send fail.......
Actually if he is as good as you seem to think then he is trying to get his 
head around me. If so then I wish him well of it.

--- In [email protected], "rewrisk" <rewrisk@...> wrote:
>
> I think I must have scared him off.
> I can be abrupt.
> It's been twenty five years since I first entered the Dark Stone 
> Temple.
> The rampant ignorance ruling this world terrifies me.
> 
> --- In [email protected], ChrisAustinLane <chris@> wrote:
> >
> > This interchange is most amusing. 
> > 
> > I suspect the two senior practitioners are in violent agreement. 
> > 
> > Bill is no philosopher, tho he manifests a love of wisdom. 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Chris Austin-Lane
> > Sent from a cell phone
> > 
> > On Jan 22, 2012, at 19:30, "rewrisk" <rewrisk@> wrote:
> > 
> > > Rubbish!
> > > The Abyss may be dark but it is hardly empty so do not speak to me of 
> > > what you do not know phillosopher.
> > > Reality is entirely ordered to the unfettered mind.
> > > Chaos is a failure to grasp reality.
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> Rewrisk,
> > >> 
> > >> The abyss is the absence of rationality - chaos.  And yes you must jump 
> > >> into it (the unknown and unknowable) to rid yourself of your attachments.
> > >> 
> > >> But don't to it so as to know.  The abyss does not contain knowledge or 
> > >> the access to knowledge or illumination of some kind.  The abyss is 
> > >> completely dark and empty.
> > >> 
> > >> ...Bill!
> > >> 
> > >> --- In [email protected], "rewrisk" <rewrisk@> wrote:
> > >>> 
> > >>> No?
> > >>> You are quite wrong.
> > >>> They are all true!
> > >>> 
> > >>> The abyss is real and you must 'jump' into it.
> > >>> If you would know?
> > >>> 
> > >>> --- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@> wrote:
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Anthony,
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> Zen stories, perhaps even more than most, are symbolic - many are 
> > >>>> allegories and should not be taken literally.  I say zen stories use 
> > >>>> this device more than most because much of what zen is about cannot be 
> > >>>> totally expressed with words - espcially written words.  Face-to-face 
> > >>>> dialog is better, but as you know some zen masters tried to express 
> > >>>> and communicate their experience of Buddha Nature without words - with 
> > >>>> just sounds or even just actions.  At least that's my opinion.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> The 'Jumping into the Abyss' phrase/allegory was taken from what 
> > >>>> you've called the physical world.  When we stand at the edge of an 
> > >>>> abyss and contemplate jumping we will probably be terrified.  It would 
> > >>>> take an act of either extreme desperation or faith to jump.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> That is the same kind of desparation or faith that is needed to sever 
> > >>>> all attachements to the illusion of 'self' and rationality and throw 
> > >>>> yourself into the 'abyss' - Buddha Nature.
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> ...Bill!   
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> Bill,
> > >>>>> Â 
> > >>>>> Quote:Â  in zen stories as 'leaping into the abyss'
> > >>>>> Â 
> > >>>>> Since the physical world is part of the reality, can you do that 
> > >>>>> physically?
> > >>>>> Â 
> > >>>>> Anthony
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > >>>>> To: [email protected] 
> > >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012, 10:19
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > >>>>> your friends & family react?
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> Â  
> > >>>>> Siska,
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> Yes, the concept of cause-and-effect is illusory.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> The belief in cause-and-effect is an attempt by your discriminating 
> > >>>>> mind to 'understand' reality, to 'make sense'of experience which is 
> > >>>>> fundamentally chaotic. It is a process of breaking up wholistic 
> > >>>>> experience (Just THIS!) into pieces, and then to categorize and even 
> > >>>>> directly associating some pieces with others by assigning a dependent 
> > >>>>> cause-and-effect relationship to these pairs or sets of pieces. The 
> > >>>>> establishment of these cause-and-effect relationships are done to fit 
> > >>>>> your needs at the time. They are not absolute, objective or real. 
> > >>>>> They are relational, subjective and illusory - this is because they 
> > >>>>> are dependent upon your dualistic concept of self/other. The illusion 
> > >>>>> of cause-and-effect helps you feel more comfortable and gives you a 
> > >>>>> certain sense of control of life.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> The concept of karma is a spritualized version of cause-and-effect 
> > >>>>> which is usually thought of as purely a physical relationship.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> The letting go of this illusion is sometimes referred to in zen 
> > >>>>> stories as 'leaping into the abyss', or 'taking a step off the 100-ft 
> > >>>>> flagpole'. These are teachings telling you that you must let go of 
> > >>>>> your attachments (espcially to logic and the belief in 
> > >>>>> cause-and-effect), come out of your fantasy comfort zone, throw away 
> > >>>>> your illusory security blanket and throw yourself completly into the 
> > >>>>> stark unknown and unknowable.
