[gentoo-user] Exim's log files

2009-05-10 Thread Sergey A. Kobzar
By default Exim puts its main log to /var/log/exim/exim_main.log, but
many software like logwatch, munin expect log in
/var/log/exim/main.log. Also in many distributions like Debian,
Ubuntu, Fedore Core, FreeBSD /var/log/exim/main.log path is used.

Developer of Exim does not recommend change main log path in config
file.

Is there any reason to use /var/log/exim/exim_main.log? Maybe it worth
to change path to /var/log/exim/main.log ?

-- 
Sergey




[gentoo-user] exim-4.50-r1: fails to stop via init.d,

2005-09-06 Thread fire-eyes
I am using exim-4.50-r1, and it does not stop via /etc/init.d/exim
stop . It simply gives !!. More detailed errors on that sure would be
nice.

Looking into this, it's not creating the pid file specified in the
init.d script. I have to kill exim manually, then pass zap to the init.d
script to straighten things out.

Has anybody else seem this? My permissions sure seem fine.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread kashani

Michael Sullivan wrote:

Do I need to add 192.168.1.100 to the hostlist in exim.conf and
restart exim?

Yes - this is easy solution for your problem ;)


--
Sergey



It didn't work:

Mar 13 15:13:31 baby exim[26470]: 2008-03-13 15:13:31 unqualified
recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
find host name from IP address)
baby bind # grep 192.168.1.100 /etc/exim/exim.conf
hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 192.168.1.2 : 192.168.1.3 :
192.168.1.4 : 192.168.0.2 192.168.1.100

Is there any other option?



Add 192.168.0.2 and .100 to your /etc/hosts file. You've got Exim set to 
deny IP addresses that do not resolve.


kashani
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Emerge exim fails

2005-11-04 Thread Jean Magnan de Bornier
Hello all,
I'm having a problem with my emerge -uD world these days, when it comes to
exim:

(...)
: undefined reference to `Perl_Gthr_key_ptr'
perl.o(.text+0x1474): In function `xs_init':
: undefined reference to `Perl_Gthr_key_ptr'
perl.o(.text+0x14aa): In function `xs_init':
: undefined reference to `Perl_Gthr_key_ptr'
perl.o(.text+0x14e0): In function `xs_init':
: undefined reference to `Perl_Gthr_key_ptr'
collect2: ld a retourné 1 code d'état d'exécution
make[1]: *** [exim] Erreur 1
make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/home/tmp/portage/exim-4.54/work/exim-4.54/build-exim-gentoo'
make: *** [go] Erreur 2

!!! ERROR: mail-mta/exim-4.54 failed.

seems related to perl, so I re-emerged perl, but it didn't improve things.

any hint welcome, tia!
-- 
  Jean Magnan de Bornier |Cours Victor Hugo
  e-mots: jean at bornier.net|13980 Alleins   France
  T 08 70 39 34 03   |P 06 09 17 35 87



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] FW: mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2) (more info added)

2007-05-29 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 10:32:23 Daevid Vincent wrote:
 *  mail-mta/exim
   Latest version available: 4.67
   Latest version installed: 4.54
   Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest]
   Homepage:http://www.exim.org/

 So I have this in my package.mask:
 =mail-mta/exim-4.55
[SNIP]
 [nomerge  ] sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r10 [4.1-r9]
 [ebuild  N]  mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2  USE=ipv6 ssl -mailwrapper
[SNIP]
 [blocks B ] mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2)

 (also, I never understand the --tree option. Does this mean that
 vixie-cron is the issue, or kdegraphics is the issue? Being reverse
 order, I am guessing vixie-cron, yet it says nomerge so that seems
 like, why would it care, plus it's worked fine all these years with the
 exim I have installed.

vixie-cron has a run-time dependency on virtual/mta which can be satisfied by 
both exim and ssmtp (and 8 other packages in the tree). ssmtp is the default 
provider.

What has happened is that all versions of exim in the tree that you haven't 
masked have been removed from the tree. I.e. there are no versions in the 
tree below 4.55. Therefore it suggests installing the default provider of 
virtual/mta which is blocked by the version of exim which is still installed 
although not installable (not in the tree). It matters despite the nomerge 
because it's a run-time dependency rather than build-time.

You have at least four options. The first option is to upgrade exim and hope 
it'll work. I have no knowledge about exim so I cannot tell you whether it 
will. The second is to restore the ebuild for your installed version in an 
overlay (you can pull it from /var/db/pkg/mail-mta/exim-4.54/) thereby 
restoring a non-masked version of exim.. The third is to add mail-mta/exim to 
package.provided (see `man portage`). The fourth is to unmerge exim and use 
another mta (I'm using postfix).

-- 
Bo Andresen


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread Michael Sullivan
I have an exim configuration question.   I run exim-4.69.  It's worked
well for over a year.  This morning I did a slight network topography
modification, and now my wife is having trouble sending email from her
computer.  Her computer used to be 192.168.1.4,, but it's connected to a
subrouter now that's connected into the main one.  The subrouter's IP is
192.168.0.1, if that matters.  My wife's computer is now 192.168.0.2.
She tried to send mail to one of her friends, and exim rejected the
message.  Here's the hostlist line from /etc/exim/exim.conf:

baby bind # grep hostlist /etc/exim/exim.conf
hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 192.168.1.2 : 192.168.1.3 :
192.168.1.4 : 192.168.0.2

Now, she can send a test message to herself by appending our domain to
the end of her username.  We're used to not having to do that.  How can
we get that back?  I would send the full exim.conf, but I don't remember
the syntax to sed to strip out all the comment lines, and my reference
books are packed away for our eminent  move...

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] 2 MTA at the same host

2016-08-08 Thread Konstantin
Hello Guys

I need to install postfix and exim at the same Gentoo server.
I know it is unusual configuration ).
I have both MTA running at CentOS and trying to migrate to Gentoo.

Current error message for "emerge -pv exim" is:
[blocks B  ] mail-mta/exim ("mail-mta/exim" is blocking
mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1)

Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 1,763 KiB
Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)

 * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
 * installed at the same time on the same system.

  (mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
mail-mta/postfix required by @selected

  (mail-mta/exim-4.87:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
exim

What i need to change in ebuild files of these packages in order to install
both of them ?

Thanks.

-- 
*This message was delivered using 100% recycled electrons*.


Re[2]: [gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hi Michael,

 Mar 13 14:22:01 baby exim[25957]: 2008-03-13 14:22:01 unqualified
 recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
 find host name from IP address)

 I guess 192.168.1.100 is what my main router calls the subrouter.  The
 subrouter is configured to use the address 192.168.0.1.

Probably this address is NATed.


 Do I need to add 192.168.1.100 to the hostlist in exim.conf and
 restart exim?

Yes - this is easy solution for your problem ;)


-- 
Sergey

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] exim / authentication

2005-12-03 Thread Uwe Thiem
Hi folks,

anybody in the know how to make exim authenticate itself when connecting to 
another MTA? The authenticator section of the default configuration file is 
completely empty, my exim book is too old, and I couldn't find useful 
info. :-(

Uwe

-- 
Unix is sexy:
who | grep -i blonde | date
cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger
mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount
sleep
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] MTA lighter on resource: Exim or Postfix?

2011-04-08 Thread kashani

On 4/8/2011 2:06 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:

Hello again, list!

I need to deploy an MTA in the Cloud. Now, RAM is at a premium, so
between Exim and Postfix, which one is lighter on resource?

Thank you for your inputs.


For light relaying both are about the same. I'd give the edge to Postfix 
in a heavy use ISP system because it's not a monolithic process like Exim.


kashani



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread Michael Sullivan

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 20:21 +0200, Sergey Kobzar wrote:
 Hello Michael,
 
 What does /var/log/exim/exim_mail log tell?
 
 
 Thursday, March 13, 2008, 7:38:55 PM, you wrote:
 
  I have an exim configuration question.   I run exim-4.69.  It's worked
  well for over a year.  This morning I did a slight network topography
  modification, and now my wife is having trouble sending email from her
  computer.  Her computer used to be 192.168.1.4,, but it's connected to a
  subrouter now that's connected into the main one.  The subrouter's IP is
  192.168.0.1, if that matters.  My wife's computer is now 192.168.0.2.
  She tried to send mail to one of her friends, and exim rejected the
  message.  Here's the hostlist line from /etc/exim/exim.conf:
 
  baby bind # grep hostlist /etc/exim/exim.conf
  hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 192.168.1.2 : 192.168.1.3 :
  192.168.1.4 : 192.168.0.2
 
  Now, she can send a test message to herself by appending our domain to
  the end of her username.  We're used to not having to do that.  How can
  we get that back?  I would send the full exim.conf, but I don't remember
  the syntax to sed to strip out all the comment lines, and my reference
  books are packed away for our eminent  move...
 
 -- 
 Sergey
 

Mar 13 14:22:01 baby exim[25957]: 2008-03-13 14:22:01 unqualified
recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
find host name from IP address)

I guess 192.168.1.100 is what my main router calls the subrouter.  The
subrouter is configured to use the address 192.168.0.1 .  Do I need to
add 192.168.1.100 to the hostlist in exim.conf and restart exim?

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re[4]: [gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hi Michael,

Thursday, March 13, 2008, 10:15:33 PM, you wrote:

 It didn't work:

 Mar 13 15:13:31 baby exim[26470]: 2008-03-13 15:13:31 unqualified
 recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
 find host name from IP address)
 baby bind # grep 192.168.1.100 /etc/exim/exim.conf
 hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 192.168.1.2 : 192.168.1.3 :
 192.168.1.4 : 192.168.0.2 192.168.1.100

 Is there any other option?

1. Show your config.
2. Tell Exim to not do resolving for hosts from 192.168.0/24 and
   192.168.1/24 networks (host_lookup option).


-- 
Sergey

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Test

2007-06-18 Thread Robert Cates

Hi, just testing my exim 4.67 configuration.  Sorry!


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] mailman stopped working after upgrade

2005-09-13 Thread Daevid Vincent
Hmm. Another insteresting thing:

Why did portage re-install the same version of mailman (r4) over and over? 

daevid init.d # genlop -l | grep mailman
 Thu Nov 11 10:26:07 2004  net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r2
 Sun Nov 14 18:12:48 2004  net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r2
 Mon Jan 17 14:36:05 2005  net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r3
 Fri Feb 11 16:58:33 2005  net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r4
 Sun Feb 13 17:57:01 2005  net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r4
 Wed Sep  7 11:34:36 2005  net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r4
 Mon Sep 12 15:48:09 2005  net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r4
daevid init.d # genlop -l | grep exim   
 Sat Nov 13 16:09:25 2004  mail-mta/exim-4.42
 Thu Jan 13 12:19:16 2005  mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2
 Mon Jun 13 13:21:37 2005  mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1
 Mon Jun 13 16:41:18 2005  mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2
 Tue Jun 14 12:34:58 2005  mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2
 Sun Jun 26 12:18:26 2005  mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1
 Thu Jul  7 00:57:45 2005  mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1

So if I read this correctly, mailman-2.1.5-r4 has been installed and
re-installed several times. But around Sept 7th is when it stopped working.
I have mail from the list on 9/5 for sure. I'm fairly certain that exim is
not to blame here, as that hasn't changed in over two months. 


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-08 Thread kashani

Michael Sullivan wrote:

My MSOutlook 2007 and my Mozilla Thunderbird email clients on my laptop
cannot connect to my exim mail server.  I can't seem to figure out
why.  



Can anybody help me fix this?


And the log files say what?

kashani



Re: [gentoo-user] Useflags EXIM

2007-06-03 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 03 June 2007, Stefan Onken wrote:
 Hello,

 anyone able to give me a detailled discription of exim ?

http://www.exim.org

Uwe

-- 
The Informal Linux Group Namibia:
http://www.linux.org.na
SysEx (Pty) Ltd.:
http://www.SysEx.com.na
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] MTA lighter on resource: Exim or Postfix?

2011-04-08 Thread Pandu Poluan
Hello again, list!

I need to deploy an MTA in the Cloud. Now, RAM is at a premium, so
between Exim and Postfix, which one is lighter on resource?

Thank you for your inputs.

Rgds,


-- 
--
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/



Re: Re[2]: [gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread Michael Sullivan

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 21:47 +0200, Sergey Kobzar wrote:
 Hi Michael,
 
  Mar 13 14:22:01 baby exim[25957]: 2008-03-13 14:22:01 unqualified
  recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
  find host name from IP address)
 
  I guess 192.168.1.100 is what my main router calls the subrouter.  The
  subrouter is configured to use the address 192.168.0.1.
 
 Probably this address is NATed.
 
 
  Do I need to add 192.168.1.100 to the hostlist in exim.conf and
  restart exim?
 
 Yes - this is easy solution for your problem ;)
 
 
 -- 
 Sergey
 

It didn't work:

Mar 13 15:13:31 baby exim[26470]: 2008-03-13 15:13:31 unqualified
recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
find host name from IP address)
baby bind # grep 192.168.1.100 /etc/exim/exim.conf
hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 192.168.1.2 : 192.168.1.3 :
192.168.1.4 : 192.168.0.2 192.168.1.100

Is there any other option?

