Hello,
I'm Robin, I do QA and is good to be here. Thus, I look forward to our
working together on this great product.
Have a great day!
R.
--
Robintel BMS
www.robintel.ro
On 8/13/13 6:55 PM, Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
2013/8/13 Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
But if
we change it it annoys potentially other users. The question is what
would be the correct and most often wanted
Hi,
it seems that besides new languages some communities are working on
fixes/improvements of the existing translation which is fine for me.
To coordinate this work with the rest I would like to propose a general
translation deadline for new languages as well as updates of existing ones.
I
2013/8/13 janI j...@apache.org
On 12 August 2013 23:47, Ricardo Berlasso rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/12 janI j...@apache.org
On 12 August 2013 11:11, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 August 2013 11:01, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Am 12.08.13
Hi there,
I am looking for the debian source packages and or debian/rules for
apache open office, can anyone give me some pointers?
mike
--
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://flossk.org
Saving wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
On 14.08.2013 12:57, Mike Dupont wrote:
I am looking for the debian source packages and or debian/rules for
apache open office, can anyone give me some pointers?
AOO creates its Debian packages using EPM [1] when the configure option
--with-package-format=deb is given to the AOO build. They
Thank you, that is what I was looking for!
mike
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 14.08.2013 12:57, Mike Dupont wrote:
I am looking for the debian source packages and or debian/rules for
apache open office, can anyone give me some pointers?
AOO
On 13.08.2013 23:02, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:16 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 August 2013 21:03, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday, I did a dmake clean to start over with my build, and then
proceded with autoconf and configure. I had chagned my ant
Hi,
On 14.08.2013 14:28, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 13.08.2013 23:02, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:16 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 August 2013 21:03, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
Yesterday, I did a dmake clean to start over with my build, and then
proceded
We're working now on AOO 4.0.1, to fix defects in AOO 4.0.0. The fact
that we're doing this, and their are no arguments against it, shows
that we value quality. I'd like to take this a step further, and see
what we can learn from the defects in AOO 4.0.0 and what we can do
going forward to
Here is the current configure statement for the Linux32 bot - is this
correct, and what changes would make it better?
./configure \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk \
--with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz
\
I apologize in advance if my note was note clear. I'm not at all
interested in off-the-cuff opinions. We all have our opinions. But
I'm only interested in fact-based analysis of the actual regressions
reported in BZ. Specifically: what caused the actually defects that
ended up in 4.0.0 and
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:55 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 14 August 2013 19:36, Edwin Sharp el...@mail-page.com wrote:
Dear Rob
The 4.0 release was too ambitious - we should advance in smaller steps.
Nothing compares to general public testing - betas and release candidates
should not
Am 14.08.13 20:21, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Edwin Sharp el...@mail-page.com wrote:
Dear Rob
The 4.0 release was too ambitious - we should advance in smaller steps.
Nothing compares to general public testing - betas and release candidates
should not be avoided.
Hello list,
For the last 3 recents OXT, timeline don't work:
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/search?query=sort_by=createdsort_order=DESC
Download numbers seems to be not tracked.
If you jump to SF.net, you got an error:
The /17434 file could not be found or is not available.
Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org has asked for 4.0.1_release_blocker:
Bug 123038: Update bundled dictionaries for OpenOffice 4.0.1
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123038
--- Additional Comments from Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
Bundled dictionaries listed in
Le 14/08/2013 21:01, Raphael Bircher a écrit :
I like the idea of a public beta. But consider the numbers. The 40
or so regressions that were reported came from an install base (based
on download figures since 4.0.0 was released) of around 3 million
users. Realistically, can we expect
Le 14/08/2013 21:29, Hagar Delest a écrit :
Le 14/08/2013 21:01, Raphael Bircher a écrit :
I like the idea of a public beta. But consider the numbers. The 40
or so regressions that were reported came from an install base (based
on download figures since 4.0.0 was released) of around 3
Am 08/14/2013 09:01 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Am 14.08.13 20:21, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Edwin Sharp el...@mail-page.com wrote:
Dear Rob
The 4.0 release was too ambitious - we should advance in smaller steps.
Nothing compares to general public testing - betas and
Since a few weeks we get mails with just [Website] as subject.
Just one word is not really meaningful to classify the mail content on
the first view. So, I'm wondering from where they come from and how to
improve this?
