citation needed

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > This is when sources truly become vital. But do
> > remember, the POV of the USA and many of its sources are as suspect as
> > those from Kazakhstan.
>
>
> ​And that is why regardless of the fact a citation  is so important, ​
>
> ​because the person receiving the information must able to make their own
> assessment​ of the sources reliability with a CC0 license and a significant
> selection of the information unsourced WikiDatas data lacks the quality,
> integrity we all expect of ourselves when we add content to any of the
> projects.
>
> On 29 December 2015 at 20:15, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hoi,
> > So you have determined that people can be manipulated. Good, then what?
> >
> > If this is the tack that you take you will be grounded because there is
> no
> > plan. It is a negative attitude that only stifles. Quality is not only in
> > sources, sources can be and are manipulations in their own right. Many
> > important subjects are woefully underrepresented. The argument has it
> that
> > it is because of a lack of sources..
> >
> > Sources are relevant but we only are interested in particular subjects.
> We
> > do not need to look at Kazakhstan to find fault. Amnest (reliable source)
> > indicates that all USA police forces are not in compliance with
> > international agreements on the use of force. NOW WHAT ??
> >
> > When quality is the subject, it is important to decide how we effectively
> > improve quality. VIAF provided Wikidata with a list of issues they found.
> > Tom checked it out and our quality is better as a result. It means that
> > more information is linked for people who visit a library. When awards
> are
> > known, adding known recipients in Wikidata based on info from multiple
> > Wikipedias improves the quality and in this way many incorrect links are
> > exposed.
> >
> > When quality of our projects is the subject, decide how we can do a
> better
> > job. When Facebook invites companies to manipulate people, it is why
> > Facebook information is suspect. At most it is a reminder that
> manipulation
> > is an important issue. It does not mean that people cannot add data on
> > their hobby horse.
> >
> > Quality is important but quality is more than sources. When sources are
> > used as an argument that is detrimental to the quality of Wikidata, then
> in
> > my opinion we have forgotten why Wikipedia was possible in the first
> place.
> > It was not because of sources, it was because of the web of information
> we
> > created, a web that is of a NPOV.
> >
> > Wikidata does not have a NPOV. It represents facts found in many places.
> As
> > the information becomes more extended, it becomes possible to find
> > manipulations, errors. This is when sources truly become vital. But do
> > remember, the POV of the USA and many of its sources are as suspect as
> > those from Kazakhstan.
> > Thanks,
> >      GerardM
> >
> > On 29 December 2015 at 11:44, Lilburne <lilbu...@tygers-of-wrath.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 28/12/2015 18:00, Jane Darnell wrote:
> > >
> > >> All I said is that the wiki way works, that's all. You can't hide it
> > when
> > >> someone tries to take over a project, and that is the reason we
> > shouldn't
> > >> try to anticipate that with convoluted strategies. "Assume Good Faith"
> > >> will
> > >> always win out over any strange misguided takeover strategy, which is
> > why
> > >> governments that intend to do such things choose nowadays to just
> block
> > >> wikimedia altogether. It is not our wake-up call to take, but that of
> > the
> > >> Kazakh people.
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Facebook showed the other year that it could manipulate people by what
> it
> > > showed them in their feeds.
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/10932534/Facebook-conducted-secret-psychology-experiment-on-users-emotions.html
> > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-28051930
> > >
> > > They didn't do this for fun, they did it to show their clients
> > > (advertisers, governments) that they could manipulate millions of
> people.
> > > You only need a small push in one direction or another to influence a
> > large
> > > population. Doesn't matter if the push is to buy a particular soap,
> vote
> > > one way or another, or how you see a particular minority, or issue.
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.networkworld.com/article/2450825/big-data-business-intelligence/facebooks-icky-psychology-experiment-is-actually-business-as-usual.html
> > >
> > > Do it to a naively trusted source and you have a triple word score
> > > jackpot^H^H^Hboot.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> GN.
> President Wikimedia Australia
> WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to