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2)

2007-05-29 Thread Randy Barlow

Daevid Vincent wrote:
[nomerge  ] sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r10 [4.1-r9] 
[ebuild  N]  mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2  USE=ipv6 ssl -mailwrapper
-md5sum 



(also, I never understand the --tree option. Does this mean that
vixie-cron is the issue, or kdegraphics is the issue? Being reverse
order, I am guessing vixie-cron, yet it says nomerge so that seems
like, why would it care, plus it's worked fine all these years with the
exim I have installed. Conversely, why would kdegraphics give a hoot
about a mail transport? I don't get it.)


This is telling you that vixie-cron (which is already installed so will 
not be merged again) is trying to bring in ssmtp for some reason.  I 
don't use exim or know anything about it, but does its ebuild register 
it as a proper MTA?  It seems that your system either doesn't recognize 
exim as an MTA, or perhaps that vixie-cron requires an MTA other than 
exim (postfix is nice :) )


R
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hello Michael,

What does /var/log/exim/exim_mail log tell?


Thursday, March 13, 2008, 7:38:55 PM, you wrote:

 I have an exim configuration question.   I run exim-4.69.  It's worked
 well for over a year.  This morning I did a slight network topography
 modification, and now my wife is having trouble sending email from her
 computer.  Her computer used to be 192.168.1.4,, but it's connected to a
 subrouter now that's connected into the main one.  The subrouter's IP is
 192.168.0.1, if that matters.  My wife's computer is now 192.168.0.2.
 She tried to send mail to one of her friends, and exim rejected the
 message.  Here's the hostlist line from /etc/exim/exim.conf:

 baby bind # grep hostlist /etc/exim/exim.conf
 hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 192.168.1.2 : 192.168.1.3 :
 192.168.1.4 : 192.168.0.2

 Now, she can send a test message to herself by appending our domain to
 the end of her username.  We're used to not having to do that.  How can
 we get that back?  I would send the full exim.conf, but I don't remember
 the syntax to sed to strip out all the comment lines, and my reference
 books are packed away for our eminent  move...

-- 
Sergey

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 2 MTA at the same host

2016-08-08 Thread Azamat Hackimov
Hello.

You know, this is very unusual configuration. I don't even can imagine why
you need both of them.
In order to resolve mutual block, you need to remove "!mail-mta/postfix"
and "!mail-mta/exim" strings from RDEPEND in both packages. Don't forget to
place modified ebuilds to local overlay.

2016-08-08 15:29 GMT+05:00 Konstantin <myownlett...@gmail.com>:

> Hello Guys
>
> I need to install postfix and exim at the same Gentoo server.
> I know it is unusual configuration ).
> I have both MTA running at CentOS and trying to migrate to Gentoo.
>
> Current error message for "emerge -pv exim" is:
> [blocks B  ] mail-mta/exim ("mail-mta/exim" is blocking
> mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1)
>
> Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 1,763 KiB
> Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)
>
>  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
>  * installed at the same time on the same system.
>
>   (mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> mail-mta/postfix required by @selected
>
>   (mail-mta/exim-4.87:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in
> by
> exim
>
> What i need to change in ebuild files of these packages in order to
> install both of them ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> *This message was delivered using 100% recycled electrons*.
>



-- 
>From Siberia with Love!


Re: [gentoo-user] 2 MTA at the same host

2016-08-08 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:40:45 +0500, Azamat Hackimov wrote:

Please don't top-post.

> You know, this is very unusual configuration. I don't even can imagine
> why you need both of them.
> In order to resolve mutual block, you need to remove "!mail-mta/postfix"
> and "!mail-mta/exim" strings from RDEPEND in both packages. Don't
> forget to place modified ebuilds to local overlay.

That's not enough. Both ebuilds install sendmail, so you'll also have to
deal with file collisions, or modify one of the ebuild to not install
sendmail. The latter is probably the better option.

Another approach would be to run one of these MTAs in a container, which
would avoid all these shenanigans.
> 
> 2016-08-08 15:29 GMT+05:00 Konstantin <myownlett...@gmail.com>:
> 
> > Hello Guys
> >
> > I need to install postfix and exim at the same Gentoo server.
> > I know it is unusual configuration ).
> > I have both MTA running at CentOS and trying to migrate to Gentoo.
> >
> > Current error message for "emerge -pv exim" is:
> > [blocks B  ] mail-mta/exim ("mail-mta/exim" is blocking
> > mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1)
> >
> > Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 1,763 KiB
> > Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)
> >
> >  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
> >  * installed at the same time on the same system.
> >
> >   (mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> > mail-mta/postfix required by @selected
> >
> >   (mail-mta/exim-4.87:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> > in by
> > exim
> >
> > What i need to change in ebuild files of these packages in order to
> > install both of them ?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > *This message was delivered using 100% recycled electrons*.
> >  
> 
> 
> 




-- 
Neil Bothwick

Top Oxymorons Number 10: Computer security


pgp46ny9g2jW7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] 2 MTA at the same host

2016-08-10 Thread Konstantin
I had to remove "!mail-mta/sendmail", "!mail-mta/postfix" and
"!mail-mta/exim" in order to install exim as second MTA.

Thanks everyone for the help!

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:40:45 +0500, Azamat Hackimov wrote:
>
> Please don't top-post.
>
> > You know, this is very unusual configuration. I don't even can imagine
> > why you need both of them.
> > In order to resolve mutual block, you need to remove "!mail-mta/postfix"
> > and "!mail-mta/exim" strings from RDEPEND in both packages. Don't
> > forget to place modified ebuilds to local overlay.
>
> That's not enough. Both ebuilds install sendmail, so you'll also have to
> deal with file collisions, or modify one of the ebuild to not install
> sendmail. The latter is probably the better option.
>
> Another approach would be to run one of these MTAs in a container, which
> would avoid all these shenanigans.
> >
> > 2016-08-08 15:29 GMT+05:00 Konstantin <myownlett...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hello Guys
> > >
> > > I need to install postfix and exim at the same Gentoo server.
> > > I know it is unusual configuration ).
> > > I have both MTA running at CentOS and trying to migrate to Gentoo.
> > >
> > > Current error message for "emerge -pv exim" is:
> > > [blocks B  ] mail-mta/exim ("mail-mta/exim" is blocking
> > > mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1)
> > >
> > > Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 1,763 KiB
> > > Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)
> > >
> > >  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
> > >  * installed at the same time on the same system.
> > >
> > >   (mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> > > mail-mta/postfix required by @selected
> > >
> > >   (mail-mta/exim-4.87:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> > > in by
> > > exim
> > >
> > > What i need to change in ebuild files of these packages in order to
> > > install both of them ?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > --
> > > *This message was delivered using 100% recycled electrons*.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Neil Bothwick
>
> Top Oxymorons Number 10: Computer security
>



-- 
*This message was delivered using 100% recycled electrons*.


[gentoo-user] Useflags EXIM

2007-06-03 Thread Stefan Onken
Hello,

anyone able to give me a detailled discription of exim ?

[ebuild  N] mail-mta/exim-4.67  USE=mailwrapper mysql pam 
perl  ssl tcpd 
-X -dnsdb -domainkeys -dovecot-sasl 
-exiscan -exiscan-acl -gnutls -ipv6 -ldap -lmtp -mbox -mbx 
-nis -postgres -radius -sasl -spf -sqlite -srs -syslog 1,600 kB

Thanks.
-- 
www.stonki.de:the more I see, the more I know...
www.proftpd.de:   Deutsche ProFTPD Dokumentation
www.krename.net:  Der Batch Renamer für KDE
www.kbarcode.net: Die Barcode Solution für KDE
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] mail-mta/exim required by dev-lang/php-5.0.5-r5 (which I don't have installed)

2006-04-20 Thread Richard Fish
On 4/20/06, Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I don't understand this error:

You masked out the versions of php greater-than *or equal to* what you
have installed, so portage naturally wants to downgrade the version.

Plus, exim only has these version available:

* mail-mta/exim
 Available versions:  [M]4.50-r999 4.54 4.60 4.60-r1
 Installed:   none
 Homepage:http://www.exim.org/
 Description: A highly configurable, drop-in replacement
for sendmail

You have masked out 4.54, 4.60, and 4.60-r1.  And 4.50-r999 is package
masked.  What do you want portage to do???

-Richard

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] MTA lighter on resource: Exim or Postfix?

2011-04-08 Thread Joost Roeleveld
On Friday 08 April 2011 16:06:51 Pandu Poluan wrote:
 Hello again, list!
 
 I need to deploy an MTA in the Cloud. Now, RAM is at a premium, so
 between Exim and Postfix, which one is lighter on resource?
 
 Thank you for your inputs.
 
 Rgds,

Without actually testing and seeing which can be best optimized for your usage 
pattern?

I run postfix without problems, but then, I don't have that much of a 
restriction on memory so I never really looked into it.

I think the memory usage also depends on the kind of filtering you use. Postfix 
has some additional processes that help in reducing the load by filtering 
connections prior to actually receiving emails. (postscreen)

I don't know enough to say how Exim handles that.

--
Joost



Re: [gentoo-user] Ghost cyber threat

2015-01-31 Thread Adam Carter
  Do they need telnet or ssh access,

 I don't understand this obsession with ssh or telnet. Remote code
 execution means that malicious party can execute any code on
 affected system.


To elaborate, since exim is an SMTP server it will be listening on TCP/25.
All the attacker needs to do is run an SMTP command that will prompt exim
to perform a lookup on a very long FQDN. The first command an SMTP client
issues to an SMTP server is 'HELO some FQDN'. Exim can be configured to
check if that the FQDN is valid, as a way of trying to distinguish spammers
from valid mail servers. So here we have a situation where a security
control happens to make the server less secure, and we have all that's
required for exploitation in a nice package.


[gentoo-user] logrotate: name of log file after it's rotated?

2016-03-25 Thread lee

Hi,

is there a built-in way (like a place holder) to figure out what name a
rotated log file has been given by logrotate?

Here's what I'm trying to do:


, [ cat /etc/logrotate.d/exim }
| /var/log/exim/exim*.log {
| daily
| missingok
| rotate 800
| compress
| delaycompress
| notifempty
| create 640 mail mail
| postrotate
| /usr/sbin/eximstats  | mail -s 
"eximstats" root
| endscript
| }
`


I want  replaced with the name the log file that
has been rotated has been renamed to.  I can think of ways to do this
otherwise, like writing a script that figures out the name of the file,
or using 'prerotate' instead.

It just won't make any sense if logrotate doesn't already have some kind
of place holder for this.



Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-08 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The problem is with dovecot.  (port 110 is the IMAP port, isn't it?  I
 can't telnet to it.)

110 is POP3



Re: [gentoo-user] exim-4.50-r1: fails to stop via init.d,

2005-09-06 Thread fire-eyes
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 16:27 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 09:59:22 -0400, fire-eyes wrote:
 
  I am using exim-4.50-r1, and it does not stop via /etc/init.d/exim
  stop . It simply gives !!. More detailed errors on that sure would be
  nice.
 
 Is there nothing in /var/log?
  
  Looking into this, it's not creating the pid file specified in the
  init.d script. I have to kill exim manually, then pass zap to the init.d
  script to straighten things out.
 
  Has anybody else seem this? My permissions sure seem fine.
 
 Including /var/run? Some programs drop root privileges before starting,
 so you need the chmod 1777 /var/run.
 
 

Turns out I'm not alone. Sounds like a duh fix to me, makes me wonder
why it hasn't been fixed.

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79743

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Ghost cyber threat

2015-01-30 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:19:01 -0500 symack wrote:
 Hello Andrew,
 
 Thank you for your response. For example, Exim implements reverse lookup.
 How is malicious activity used against it?

Exim uses vulnerable function depending on its configuration, that's
why it may be possible to remotely execute code with privileges of
the exim process.

 Do they need telnet or ssh access,

I don't understand this obsession with ssh or telnet. Remote code
execution means that malicious party can execute any code on
affected system.

 or buy some freak of nature can exploit the vulnerability in other ways?

Considering how old one's setup should be to be affected to this
issue, it is likely that such systems have another vulnerabilities,
allowing attacker to gain root privileges even if exim itself is
being run as a non-root user.

Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko


pgpKpmns3wCDW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2018-01-19 20:19, Grant Edwards wrote:

> >>>> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
> >>>> SMTP server?
> >>>
> >>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
> >>>
> >>> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would need
> >>> to hand the mail over to something that *can* deliver to Exchange.
> >> 
> >> Yes, and that something is my existing command-line MTA utility
> >> that has the same usage as /usr/bin/sendmail.

FWIW, you can plug in your existing script into exim as a custom
"transport", in the exim terminology.  In fact that is what I used to do
for years, to stuff outgoing mail into sendmail on a system where I had
a shell account.  But if I understand the problem now (a well sized if,
LOL) that doesn't by itself help you because the existing script is
broken; replacing the script is the main part of the problem.  Right?

