1) Correct, this cannot be used in a multiwire branch circuit since it
may eventually be removed without being bypassed. The concern is that an
open neutral in a multiwire (e.g. 120/240 3w or 120/208 4w) circuit
leaves loads connected in series phase to phase. The voltage across a
product intended
I'm no medical Guru either but I know the sort of field levels involved.
They range from about .5 to 3 teslas. This is not much higher
than the fields in the gaps of electrical motors and generators
(up to 1.8T in normal silicon iron and up to 2.1 T in cobalt
iron used in aerospace machines)
We are facing the same challenge.
The way we address it is essentially the TCF route, including a Competent
Body involvement.
Our installation contains some equipment qualified for residential
environment only, which wouldn't meet the industrial immunity test levels by
itself. We add filters in
I would amplify on my original MOTO response and say that it is common
practice to scan using peak detection, and use average detection only at
frequencies where an outage condition occurs; that will drastically reduce
test time.
--
From: Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl
To: Ken Javor
At ce-test, we call this kind of answer EOE - Evidence by Experience,
in addition to MOTO, the dwell time should extend any slow variations
that EUT emission contains
A fine and obvious example is the Microwave oven: emission varies
substantially with the rotation degree of the food rotating
I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson robert_wil...@tirsys.com wrote
(in 3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F698D@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM)
about 'Power Factor regulations.', on Tue, 30 Apr 2002:
We will be starting the design of a relatively simple, off-line
switchmode power supply that will be
I read in !emc-pstc that richwo...@tycoint.com wrote (in 846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A01F140FA@flbocexu05) about 'General Product Safety
Directive', on Tue, 30 Apr 2002:
Now, back to the original question. I found the following definition of
professional apparatus in EN 55103-2 (immunity for
I have a general question regarding power factor limits relating to the
design of off-line switchmode power supplies.
We will be starting the design of a relatively simple, off-line
switchmode power supply that will be used to power an LED Luminaire (for
lighting up the outside of buildings). A
I have a couple of questions regrading the National Electrical Code:
1) Consider a power measuring device that is intended to be installed into
a residential 120V branch circuit, protected by a single 15 A or 20 A
circuit breaker. The device would be installed into a conduit outlet box
on
Well, this series sure took a left turn and accelerated hurriedly out of
site of the original intent which was to determine what the term consumer
means as used in the GPSD. The imaginary product example I put forth was
intended solely to support the question, and I in no way advocated that such
You have me all confused here. You claim the equipment should be able
to state heavy industrial immunity but at the same time acknowledge that some
of the components don't meet the surge requirements. Kind of like the
government saying fiscal responsibility - an oxymoron.
If
Hi Amund,
I read your email (below). I'm no medical device expert; but I'm
wondering if the magnetic strength limit was set so high due to MRI
(Magnetic Resnonance Imaging) devices. My understanding is that MRI
devices produce HUGE magnetic field levels. According to a recent
newspaper story
How do the safety standards (for example, IEC 60950 and their clones) define
'insulating tape'?
Are the insulating properties determined as applied in the end product by hipot
and leakage current?
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:16:16 -0700 (PDT), Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote:
Thanks for sharing your
Robert - I know that it may SEEM heavy but there is not NEED to go overboard
- do you remember the incident where a (Lithium) battery was 'charged' as a
result of a fault condition? The FAA banned all Lithium batteries in
aircraft for many years after the incident. Have you not mentioned any
At NASA we call this kind of answer MOTO - Master of the Obvious, but I
can't think of any reason the dwell time would be other than the longer of
the detector time constant or a small integer multiple of the broadband
spike repetition period.
--
From: Gordon,Ian
John is absolutely correct - an experienced engineer can run through '950
with a product in a couple of hours AND record WHY the various clauses and
entire sections are not applicable to a simple product.
