Edgar,

Break through what?

This isn't a trick question because I actually agree with what you've said, but 
I'd like to know what term you'd use to describe what needs to be 'broken 
through'.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> KG,
> 
> Difference is religious myth is usually MISunderstood AS reality, but a koan 
> is understood as a means to break through TO reality...
> 
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Kristopher Grey wrote:
> 
> > 
> > A myth is no more or less direct than a koan.
> > 
> > Have you built Zen into your personal dispensary? ;)
> > 
> > KG
> > 
> > 
> > On 9/12/2012 6:48 AM, Edgar Owen wrote:
> >>  
> >> Bill,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Actually the Christ myth, and that's what it is a myth, is something that 
> >> evolved from earlier personifications of the seasons where life was seen 
> >> to die in winter and be reborn in Spring, and by extension the hope that 
> >> people too could also rise from the dead and enjoy new lives. There are 
> >> quite a few other earlier myths such as that of Persephone or Osiris that 
> >> are precursors to The Christ myth.
> >> 
> >> Getting hung up in these like they are real and not mythical is a VERY BIG 
> >> sidetrack off the path of Zen... 
> >> 
> >> Zen dispenses with all the myths which dance around various aspects of 
> >> reality and goes right to the core of reality itself...
> >> 
> >> Edgar
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Sep 11, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Bill! wrote:
> >> 
> >>>  
> >>> Bill,
> >>> 
> >>> I fail to see much of a difference in these two focuses. My 'mental 
> >>> model' of Christianity includes both. Christ, being the 'perfect' 
> >>> sacrifice, died for our sins. He was the atonement the Heavenly Father 
> >>> required in order to forgive humans of their sins. The rising from the 
> >>> dead does symbolize everlasting life, but only after some the forgiveness 
> >>> of sins which might require additional attonement. Lutherans believe 
> >>> that, don't they?
> >>> 
> >>> ...Bill!
> >>> 
> >>> --- In [email protected], William Rintala <brintala@> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > As I understand it Bill! there are at least 2 extremely different 
> >>> > interpretations of Christ and his cross.  Catholacism saiys that 
> >>> > Christ suffered 
> >>> > and died on the cros for our sins.  Their image of Christ has him 
> >>> > nailed to the 
> >>> > cross.  I was raised as a Lutheran/ Protestant and they don't say 
> >>> > that.  What we 
> >>> > were taught was that Christ died and was buried.  He rose from the 
> >>> > dead 3 days 
> >>> > later and ascended into heaven as proof that all who believe in him 
> >>> > will have 
> >>> > everlasting life.  Their image is of an empty cross and their call at 
> >>> > Easter is 
> >>> > "Christ has risen" to which the appropriate response is "He has risen 
> >>> > indeed".
> >>> > Â Bill 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > Find what makes your heart sing…and do it! 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > 
> >>> > ________________________________
> >>> > From: Bill! <BillSmart@>
> >>> > To: [email protected]
> >>> > Sent: Tue, September 11, 2012 5:14:51 AM
> >>> > Subject: Re: [Zen] He Who Is Without Sin...
> >>> > 
> >>> > Â  
> >>> > Merle,
> >>> > 
> >>> > Play 'Drop the Biblical Quote and Then Run Away and Hide'.
> >>> > 
> >>> > My question to you was "According to Christianity what was the 
> >>> > 'purpose' or 
> >>> > 'achievement' of Jesus' life (and death)?"
> >>> > 
> >>> > I'll give you a hint. It has to do with 'sin'.
> >>> > 
> >>> > Tag! You're it! ...Bill! 
> >>> > 
> >>> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > 
> >>> > >  play what.?..i did not know it was a game...merle
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > 
> >>> > >   
> >>> > > Merle,
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > Was that an answer to my question, or just a 'I don't want to play 
> >>> > > anymore'?
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > ...Bill!