-- 
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.



Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-08 Thread Michael Sullivan
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 14:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
 Michael Sullivan wrote:
  My MSOutlook 2007 and my Mozilla Thunderbird email clients on my laptop
  cannot connect to my exim mail server.  I can't seem to figure out
  why.  
 
  Can anybody help me fix this?
 
 And the log files say what?
 
 kashani
 

As far as I can tell, nothing, except for a bunch of errors about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] messages being deferred (mailman's not even
running!) and Spool files being locked...




Re: [gentoo-user] sorta OT - honest (!) opinions on mailservers

2005-06-13 Thread Peter Karlsson

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:

I would suggest you go to the very active exim-users mail list and be 
prepared to show your config and the log entries.  You can find a link to the 
mail list at www.exim.org .  The author of exim is very forthcoming and 
helpful as well as the well established and knowledgable userbase.


Ok, I'll try that. Thanks!

Best regards

Peter K

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] OT - A serious problem with my exim configuration

2007-05-11 Thread Michael Sullivan
On my new exim install on my server box, I have a
serious problem.  It will accept mail sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but not
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Here are the relevant
portions of my config:

domainlist local_domains = @ espersunited.com :
baby.espersunited.com : localhost
domainlist relay_to_domains =
hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 :
70.234.122.248 : 70.234.122.250 : 70.234.122.251

qualify_domain = baby.espersunited.com :
localhost.localdomain

How do I get it to accept mail for espersunited.com?


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2)

2007-05-29 Thread Daevid Vincent
I haven't done an emerge on my server in quite a while, but now that
I've upgraded the CPU/RAM, I figure it's about time.

There are a few packages I'm a bit apprehensive about upgrading. exim
being one. I hate that MTA. It was a nightmare to setup and get working
properly, and now I don't want to break it. (a friend set it up
actually, as that was the MTA he used.)

daevid portage # esearch exim
*  mail-mta/exim
  Latest version available: 4.67
  Latest version installed: 4.54
  Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest]
  Homepage:http://www.exim.org/

So I have this in my package.mask:
=mail-mta/exim-4.55

(Is this upgrade from 4.54 to 4.67 very smooth? Should I worry? I dread
having to deal with exim.conf again, and the exim users list is very
elitist. Usually saying RTFM for most issues -- but they all are experts
or mail admins. I'm not. Nor do I want to be.)

But when I do an emerge -aut world, I get this blocking issue:

These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
...snip...
[nomerge  ] x11-misc/xscreensaver-5.02 [5.01-r2] 
[nomerge  ]  x11-apps/appres-1.0.1 [1.0.0] 
[ebuild U ]   x11-libs/libX11-1.1.1-r1 [1.0.3-r1] USE=-xcb% 
[nomerge  ] sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r10 [4.1-r9] 
[ebuild  N]  mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2  USE=ipv6 ssl -mailwrapper
-md5sum 
[nomerge  ] kde-base/kdegraphics-3.5.5-r2 [3.5.5] 
[nomerge  ]  media-libs/lcms-1.15 [1.14-r1] USE=-tiff* 
[nomerge  ]   dev-lang/swig-1.3.31 [1.3.25] USE=ruby* -lua% -mono%
-ocaml% -pike% 
[nomerge  ]dev-lang/php-5.2.2-r1 [5.2.1-r3] 
[nomerge  ] net-misc/curl-7.15.1-r1 [7.15.1] USE=ldap* -idn* 
[ebuild U ]  net-nds/openldap-2.3.30-r2 [2.3.27]
USE=-smbkrb5passwd% 
[nomerge  ] media-gfx/imagemagick-6.3.3 [6.2.9.5] 
[ebuild U ]  x11-libs/libXt-1.0.5 [1.0.4] 
...snip...
[blocks B ] mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2)

(also, I never understand the --tree option. Does this mean that
vixie-cron is the issue, or kdegraphics is the issue? Being reverse
order, I am guessing vixie-cron, yet it says nomerge so that seems
like, why would it care, plus it's worked fine all these years with the
exim I have installed. Conversely, why would kdegraphics give a hoot
about a mail transport? I don't get it.)


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] mail-mta/exim required by dev-lang/php-5.0.5-r5 (which I don't have installed)

2006-04-20 Thread Daevid Vincent
I don't understand this error:
--
Calculating world dependencies   
!!! Packages for the following atoms are either all
!!! masked or don't exist:
net-mail/mailman net-mail/dovecot mail-mta/exim
media-sound/beep-media-player net-wireless/hostapd net-firewall/shorewall
 
/
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy mail-mta/exim have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- mail-mta/exim-4.60-r1 (masked by: package.mask)
- mail-mta/exim-4.54 (masked by: package.mask)
- mail-mta/exim-4.50-r999 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)
# Fernando J. Pereda [EMAIL PROTECTED] (25 April 2005)
# mask these until the new mailwrapper/mailer-config scheme is ready
# it is secure to unmask them to test

- mail-mta/exim-4.60 (masked by: package.mask, ~x86 keyword)

For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or 
refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
!!!(dependency required by dev-lang/php-5.0.5-r5 [ebuild])
--

I don't have that old version of php installed and what does this mean? How
can the latest version be LESS than what I have installed?!

*  dev-lang/php
  Latest version available: 5.0.5-r5
  Latest version installed: 5.1.1

daevid ~ # emerge -Ca dev-lang/php   

 These are the packages that I would unmerge:

 dev-lang/php
selected: 5.1.1
   protected: none
 omitted: none

I do have some packages masked so as not to destabalize my server, but that
doesn't explain the above errors. Plus there may be other packages I'd like
to upgrade, but I can't see them until emerge -Davu world can get past
that dependency issue above.

daevid ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.mask
=mail-mta/exim-4.54
=mail-mta/ssmtp-2.00
=dev-lang/php-5.1.1

=net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r4
=net-mail/dovecot-0.99.14-r1
=net-wireless/hostapd-0.4.7-r1
=net-firewall/shorewall-2.4.2


And finally, I tried:

USE=~x86 emerge -Davu world

Shouldn't that just unmask everything and at least get past the error?

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] syslog problem....

2006-12-07 Thread David Corbin
When I try to start exim, I get this:

 * Caching service dependencies ...
 *  Service 'sysklogd' already provided by 'logger'!;
 *  Not adding service 'syslog-ng'...   
 
[ ok ]
 * sysklogd - start: syslogd ...
/sbin/start-stop-daemon: stat /usr/sbin/syslogd: No such file or directory (No 
such file or directory)
 * Failed to start syslogd  
 
[ !! ]
 * ERROR:  cannot start exim as sysklogd could not start

I have syslog-ng installed, and don't understand why it's trying to load 
sysklogd...pointers welcome.

Thanks
David
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Exim question

2008-03-13 Thread Michael Sullivan

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:32 -0700, kashani wrote:
 Michael Sullivan wrote:
  Do I need to add 192.168.1.100 to the hostlist in exim.conf and
  restart exim?
  Yes - this is easy solution for your problem ;)
 
 
  -- 
  Sergey
 
  
  It didn't work:
  
  Mar 13 15:13:31 baby exim[26470]: 2008-03-13 15:13:31 unqualified
  recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
  find host name from IP address)
  baby bind # grep 192.168.1.100 /etc/exim/exim.conf
  hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 192.168.1.2 : 192.168.1.3 :
  192.168.1.4 : 192.168.0.2 192.168.1.100
  
  Is there any other option?
  
 
 Add 192.168.0.2 and .100 to your /etc/hosts file. You've got Exim set to 
 deny IP addresses that do not resolve.
 
 kashani

192.168.0.2 was already in there, but I've added 192.168.1.100 to
both /etc/hosts and the DNS server files.  Now, in addition to the
previous error, I get this:

Mar 13 21:14:15 baby exim[30880]: 2008-03-13 21:14:15 unqualified
recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100]
(192.168.1.100 does not match any IP address for
subrouter.espersunited.com.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa)

baby named # grep subrouter *
db.1.168.192:100 IN PTR subrouter.espersunited.com
db.espersunited.com:subrouter.espersunited.com  IN A 192.168.1.100


-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 2 MTA at the same host

2016-08-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 08/08/2016 12:29, Konstantin wrote:
> Hello Guys
> 
> I need to install postfix and exim at the same Gentoo server.

Why?

You either have them running on different ports (mighty unusual) or,
more likely or different NICs.

So put them on two different machines. Hardware is dirt cheap and unless
you are a huge corporate an average Samsung S5 phone can fill most mail
needs. Or as Neil suggested, make one machine a VM


> I know it is unusual configuration ).
> I have both MTA running at CentOS and trying to migrate to Gentoo.
> 
> Current error message for "emerge -pv exim" is:
> [blocks B      ] mail-mta/exim ("mail-mta/exim" is blocking
> mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1)
> 
> Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 1,763 KiB
> Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied)
> 
>  * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
>  * installed at the same time on the same system.
> 
>   (mail-mta/postfix-3.1.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
> mail-mta/postfix required by @selected
> 
>   (mail-mta/exim-4.87:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
> exim
> 
> What i need to change in ebuild files of these packages in order to
> install both of them ?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> *This message was delivered using 100% recycledelectrons***.


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




[gentoo-user] FW: mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2) (more info added)

2007-05-29 Thread Daevid Vincent
I haven't done an emerge on my server in quite a while, but now that
I've upgraded the CPU/RAM, I figure it's about time.

There are a few packages I'm a bit apprehensive about upgrading. exim
being one. I hate that MTA. It was a nightmare to setup and get working
properly, and now I don't want to break it. (a friend set it up
actually, as that was the MTA he used.)

daevid portage # esearch exim
*  mail-mta/exim
  Latest version available: 4.67
  Latest version installed: 4.54
  Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest]
  Homepage:http://www.exim.org/

So I have this in my package.mask:
=mail-mta/exim-4.55

(Is this upgrade from 4.54 to 4.67 very smooth? Should I worry? I dread
having to deal with exim.conf again, and the exim users list is very
elitist. Usually saying RTFM for most issues -- but they all are experts
or mail admins. I'm not. Nor do I want to be.)

But when I do an emerge -aut world, I get this blocking issue:

These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
...snip...
[nomerge  ] x11-misc/xscreensaver-5.02 [5.01-r2] 
[nomerge  ]  x11-apps/appres-1.0.1 [1.0.0] 
[ebuild U ]   x11-libs/libX11-1.1.1-r1 [1.0.3-r1] USE=-xcb% 
[nomerge  ] sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r10 [4.1-r9] 
[ebuild  N]  mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2  USE=ipv6 ssl -mailwrapper
-md5sum 
[nomerge  ] kde-base/kdegraphics-3.5.5-r2 [3.5.5] 
[nomerge  ]  media-libs/lcms-1.15 [1.14-r1] USE=-tiff* 
[nomerge  ]   dev-lang/swig-1.3.31 [1.3.25] USE=ruby* -lua% -mono%
-ocaml% -pike% 
[nomerge  ]dev-lang/php-5.2.2-r1 [5.2.1-r3] 
[nomerge  ] net-misc/curl-7.15.1-r1 [7.15.1] USE=ldap* -idn* 
[ebuild U ]  net-nds/openldap-2.3.30-r2 [2.3.27]
USE=-smbkrb5passwd% 
[nomerge  ] media-gfx/imagemagick-6.3.3 [6.2.9.5] 
[ebuild U ]  x11-libs/libXt-1.0.5 [1.0.4] 
...snip...
[blocks B ] mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2)

(also, I never understand the --tree option. Does this mean that
vixie-cron is the issue, or kdegraphics is the issue? Being reverse
order, I am guessing vixie-cron, yet it says nomerge so that seems
like, why would it care, plus it's worked fine all these years with the
exim I have installed. Conversely, why would kdegraphics give a hoot
about a mail transport? I don't get it.)

And maybe I'm using this tool wrong, but this just adds to my confusion.

daevid portage # equery depends mail-mta/ssmtp
[ Searching for packages depending on mail-mta/ssmtp... ]

daevid portage # equery depends mail-mta/exim 
[ Searching for packages depending on mail-mta/exim... ]
app-admin/sudo-1.6.8_p9-r2 (virtual/mta)
app-admin/tripwire-2.3.1.2-r2 (virtual/mta)
dev-lang/php-5.2.1-r3 (virtual/mta)
mail-client/mailx-8.1.2.20040524-r1 (virtual/mta)
mail-filter/procmail-3.22-r7 (virtual/mta)
net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r4 (virtual/mta)
sys-power/apcupsd-3.10.18-r1 (virtual/mta)
sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r9 (virtual/mta)

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] FW: mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2) (more info added)

2007-05-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 29 May 2007, Daevid Vincent wrote:
 I haven't done an emerge on my server in quite a while, but now that
 I've upgraded the CPU/RAM, I figure it's about time.

