Bill, I agree. Do you disagree with my agreement?
Edgar On May 2, 2013, at 2:57 AM, Bill! wrote: > Merle, > > Joe is correct here, but just to clarify a little... > > 'Suffering' is not physical pain. 'Suffering' caused by physical pain would > be feeling sorry for yourself because you can't do something you want to do > because your knees hurt. 'Suffering' as used in Buddhism is very much akin to > 'disappointment' and carries with it an aura of attachment. > > ...Bill! > > --- In [email protected], "Joe" <desert_woodworker@...> wrote: > > > > Merle, > > > > Yet, this is what the Buddha discovered, and what the Buddha taught. > > > > I think it's true that pain is guaranteed in life. It starts at birth. But > > Agony is optional. The difference is stark, and very, very real. > > > > I don't blame you, questioning what the Buddha taught. The only way to > > convince yourself of the truth of it is to practice. I bet you never > > thought you'd ever be able to stay on a bicycle the first time you tried to > > ride one! And I bet you got the hang of it, and can make it go down the > > road pretty straight. > > > > --Joe > > > > > Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote: > > > > > > my understanding is suffering cannot be eliminated..how the hell can that > > > come about..the very nature of life is suffering... > > > point to me who does not what does not..be it animal mineral or > > > vegetable.. > > > the notion of happy happy is absurd.. > > > we can come to terms with suffering > > > we can embrace and realise that compassion and eternal universal love can > > > lift us from suffering and soar us high above the treetops to the heavens > > > above just as the eagle flies we too can fly.. > > > >