Marcus
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 14/08/2013 21:29, Hagar Delest a écrit :
Le 14/08/2013 21:01, Raphael Bircher a écrit :
I like the idea of a public beta. But consider the numbers. The 40
or so regressions that were reported came from an
Le 14/08/2013 21:37, Marcus (OOo) a écrit :
In general, my feeling is that it's too early to do a retrospective and ask what
was good, what needs to be improved? (to say it with SCRUM words ;-) ) Just after
the first major release.
Well, I visit forums and contribute since OOo 2.0 and it's
Am 08/14/2013 09:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Hagar Delesthagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 14/08/2013 21:29, Hagar Delest a écrit :
Le 14/08/2013 21:01, Raphael Bircher a écrit :
I like the idea of a public beta. But consider the numbers. The 40
or so
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/14/2013 09:01 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Am 14.08.13 20:21, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Edwin Sharp el...@mail-page.com wrote:
Dear Rob
The 4.0 release was too ambitious - we should
Am 08/14/2013 09:50 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 14/08/2013 21:37, Marcus (OOo) a écrit :
In general, my feeling is that it's too early to do a retrospective
and ask what was good, what needs to be improved? (to say it with
SCRUM words ;-) ) Just after the first major release.
Well, I visit
Le 14/08/2013 21:39, Rob Weir a écrit :
Maybe we need to call an earlier build the RC so it will get more
attention? We had a complete test build that we were testing for
over a month. But maybe it is ignored unless we call it an RC? In
other words, there were many opportunities for users to
Raphael Bircher rbirc...@apache.org has asked for 4.0.1_release_blocker:
Bug 122881: OpenOffice Application icon invisible
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122881
--- Additional Comments from Raphael Bircher rbirc...@apache.org
Ask for Release Blocker
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Since a few weeks we get mails with just [Website] as subject.
Just one word is not really meaningful to classify the mail content on the
first view. So, I'm wondering from where they come from and how to improve
this?
Am 08/14/2013 09:58 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/14/2013 09:01 PM, schrieb Raphael Bircher:
Am 14.08.13 20:21, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Edwin Sharpel...@mail-page.com wrote:
Dear Rob
The
Am 08/14/2013 10:05 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 14/08/2013 21:39, Rob Weir a écrit :
Maybe we need to call an earlier build the RC so it will get more
attention? We had a complete test build that we were testing for
over a month. But maybe it is ignored unless we call it an RC? In
other words,
Am 08/14/2013 10:24 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/14/2013 10:05 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 14/08/2013 21:39, Rob Weir a écrit :
Maybe we need to call an earlier build the RC so it will get more
attention? We had a complete test build that we were testing for
over a month. But maybe it is
On 14 August 2013 20:39, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Maybe we need to call an earlier build the RC so it will get more
attention? We had a complete test build that we were testing for
over a month. But maybe it is ignored unless we call it an RC? In
other words, there were many
Am 08/14/2013 10:11 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Since a few weeks we get mails with just [Website] as subject.
Just one word is not really meaningful to classify the mail content on the
first view. So, I'm wondering from where
Am 08/14/2013 10:32 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/14/2013 10:11 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Since a few weeks we get mails with just [Website] as subject.
Just one word is not really meaningful to classify the mail content
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/14/2013 10:05 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 14/08/2013 21:39, Rob Weir a écrit :
Maybe we need to call an earlier build the RC so it will get more
attention? We had a complete test build that we were testing for
2013/8/14 FR web forum ooofo...@free.fr
Hello list,
For the last 3 recents OXT, timeline don't work:
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/search?query=sort_by=createdsort_order=DESC
Download numbers seems to be not tracked.
Actually the timeline works only for extensions hosted on the
On 14 August 2013 23:10, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/14/2013 10:05 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
Le 14/08/2013 21:39, Rob Weir a écrit :
Maybe we need to call an earlier build the RC so it will get more
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 08/14/2013 09:39 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Hagar
Delesthagar.delest@laposte.**nethagar.del...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le 14/08/2013 21:29, Hagar Delest a écrit :
Le 14/08/2013 21:01,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.comwrote:
Here is the current configure statement for the Linux32 bot - is this
correct, and what changes would make it better?
./configure \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/**java-6-openjdk \
39 matches
Mail list logo