 There are a few packages I'm a bit apprehensive about upgrading.
 exim being one. I hate that MTA. It was a nightmare to setup and
 get working properly, and now I don't want to break it. (a friend set
 it up actually, as that was the MTA he used.)

 daevid portage # esearch exim
 *  mail-mta/exim
   Latest version available: 4.67
   Latest version installed: 4.54
   Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest]
   Homepage:http://www.exim.org/

 So I have this in my package.mask:
 =mail-mta/exim-4.55

That's correct. If you are happy with exim-4.55 and there's no reaosn 
you can find to upgrade it, just stick with what you have

 (Is this upgrade from 4.54 to 4.67 very smooth? Should I worry? I
 dread having to deal with exim.conf again, and the exim users list is
 very elitist. Usually saying RTFM for most issues -- but they all are
 experts or mail admins. I'm not. Nor do I want to be.)

 But when I do an emerge -aut world, I get this blocking issue:

A better command is probably 'emerge -avuNDt world'. This will pick up 
changes in USE flags (N) and also update any dependencies that are not 
in world (D)

 These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:
 ...snip...
 [nomerge  ] x11-misc/xscreensaver-5.02 [5.01-r2]
 [nomerge  ]  x11-apps/appres-1.0.1 [1.0.0]
 [ebuild U ]   x11-libs/libX11-1.1.1-r1 [1.0.3-r1] USE=-xcb%
 [nomerge  ] sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r10 [4.1-r9]
 [ebuild  N]  mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2  USE=ipv6 ssl -mailwrapper
 -md5sum
 [nomerge  ] kde-base/kdegraphics-3.5.5-r2 [3.5.5]
 [nomerge  ]  media-libs/lcms-1.15 [1.14-r1] USE=-tiff*
 [nomerge  ]   dev-lang/swig-1.3.31 [1.3.25] USE=ruby* -lua%
 -mono% -ocaml% -pike%
 [nomerge  ]dev-lang/php-5.2.2-r1 [5.2.1-r3]
 [nomerge  ] net-misc/curl-7.15.1-r1 [7.15.1] USE=ldap*
 -idn* [ebuild U ]  net-nds/openldap-2.3.30-r2 [2.3.27]
 USE=-smbkrb5passwd%
 [nomerge  ] media-gfx/imagemagick-6.3.3 [6.2.9.5]
 [ebuild U ]  x11-libs/libXt-1.0.5 [1.0.4]
 ...snip...
 [blocks B ] mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2)

 (also, I never understand the --tree option. Does this mean that
 vixie-cron is the issue, or kdegraphics is the issue? Being
 reverse order, I am guessing vixie-cron, yet it says nomerge so
 that seems like, why would it care, plus it's worked fine all these
 years with the exim I have installed. Conversely, why would
 kdegraphics give a hoot about a mail transport? I don't get it.)

It means that vixie-cron depends on ssmtp (i.e. vixie-cron uses ssmtp 
for some reason). Obviously, ssmtp will be merged first so that it is 
there when vixie-cron is merged. The output does indeed show that 
packages will be emerged in bottom-up order, but the list of 
dependencies is top-down.

The vixie-cron ebuild inherits the cron eclass, and that file has this:
RDEPEND=!virtual/cron
virtual/mta
=sys-process/cronbase-0.3.2

So it wants a virtual mta, and somehow believes that exim doesn't 
provide it, so portage has (helpfully...) suggested ssmtp. vixie-cron 
doesn't need to be recompiled, as it's an RDEPEND and only needed at 
run time (hence the nomerge)

I would suggest you investigate why portage thinks exim does not provice 
virtual/mta capabilities

 And maybe I'm using this tool wrong, but this just adds to my
 confusion.

 daevid portage # equery depends mail-mta/ssmtp
 [ Searching for packages depending on mail-mta/ssmtp... ]

 daevid portage # equery depends mail-mta/exim
 [ Searching for packages depending on mail-mta/exim... ]
 app-admin/sudo-1.6.8_p9-r2 (virtual/mta)
 app-admin/tripwire-2.3.1.2-r2 (virtual/mta)
 dev-lang/php-5.2.1-r3 (virtual/mta)
 mail-client/mailx-8.1.2.20040524-r1 (virtual/mta)
 mail-filter/procmail-3.22-r7 (virtual/mta)
 net-mail/mailman-2.1.5-r4 (virtual/mta)
 sys-power/apcupsd-3.10.18-r1 (virtual/mta)
 sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r9 (virtual/mta)

What's confusing about that? equery found 8 packages that claim to 
depends (or use) ssmtp. That's perfectly normal. It's the packages that 
depend on ssmtp, not the packages you have installed and are 
configured/USE-flagged to use it

alan


-- 
Optimists say the glass is half full,
Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?

Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] I can't send attachments

2008-01-06 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi,

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:09:15 -0600
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We use evolution.  I tried using Squirrelmail and got this:
 
 Message not sent. Server replied: 
 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
 550 Rejected: spam score 6.5

Ah, I see. Exim does output a 550 anyway (and it makes some sense, I
guess the SMTP protocol definition is impractical w/ regard to the
allowed errors). But reading the full error report, it seems it's your
spam detection software that leads exim to deny the mail. Your exim
config seems to indicate that everything with a spam score  6.0 is to
be denied (those numbers in the config are given with a factor of ten,
I guess?). Depending on whether the full spam check report is available
on the logs, you might want to temporarly disable that mail denial and
check the mail headers for the protocol of which certain spam checks
leads your spam filter to the conclusion it is spam, then adjust that.

-hwh
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with exim and mail destinations

2008-10-02 Thread Robert Bridge
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 08:41:43 -0500
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have three boxes:  camille.espersunited.com,
 catherine.espersunited.com, and baby.espersunited.com .
 Traditionally, baby has been our server, but the power supply went
 bad last April and I wasn't able to get it fixed until very
 recently.  Since baby went down, camille has been our server.  But
 now baby is back up again, and acting as a server, and everything has
 been going well except this:  camille and catherine as still trying
 to send mail from cron jobs to camille instead of to baby.  AFAIK
 I've updated all the appropriate DNS records on all machines, so how
 can I fix this?  Is it possible to set camille's exim to forward all
 mail it receives to the equivalent accounts on baby?

Yes, simply configure exim on camille to accept all, and to deliver all
to baby.

Rob.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] sorta OT - honest (!) opinions on mailservers

2005-06-14 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC


On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:54 AM, A. Khattri wrote:



The usual clamav + spamassassin combo.




If you do decide to go the exim route, there are two ways to  
interface spamassassin to it.  One is now built in called exiscan.   
The other is called sa-exim and, the reason I am mentioning this, it  
now supports a spamassassin assisted form of greylisting.   sa-exim  
will do greylisting for you but will only greylist stuff that  
spamassassin marks as being spam, so you avoid most of the negatives  
of greylisting.  I implemented it a day and a half ago and about 90%  
of the spam is now not even received in the first place.  It seems to  
work really well and is better than standard greylistin.


best regards
Chad


---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Need procmail recipe

2007-05-11 Thread Bertram Scharpf
Hi,
1
Am Freitag, 11. Mai 2007, 13:39:21 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
 On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:43 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
  Am Mittwoch, 09. Mai 2007, 15:21:52 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
   On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:50 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
Am Dienstag, 08. Mai 2007, 14:52:15 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
 On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:33 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
http://opensource.bertram-scharpf.de/sites/cropmail/
   
   OKay.  It emerged.  Now, how do I plug it into sendmail?
 
 I'm a little confused as to exactly what I insert
 into /etc/exim/exim.conf.  Any clues?

As far as I remember Exim became prominent for its excellent
logging and diagnostics output. (It's months ago for me). Do
you like to post some parts of /var/log/exim/* ?

Thanks in advance.

Bertram


-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Need procmail recipe

2007-05-12 Thread Michael Sullivan
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 04:51 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
 Hi,
 1
 Am Freitag, 11. Mai 2007, 13:39:21 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
  On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:43 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
   Am Mittwoch, 09. Mai 2007, 15:21:52 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:50 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
 Am Dienstag, 08. Mai 2007, 14:52:15 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
  On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:33 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
 http://opensource.bertram-scharpf.de/sites/cropmail/

OKay.  It emerged.  Now, how do I plug it into sendmail?
  
  I'm a little confused as to exactly what I insert
  into /etc/exim/exim.conf.  Any clues?
 
 As far as I remember Exim became prominent for its excellent
 logging and diagnostics output. (It's months ago for me). Do
 you like to post some parts of /var/log/exim/* ?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 Bertram
 
 
 -- 
 Bertram Scharpf
 Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
 http://www.bertram-scharpf.de

Is there anything in particular I should be looking for?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Exim and Spamassassin

2006-04-29 Thread Meino Christian Cramer
Hi,

 I have installed exim-4.60-r1 and spamassassin-3.1.0.

 Both are started in daemon mode at boot. I can connect to port
 783 via telnet: Spamassassin is listening.

 In the exim.conf file I found this line

   # For spam scanning, there is a similar option that defines the interface to
   # SpamAssassin. You do not need to set this if you are using the default, 
which
   # is shown in this commented example. As for virus scanning, you must also
   # modify the acl_check_data access control list to enable spam scanning.
   
   # spamd_address = 127.0.0.1 783

 I understand this passage as Exim will interface to Spamassassin
 automagically if port 783 is opened by it and I have nothing
 additionally to do. Nevertheless I uncommented the last line.

 But I get no mails scanned

 Something went wrong and I cannot figure out, what it is...

 Any help is very appreciated !!! :O)

 Kind regards,
 mcc


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Setting up SMTP relay

2011-01-23 Thread kashani

On 1/23/2011 12:20 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:


It manages it's own queues beautifully. But, and this makes me sad, it doesn't
really want *me* to manage it's queues. Border controls are hard, and finding
the 1,000 mails some idiot with a Windows bot just sent, and deleting them, is
really hard.

I'm redesigning our mail setup at work,a nd I'm going to do it with exim *and*
Postfix. Exim is the front end I can see, work with, and manage. Exim sends on
to Postfix as fast as it can, and Postfix transparently relays to recipient. I
get best of both worlds :-)


	I can't say I've ever needed anything more than mailq | grep |awk  | 
postsuper -d - in order to delete mail from the Postfix queues. What 
sort of things are your trying to do other than delete a lot of spam or 
bounces?


kashani



Re: [gentoo-user] MTA lighter on resource: Exim or Postfix?

2011-04-08 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 16:20, Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
 On Friday 08 April 2011 16:06:51 Pandu Poluan wrote:
 Hello again, list!

 I need to deploy an MTA in the Cloud. Now, RAM is at a premium, so
 between Exim and Postfix, which one is lighter on resource?

 Thank you for your inputs.

 Rgds,

 Without actually testing and seeing which can be best optimized for your usage
 pattern?

 I run postfix without problems, but then, I don't have that much of a
 restriction on memory so I never really looked into it.

 I think the memory usage also depends on the kind of filtering you use. 
 Postfix
 has some additional processes that help in reducing the load by filtering
 connections prior to actually receiving emails. (postscreen)

 I don't know enough to say how Exim handles that.

Well, the load shouldn't be too heavy. After all, it's meant only to
be a (closed) mail relay server.

Anyways, it's a direct instruction from the BoD, and you know they
always want the server to be deployed yesterday... :-P

Rgds,
--
Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com



Re: [gentoo-user] logrotate: name of log file after it's rotated?

2016-03-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 25/03/2016 13:46, lee wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is there a built-in way (like a place holder) to figure out what name a
> rotated log file has been given by logrotate?
> 
> Here's what I'm trying to do:
> 
> 
> ,---- [ cat /etc/logrotate.d/exim }
> | /var/log/exim/exim*.log {
> | daily
> | missingok
> | rotate 800
> | compress
> | delaycompress
> | notifempty
> | create 640 mail mail
> | postrotate
> | /usr/sbin/eximstats  | mail -s 
> "eximstats" root
> | endscript
> | }
> `
> 
> 
> I want  replaced with the name the log file that
> has been rotated has been renamed to.  I can think of ways to do this
> otherwise, like writing a script that figures out the name of the file,
> or using 'prerotate' instead.
> 
> It just won't make any sense if logrotate doesn't already have some kind
> of place holder for this.
> 


It depends. There are options to tell logrotate to use, or not use,
dates in the new filename, and what compression to use or not use. So
the names can vary.

By far the easiest solution is to put your "| mail" into prerotate
section. That way you know exactly what the name is. Or maybe not due to
that * in the name glob...

Perhaps look into renamecopy described in man logrotate

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman <i...@very.loosely.org> wrote:
> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>> > need 2 pieces here.  Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
>> > you?  It certainly has all the functionality.
>> 
>> I don't see how you can say that when you don't know the method that
>> my command-line MTA uses to transfer mail on down the path towards
>> delivery.
>
> I can say it because I have some experience with exim, and I know it can
> do pretty much anything.  If its configuration language isn't Turing
> complete, it is quite damn close to it.  And the same can be said of
> sendmail, though I know much less about it know.

Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
SMTP server?

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! It's the RINSE CYCLE!!
  at   They've ALL IGNORED the
  gmail.comRINSE CYCLE!!




