Whether these opinions/conceptions are illusory or otherwise, they are
all mere opinions/conceptions that furnish a framework for some to
'understand' the teacher-student relation; but one can never be certain
one is not fooling oneself.


--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Jue Miao Jing Ming  wrote:
Hi All,

In my limited experience, some teachers are like a tour guide, he tells
us where to go or what to do.  Some teachers are like a mirror, it
reflects the true we, so that we get to know ourselves, to wake us up.

Depending on whether we are the at the stage of seeking inwardly or
outwardly, both type of teachers do have merits.

It all depends on the "I' at that moment in life.

This momentary condition are what we called karmic conditions.

That's life.


Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
<http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com>  http://www.heartchan.org
On 10/29/2010 11:56 AM, ED wrote:

On the path or off the path, with a teacher (zen, psychological or
spiritual) or without a teacher, one could be fooling oneself about
something or other, from one perspective or another. This is a universal
given in the game of life.


--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
hEug1t9U4O9vA9JNhBbiuR5dhuao3pbrhrWwlCbXcK3dk16I68Aw> , ChrisAustinLane
FE8XW5oBbn7HQYaKqrFVLczIXCfQ>  wrote:

> At various places on the path, there is a common tendency to fool
yourself. A strong relationship with a teacher makes this fooling
yourself much harder.
> I had to move away from my teacher two years ago and haven't replaced
her, and I can tell I am missing the interaction of someone who knows me
well but is not me.

> Thanks,
> Chris Austin-Lane

> On Oct 28, 2010, at 23:24, Siska siska_...@... wrote:
> > Agree, a teacher would be nice to have. From where I stand, it is
still not a "must have", but then again, I'm open to the difference, if
perhaps this is the way it is in Zen.

Reply via email to