of 160.4 GHz. ZPE as a whole may be more robust, but CMB is 
adequate for many uses.

The peak intensity of the background is about... ta ad.. a whopping 385 MJy/Sr 
(that's MegaJanskys per Steradian (I kid you not) which is a candidate for the 
oddest metric in all of free energy, maybe all of physics ... along with 
furlongs per fortnight).

At any rate, if one could invent the way to couple to CMB easily, it would be 
possible to see an effective temperature equivalent in an excellent range for 
thermionics, for instance. The ~2 mm wavelength is interesting too. There have 
been fringe reports of anomalies with 13 gauge wire but anything with the 
number 13 is going to bring out the worst ...

Reply via email to