[gentoo-user] SMTPS not working after upgrade 4.43 to 4.50

2005-06-14 Thread Daevid Vincent
Please help. I run Gentoo and try to use only the stable x86 packages for my
server. I upgraded from 4.43-r2 to 4.50-r1 as per portage's suggestion and
now I can't SEND mail from Outlook through my server to anywhere using
SMTPS. This worked fine earlier today before the upgrade. I don't see any
readme or other txt that would indicate I needed to configure something.
there was no 
etc-update files to examine either.

checking here, i don't see any known bugs re: my issue.
http://gentoo-portage.com/mail-mta/exim/bugs

this also talks about port 465, but i'm using port 25 according to outlook.

this chapter talks about SSL, but it's over my head.
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.50/doc/html/spec_38.html
like i say, this worked earlier with the lower version, so i assume my
config files are correct.

If i disable SSL in outlook for outgoing, then i can send mail to my exim
server (daevid.com), but can't send to anywhere else as relay not
permitted [which is expected]

If i check the SSL box for outgoing SMTP (like i has always been), then mail
never leaves outlook. it just constantly tries to send.

i can send mail using 'pine' from the server to anywhere.

i don't see any messages in the log file ?!

i do have a firewall (shorewall). did some port change now that i need to
open?

here are the parameters for exim that i have in my emerge:

[ebuild   R   ] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1  +X -dnsdb -exiscan -exiscan-acl +ipv6
-ldap -lmtp -mailwrapper -mbox +mysql -nis +pam +perl -postgres -sasl +ssl
-syslog +tcpd 0 kB

so +ssl is on.

i recieve mail just fine.

so at the moment, no users can send mail basically and i'm dead in the water
as we require SSL to send so that we're not an open relay. :(

I tried to post to the exim list but they have dynamic IPs blocked via an
RBL list even though you have to be a member of the list to post -- very
helpful. UGH! So I was hoping that someone on this list would be a bit more
helpful.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] php 4.4.1-r3 wont emerge

2006-02-06 Thread Michael George
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:49:15AM +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
 
 Did you do an emerge -uaDNtv world after you put -nis in make.conf, to
 recompile anything with the USE flag previously active?
 
 From looking at the ebuild, it looks like this is due to php-4
 inheriting the php-4_4.sapi eclass; contained in the eclass is this line:
 
   # Recode is not liked
   confutils_use_conflict recode mysql imap nis
 
 Now, I don't know what this means, but it clearly is intended in some way.
 
 I also would suspect that the nis flag is not related to PHP itself, but
 one of its dependencies, which was compiled previously with this flag
 set, which has now become 'illegal' (that happened to me the other day
 with another package, the dependency had to be recompiled without a
 particular flag set for the upgrade of the main package to install).

Holly, thanks for the information.  I will give that a try, but the
problem is that I *want* the nis USE flag set.  I cannot imagine that
something precludes php being used on a system which uses nis...

 Here's the list of packages that have this flag:
 
  equery hasuse -p nis
 [ Searching for USE flag nis in all categories among: ]
  * installed packages
  * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
 [I--] [  ] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r2 (4)
 [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r1 (4)
 [-P-] [  ] net-mail/lbdb-0.30 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] net-mail/lbdb-0.31 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.4 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4-r1 (3)
 [-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r3 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r4 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8-r1 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r3 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7-r1 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5-r1 (0)
 [-P-] [M-] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0 (4)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.60 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r999 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.54 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.52 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.0.1 (4)
 [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.5 (3)
 [-P-] [  ] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4 (3)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1 (0)
 
 I don't have anything to do with PHP myself, but if one of these is
 associated with your install of PHP, I would consider recompiling it
 without the nis USE flag, and then see if PHP compiles.
 
 Hope this is helpful, despite my ignorance of this specific package.

-- 
-M

There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Problem with exim and mail destinations

2008-10-02 Thread Michael Sullivan
I have three boxes:  camille.espersunited.com,
catherine.espersunited.com, and baby.espersunited.com .  Traditionally,
baby has been our server, but the power supply went bad last April and I
wasn't able to get it fixed until very recently.  Since baby went down,
camille has been our server.  But now baby is back up again, and acting
as a server, and everything has been going well except this:  camille
and catherine as still trying to send mail from cron jobs to camille
instead of to baby.  AFAIK I've updated all the appropriate DNS records
on all machines, so how can I fix this?  Is it possible to set camille's
exim to forward all mail it receives to the equivalent accounts on baby?




Re: [gentoo-user] sorta OT - honest (!) opinions on mailservers

2005-06-12 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC


On Jun 12, 2005, at 1:19 AM, Rumen Yotov wrote:



Hi,
Could use qmail or postfix, think none of them runs on Win.
There are also eximsendmail but not as good IMHO. i use qmail.
HTH. Rumen



yes, but most knowledgable people  know that exim blows the pants off  
qmail and postfix.


There are installations running in the UK with millions of user  
accounts with exim as the mta and it works just fine, is secure, and  
is *easy* to manage and maintain with very complex configurations.


yes, its MHO, but also the opinion of lots of others who do mail for  
small to very large organizations professionally


Chad
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] sorta OT - honest (!) opinions on mailservers

2005-06-14 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC


On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:47 AM, A. Khattri wrote:


On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:



yes, but most knowledgable people  know that exim blows the pants off
qmail and postfix.



Now why would you want to start a flame war? Noone said package X is
better than package Y - most of us are just saying what works well for
us.


Why do you selectively quote?  The parts you left  out put the  
statements in context that the other guy was ragging on exim.



---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] OT - A couple of questions about setting up exim

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Sullivan
I think I sent this question from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] about an hour ago, but as I
have not received it back again at either this
address, or espersunited.com and as I don't seem to
have sent any mail from espersunited.com since April,
I'll send this again.  In my exim.conf file, I'm a
little confused about the hostlist   relay_from_hosts
variable.  I need to be able to send mail from
127.0.0.1, 70.234.122.250 (the machine exim's running
on), 70.234.122.251, and 70.234.122.248 (which are two
other machines on my LAN).  How would I set the
variable thus?  Also, exim needs to be able to receive
mail from anywhere.  Is this the default behaviour?





-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] OT - Need help setting up mailman to work with exim

2007-05-11 Thread Michael Sullivan
What do I need to do to set up mailman to work with
exim?  I have a test list called phantom that I tried
to send a test message to from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:  

exim_main.log:2007-05-11 11:47:37
H=adsl-70-234-122-248.dsl.tul2ok.sbcglobal.net
(baby.espersunited.com) [70.234.122.248] sender verify
fail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Unrouteable address

I don't know where it's getting
bullet.espersunited.com from; bullet's not even hooked
up anymore.  Can anyone help me?  If I can't get this
working, I'll have to go back to sendmail, which I
know it works with...


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Not getting cron emais that should go to root user

2009-07-27 Thread Michael Sullivan
For a long time I haven't gotten cron reports from one particular box on
my network.  I've been seeing these lines in my /var/log/cron.log file:

27-Jul-09 12:00  unable to exec /usr/lib/sendmail -t, user -oem, output
to sink null27-Jul-09 12:09  failed user root parsing pr 2002; Thilo
Bangert bang...@gentoo.org

I don't know why it's trying to use sendmail; I use exim.  The server is
actually on the same box that's giving me this problem, but the other
two boxes on the network use ssmtp forwarding to forward their mail to
this box, and I get their cron reports.  

There's nothing in the exim logs about this.




[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2018-01-19 23:58, Grant Edwards wrote:

> That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected
> based on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real
> one).  I get the impression from exim and postfix docs that outbound
> routing based on input method aren't possible (I may be wrong about
> that).

In the case of exim, you're definitely very wrong about it.

-- 
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT - Migrating servers to a new box

2008-04-10 Thread Michael Sullivan

--- Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 --- Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  This morning my server box died (power supply
  problem
  I think).  I've pulled the hard drive and am
 trying
  to
  set up a similar environment on one of my other
  boxes.
   I've copied over two user home directories, as
 well
  as exim.conf and dovecot.conf to their proper
  places,
  and restarted the servers.  I think we're getting
  new
  mail in, but I'm not sure where it's going. 
  Attached
  is the results of grep 'Apr 10' /var/log/mail.log
 . 
  AFAIK, nothing is being rejected.  While we're on
  the
  subject, what files do I need to move/replace in
  order
  to make sure that all my users can log onto their
  accounts on this alternate box; is it just
  /etc/passwd
  and /etc/shadow, or is there more?
  
 
 I forgot to add in my previous post that I'm using 
 
 camille ~ # emerge -pv exim
 
 These are the packages that would be merged, in
 order:
 
 Calculating dependencies... done!
 [ebuild   R   ] mail-mta/exim-4.69  USE=X
 exiscan-acl
 ldap mysql pam perl sasl ssl syslog tcpd -dnsdb
 -domainkeys -dovecot-sasl -exiscan -gnutls -ipv6
 -lmtp
 -mailwrapper -mbox -mbx -nis -postgres -radius -spf
 -sqlite -srs 0 kB 
 
 Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0
 kB
 
 and my exim.conf file (attached)
 
 And on closer inspection of the mail.log I saw that
 all the messages are being temporarily rejected
 after
 DATA.  Now if only I knew what that meant...
 
 


camille ~ # exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is undeliverable:
Unrouteable address
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where would it be rewritten as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

camille ~ # grep baby /etc/exim/*
camille ~ # 


Would this be a DNS thing?


-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-08 Thread Michael Sullivan
On Mon, September 8, 2008 5:32 pm, Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Michael Sullivan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The problem is with dovecot.  (port 110 is the IMAP port, isn't it?  I
 can't telnet to it.)

 110 is POP3



So what port is IMAP?




Re: [gentoo-user] sorta OT - honest (!) opinions on mailservers

2005-06-13 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC


On Jun 13, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Peter Karlsson wrote:


On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:


yes, but most knowledgable people  know that exim blows the pants  
off qmail and postfix.




Ok, then perhaps you could explain why a mail server (running  
exim4) suddenly stops to relay emails (this worked before) and then  
all of a sudden starts to relay them again (without me changing any  
settings)... I have looked for clues in the logs and tried the  
debug mode but I still haven't understood why. Help?


I would suggest you go to the very active exim-users mail list and be  
prepared to show your config and the log entries.  You can find a  
link to the mail list at www.exim.org .  The author of exim is very  
forthcoming and helpful as well as the well established and  
knowledgable userbase.


Without a copy of your config and the log file entries, I cannot  
start to answer your questions.


I have been running exim since 0.5x (since 97) and it has been rock  
solid for me and everyone I know including the ISPs who handle  
millions of email addresses with it.


best
Chad



Best regards

Peter K
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list




---
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
Your Web App and Email hosting provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] sorta OT - honest (!) opinions on mailservers

2005-06-14 Thread A. Khattri
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:

 yes, but most knowledgable people  know that exim blows the pants off
 qmail and postfix.

Now why would you want to start a flame war? Noone said package X is
better than package Y - most of us are just saying what works well for
us.


-- 


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] simple mta for local delivery

2005-10-03 Thread Covington, Chris
Postfix is probably the easiest to setup out of the lot of sendmail,
exim, qmail, postfix. 


---
Chris Covington
IT
Plus One Health Management
75 Maiden Lane Suite 801
NY, NY 10038
646-312-6269
http://www.plusoneactive.com

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - A serious problem with my exim configuration

2007-05-11 Thread Dirk GROSSE OSTERHUES
On 11/5/07 15:35, Michael Sullivan wrote:
 [...]
 domainlist local_domains = @ espersunited.com :

Try it with a : after the @ ;)

 baby.espersunited.com : localhost
 domainlist relay_to_domains =
 hostlist   relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 :
 70.234.122.248 : 70.234.122.250 : 70.234.122.251
 
 qualify_domain = baby.espersunited.com :
 localhost.localdomain
 
 How do I get it to accept mail for espersunited.com?
 

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] FW: mail-mta/exim (is blocking mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2) (more info added)

2007-05-29 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 06:51:12 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
 On Tuesday 29 May 2007 10:32:23 Daevid Vincent wrote:
  *  mail-mta/exim
Latest version available: 4.67
Latest version installed: 4.54
Size of downloaded files: [no/bad digest]
Homepage:http://www.exim.org/
 
  So I have this in my package.mask:
  =mail-mta/exim-4.55

 [SNIP]

  [nomerge  ] sys-process/vixie-cron-4.1-r10 [4.1-r9]
  [ebuild  N]  mail-mta/ssmtp-2.61-r2  USE=ipv6 ssl -mailwrapper

 vixie-cron has a run-time dependency on virtual/mta which can be satisfied
 by both exim and ssmtp (and 8 other packages in the tree). ssmtp is the
 default provider.  It matters despite
 the nomerge because it's a run-time dependency rather than build-time.

 You have at least four options.

Another, less tenable, option is to use paludis as your package manager.  It 
will satisfy dependencies (including virtuals) with installed packages.  
Also, paludis's --show-reasons summary option is usually easier to understand 
and more informative than emerge/portage's --tree option.