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> There's no comforting assurance of cause-and-effect there. Just THIS!
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> ...Bill! 
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>>> --- In [email protected], siska_cen@ wrote:
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> Hi Bill,
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> The killing is not the cause and the dieing the effect.
> > >>>>>> Would you then say that cause and effect is illusory?
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> Siska
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: "Bill!" <BillSmart@>
> > >>>>>> Sender: [email protected]
> > >>>>>> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:18:32 
> > >>>>>> To: <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > >>>>>> your friends & family react?
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> Anthony,
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> When I said 'outside agency' I meant 'outside of you' or 'other than 
> > >>>>>> you'. When you say 'karma functions by itself' you are implying that 
> > >>>>>> karma exists independently of you; like when you say 'not my will 
> > >>>>>> but Yours (God's) be done' you are implying that God exists 
> > >>>>>> independently of you. You are implying that 'karma' and 'God' are 
> > >>>>>> 'outside agencies' - outside of and/or separate from you.
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> I am saying that both the concept of 'karma' and 'God' and all their 
> > >>>>>> supposed attributes and associated powers/activites are NOT separate 
> > >>>>>> from you. That are created by you - by your discriminating mind. 
> > >>>>>> They are illusory.
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> If you kill, there is killing. If you are killed, you die. If you 
> > >>>>>> loot, there is looting. If you are looted, you loose property. The 
> > >>>>>> killing is not the cause and the dieing the effect. It is the same 
> > >>>>>> action viewed or described from two perspectives. It is Just THIS!
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> This is my experience...Bill!
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> Bill,
> > >>>>>>>  
> > >>>>>>> The difference is that karma does not rely on God or any other 
> > >>>>>>> 'outside agent'. It functions by itself. On the other hand, if you 
> > >>>>>>> deny karma, does that mean whatever you do, whether killing, 
> > >>>>>>> looting or burning, does not have any effects? You may say you rely 
> > >>>>>>> on law to take care of it. But that is part of karma, at the human 
> > >>>>>>> level. Nevertheless, it is more realistic than reliance on God. if 
> > >>>>>>> all are illusory, killing and looting will be out of control. In 
> > >>>>>>> that case, believing in God is better than believing in nothing.
> > >>>>>>>  
> > >>>>>>> Anthony
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 13:00
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > >>>>>>> your friends & family react?
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>   
> > >>>>>>> Anthony,
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> How are they different concepts?
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> Both have to do with action/reaction (cause and effect), and both 
> > >>>>>>> exist as a concept in your mind.
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> Labeling some actions/reactions or cause/effect as good or bad 
> > >>>>>>> (good deeds lead to reward or sin leads to punishment; or 
> > >>>>>>> accumulation of [bad] karma leads to being re-born as a toad) is 
> > >>>>>>> just packaging. Likewise attributng the enforcement of 
> > >>>>>>> actions/reactions or cause/effect to an outside agency such as 
> > >>>>>>> karma or God is also just packaging.
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> It all looks the same to me - illusory, dualistic packaging.
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> ...Bill! 
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> Bill,
> > >>>>>>>> ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ 
> > >>>>>>>> It is a different message you wrap in the same envelope.
> > >>>>>>>> ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ 
> > >>>>>>>> Anthony
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 9 January 2012, 9:15
> > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > >>>>>>>> your friends & family react?
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ  
> > >>>>>>>> Anthony,
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> You definition of karma is well stated, but why do you not think 
> > >>>>>>>> that definition could not also be applied to the Christian concept 
> > >>>>>>>> of sin/obedience and Hell/Heaven?
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> For me it's the same message in a different envelope.
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> ...Bill!
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> That is not karma, but reward and punishment by God. Karma is 
> > >>>>>>>>> action and reaction by yourself through your own mind (or Buddha 
> > >>>>>>>>> nature).
> > >>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ 
> > >>>>>>>>> Anthony
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>> From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> > >>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
> > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2012, 18:03
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How 
> > >>>>>>>>> did your friends & family react?
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ  
> > >>>>>>>>> Christians beleive in 'karma' also: if you're 'good' you go to 
> > >>>>>>>>> Heaven and if you're 'bad' you go to Hell...Bill!
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> --- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> ItÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ
> > >>>>>>>>>>  is not at all surprising that you got a funny reaction from 
> > >>>>>>>>>> people surrounding you when you said you were interested in 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Buddhism. Try doing the same thing with Moslems, and you get a 
> > >>>>>>>>>> funnier response. Even in this forum, which is less hostile to 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Buddhism, you find different views on it. 
