On Thursday 02 February 2006 15:48, Martin Aspeli wrote: > > I am pretty sure there is a SOAP implementation for Zope 3 and it is in > > svn.zope.org. > > You missed my point (unless that was dry humour)...
With all the discussion about the Cubed project today, I guess I have not much humor left in me. ;-) > No-one who doesn't > already read this list has heard of Zope 3 (as in, they understand what > it's all about, and they understand the distinction between Zope 2 and > Zope 3) and very few have heard of Zope in general. They have, however, > seen all the Ruby-on-Rails demos and are talking about it all the time. Yeah, but honestly I don't care. If people choose a technology on name recognition and not on technical merit, then it is their bad. However, I question the RoR hype. I wonder whether big companies seriously considering it; it has absolutely no track record. Zope 2 (and even 3) on the other hand is deployed on many huge sites and the risk of deploying it is low. Even deploying Zope 3 is a smaller risk than RoR. > Is Ruby-on-Rails a better framework than Zope 3? I do not know. I have not looked at it, but I doubt it. There is a lot of experience in Zope 3. Also some users have reported coming back from RoR. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