However, paludis does have some missing features that may be critical for your 
environment: binary packages (both building and using) and a revdep-rebuild 
equivalent (although this can be hacked around) AND you can't simply switch 
between using paludis and emerge/portage; they use the same VDB, but 
repositories are configured differently and paludis can perform some caching 
that emerge/portage will not use/update.  It also runs the ebuild test phase 
by default which results in more merge failures and thus more required 
interaction; you can turn that off if you desire.

-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.org/  \_/ 


pgp5UWuEL5RKe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] RE: I'm not getting gentoo list emails anymore?

2006-12-24 Thread Daevid Vincent
Something in definitely strange...

I turned off my Mailhop Outbound service and sent the mail directly via
exim:

I tried to subscribe to a list that I know I'm not already in (the osx one).

I turned off .procmailrc (no recopies and full logging)

daevid exim # grep gentoo /var/log/mail/current 
Dec 24 13:21:31 [exim] 2006-12-24 13:21:31 1Gyamg-0006aw-2F =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp
H=lists.gentoo.org [140.105.134.102]
Dec 24 13:31:22 [exim] 2006-12-24 13:31:22 1GyawC-0006c2-K7 =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mail.gentoo.org
[140.211.166.183] X=TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256
Dec 24 13:31:22 [exim] 2006-12-24 13:31:22 1GyawC-0006c2-Va =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp
H=mail.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183] X=TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256

I'm running out of ideas. As you can see, NOTHING is coming back to my
server. I should at least see something in the log there with an = arrow
from the gentoo.org server.

I get all other mail from several lists and for several different users on
this system.

daevid exim # ping gentoo.org
PING gentoo.org (204.74.99.100) 56(84) bytes of data.
--- gentoo.org ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 4015ms

But its not unusual for someone to drop ping packets (I do it too for
security reasons)

Would the list admin please double check the mlmmj list tools and see if
there is some setting for my email address that says 'nomail' or 'suspended'
or something like that... Is my email even showing up in the list (or did my
unsubscribes go through). Does the list use any kind of RBL?

 -Original Message-
 From: Andrea Barisani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 3:36 AM
 To: Daevid Vincent
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: I'm not getting gentoo list emails anymore?
 
 On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 02:45:13PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
  I had a power outage here in Seattle, WA since last 
 Thursday. Server is
  finally online. I suspect your mail server suspended or 
 unsubscribed me due
  to bounces.
  
  However, how can I turn it back on? I tried to send messages to 
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Also tried
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  And I don't get any emails at all back.
  
  Then I tried it from my work account and I do get a 
 'confirmation' email?!
  
  Are you doing some kind of blocking or checking (I hope 
 not) that my email
  address comes from some certain domain or something? I run 
 a gentoo server
  on my cable modem at home and use DynDNS Outbound Mail 
 relay (to prevent
  this very kind of thing, where certain domains like AOL 
 block mail from
  dynamic IPs)
 
 
 We don't do any kind of specific filtering on our side, so 
 this is not a
 problem on our end. You might want to wait a few days and see if this
 changes, it might be just a connectivity issue.
 
 Cheers
 
  I have been monitoring my /var/log/mail/current and don't 
 see any gentoo
  emails coming in. As a sanity check, I even turned off my 
 .procmailrc file
  (the whole thing!) and still nada.
  
  daevid mail # grep gentoo *
  current:Dec 22 14:17:47 [exim] 2006-12-22 14:17:47 
 1Gxsi2-0002UD-6L =
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=send_to_gateway T=outbound_smtp
  H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171] X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
  log-2006-12-21-11:12:52:Dec 21 02:11:33 [exim] 2006-12-21 02:11:33
  1GxKtg-0005RB-5D = gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org R=send_to_gateway
  T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
  X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
  log-2006-12-22-01:05:18:Dec 21 12:14:04 [exim] 2006-12-21 12:14:04
  1GxUIm-lT-CG = 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  H=lists.gentoo.org (robin.gentoo.org) [140.105.134.102] 
 P=esmtp S=4261
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  log-2006-12-22-01:05:18:Dec 21 12:19:04 [exim] 2006-12-21 
 12:19:04 SMTP
  command timeout on connection from lists.gentoo.org 
 (robin.gentoo.org)
  [140.105.134.102]
  log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 22:15:41 [exim] 2006-12-21 22:15:41
  1Gxdgw-0003Ql-GT = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 R=send_to_gateway
  T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
  X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
  log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 22:15:41 [exim] 2006-12-21 22:15:41
  1Gxdgx-0003Ql-22 = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 R=send_to_gateway
  T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
  X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
  log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 22:16:26 [exim] 2006-12-21 22:16:26
  1Gxdhh-0003RB-2s = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 R=send_to_gateway
  T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
  X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
  log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 22:16:26 [exim] 2006-12-21 22:16:26
  1Gxdhh-0003RB-Dw = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 R=send_to_gateway
  T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
  X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
  log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 22:17:07 [exim] 2006-12-21 22:17:07
  1GxdiG-0003RM-RR = [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 R=send_to_gateway
  T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
  X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256
  log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 23:27:02 [exim

Re: [gentoo-user] netqmail and qmail

2006-07-31 Thread Alexander Skwar
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:

 Which is the best for organization mail server.

NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
sendmail has had numerous holes way back then. And I
dislike the configuration language.

So, I'd suggest postfix or exim. I personally use Postfix
always. It's featureful and easy enough to configure.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Ghost cyber threat

2015-01-30 Thread symack
Hello Andrew,

Thank you for your response. For example, Exim implements reverse lookup.
How is malicious activity used against it? Do they need telnet or ssh
access,
or buy some freak of nature can exploit the vulnerability in other ways?

N
​


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 19/01/2018 22:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman <i...@very.loosely.org> wrote:
>>>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>>>>>> need 2 pieces here.  Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
>>>>>> you?  It certainly has all the functionality.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see how you can say that when you don't know the method that
>>>>> my command-line MTA uses to transfer mail on down the path towards
>>>>> delivery.
>>>>
>>>> I can say it because I have some experience with exim, and I know it can
>>>> do pretty much anything.  If its configuration language isn't Turing
>>>> complete, it is quite damn close to it.  And the same can be said of
>>>> sendmail, though I know much less about it know.
>>>
>>> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
>>> SMTP server?
>>
>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
>>
>> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would need to
>> hand the mail over to something that *can* deliver to Exchange.
> 
> Yes, and that something is my existing command-line MTA utility that
> has the same usage as /usr/bin/sendmail.
> 

Got it now.

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-01-19, Grant Taylor <gtay...@tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 12:48 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Yep, and it looks like the Postfix equivalent is a custom pipe transport. 
>> Once you know what phrases to google for, it's a lot easier.
>
> *nod*
>
> I figured that you would be able to find something.
>
> Hence why I mentioned the terms.  ;-)

[...]

>> I wrote the server I'm using now, but it uses somebody else's snmpd 
>> module, and that's where the SSL breakage is.  I've filed a bug, and I've 
>> been doing some reading toward attempting a fix, but it looks like it 
>> might be a bit hairy: it involves Python's asyncore/asynchat framework 
>> (and process pools).  What's missing is handling for ssl "want read" 
>> and "want write" exceptions.
>
> "snmpd" or "smtpd"?

Aargh.  smtpd.  Typos like that certinaly don't help the confusion.

> You lost me at Python.  (I know it's a personal prejudice.  But I
> think I'm allowed to have it as long as I acknowledge them as such.)

I'm going to try stunnel in front of the existing solution first.

If that doesn't work, I'll try sendmail/postfix/exim.  It looks like
they'll all do what I want (modulo the no-queue desire). FWIW, the
google phrase for exim is "exim pipe transport":

  
https://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-the_pipe_transport.html

Thanks again (and apologies) to everbody who tried to figure out what
it was I was asking...

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! They collapsed
  at   ... like nuns in the
  gmail.comstreet ... they had no
   teen appeal!




[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman <i...@very.loosely.org> wrote:
>>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>>>>> need 2 pieces here.  Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
>>>>> you?  It certainly has all the functionality.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see how you can say that when you don't know the method that
>>>> my command-line MTA uses to transfer mail on down the path towards
>>>> delivery.
>>>
>>> I can say it because I have some experience with exim, and I know it can
>>> do pretty much anything.  If its configuration language isn't Turing
>>> complete, it is quite damn close to it.  And the same can be said of
>>> sendmail, though I know much less about it know.
>> 
>> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
>> SMTP server?
>
> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
>
> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would need to
> hand the mail over to something that *can* deliver to Exchange.

Yes, and that something is my existing command-line MTA utility that
has the same usage as /usr/bin/sendmail.

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! HELLO KITTY gang
  at   terrorizes town, family
  gmail.comSTICKERED to death!




[gentoo-user] Re: mail cannot send emails (trying to use it with smartd)

2020-04-02 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2020-04-02, Caveman Al Toraboran  wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 1, 2020 10:20 AM, Ian Zimmerman  
> wrote:
>
>> Normally the mail program works by execing /usr/sbin/sendmail to to the
>> hard part :-P Do you have it? It doesn't have to be the "real"
>> sendmail - any MTA program you install usually makes a symlink from
>> /usr/sbin/sendmail to itself.
>
> i got sendmail around.  but didn't do any configurations.
>
> what's the minimum configuration to do?  i'm really not planning
> anything ultra-professional.

Then DO NOT use sendmail.  Sendmail is only for the ultra-professional
who already knows how to configure it (not joking).

If all your mail gets sent via a single SMTP server at your ISP (or
wherever), then Sendmail is definitely not what you want.

> i hope it to send an email the shameless style (just send an smtp
> message to the smtp server where my email is hosted)

If you don't need local queueing (so you can send email while
offline), then I'd pick ssmtp.  NB: ssmtp is a bit old and in need of
a ebuild maintainer, so might not be my first choice if I wasn't
already familiar it.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SSMTP

Nullmailer is also a good option with the added bonus of queueing
outbound mail while you're offline.:

https://github.com/bruceg/nullmailer
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Nullmailer

If you want something even more sophisticated (e.g. something that can
deliver mail locally and receive inbound mail using SMTP), then postfix
or exim would probably the be the next step up:

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Postfix
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Postfix

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Exim
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Exim

I've read claims that there are things you can do with sendmail that
Exim or Postfix can't handle, but I'm not sure I believe it.  I am
sure I'll never need to do any of those things.

--
Grant




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: mail cannot send emails (trying to use it with smartd)

2020-04-02 Thread Caveman Al Toraboran
On Thursday, April 2, 2020 6:18 PM, Grant Edwards  
wrote:

> Then DO NOT use sendmail. Sendmail is only for the ultra-professional
> who already knows how to configure it (not joking).
>
> If all your mail gets sent via a single SMTP server at your ISP (or
> wherever), then Sendmail is definitely not what you want.
>
> If you don't need local queueing (so you can send email while
> offline), then I'd pick ssmtp. NB: ssmtp is a bit old and in need of
> a ebuild maintainer, so might not be my first choice if I wasn't
> already familiar it.
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SSMTP
>
> Nullmailer is also a good option with the added bonus of queueing
> outbound mail while you're offline.:
>
> https://github.com/bruceg/nullmailer
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Nullmailer
>
> If you want something even more sophisticated (e.g. something that can
> deliver mail locally and receive inbound mail using SMTP), then postfix
> or exim would probably the be the next step up:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Postfix
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Postfix
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Exim
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Exim
>
> I've read claims that there are things you can do with sendmail that
> Exim or Postfix can't handle, but I'm not sure I believe it. I am
> sure I'll never need to do any of those things.

thanks a lot for this info.  highly appreciated.
i'll go with nullmailer (imo suits me best).

though i'm a bit curious about sendmail (if your
time allows).  do you mean the ebuild "sendmail"?
or the command "sendmail"?  i used to think it's a
swiss-army kind of tool (used to call "sendmail"
in my cgi scripts decades ago without any
infrastructure; by just directly zapping
recipient's smtp gateway).




[gentoo-user] I'm not receiving this list anymore but I can send to it (according to gmane). Am I suspended?

2006-12-22 Thread Daevid Vincent
I had a power outage here in Seattle, WA since last Thursday. Server is
finally online. I suspect the mail server suspended or unsubscribed me due
to bounces because I've not received any for a few days, when normally there
are plenty per day.

However, how can I turn it back on? 

I tried to send messages to 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Also tried

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

And I don't get any emails at all back.

Then I tried it from my work account and I *do* get a 'confirmation' email?!
But I can't actually use that account.

Is the list doing some kind of blocking or checking (I hope not) that my
email address comes from some certain domain or something? The 'exim' list
server did that crap and it sucked. I run a gentoo server on my cable modem
at home and use DynDNS Outbound Mail relay (to prevent this very kind of
thing, where certain domains like 'exim' list and AOL block mail from
dynamic IPs)

I have been monitoring my /var/log/mail/current and don't see any gentoo
emails coming in. As a sanity check, I even turned off my .procmailrc file
(the whole thing!) and still nada -- normally it just sends all gentoo
emails to a folder.

I don't know what else to do.

I wish there was a mailman-like web front end :(

I didn't know that the list was even functioning until I happened to notice
emails that I had SENT here: 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/176211
That were dated from today.