> > >>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ
> > >>>>>>>>>>  
> > >>>>>>>>>> The key point in Buddhism is karma. But Hinduism also agrees to 
> > >>>>>>>>>> karma. The difference between the two is the former insists that 
> > >>>>>>>>>> karma is your own business, nobody else can help you change it. 
> > >>>>>>>>>> However, in Hinduism, there are powerful deities who respond to 
> > >>>>>>>>>> your requests and assist you. Don't forget we are a zen forum, 
> > >>>>>>>>>> and there are a view I term chaotic zen, which denies anything 
> > >>>>>>>>>> on karma, or any laws or rules. They say everything is in chaos. 
> > >>>>>>>>>> On the other hand, you will also hear all kinds of Buddhist 
> > >>>>>>>>>> views here. I hope you have fun here. 
> > >>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ
> > >>>>>>>>>>  
> > >>>>>>>>>> Anthony
> > >>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ
> > >>>>>>>>>>  
> > >>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ
> > >>>>>>>>>>  
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> ________________________________
> > >>>>>>>>>> From: dan_guzy <dan_guzy@>
> > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, 7 January 2012, 16:08
> > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: [Zen] When you began learning about buddhism, How did 
> > >>>>>>>>>> your friends & family react?
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> ÃÆ'Æ'Æ'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂ
> > >>>>>>>>>>   
> > >>>>>>>>>> I seem to be having trouble with this. I'm new to buddhism, just 
> > >>>>>>>>>> recently starting reading up on it the past several months, 
> > >>>>>>>>>> although technically I've been exposed to it for many years 
> > >>>>>>>>>> through a variety of tv shows, movies, etc. My favorite was Kung 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Fu: The Legend Continues. Don't know why, but the scenes with 
> > >>>>>>>>>> the shoalin temple and buddhist monks were always my favorite. 
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Although I haven't come right out and said to my family (except 
> > >>>>>>>>>> for my sister) that I'm learning about Buddhism, they've seen 
> > >>>>>>>>>> the books and notes I leave to myself pertaining to it. So far, 
> > >>>>>>>>>> it has not been encouraging. They kind of give a disgusted look 
> > >>>>>>>>>> or a groan when they see it that suggests that they are not 
> > >>>>>>>>>> happy about it. They are catholics. I'm an atheist (which 
> > >>>>>>>>>> they've known for years). When I finally told my sister that I'd 
> > >>>>>>>>>> like to visit a temple in town, she got disqusted and said "why? 
> > >>>>>>>>>> You'll never go with me to my church, but you'll go to a 
> > >>>>>>>>>> buddhist church?" I didn't know what to say, so I told her the 
> > >>>>>>>>>> truth, that I didn't feel anything for catholicism anymore, and 
> > >>>>>>>>>> that it didn't feel like the right religion for me. She wasn't 
> > >>>>>>>>>> pleased.
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Then today I was having a chat with a co-worker and boss at 
> > >>>>>>>>>> work. I get along great with both of them, known them for 
> > >>>>>>>>>> several years. My co-worker mentioned she and her husband were 
> > >>>>>>>>>> atheists, so I told her I was too. We both got a kick out of it 
> > >>>>>>>>>> realizing that we never knew that about each other. Then I 
> > >>>>>>>>>> mentioned to her that I had been reading up on buddhism lately, 
> > >>>>>>>>>> and she gave the same kind of groan I've been hearing from my 
> > >>>>>>>>>> family. My boss just sort of gave a look of shock and disbelief, 
> > >>>>>>>>>> didn't say anything. I couple of weeks or so before that, I was 
> > >>>>>>>>>> discussing various books with another boss that we like to read, 
> > >>>>>>>>>> and I mentioned one I'd been reading called the Peaceful 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Warrior. He asked what it was about so I told him, and when I 
> > >>>>>>>>>> mentioned it has a buddhist theme to it, he gave a funny look.
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> What's funny about all of this is that I've always figured 
> > >>>>>>>>>> buddhism to be one of the most revered and highly respected 
> > >>>>>>>>>> forms of philosophy and religion on earth. Even growing up I 
> > >>>>>>>>>> felt that way. When I go online to Yahoo Answers R&S forum to 
> > >>>>>>>>>> ask a question pertaining to it, I haven't had any bad replies 
> > >>>>>>>>>> over a single question, and if any of you have ever been on 
> > >>>>>>>>>> there, you know they can be harsh sometimes in that section. So 
> > >>>>>>>>>> it really threw me for a loop seeing all these crazy reactions 
> > >>>>>>>>>> from people I know.
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> Did any of you get these same reactions from the people you knew 
> > >>>>>>>>>> when you were first learning about buddhism?
> > >>>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>>> 
> > >>>>>> 
> > >>>>> 
> > >>>> 
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
> > > reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to