This interchange is most amusing. 

I suspect the two senior practitioners are in violent agreement. 

Bill is no philosopher, tho he manifests a love of wisdom. 

Thanks,
Chris Austin-Lane
Sent from a cell phone

On Jan 22, 2012, at 19:30, "rewrisk" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rubbish!
> The Abyss may be dark but it is hardly empty so do not speak to me of what 
> you do not know phillosopher.
> Reality is entirely ordered to the unfettered mind.
> Chaos is a failure to grasp reality.
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@...> wrote:
>> 
>> Rewrisk,
>> 
>> The abyss is the absence of rationality - chaos.  And yes you must jump into 
>> it (the unknown and unknowable) to rid yourself of your attachments.
>> 
>> But don't to it so as to know.  The abyss does not contain knowledge or the 
>> access to knowledge or illumination of some kind.  The abyss is completely 
>> dark and empty.
>> 
>> ...Bill!
>> 
>> --- In [email protected], "rewrisk" <rewrisk@> wrote:
>>> 
>>> No?
>>> You are quite wrong.
>>> They are all true!
>>> 
>>> The abyss is real and you must 'jump' into it.
>>> If you would know?
>>> 
>>> --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Anthony,
>>>> 
>>>> Zen stories, perhaps even more than most, are symbolic - many are 
>>>> allegories and should not be taken literally.  I say zen stories use this 
>>>> device more than most because much of what zen is about cannot be totally 
>>>> expressed with words - espcially written words.  Face-to-face dialog is 
>>>> better, but as you know some zen masters tried to express and communicate 
>>>> their experience of Buddha Nature without words - with just sounds or even 
>>>> just actions.  At least that's my opinion.
>>>> 
>>>> The 'Jumping into the Abyss' phrase/allegory was taken from what you've 
>>>> called the physical world.  When we stand at the edge of an abyss and 
>>>> contemplate jumping we will probably be terrified.  It would take an act 
>>>> of either extreme desperation or faith to jump.
>>>> 
>>>> That is the same kind of desparation or faith that is needed to sever all 
>>>> attachements to the illusion of 'self' and rationality and throw yourself 
>>>> into the 'abyss' - Buddha Nature.
>>>> 
>>>> ...Bill!   
>>>> 
>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>> Â 
>>>>> Quote:Â  in zen stories as 'leaping into the abyss'
>>>>> Â 
>>>>> Since the physical world is part of the reality, can you do that 
>>>>> physically?
>>>>> Â 
>>>>> Anthony
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
>>>>> To: [email protected] 
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012, 10:19
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
>>>>> friends & family react?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Â  
>>>>> Siska,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, the concept of cause-and-effect is illusory.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The belief in cause-and-effect is an attempt by your discriminating mind 
>>>>> to 'understand' reality, to 'make sense'of experience which is 
>>>>> fundamentally chaotic. It is a process of breaking up wholistic 
>>>>> experience (Just THIS!) into pieces, and then to categorize and even 
>>>>> directly associating some pieces with others by assigning a dependent 
>>>>> cause-and-effect relationship to these pairs or sets of pieces. The 
>>>>> establishment of these cause-and-effect relationships are done to fit 
>>>>> your needs at the time. They are not absolute, objective or real. They 
>>>>> are relational, subjective and illusory - this is because they are 
>>>>> dependent upon your dualistic concept of self/other. The illusion of 
>>>>> cause-and-effect helps you feel more comfortable and gives you a certain 
>>>>> sense of control of life.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The concept of karma is a spritualized version of cause-and-effect which 
>>>>> is usually thought of as purely a physical relationship.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The letting go of this illusion is sometimes referred to in zen stories 
>>>>> as 'leaping into the abyss', or 'taking a step off the 100-ft flagpole'. 
>>>>> These are teachings telling you that you must let go of your attachments 
>>>>> (espcially to logic and the belief in cause-and-effect), come out of your 
>>>>> fantasy comfort zone, throw away your illusory security blanket and throw 
>>>>> yourself completly into the stark unknown and unknowable.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There's no comforting assurance of cause-and-effect there. Just THIS!