I certainly would not intend to spend more time than that on something
simple - HOWEVER -
I read in !emc-pstc that Gordon,Ian ian.gor...@edwards.boc.com wrote
(in E1BA0362B28ED211A1E80008C71EA30601818F4F@EXC_EAS01) about 'CE
MARKING A SYSTEM', on Tue, 30 Apr 2002:
Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC
to a system some of whose component parts are
Gordon, cosider constructing a Technical Construction File (TCF) and
submitting it to a Competent Body. Your product may comply with the
essential requirements when operating in its intended environment without
the need to apply the full industrial strength tests. At least, you could
make that
Can anybody advise as to what dwell time should be used for an average
detector when measuring a broadband noise source? This time obviously
increases the total test time unnecessarily if set too high and reduces the
measurement accuracy if set too low.
Thanks
Ian Gordon
Can anyone advise the course of action in applying a CE mark as regards EMC
to a system some of whose component parts are not built by us and whose D of
C's claim light industrial immunity. However, the system has been running in
very harsh environments e.g. plasma etch applications at customer
Hi all,
I believe you have to apply C-tick mark to fulfill australia EMC
requirement. Do any one could tell me which AS standard and procedure
applicable to Battery toy that has motor and PCB circuit?
Thank you
Steven
QA Engineer
Tiger Electronics Far East Ltd.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:44:34 -0700, Doug McKean wrote:
For those interested in how to track down something like this,
take a look at the header information. You'l see a bunch of
Received: xx lines.
Lots of tricks involved here, including possibility of forged
headers. Those interested
I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson robert_wil...@tirsys.com wrote
(in 3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F698B@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM)
about 'General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something', on
Mon, 29 Apr 2002:
With regards to the need to subject something running from a 9V
battery
Hi Doug:
Thanks for sharing your findings on insulating tape
and anti-static tape.
All insulators have the property of insulation
resistance. Modern insulations have insulation
resistances in the gigaohm and teraohm ranges.
I would guess that anti-static insulators have a
relatively low
With regards to the need to subject something running from a 9V
battery to a battery (pun not intended) of safety approvals, to me
this shows how some aspects of regulatory control are just a solution
searching desperately for a problem. There are times when it seems to
me that the entire
Hi John:
Now we have sub-classes Y1 to Y4. Y capacitors can be used in locations
where neither side is grounded, but in the OP's context, grounding is
involved.
What are the definitions of the various Y
capacitors in the most edition of IEC 384?
OP?
A Y-cap can be used
Greetings all,
Last week I had an interesting experience I thought was worth sharing with
the discussion group. It's all about anti-static insulating tape, which
sounds oxymoronic to me.
Currently, in my company, we use several styles of tape for safety
insulation, both in design of
Hi,
I can help much, but, for this paragraph, the rationale at the back of the
standard states that Annex AAA of the Collateral Standard IEC 60601-1-2
states that the limits and methodology are under consideration by technical
committee 77. This Particular Standard, however, refers for the time
-Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated -ITE
product(sic)
Consider the liability and your defense - it you review to the ITE standard
then you have performed due diligence - if you do not review to the ITE
standard then you have not!
If you assume that the product
Paul,
ANSI/EIA-625-1994 Requirements for Handling
Electrostatic-Discharge-Sensitive (ESDS) Devices
specifies that antistatic packaging shall not triboelectric charge to
greater than +/-200V; and workstation equipment 'shall not generate +/-200V
within twelve (12) inches of unprotected ESDS
Hi all,
A colleague was checking the IEC 60601-2-24:98 and found the Magnetic Field
Req't (paragraph 36.202.6) far too high: 400 Ampere-per-meter! I'd like to
check this requirement for its correctness or history with backgrounds for
such a demand. I know that 3A/m, 10A/m and 30A/m are often
In cleaning out the office I came upon these units, three pieces of
Coherent Communications Corp FSM-86B LSI Subset, a device which allows
piggy-backing a data channel over a phone line, stealing a bit of
bandwidth at about 2800 Hz. You can key in using +/- 3V to +/- 25V
(so can run a telex over
Hi Doug
We looked at doing a 10m OATS but found that at 10m you didn't have a clear
10db margin from the relevant limit line in the standards, so we're aiming
for a 3m site now with a raised platform so that cable trunking, turntable
wont be too much trouble (I hope!)
