Harry, it seems that you as well as other people are always concerned with "imposing" a theocratic rule. No one wants a theocratic rule, including me. I don't believe any Christian person is attempting to do that, so your concerns are without merit.

Christians know better than to impose any monarchy by ourselves. Jesus Christ will install himself as a Monarch when he comes back without any help from any of us. Hence, that Monarchy will be established totally of his own power, not by the power of any Christian movement. It will be a time of good and just governance - no corruption and injustice that currently plagues our society.+


Jojo


----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Veeder" <hveeder...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Quantum Soul?


I agree that secularism is in crisis, but this doesn't mean we must
return to a theocratic rule which is the danger implied by movements
like radical orthodoxy.
Secularism neeeds a more anthropological (mytho-poetic) foundation
rather than the narrow structures of a particular science or religion.

Harry


On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
FYI

Seevn part radio show called Myth of the Secular. This about part six.

http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/episodes/2012/10/29/the-myth-of-the-secular-part-6/

<<In 1990 British theologian John Milbank published a
five-hundred-page manifesto called Theology and Social Theory: Beyond
Secular Reason. The book argued that theology should stop deferring to
social theories that are just second-hand theology and declare itself,
once again, the queen of the sciences. The book led, in time, to a
movement called "Radical Orthodoxy." IDEAS producer David Cayley
profiles John Milbank.
The English poet William Blake once wrote that humanity must and will
have some religion - the only question is which religion.  British
theologian John Milbank agrees.  A purely secular society, in
Milbank's view, is simply not viable.  The only choice in our time, he
says, is between religion and nihilism.  But religion for him means
something more than just a private moment with God on a Sunday morning
- it means a way of life. Milbank belongs to a movement called Radical
Orthodoxy.  Under its banner, he and a group of like-minded colleagues
have argued that modern Western societies have lost touch with
authentic Christianity and, as a result, are now living  in a
spiritually flattened world.>>


Harry

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:
You've made my point better than I. For when you are studying the ones and zeros wherever they may persist, you are in fact studying the software. The
ones and zeros are not hardware, they're software.

Much like the soul.  We can spend a hundred lifetimes studying neuron
chemical reactions, electrical impulses, cellular structure of brain cells and other psychological theories and mumbo-jumbo; we will never understand how Human consciousness works. To understand the human soul, one needs to
understand its creator.  Much like studying the software requires an
understanding of Microsoft Software Engineer's design methods and
techniques, in fact, a understanding of the man himself.

Tell me, can you reverse engineer the entire windows operating system from the ones and zeros of machine code? Doesn't understanding windows require
understanding of its design at a higher level? not at the machine code
level? possibly by interviewing the designer and studying his work? Why would one think he can understand the human soul by studying the individual
ones and zeros of the neurons?

You see, this issue goes deeper than just discussions about the human soul. This issue involves our humanistic prederilection to avoid acknowledging the creator. We try our best to understand ourselves without studying the human blueprint. Such efforts are always doom to fail, much like the fallacies of
Darwinian Evolution.



Jojo



----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Ellul
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Quantum Soul?

If I studied close enough the inside of a computer that has MS Windows
installed on it, without ever switching it on, I can still see and
understand the expected behaviour. The software program is persisted as ones
and zeros on a memory device.

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Any psychological/psychiatric/philosophical attempt to understand the soul
is doom to failure from the onset.

Let says you're a hardware/ASIC/Electronics/IC engineer who designed the Pentuim chip. Without understanding of the software, can you discern the
operation of a PC from your understanding of the
hardware/Chips/IC/CPU/GPU/etc? At best, you understanding would be severely incomplete and faulty. Software is the intangible thing that controls the
behavior of the computer.  Software controls the hardware.

On the same token, experts in
Psychology/Psychiatry/Philosophy/Sociology/Humanism/etc, can never hope to completely understand the Human Soul. It is that intangible entity - the soul, that controls the hardware consisting of your brain cells/neurons, etc. The Software soul is what needs to be understood for us to understand the behavior of man. You need to study the soul, not the brain. The brain is simply a mechanism that the soul controls much like the CPU chip is the
mechanism that MS Windows controls.  The analogy is apt and accurate.

Hence, one is wasting their time trying to study all the ideas of these
philosophers/psychologists/psychiatrists/etc. They are at best severely
incomplete, at worst gravely misleading.

If you want to understand the spiritual soul, go to the one who wrote the software soul. Study his book - the Bible to have a better understanding of
human behavior.


Jojo








----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <hohlr...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Quantum Soul?



I think Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff have the best explanation of
consciousness to date.  It's called Orchestrated Objective Reduction,
or Orch-OR.  The two actually developed the idea separately, Sir
Penrose being a physicist and Hameroff being a physician who
specialized in anesthesia and cancer research.  Roger was seeking a
model of the brain that did not require computation.  Hameroff wanted
to know how anesthesia worked and where the conscious went when under.
Penrose theorizes that spacetime is granular at the size of the
Planck length and that quantum superposition is linked to the
curvature.  Orchestrated Reduction is the collapse of the
superposition.

Hameroff brought in the neuron microtubles which provide the
structure.  He sees a synchronous oscillation in neural MT can
influence other neurons.  Together they see these electrons as a sea
embedded in the geometry of spacetime.

Needless to say, they have many critics.  :-)






--
Patrick

www.tRacePerfect.com
The daily puzzle everyone can finish but not everyone can perfect!
The quickest puzzle ever!




Reply via email to