From: Bill Smart<as soon as you enter into a
dualistic despription of chi, assigning it such qualities as personal chi, 
universal chi, good chi, bad chi, feminine chi, masuline chi, stong chi, 
weak chi, etc..., you are no longer talking about chi, you're just babbling 
about some illusions and attachments you have in regards to the concept of 
chi.>

Chi is an illusion anyway, so why not qualify your illusions. After all, 
they are part of the real world and thus there are all kinds. 


------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to