Richard
EMC Resource Network
PROTEL.XLS
Description: Binary data
I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com wrote (in
200204262205.paa10...@epgc264.sdd.hp.com) about 'EMC and Class 2
equipment', on Fri, 26 Apr 2002:
Hi John:
Ground connections is usually nice to have when dealing with EMC. But what
about EMC and a class 2 (double insulation
Greetings All,
I have one question about MII CCC standard. For the Switching Hub, which
standard will be applied?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Michelle Cho
Hi John:
Ground connections is usually nice to have when dealing with EMC. But what
about EMC and a class 2 (double insulation) power supply (shall comply with
MIL-STD-461E) . I'm thinking on, what to do with the regularly Y-caps,
does it really have any meaning with these
Not yet. CISPR/I is working the issue and has 3 CD's in circulation at the
moment.
Nothing yet, however, on non-invasive measurements using current probes and
capacitive voltage clamps -- measurment method C.1.3 and C.1.4. Its on the
agenda for WG3 and hopefully a CD will be forthcoming by
TUV in San Diego had a roof top OATS. I would talk to them on the subject.
Regards,
Ron Chernus, Compliance Engineer
DENSO Wireless
POWELL, DOUG doug.pow...@aei.com on 04/26/2002 09:21:16 AM
Please respond to POWELL, DOUG doug.pow...@aei.com
To: EMC-PSTC (E-mail) emc-p...@ieee.org
cc:
Richard,
We (I'm on CISPR SC I WG3) are still working on fixes to CISPR 22:1997 in
this area. I would not expect to have the necessary amendment published by
August of next year. Stranger things have happened, but I would be highly
surprised. What happens with EN 55022:1998 in the meantime is
The issue of sending polonium static elimination devices to our customers
has come up. It is my understanding that the devices in question, which are
10CFR31.3 devices (500 microcuries), can be sent, and we need to notify the
federal Director of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. In
Doug,
Rooftop sites have a number of problems. I'm sure the folks who have
actually built them can elaborate more, but one that jumps to mind is the
fact that you will have a worse ambient than at ground level. The VHF and
UHF signals that comprise the ambient tend to be line of sight, and
Greetings all,
I am considering a proposal to build a pre-compliance OATS on the rooftop of
our facility. I am interested in hearing any experiences along this line
especially any unexpected difficulties that came up.
I am considering a 10 meter site on a raised framework or platform with
Greetings Cecil and fellow Forumites,
The best summation of test report content I have seen for a long time may be
found at the following link: http://www.conformity.com/0204123s.pdf
http://www.conformity.com/0204123s.pdf
I would invite all to read it, irrespective of discipline.
Regards,
I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson robert_wil...@tirsys.com wrote
(in 3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F697E@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM)
about 'A very nice game', on Wed, 24 Apr 2002:
I have used it several times to
eliminate viruses my son managed to get,
Is it safer than MRI, then? (;-)
--
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB
mhpeibnilgedmceaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'EMC and Class 2
equipment', on Tue, 23 Apr 2002:
Ground connections is usually nice to have when dealing with EMC. But what
about EMC and a class 2 (double insulation) power
I read in !emc-pstc that Jacob Schanker schan...@frontiernet.net wrote
(in 005b01c1e8a8$183598c0$3579d...@frontiernet.net) about 'High Temp
Caps and Inductors', on Sat, 20 Apr 2002:
I used fiberglass, but although I haven't checked, I don't think that will
work at 180C. Possibly Teflon
I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Maxwell chris.maxw...@nettest.com wrote
(in 83d652574e7af740873674f9fc12dbaaf7e...@utexh1w2.gnnettest.com)
about 'Varistor to Ground', on Mon, 22 Apr 2002:
I read your quote below regarding the safety implications of placing
MOVs between AC power and ground:
All,
Attached is an invitation to the Northeast Product Safety Society annual
dinner to be held on Wednesday, May 22, Best Western Royal Plaza Hotel
Trade Center in Marlborough, MA.