So that makes it even stranger that I can apparently POST to the list, but I
am not receiving it?!

Ideas?

daevid mail # grep gentoo /var/log/mail/*

/var/log/mail/log-2006-12-22-01:05:18:Dec 21 12:14:04 [exim] 2006-12-21
12:14:04 1GxUIm-lT-CG =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] H=lists.gentoo.org
(robin.gentoo.org) [140.105.134.102] P=esmtp S=4261
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/var/log/mail/log-2006-12-22-01:05:18:Dec 21 12:19:04 [exim] 2006-12-21
12:19:04 SMTP command timeout on connection from lists.gentoo.org
(robin.gentoo.org) [140.105.134.102]

/var/log/mail/log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 22:15:41 [exim] 2006-12-21
22:15:41 1Gxdgw-0003Ql-GT = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=send_to_gateway T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256

/var/log/mail/log-2006-12-22-09:56:01:Dec 21 23:27:02 [exim] 2006-12-21
23:27:02 1Gxeo0-0005Qb-2Z = gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org R=send_to_gateway
T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256

/var/log/mail/log-2006-12-22-24:14:07:Dec 22 14:17:47 [exim] 2006-12-22
14:17:47 1Gxsi2-0002UD-6L = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=send_to_gateway T=outbound_smtp H=outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]
X=TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-01-19, Ian Zimmerman <i...@very.loosely.org> wrote:
> On 2018-01-19 20:19, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> >>>> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
>> >>>> SMTP server?
>> >>>
>> >>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
>> >>>
>> >>> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would need
>> >>> to hand the mail over to something that *can* deliver to Exchange.
>> >> 
>> >> Yes, and that something is my existing command-line MTA utility
>> >> that has the same usage as /usr/bin/sendmail.
>
> FWIW, you can plug in your existing script into exim as a custom
> "transport", in the exim terminology.  In fact that is what I used to do
> for years, to stuff outgoing mail into sendmail on a system where I had
> a shell account.  But if I understand the problem now (a well sized if,
> LOL) that doesn't by itself help you because the existing script is
> broken; replacing the script is the main part of the problem.  Right?

The existing /usr/bin/sendmail (that's not it's actual path) script
works fine.  It's the SSL support in the SMTP server that invokes the
/usr/bin/sendmail script that's broken.  I've modified that server to
run an instance of stunnel and use plain SMTP (sans SSL).  It looks
like that's probably going to work.  There's a custom SSL server
because at some point in the past it had to do some odd things with
headers and the envelope from field (it also implements some special
logging).  Then at some later point in the past, the requirement for
those odd things went away.  At some other point in history, the SSL
support in that server got broken.  The actual failure is intermittent
(it depends on message size and network timing), so it's taken a while
to track it down and decide what to do about it.

For now, I'm going with the custom server and stunnel.  If there are
problems with that, I'll try one of sendmail/postfix/exim.  [One of
the hassles with those is that portage won't allow me to install any
of them because they conflict with msmtp, which is what I use for
sending normal e-mail.]

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! Life is a POPULARITY
  at   CONTEST!  I'm REFRESHINGLY
  gmail.comCANDID!!




Re: [gentoo-user] php 4.4.1-r3 wont emerge

2006-02-06 Thread Holly Bostick
Michael George wrote:
 I am trying to update my system, and it seemed like a good time to go
  from the old php ports to the dev-lang ports.  But I'm having
 trouble building php-4.4.1-r3.
 
 I have masked php-5 and up, as I'm not quite ready to move to that
 yet.
 
 When I try to emerge php-4.4.1-r3, it stops with this error:
 
 QA Notice: USE Flag 'nis' not in IUSE for dev-lang/php-4.4.1-r3
 
 I get the same error with php-5.0.5.
 
 I don't have nis set as a use flag anywhere in my stuff, though, and
 I cannot find it set for php in the profiles.
 
 I have put -nis into package.use for php and I have tried removing
 nis and setting -nis into /etc/make.conf, but nothing helps.

Did you do an emerge -uaDNtv world after you put -nis in make.conf, to
recompile anything with the USE flag previously active?

From looking at the ebuild, it looks like this is due to php-4
inheriting the php-4_4.sapi eclass; contained in the eclass is this line:

# Recode is not liked
confutils_use_conflict recode mysql imap nis

Now, I don't know what this means, but it clearly is intended in some way.

I also would suspect that the nis flag is not related to PHP itself, but
one of its dependencies, which was compiled previously with this flag
set, which has now become 'illegal' (that happened to me the other day
with another package, the dependency had to be recompiled without a
particular flag set for the upgrade of the main package to install).

Here's the list of packages that have this flag:

 equery hasuse -p nis
[ Searching for USE flag nis in all categories among: ]
 * installed packages
 * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
[I--] [  ] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r2 (4)
[-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r1 (4)
[-P-] [  ] net-mail/lbdb-0.30 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] net-mail/lbdb-0.31 (0)
[-P-] [  ] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.4 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4-r1 (3)
[-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2 (0)
[-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r3 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r4 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8-r1 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r3 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r2 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7-r1 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5-r1 (0)
[-P-] [M-] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0 (4)
[-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.60 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r999 (0)
[-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.54 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.52 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.0.1 (4)
[-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.5 (3)
[-P-] [  ] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4 (3)
[-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r2 (0)
[-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1 (0)

I don't have anything to do with PHP myself, but if one of these is
associated with your install of PHP, I would consider recompiling it
without the nis USE flag, and then see if PHP compiles.

Hope this is helpful, despite my ignorance of this specific package.

Holly
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] php uncompatible with nis USE flag?

2006-02-07 Thread Michael George
On the off-chance that perhaps there was an error in the ebuild file, I
did a sync.  However, php will still not build.

Are the NIS USE flag and dev-lang/php mutually-exclusive? 

I had no problem building dev-php/php and dev-php/mod_php with the same
USE flags.

If anyone can offer advice on dealing with this issue, I would be
grateful.

Thank you.

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:49:15AM +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
 Michael George wrote:
  I am trying to update my system, and it seemed like a good time to go
   from the old php ports to the dev-lang ports.  But I'm having
  trouble building php-4.4.1-r3.
  
  I have masked php-5 and up, as I'm not quite ready to move to that
  yet.
  
  When I try to emerge php-4.4.1-r3, it stops with this error:
  
  QA Notice: USE Flag 'nis' not in IUSE for dev-lang/php-4.4.1-r3
  
  I get the same error with php-5.0.5.
  
  I don't have nis set as a use flag anywhere in my stuff, though, and
  I cannot find it set for php in the profiles.
  
  I have put -nis into package.use for php and I have tried removing
  nis and setting -nis into /etc/make.conf, but nothing helps.
 
 Did you do an emerge -uaDNtv world after you put -nis in make.conf, to
 recompile anything with the USE flag previously active?
 
 From looking at the ebuild, it looks like this is due to php-4
 inheriting the php-4_4.sapi eclass; contained in the eclass is this line:
 
   # Recode is not liked
   confutils_use_conflict recode mysql imap nis
 
 Now, I don't know what this means, but it clearly is intended in some way.
 
 I also would suspect that the nis flag is not related to PHP itself, but
 one of its dependencies, which was compiled previously with this flag
 set, which has now become 'illegal' (that happened to me the other day
 with another package, the dependency had to be recompiled without a
 particular flag set for the upgrade of the main package to install).
 
 Here's the list of packages that have this flag:
 
  equery hasuse -p nis
 [ Searching for USE flag nis in all categories among: ]
  * installed packages
  * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
 [I--] [  ] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r2 (4)
 [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r1 (4)
 [-P-] [  ] net-mail/lbdb-0.30 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] net-mail/lbdb-0.31 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.4 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4-r1 (3)
 [-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r3 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r4 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8-r1 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r3 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7-r1 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5-r1 (0)
 [-P-] [M-] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0 (4)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.60 (0)
 [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r999 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.54 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.52 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50 (0)
 [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.0.1 (4)
 [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.5 (3)
 [-P-] [  ] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4 (3)
 [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r2 (0)
 [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1 (0)
 
 I don't have anything to do with PHP myself, but if one of these is
 associated with your install of PHP, I would consider recompiling it
 without the nis USE flag, and then see if PHP compiles.
 
 Hope this is helpful, despite my ignorance of this specific package.
 
 Holly
 -- 
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 

-- 
-M

There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] php uncompatible with nis USE flag?

2006-02-07 Thread Michael George
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 07:38:00AM -0500, Michael George wrote:
 On the off-chance that perhaps there was an error in the ebuild file, I
 did a sync.  However, php will still not build.
 
 Are the NIS USE flag and dev-lang/php mutually-exclusive? 
 
 I had no problem building dev-php/php and dev-php/mod_php with the same
 USE flags.
 
 If anyone can offer advice on dealing with this issue, I would be
 grateful.

After playing with the USE flags a bit, I was able to generate another
error *after* the message:
QA Notice: USE Flag 'nis' not in IUSE for dev-lang/php-4.4.1-r3

I'm suspecting now that execution of the emerge is continuing after the
QA notice and the failure is actually later in the script.  Though there
are no further error messages to indicate what the problem is...

 On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:49:15AM +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
  Michael George wrote:
   I am trying to update my system, and it seemed like a good time to go
from the old php ports to the dev-lang ports.  But I'm having
   trouble building php-4.4.1-r3.
   
   I have masked php-5 and up, as I'm not quite ready to move to that
   yet.
   
   When I try to emerge php-4.4.1-r3, it stops with this error:
   
   QA Notice: USE Flag 'nis' not in IUSE for dev-lang/php-4.4.1-r3
   
   I get the same error with php-5.0.5.
   
   I don't have nis set as a use flag anywhere in my stuff, though, and
   I cannot find it set for php in the profiles.
   
   I have put -nis into package.use for php and I have tried removing
   nis and setting -nis into /etc/make.conf, but nothing helps.
  
  Did you do an emerge -uaDNtv world after you put -nis in make.conf, to
  recompile anything with the USE flag previously active?
  
  From looking at the ebuild, it looks like this is due to php-4
  inheriting the php-4_4.sapi eclass; contained in the eclass is this line:
  
  # Recode is not liked
  confutils_use_conflict recode mysql imap nis
  
  Now, I don't know what this means, but it clearly is intended in some way.
  
  I also would suspect that the nis flag is not related to PHP itself, but
  one of its dependencies, which was compiled previously with this flag
  set, which has now become 'illegal' (that happened to me the other day
  with another package, the dependency had to be recompiled without a
  particular flag set for the upgrade of the main package to install).
  
  Here's the list of packages that have this flag:
  
   equery hasuse -p nis
  [ Searching for USE flag nis in all categories among: ]
   * installed packages
   * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
  [I--] [  ] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r2 (4)
  [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0-r1 (4)
  [-P-] [  ] net-mail/lbdb-0.30 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] net-mail/lbdb-0.31 (0)
  [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5 (0)
  [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.4 (0)
  [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4-r1 (3)
  [-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2 (0)
  [-P-] [  ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r3 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r4 (0)
  [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8-r1 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r3 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r2 (0)
  [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7-r1 (0)
  [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5-r1 (0)
  [-P-] [M-] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0 (4)
  [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.60 (0)
  [-P-] [M~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r999 (0)
  [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.54 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.52 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50 (0)
  [-P-] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-4.0.1 (4)
  [-P-] [M~] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.5 (3)
  [-P-] [  ] x11-libs/qt-embedded-3.3.4 (3)
  [-P-] [ ~] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r2 (0)
  [-P-] [  ] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1 (0)
  
  I don't have anything to do with PHP myself, but if one of these is
  associated with your install of PHP, I would consider recompiling it
  without the nis USE flag, and then see if PHP compiles.
  
  Hope this is helpful, despite my ignorance of this specific package.
  
  Holly
  -- 
  gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
  
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
  
  
 
 -- 
 -M
 
 There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
   Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
 -- 
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 

-- 
-M

There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Need procmail recipe

2007-05-10 Thread Bertram Scharpf
Hi Michael,

Am Mittwoch, 09. Mai 2007, 15:21:52 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
 On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:50 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
  Am Dienstag, 08. Mai 2007, 14:52:15 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
   On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:33 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
If you don't want to write it in Procmail, maybe you like to
do some Ruby. I once composed my own mail filter. It's not
documented very well but really easy to use.

  http://opensource.bertram-scharpf.de/sites/cropmail/
   
 
 OKay.  It emerged.  Now, how do I plug it into sendmail?

I'm using Exim and I only have no other machine at home
where I could try another MTA. As I did with Exim, it should
suffice when you take the Procmail plug of Sendmail and just
s/procmail/cropmail/g it.

A successful configuration example is welcome here.

Bertram


-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] syslog problem....

2006-12-07 Thread Richard Fish

On 12/7/06, David Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

When I try to start exim, I get this:

 * Caching service dependencies ...
 *  Service 'sysklogd' already provided by 'logger'!;
 *  Not adding service 'syslog-ng'...
[ ok ]
 * sysklogd - start: syslogd ...
/sbin/start-stop-daemon: stat /usr/sbin/syslogd: No such file or directory (No
such file or directory)
 * Failed to start syslogd


I don't have exim installed, but I'm guessing it depends on logger,
which can be provided by either sysklogd or syslog-ng.

