Bill,

Depends. Some of the extreme Protestant traditions such as Calvinism, the 
Pilgrims etc. are or at least were horribly repressive.

My ancestors came out of such a strict rigid tradition and it impacted my 
family down to my father's generation by adversely programming their morality, 
and placing a great weight on their ability to enjoy life.

In this tradition one MUST SUFFER to be a good Christian. Having fun in life 
means you are a "bad person". Even after the Christian faith was gone, this 
morality still infected my father and his family.

I count myself lucky to have escaped it!

Edgar



On Sep 11, 2012, at 11:14 PM, William Rintala wrote:

> 
> Protestants don't focus much on the sinning, although fire and brimstone 
> preaching does.  They are more of the school that if you are baptised and 
> accept Christ you go to heaven.  Catholics have their confessional and 
> absolution of sins but they also have that Sacrament of the Sick and 
> Purgatory thing going that the Protestants do not.  I was always taught that 
> Protestants believed that the resurrection and ascension trumped the 
> suffering and the dying.
>  
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Find what makes your heart sing…and do it!
> 
> 
> From: Bill! <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tue, September 11, 2012 8:30:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Zen] He Who Is Without Sin...
> 
>  
> Bill,
> 
> I fail to see much of a difference in these two focuses. My 'mental model' of 
> Christianity includes both. Christ, being the 'perfect' sacrifice, died for 
> our sins. He was the atonement the Heavenly Father required in order to 
> forgive humans of their sins. The rising from the dead does symbolize 
> everlasting life, but only after some the forgiveness of sins which might 
> require additional attonement. Lutherans believe that, don't they?
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], William Rintala <brintala@...> wrote:
> >
> > As I understand it Bill! there are at least 2 extremely different 
> > interpretations of Christ and his cross.  Catholacism saiys that Christ 
> > suffered 
> > and died on the cros for our sins.  Their image of Christ has him nailed 
> > to the 
> > cross.  I was raised as a Lutheran/ Protestant and they don't say that.  
> > What we 
> > were taught was that Christ died and was buried.  He rose from the dead 3 
> > days 
> > later and ascended into heaven as proof that all who believe in him will 
> > have 
> > everlasting life.  Their image is of an empty cross and their call at 
> > Easter is 
> > "Christ has risen" to which the appropriate response is "He has risen 
> > indeed".
> > Â Bill 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Find what makes your heart sing…and do it! 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bill! <BillSmart@...>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Tue, September 11, 2012 5:14:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Zen] He Who Is Without Sin...
> > 
> > Â  
> > Merle,
> > 
> > Play 'Drop the Biblical Quote and Then Run Away and Hide'.
> > 
> > My question to you was "According to Christianity what was the 'purpose' or 
> > 'achievement' of Jesus' life (and death)?"
> > 
> > I'll give you a hint. It has to do with 'sin'.
> > 
> > Tag! You're it! ...Bill! 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  play what.?..i did not know it was a game...merle
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > Merle,
> > > 
> > > Was that an answer to my question, or just a 'I don't want to play 
> > > anymore'?
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  hail mary!...merle
> > > >   
> > > > Merle,
> > > > 
> > > > Yes! A sinless human.
> > > > 
> > > > I thought you knew something about the 'mental model' of Christianity. 
> > > > According to Christianity what was the 'purpose' or 'achievement' of 
> > > > Jesus' 
> > >life (and death)? That's the whole point of Christianity!
> > > > 
> > > > ...Bill!
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ÃÆ'‚  jesus bill then you are a bloody saint!...a 
> > > > > sinless human 
> > >being..lordy be... what an achievement!..merle
> > > > > ÃÆ'‚  
> > > > > Merle,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I never said I was the 'second Christ'. I said 'I was without sin'. I 
> > > > > was 
> > >YOU that suggested I was the 'second coming'...
> > > > > 
> > > > > ...Bill!
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ hang on bill... you said 
> > > > > > you were the second 
> > >christ..did i mis judge you?..merle
> > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚  
> > > > > > Merle,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > There is only ONE 'Christ' - like there is only ONE 'Buddha' and 
> > > > > > only ONE 
> > >'Buddha Nature'.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Just FYI...Bill!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> > > > > > >  well said KG...is romney 
> > >thinking he is the second christ?... merle
> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> > > > > > >   
> > > > > > > We all are "the second coming of Christ [not of Jesus - but of 
> > >"Christ"].ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > >'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ 
> > > Teaching point to 
> > >realization. We all have/are the potential to realize this - for this to 
> > >be 
> > >realized - all have/are Buddha nature - to awaken to (call it what you 
> > >like). 
> > >That's the point of the teachings. Otherwise why come to teach the 'first' 
> > >time? 
> > >Applies to equally Jesus' or Buddha's story.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The whole 'give a man a fish/teach a man to fish' schtick.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Surely you have always realized this?! *L*
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > KG
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On 9/10/2012 8:49 AM, Merle Lester wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > > > > > > 'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> > > > > > >   
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > > > > > > >'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> > > > > > > > christ we have found 
> > >him..bill is the second coming!...merle
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >ÃÆ'Æ'Æ
> > > > > > > >'ÃÆ'¢â‚¬Å¡ÃÆ'Æ'‚ÃÆ'‚ÂÂÂ
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > >Merle,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >In one of your posts a long time ago and far,
> > > > > > > far away (that means I couldn't find it) you
> > > > > > > castigated me for stating that Christians and
> > > > > > > Muslims did bad things during the Crusades in
> > > > > > > the name of their religions. You used a quote
> > > > > > > of Jesus from the Bible and I think it was:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >"Let him who is without sin among you be the
> > > > > > > first to throw a stone... - John 8:7 (English
> > > > > > > Standard Version)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I have already stated in an early post (an
> > > > > > > even longer time ago and further away) that I
> > > > > > > considered myself pretty knowledgeable about
> > > > > > > Christianity and very knowledgeable about the
> > > > > > > teaching of Jesus. I didn't respond to this
> > > > > > > part of your post at that time because I
> > > > > > > didn't consider this quote really relevant to
> > > > > > > our discussion, but I would like to respond
> > > > > > > now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >I am without sin so would be eligible to throw
> > > > > > > stones if and when the situation calls for
> > > > > > > that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >...Bill!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to