>>>>> 
>>>>> ...Bill! 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --- In [email protected], siska_cen@ wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Bill,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The killing is not the cause and the dieing the effect.
>>>>>> Would you then say that cause and effect is illusory?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Siska
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: "Bill!" <BillSmart@>
>>>>>> Sender: [email protected]
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:18:32 
>>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
>>>>>> friends & family react?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anthony,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> When I said 'outside agency' I meant 'outside of you' or 'other than 
>>>>>> you'. When you say 'karma functions by itself' you are implying that 
>>>>>> karma exists independently of you; like when you say 'not my will but 
>>>>>> Yours (God's) be done' you are implying that God exists independently of 
>>>>>> you. You are implying that 'karma' and 'God' are 'outside agencies' - 
>>>>>> outside of and/or separate from you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am saying that both the concept of 'karma' and 'God' and all their 
>>>>>> supposed attributes and associated powers/activites are NOT separate 
>>>>>> from you. That are created by you - by your discriminating mind. They 
>>>>>> are illusory.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you kill, there is killing. If you are killed, you die. If you loot, 
>>>>>> there is looting. If you are looted, you loose property. The killing is 
>>>>>> not the cause and the dieing the effect. It is the same action viewed or 
>>>>>> described from two perspectives. It is Just THIS!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is my experience...Bill!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> The difference is that karma does not rely on God or any other 'outside 
>>>>>>> agent'. It functions by itself. On the other hand, if you deny karma, 
>>>>>>> does that mean whatever you do, whether killing, looting or burning, 
>>>>>>> does not have any effects? You may say you rely on law to take care of 
>>>>>>> it. But that is part of karma, at the human level. Nevertheless, it is 
>>>>>>> more realistic than reliance on God. if all are illusory, killing and 
>>>>>>> looting will be out of control. In that case, believing in God is 
>>>>>>> better than believing in nothing.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Anthony
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
>>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 13:00
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
>>>>>>> friends & family react?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>> Anthony,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> How are they different concepts?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Both have to do with action/reaction (cause and effect), and both exist 
>>>>>>> as a concept in your mind.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Labeling some actions/reactions or cause/effect as good or bad (good 
>>>>>>> deeds lead to reward or sin leads to punishment; or accumulation of 
>>>>>>> [bad] karma leads to being re-born as a toad) is just packaging. 
>>>>>>> Likewise attributng the enforcement of actions/reactions or 
>>>>>>> cause/effect to an outside agency such as karma or God is also just 
>>>>>>> packaging.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It all looks the same to me - illusory, dualistic packaging.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ...Bill! 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> It is a different message you wrap in the same envelope.
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> Anthony
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 9:15
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
>>>>>>>> your friends & family react?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>   
>>>>>>>> Anthony,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You definition of karma is well stated, but why do you not think that 
>>>>>>>> definition could not also be applied to the Christian concept of 
>>>>>>>> sin/obedience and Hell/Heaven?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> For me it's the same message in a different envelope.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ...Bill!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That is not karma, but reward and punishment by God. Karma is action 
>>>>>>>>> and reaction by yourself through your own mind (or Buddha nature).
>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'‚ 
>>>>>>>>> Anthony
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2012, 18:03
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
>>>>>>>>> your friends & family react?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'‚  
>>>>>>>>> Christians beleive in 'karma' also: if you're 'good' you go to Heaven 
>>>>>>>>> and if you're 'bad' you go to Hell...Bill!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ItÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ is not at all surprising 
>>>>>>>>>> that you got a funny reaction from people surrounding you when you 
>>>>>>>>>> said you were interested in Buddhism. Try doing the same thing with 
>>>>>>>>>> Moslems, and you get a funnier response. Even in this forum, which 
>>>>>>>>>> is less hostile to Buddhism, you find different views on it. 