Probably:

1. You had sysklogd installed at one point (thus got an init file for it)
2. You emerge -C'd it (thus why /usr/sbin/syslogd doesn't exist)
3. You have /etc in CONFIG_PROTECT but don't have /etc/init.d in
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, so portage left the sysklogd init file on your
system.

I'm guessing you should be able to resolve this with:

1. rc-update -d sysklogd
2. rm /etc/init.d/sysklogd

Then add /etc/init.d to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK in /etc/make.conf if you
want portage to automatically remove init files when you remove the
associated package.

HTH,
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Need advice in selecting a mail server

2009-07-06 Thread Michael Sullivan
I have three boxes (baby, camille, and catherine) in my LAN, and for
some reason (this was years ago) I set up an exim server on each of
them.  camille and catherine were supposed to forward their mail to
baby, which has a working dovecot server.  Now, nothing from catherine
is going through, and only mail sent from cron on camille is going
through, and everything on baby is being delivered.  Some time a couple
of years ago my daily logwatch reports stopped coming (all of them) and
earlier this year my portage elogs stopped getting mailed to me.  I
would like to replace all of them with something simple (like ssmtp),
but I'm not sure what the setup on baby needs to be so that I can still
access my hundreds of saved emails on the dovecot server.  Every time
emerge on camille or catherine tries to send an elog I get the 451
error.  I can't seem to find the attempts in the log files.  Anyway, can
I use ssmtp on baby to receive/store network mail, or do I need
something extra like exim/sendmail?  




Re: [gentoo-user] Ghost cyber threat

2015-01-30 Thread shawn wilson
On Jan 30, 2015 12:53 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:

 On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:19:01 -0500 symack wrote:

  or buy some freak of nature can exploit the vulnerability in other ways?

 Considering how old one's setup should be to be affected to this
 issue, it is likely that such systems have another vulnerabilities,
 allowing attacker to gain root privileges even if exim itself is
 being run as a non-root user.


Well, it's only a few days old on most distros.  It's about a year old on
Gentoo.  I think most of us run multiple boxes with some !gentoo. So most
of us had at least one box that was potentially vulnerable. Exim being the
only service proven vulnerable so far, it's possible you're otherwise fine.
OTOH, how would you like to find out a service you use is vulnerable to an
old bug? Especially one you had plenty of time to fix?

Again Gentoo has been fine unless for a while you stuck with an old version
for some reason. Most everything else...


Re: [gentoo-user] 2 MTA at the same host

2016-08-08 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 15:40:45 +0500, Azamat Hackimov wrote:
>>
>> You know, this is very unusual configuration. I don't even can imagine
>> why you need both of them.
>>
>> In order to resolve mutual block, you need to remove "!mail-mta/postfix"
>> and "!mail-mta/exim" strings from RDEPEND in both packages. Don't
>> forget to place modified ebuilds to local overlay.
>
> That's not enough. Both ebuilds install sendmail, so you'll also have to
> deal with file collisions, or modify one of the ebuild to not install
> sendmail. The latter is probably the better option.

On RHEL, if you co-install sendmail and postfix (exim isn't in the
regular repo; it must be in EPEL since it's in Fedora), /sbin/sendmail
is a symlink to /etc/alternatives/mta and /etc/alternatives/mta is a
symlink to /sbin/sendmail.sendmail or /sbin/sendmail.postfix, with a
similar setup for the sendmail man page. But their startup
scripts/units conflict and have to be modified to be co-runnable.



Re: [gentoo-user] Setting up fetchmail to feed postfix

2017-11-26 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 26.11.2017 03:30, Peter Humphrey wrote:

> I get duplicate messages, which are a known problem and easily worked
> around, but the latest version of KMail whinges about more than one
> candidate for display and just gives up.

For debugging purposes it might help you to know that you actually sent
the message I am currently quoting twice, according to the header data.
Message #1:

  Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet)
by smarthost03d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps 
(TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
(Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
id 1eImhw-IJ-SK
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 02:30:12 +

Message #2:

  Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet)
by smarthost03a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps 
(TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
(Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
id 1eImhw-0002XH-8v
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 02:30:12 +

Note the different host names and different IDs, these are two distinct
emails sent by you.

-Ralph




[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/01/2018 22:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 19/01/2018 21:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can exim transfer mail to an Exchange server that doesn't expose an
>>>> SMTP server?
>>>
>>> Errr, no. exim does SMTP.
>>>
>>> If the above is what you need, any orthodox mail server would need to
>>> hand the mail over to something that *can* deliver to Exchange.
>> 
>> Yes, and that something is my existing command-line MTA utility that
>> has the same usage as /usr/bin/sendmail.
>
> Got it now.

I obviously did a bad job describing the problem, since I seemed to
have confused just about everybody.  I erred in leaving out what I
thought were irrelevant details.

-- 
Grant Edwards   grant.b.edwardsYow! Boy, am I glad it's
  at   only 1971...
  gmail.com




[gentoo-user] Re: Simple SMTP to cmd-line MTA relay?

2018-01-19 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:

> > Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
> > need 2 pieces here.  Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
> > you?  It certainly has all the functionality.
> 
> I don't see how you can say that when you don't know the method that
> my command-line MTA uses to transfer mail on down the path towards
> delivery.

I can say it because I have some experience with exim, and I know it can
do pretty much anything.  If its configuration language isn't Turing
complete, it is quite damn close to it.  And the same can be said of
sendmail, though I know much less about it know.

-- 
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.



[gentoo-user] Is it sefe to unmerge?

2008-02-13 Thread Sergey Kobzar
Hi

'emerge -pv --depclean' shows that these packages may be unmerged:

 These are the packages that would be unmerged:

 app-crypt/hashalot
selected: 0.3-r2
   protected: none
 omitted: none

 sys-libs/pwdb
selected: 0.62
   protected: none
 omitted: none

 sys-apps/attr
selected: 2.4.32
   protected: none
 omitted: none


Is it safe to remove they from the system? This is mail server and has
mostly no additional packages except exim, mysql, spamassassin and
some other.


Thanks for any help.


-- 
Sergey

-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-08 Thread Michael Sullivan
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 17:37 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
 On Mon, September 8, 2008 5:32 pm, Paul Hartman wrote:
  On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Michael Sullivan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The problem is with dovecot.  (port 110 is the IMAP port, isn't it?  I
  can't telnet to it.)
 
  110 is POP3
 
 
 
 So what port is IMAP?
 
 

Connection to port 143 refused.  The problem is dovcot, definitely...




Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-08 Thread kashani

Michael Sullivan wrote:

My public IP address is 70.234.122.254

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ telnet 127.0.0.1 143
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK Dovecot ready.
^]

telnet quit
Connection closed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ telnet 70.254.122.254 143
Trying 70.254.122.254...
telnet: connect to address 70.254.122.254: Connection refused


Are you port forwarding port 143 through your NAT if you're using NAT? 
Are you allowing imap in your firewall rules?


I'd also try the suggesting of changing to listen = * suggested here.
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Dovecot#Configure

kashani



Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-08 Thread kashani

Michael Sullivan wrote:
Are you port forwarding port 143 through your NAT if you're using NAT? 
Are you allowing imap in your firewall rules?


I'd also try the suggesting of changing to listen = * suggested here.
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Dovecot#Configure

kashani




From nmap:

143/tcp filtered imap
443/tcp filtered https



So yes you have a firewall and you have not checked the rules? That's 
generally what filtered means.


kashani



Re: [gentoo-user] Exim, Outlook 2007, and Thunderbird

2008-09-09 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:51:47 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:

 dovecot doesn't seem to have a log.  How do I turn on logging for
 dovecot?

It's explained in the config comments, but turned off by default

# Log file to use for error messages, instead of sending them to syslog.
# /dev/stderr can be used to log into stderr.
log_path = /var/log/dovecot


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Assassins do it from behind.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Multi-services box

2005-09-29 Thread Mark
Hi, I'm thinking of setting up a Gentoo server to host a few different
services, primarily a small web site on Apache, an Exim mail server, a
Halafax fax server and a Squid proxy server. I intend to put the
machine in a DMZ to protect the internal network. At first glance,
should these 4 packages play well together on the same piece of
hardware? I'm very open to suggestions, including separate hardware if
it's necessary.

Thanks!-- Mark[unwieldy legal disclaimer would go here - feel free to type your own]


Re: [gentoo-user] how to allow pop,smtp ports on a squid?

2005-11-06 Thread Norberto Bensa
El Nino wrote:
 Dear friends,
 (how to allow pop 
 smtp protocols through a squid?)

You can't

You want postfix/exim/qmail/whatever as an smtp relay -perhaps to your ISP 
smtp server- and fetchmail for your pop/imap accounts.

HTH,
Norberto

-- 
Norberto Bensa
4544-9692
Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] OT - !!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:

2007-05-11 Thread Michael Sullivan
Since I installed an exim server on a couple of my
machines yesterday I have been getting this error when
I try to emerge anything:

!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:
{'root': (501, 'root: recipient address must contain
a domain')}

I have the domain name set in the DNSDOMAIN variable
in /etc/conf.d/domainname.  How do I activate it?


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Need help setting up mailman to work with exim

2007-05-11 Thread Randy Barlow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Michael Sullivan wrote:
 If I can't get this
 working, I'll have to go back to sendmail, which I
 know it works with...

I use Postfix and it plays nice with Mailman.  I'd highly recommend it!

R

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGRRFN7So1xaF/eR8RAuUAAKCDfi/C1oA/GxUh9QdsFAj5kE7y2ACgyQ2r
/GtdD1eN36p0LppoRX7YmNk=
=Tep7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] OT - spamassassin not rewriting subject headers

2007-05-29 Thread Michael Sullivan
I'm having a problem.  I'm running spamassassin with exim:

baby ~ # emerge -pv exim spamassassin

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] mail-mta/exim-4.67  USE=exiscan exiscan-acl ldap mysql
pam perl sasl ssl syslog tcpd -X -dnsdb -domainkeys -dovecot-sasl
-gnutls -ipv6 -lmtp -mailwrapper -mbox -mbx -nis -postgres -radius -spf
-sqlite -srs 0 kB 
[ebuild   R   ] mail-filter/spamassassin-3.1.8-r1  USE=berkdb doc mysql
ssl -ipv6 -ldap -postgres -qmail -sqlite -tools 980 kB 

and I've finally gotten spamassassin to add X-Spam headers to potential
spammish emails, but it's not rewriting the Subject header.  Here's the
ACL from /etc/exim/exim.conf:

acl_check_data:

  # Deny if the message contains a virus. Before enabling this check,
you
  # must install a virus scanner and set the av_scanner option above.
  #
#  denymalware= *
#  message= This message contains a virus ($malware_name).

  # Add headers to a message if it is judged to be spam. Before enabling
this,
  # you must install SpamAssassin. You may also need to set the
spamd_address
  # option above.
  #

  warnspam   = nobody
  add_header = X-Spam_score: $spam_score\n\
  X-Spam_score_int: $spam_score_int\n\
  X-Spam_bar: $spam_bar\n\
  X-Spam_report: $spam_report

  # Accept the message.

accept


Here's my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:

baby ~ # cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# This is the right place to customize your installation of
SpamAssassin.
#
# See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' for details of what can be
# tweaked.
#
# Only a small subset of options are listed below
#
###

#   Add *SPAM* to the Subject header of spam e-mails
#
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*


#   Save spam messages as a message/rfc822 MIME attachment instead of
#   modifying the original message (0: off, 2: use text/plain instead)
#
report_safe 0


#   Set which networks or hosts are considered 'trusted' by your mail
#   server (i.e. not spammers)
#
#trusted_networks 70.234.122.


#   Set file-locking method (flock is not safe over NFS, but is faster)
#
lock_method flock


#   Set the threshold at which a message is considered spam (default:
5.0)
#
required_score 5.0


#   Use Bayesian classifier (default: 1)
#
use_bayes 1


#   Bayesian classifier auto-learning (default: 1)
#
bayes_auto_learn 1


#   Set headers which may provide inappropriate cues to the Bayesian
#   classifier
#
# bayes_ignore_header X-Bogosity
# bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
# bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Status
#
#
header CITIBANK Body =~ /Citi/
score -100

header YAHOOGROUPS Reply-To =~ /yahoogroups.com/
score -100

So why isn't it rewriting the Subject header?

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] qmail spamming

2007-07-03 Thread Sergey A. Kobzar
Hi Gentoo,

Wednesday, July 4, 2007, 7:02:41 AM, you wrote:

 Dear all,

 I'm using qmail with qmail-scanner. but i'm getting lots of mails
 from drug sites(drug advertiesment)  to my users mail boxes. i have
 installed the spammassin. but still I'm getting such spam mail.
 please help me how I'm stop this spam mails. 

 Thanks  regards,

Switch to Exim or Postfix.


-- 
Sergey

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



  1   2   3   >