as to where the citation needs to available its any where from which
editors draw information from Trove, including, newspapers, magazines,
audio(http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/163116758)

On 7 August 2013 18:33, Liam Wyatt <liamwy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Mark, Nick, Gideon,
>
> In response to your points thus far, (and others - please send me any
> responses you have too!)
>
> The general gist, if I can put it this way, is "the current cite code is
> working, don't fix it until it's broken". Which is good to hear :-) This
> answers my question no.1, but I'd be interested in feedback about question
> no.2 as well - which kinds of records in both the Trove and NLA search
> results would be actually useful for having this citation code appear. For
> example - here http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2540625 is the NLA
> catalogue reference for Harry Potter book 1. Clicking 'cite this' pulls up
> a WP code as well. My educated guess is that this code (and the equivalent
> in Trove) is neither useful for the NLA nor for WP. Am I right in this? Are
> newspaper articles the ONLY time wikimedians will use this citation code,
> or are there other cases that are beneficial (e.g. unique materials in the
> NLA that have no ISBN)?
>
>
> Mark, with regards to the formatting (underscores, capitalisation) this is
> something that I believe Grahame has already submitted a comprehensive
> series of bug reports for to the Trove team. The issue there is not so much
> the citation system itself but Trove's record naming structure and, more
> generally, the long list of higher priority bugs that are not as easily
> manually worked-around.
> As for the clipboard issue - this is a clear way of summarising my primary
> concern, thanks for framing it so neatly. I've subsequently asked it in
> those terms over on Mediawiki.org too.
>
> Nick, thank you too. WRT some ability to make uploads of images more
> direct might be cool - but as Gnang says, many of the files available in
> Trove aren't actually from the NLA and also many are in copyright (so a
> blanket system wouldn't be appropriate).
>
> -Liam
>
>
> wittylama.com
> Peace, love & metadata
>
>
> On 7 August 2013 10:01, Nick Dowling <nick_dowl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Liam,
>>
>> I've used Trove for quite a few articles. In response to your questions:
>>
>> 1) Given that experienced Wikipedia editors are still mainly using wiki
>> code, and will probably do so for some time, the pre-filled wiki mark up
>> remains very useful.
>>
>> 2) I agree that this functionality is mainly useful for newspaper
>> articles and the like. Something to support uploads of images into Commons
>> would also be very useful, but would be less-used I suspect.
>>
>> I hope that's helpful.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nick
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 12:07:17 +1000
>> From: liamwy...@gmail.com
>> To: wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Subject: [Wikimediaau-l] WP citations in NLA/Trove
>>
>>
>> As many of you know, the National Library and its Trove service include a
>> WP citation code in the "cite this" drop down in all search results (along
>> with permalink, and various standardised footnoting styles). At the
>> Library we are currently in the midst of a very broad tech and
>> database integration process - part of which is revisiting what kinds of
>> citations are useful where. I'm going to a meeting next week to discuss
>> where the WP citation sits within this and I'd really appreciate some
>> feedback:
>>
>> 1) What effect does the Visual Editor have on the provision of this kind
>> of code. Is it even useful anymore to provide pre-filled wiki markup?
>> 2) Which kinds of results are useful to have this service provided, and
>> which are irrelevant? I believe the best use-case is for individual
>> newspaper articles within Trove. However, I believe that there is little/no
>> value in providing this service for individual book results in the NLA 
>> catalogue
>> search (because WP just wants the ISBN, not the fact that it's in any
>> individual library's collection). However - what about manuscripts, music
>> scores, unpublished collections of personal papers, digitised maps.... Is
>> it useful to have this service provided in those circumstances?
>>
>> -Liam / Wittylama
>> (In this case I'm asking from my professional capacity as employee of the
>> NLA)
>>
>> --
>> wittylama.com
>> Peace, love & metadata
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing
>> list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimediaau-l mailing list
>> Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimediaau-l mailing list
> Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
>
>


-- 
GN.
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
Gn. Blogg: http://gnangarra.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaau-l mailing list
Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l

Reply via email to