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > >  hail mary!...merle
> >>> > > >   
> >>> > > > Merle,
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > Yes! A sinless human.
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > I thought you knew something about the 'mental model' of 
> >>> > > > Christianity. 
> >>> > > > According to Christianity what was the 'purpose' or 'achievement' 
> >>> > > > of Jesus' 
> >>> > >life (and death)? That's the whole point of Christianity!
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > ...Bill!
> >>> > > > 
> >>> > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > 
> >>> > > > > 
> >>> > > > > ÃÆ'‚  jesus bill then you are a bloody saint!...a 
> >>> > > > > sinless human 
> >>> > >being..lordy be... what an achievement!..merle
> >>> > > > > ÃÆ'‚  
> >>> > > > > Merle,
> >>> > > > > 
> >>> > > > > I never said I was the 'second Christ'. I said 'I was without 
> >>> > > > > sin'. I was 
> >>> > >YOU that suggested I was the 'second coming'...
> >>> > > > > 
> >>> > > > > ...Bill!
> >>> > > > > 
> >>> > > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> >>> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ hang on bill... you 
> >>> > > > > > said you were the second 
> >>> > >christ..did i mis judge you?..merle
> >>> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚  
> >>> > > > > > Merle,
> >>> > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > There is only ONE 'Christ' - like there is only ONE 'Buddha' 
> >>> > > > > > and only ONE 
> >>> > >'Buddha Nature'.
> >>> > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > Just FYI...Bill!
> >>> > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> >>> > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> >>> > > > > > >  well said KG...is romney 
> >>> > >thinking he is the second christ?... merle
> >>> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> >>> > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> >>> > > > > > >   
> >>> > > > > > > We all are "the second coming of Christ [not of Jesus - but 
> >>> > > > > > > of 
> >>> > >"Christ"].ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> >>> > >'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> >>> > >  Teaching point to 
> >>> > >realization. We all have/are the potential to realize this - for this 
> >>> > >to be 
> >>> > >realized - all have/are Buddha nature - to awaken to (call it what you 
> >>> > >like). 
> >>> > >That's the point of the teachings. Otherwise why come to teach the 
> >>> > >'first' time? 
> >>> > >Applies to equally Jesus' or Buddha's story.
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > The whole 'give a man a fish/teach a man to fish' schtick.
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > Surely you have always realized this?! *L*
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > KG
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > On 9/10/2012 8:49 AM, Merle Lester wrote:
> >>> > > > > > > 
> >>> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> >>> > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> >>> > > > > > >   
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> >>> > > > > > > >'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> >>> > > > > > > > christ we have found 
> >>> > >him..bill is the second coming!...merle
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> >>> > > > > > > >'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> >>> > > > > > > >  
> >>> > > > > > > >Merle,
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >In one of your posts a long time ago and far,
> >>> > > > > > > far away (that means I couldn't find it) you
> >>> > > > > > > castigated me for stating that Christians and
> >>> > > > > > > Muslims did bad things during the Crusades in
> >>> > > > > > > the name of their religions. You used a quote
> >>> > > > > > > of Jesus from the Bible and I think it was:
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >"Let him who is without sin among you be the
> >>> > > > > > > first to throw a stone... - John 8:7 (English
> >>> > > > > > > Standard Version)
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >I have already stated in an early post (an
> >>> > > > > > > even longer time ago and further away) that I
> >>> > > > > > > considered myself pretty knowledgeable about
> >>> > > > > > > Christianity and very knowledgeable about the
> >>> > > > > > > teaching of Jesus. I didn't respond to this
> >>> > > > > > > part of your post at that time because I
> >>> > > > > > > didn't consider this quote really relevant to
> >>> > > > > > > our discussion, but I would like to respond
> >>> > > > > > > now.
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >I am without sin so would be eligible to throw
> >>> > > > > > > stones if and when the situation calls for
> >>> > > > > > > that.
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >...Bill!
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> > > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to