Been testing Zvols, HFS+ formatted and Spotlight does seem to like them, which
technically means, Mail, iPhoto, etc., etc., can function normally.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 18, 2014, at 7:56 AM, ilove...@icloud.com wrote:
> The best description of the current status of the Open ZFS port is here:
> State of osx.zfs Dec 2013
>> Can I use your script to compile and install OpenZFS
> Yes you can use the script to install it, as outlined here
>> maybe even mount the ZEVO pools…
> Yes pool version 5000 is backwards compatible with pool version 28. It is
> basically pool version 28 plus feature flags:
> It may be a better idea to start with a fresh pool so that you can take
> advantage of lz4 compression.
> zpool create -o ashift=13 -O casesensitivity=insensitive -O compression=lz4
> -O atime=off -O normalization=formD -f tank …
> If you intend never to replace any of the disks with SSD, ashift=12.
>> and expect it to be stable?
> Yes, it is pretty stable at this point. You might rarely hit a kernel panic
> or not be able to export the pool with a forced shutdown, neither of which
> should cause any actual harm to your data.
>> I would REALLY like to have features like case insensitivity and UTF8
> Yes it has those features.
>> Also it would be nice if the mounted filesystems were actually visible in
> The default is for the pool foo to mount at /foo, and a dataset foo/bar to
> mount at /foo/bar. I explained the reason we do not use /Volumes (at least
> not yet) here: https://github.com/zfs-osx/zfs/issues/64
> Even though foo mounts at /foo not /Volumes/foo, it will still appear as a
> volume with a disk icon in Finder. Ditto for foo/bar, etc.
>> Can I use it for my iPhoto, iTunes and general file storage?
> Yes you can use it for iPhoto, iTunes and general file storage, but do not
> use it for an entire home directory yet.
>> Can it be scanned by Spotlight?
> No Spotlight does not work yet. However, if you want Spotlight, you can use
> either a sparsebundle or zvol. zvols are not available on ZEVO, so ZEVO users
> are often unfamiliar with them. Here's a description of their use on Linux:
> The only difference on OS X would be that you'd want to use only -b 512 or -b
> 4096 (our default is 4096), and an HFS+ file system.
>> Thank you, if OpenZFS is not an option for everyday use then I will go for
> If you have independent backups, then this is primarily a question of whether
> you value stability or new features more. If you do not have independent
> backups, this conversation is moot because your one and only concern should
> be creating an independent backup of all of your data. By "independent
> backups," I mean that if every disk in your zpool is tossed in the swimming
> pool, you still have your data because it is available somewhere entirely
> separate from your zpool. Ideally, the backup is offsite, or you have both an
> independent local back and an independent offsite backup.
>> Thank you!
> You're welcome.
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "zfs-macos" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to zfs-macos+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.