Merle,

That's how I think of it.  And also I use the term 'zen' or 'zen practice' to 
describe the further integration of Buddha Nature into your daily life.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
>  bill... i agree with you..zen is the "tool" to reach buddha nature...merle
> 
> 
>   
> Edgar,
> 
> Again, you are using the term 'Zen' when I've used 'experience Buddha 
> Nature'.  I don't consider these two terms the as referring to the same 
> thing.  Zen certainly is strongly associated with Buddha Nature, but it is 
> not Buddha Nature - least the way I use these terms.
> 
> ...Bill!
> 
> --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen <edgarowen@> wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> > 
> > LOL!
> > 
> > I think you should have a lobotomy. It might improve your Zen by your 
> > definition...
> > 
> > Edgar
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On May 2, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > 
> > > Merle,
> > > 
> > > I say defintely YES! A mentally deficient person can experience Buddha 
> > > Nature - and I THINK (but cannot say for sure) that they can experience 
> > > Buddha Nature more easily than a normal person.
> > > 
> > > ...Bill!
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Â can an intellectually disabled mind experience the buddha nature if 
> > > > we must begin with reason as our first requirement edgar?...
> > > > 
> > > > ho hum..
> > > > 
> > > > merle
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Â 
> > > > Edgar,
> > > > 
> > > > I think we're getting very close here to the core of our disagreements, 
> > > > and I think this has to do with your continual use of the word 'Zen' 
> > > > whereas I use 'experience Buddha Nature'
> > > > 
> > > > Below you wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > [Edgar] "First you use reason to understand the world of forms. Only 
> > > > then can you experience the true nature of the world of forms. Â 
> > > > That's Zen..."
> > > > 
> > > > My question to you was:
> > > > 
> > > > [Bill!] Â "What then of all the sentient beings that are not endowed 
> > > > with the ability to reason?"
> > > > 
> > > > Now here's what maybe the difference-breaker...(I'm getting excited...)
> > > > 
> > > > Are you saying that only beings that can employ reason can engage in 
> > > > (practice, partake of) Zen?
> > > > 
> > > > This is NOT a trick question. Â There will be no 'gotcha's' no matter 
> > > > what you answer...I promise...
> > > > 
> > > > ...Bill!
> > > > 
> > > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What about them?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Edgar
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On May 2, 2013, at 2:26 AM, Bill! wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Edgar,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > What then of all the sentient beings that are not endowed with the 
> > > > > > ability to reason?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ...Bill!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the history of humanity first things had to be figured out 
> > > > > > > using reason. Only after learning them can they be done via 
> > > > > > > second nature.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This is another proof that first we must understand reality. Only 
> > > > > > > then can it be directly experienced as it actually is.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Of course we all directly experience reality anyway all the time. 
> > > > > > > But without understanding what we are experiencing is the 
> > > > > > > magician's tricks reality continually plays on us as illusion 
> > > > > > > appears to be reality that we experience as reality. We are 
> > > > > > > fooled into thinking illusion is reality if we have no 
> > > > > > > understanding of the nature of forms.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Not using reason to figure out reality is like trying to use 
> > > > > > > water to start a fire. Never hatchy!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > First you use reason to figure out how to start a fire. Then you 
> > > > > > > start a fire....
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > First you use reason to understand the world of forms. Only then 
> > > > > > > can you experience the true nature of the world of forms.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > That's Zen...
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Edgar
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On May 1, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Email wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > My comment is addressed towards Joe's statement that "
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Our success as a species does not depend on models. It depends 
> > > > > > > > instead on real life.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Much of it is genuine engagement with Nature, in Nature, and 
> > > > > > > > luck and spontaneity, and takes no time to "figure out".
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > The figure-outers are in the dust, and tend not to pass on 
> > > > > > > > their genes.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > They'll argue that their way is the superior one, however. Of 
> > > > > > > > course they'll argue! There's little left for them.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > --Joe
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On May 1, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> Gosh, this suggests that reason helps us survive because it 
> > > > > > > >> accurately models reality!
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> What will Bill say?
> > > > > > > >> :-)
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> Edgar
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> On May 1, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Email wrote:
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >>> 
> > > > > > > >>> 
> > > > > > > >>> Figured out how to kill the Mammoth without being killed. 
> > > > > > > >>> Figured out what was safe to eat without being poisoned. 
> > > > > > > >>> Figured out how to survive. 
> > > > > > > >>> 
> > > > > > > >>> Sent from my iPhone
> > > > > > > >>> 
> > > > > > > >>> On May 1, 2013, at 1:45 PM, "Joe" desert_woodworker@ wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> 
> > > > > > > >>>> 
> > > > > > > >>>> Hi, William,
> > > > > > > >>>> 
> > > > > > > >>>> OK, I'll bite.
> > > > > > > >>>> 
> > > > > > > >>>> Figured what out?
> > > > > > > >>>> 
> > > > > > > >>>> --Joe
> > > > > > > >>>> 
> > > > > > > >>>> > Email wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>> >
> > > > > > > >>>> > I disagree. It was the first guy who attacked the Mammoth 
> > > > > > > >>>> > with a rock who failed to pass on his genes. The fellows 
> > > > > > > >>>> > who figured it out are our forefathers
> > > > > > > >>>> 
> > > > > > > >>> 
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to