>>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
>>>>>>>>>> The key point in Buddhism is karma. But Hinduism also agrees to 
>>>>>>>>>> karma. The difference between the two is the former insists that 
>>>>>>>>>> karma is your own business, nobody else can help you change it. 
>>>>>>>>>> However, in Hinduism, there are powerful deities who respond to your 
>>>>>>>>>> requests and assist you. Don't forget we are a zen forum, and there 
>>>>>>>>>> are a view I term chaotic zen, which denies anything on karma, or 
>>>>>>>>>> any laws or rules. They say everything is in chaos. On the other 
>>>>>>>>>> hand, you will also hear all kinds of Buddhist views here. I hope 
>>>>>>>>>> you have fun here. 
>>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
>>>>>>>>>> Anthony
>>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
>>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> From: dan_guzy <dan_guzy@>
>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, 7 January 2012, 16:08
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did your 
>>>>>>>>>> friends & family react?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚  
>>>>>>>>>> I seem to be having trouble with this. I'm new to buddhism, just 
>>>>>>>>>> recently starting reading up on it the past several months, although 
>>>>>>>>>> technically I've been exposed to it for many years through a variety 
>>>>>>>>>> of tv shows, movies, etc. My favorite was Kung Fu: The Legend 
>>>>>>>>>> Continues. Don't know why, but the scenes with the shoalin temple 
>>>>>>>>>> and buddhist monks were always my favorite. 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Although I haven't come right out and said to my family (except for 
>>>>>>>>>> my sister) that I'm learning about Buddhism, they've seen the books 
>>>>>>>>>> and notes I leave to myself pertaining to it. So far, it has not 
>>>>>>>>>> been encouraging. They kind of give a disgusted look or a groan when 
>>>>>>>>>> they see it that suggests that they are not happy about it. They are 
>>>>>>>>>> catholics. I'm an atheist (which they've known for years). When I 
>>>>>>>>>> finally told my sister that I'd like to visit a temple in town, she 
>>>>>>>>>> got disqusted and said "why? You'll never go with me to my church, 
>>>>>>>>>> but you'll go to a buddhist church?" I didn't know what to say, so I 
>>>>>>>>>> told her the truth, that I didn't feel anything for catholicism 
>>>>>>>>>> anymore, and that it didn't feel like the right religion for me. She 
>>>>>>>>>> wasn't pleased.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Then today I was having a chat with a co-worker and boss at work. I 
>>>>>>>>>> get along great with both of them, known them for several years. My 
>>>>>>>>>> co-worker mentioned she and her husband were atheists, so I told her 
>>>>>>>>>> I was too. We both got a kick out of it realizing that we never knew 
>>>>>>>>>> that about each other. Then I mentioned to her that I had been 
>>>>>>>>>> reading up on buddhism lately, and she gave the same kind of groan 
>>>>>>>>>> I've been hearing from my family. My boss just sort of gave a look 
>>>>>>>>>> of shock and disbelief, didn't say anything. I couple of weeks or so 
>>>>>>>>>> before that, I was discussing various books with another boss that 
>>>>>>>>>> we like to read, and I mentioned one I'd been reading called the 
>>>>>>>>>> Peaceful Warrior. He asked what it was about so I told him, and when 
>>>>>>>>>> I mentioned it has a buddhist theme to it, he gave a funny look.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> What's funny about all of this is that I've always figured buddhism 
>>>>>>>>>> to be one of the most revered and highly respected forms of 
>>>>>>>>>> philosophy and religion on earth. Even growing up I felt that way. 
>>>>>>>>>> When I go online to Yahoo Answers R&S forum to ask a question 
>>>>>>>>>> pertaining to it, I haven't had any bad replies over a single 
>>>>>>>>>> question, and if any of you have ever been on there, you know they 
>>>>>>>>>> can be harsh sometimes in that section. So it really threw me for a 
>>>>>>>>>> loop seeing all these crazy reactions from people I know.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Did any of you get these same reactions from the people you knew 
>>>>>>>>>> when you were first learning about buddhism?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
> reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to