If you will be in the area on May 22nd, please consider joining us for
dinner and the opportunity to mingle with
Hi Donald,
I have the TRA1000 (the previous version, but very little difference to the
TRA 2000) and find it an excellent value for money. I have just had it
re-calibrated for the 2nd time, no problems! I use it for compliance
immunity testing.
Notes:
No faults to date
Very flexible
Desmond,
Not as simple as your questions to explain I am afraid. Below is a very
brief outline and by no means should be looked upon as detailing all the
issues. Hope it helps.
A 2.4GHz spread spectrum device must comply with:
a) ACA Radiocommunications Class Licence (Spread Spectrum
Hello All,
Just one clarification regarding update of South Korea's APEC TEL MRA Annex I -
this recent update does now allow for Canadian labs to be accredited with full
scope of the Korean requirements. This bilateral agreement has been in place
between Canada and Korea for several years, by
All,
Just last night, I was re-reading the procedures for
Verification (e.g. for Class A ITE) and Declaration of Conformity
(e.g. for Class B ITE.)
For products subject to Certification, refer to 47CFR2.938,
Retention of Records.
For products subject to Verification, refer to 47CFRF2.955,
IEC 61558 series standards are now/will be EN's in the same series.
John Allen
- Original Message -
From: POWELL, DOUG doug.pow...@aei.com
To: iun...@servomex.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: Transformer assessments
Ian,
We use
Group:
We are currently considering the purchase of a EMC-Partner TRA2000 Immunity
test system.
Are there any members of the group that are familiar with, or have used this
test system and would be willing to share there comments good or bad.
This system appears to provide full compliance
EN 61558-1:1997, Safety of power transformers, power supply units and
similar -- Part 1: General requirements and tests
Scope: Deals with all aspects of safety (such as electrical, thermal and
mechanical) of: a) Stationary or portable, single-phase or polyphase,
air-cooled (natural or forced)
I don't know what FCC require, but this is a general proposal for a test
report:
1. SCOPE OF WORK
2. TEST LABORATORY
3. TEST PERIOD
4. ATTENDING REPRESENTATIVES
5. EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST
5.1 Equipment submitted for tests (incl. EUT description, manufacturer,
serial number, SW and HW versions, etc)
Folks,
Is there a standard specifying that the potential ESD hazard Must Be
reduced to a level BELOW 200V ( or other max. voltage ) adjacent to any
location where a customer's Semiconductor Device Under Test might be
Handled or Contacted.
Your comments would be most appreciated.
Best Regards,
Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated ITE product
intended soley for business use; and due to its nature, it is highly
unlikely to be used by laymen outside that business environment (i.e., not
in the home). That product is not subject to the LVD, but it might be
subject
Ian,
We use IEC61558-1 and find it is acceptable for electrical equipment
apporved to most EN's. This standard replaces the old IEC60742. I haven't
checked to see if there is an equivalent European Norm.
Regards,
-doug
---
Douglas E. Powell, Compliance Engineer
Advanced Energy
From: T.Sato vef00...@nifty.ne.jp
# BTW, a good anti-virus solution is to stop using Microsoft Windows
# (at least Microsoft's mailers)! :-)
I suppress the preview pane for viewing the contents of my mail
and use only two panes, one for mail folders and the other for
the list of emails in
Do any members have any tips and guidance on the assessments that need to
be carried out on transfromers included in apparatus intended for the
following market areas: Europe (EN 61010, EN 50021Type n), North America
(FM and CSA), plus world-wide.
Many thanks
Ian Unwin
Servomex Group Limited
This has been my experience with Class II switching power supplies.
The absence of the earth connection will make very little difference in the
emissions.
But, without the earth connection the leakage current requirement is much
lower. (For ITE, 3.5mA is allowed for Class I, but only 0.25mA
Hi Desmond,
Conformity assessment in Australia is via declaration of conformity and
supporting compliance folder. There is no approval to be applied for. The
compliance folder should include a copy of the Part 15.247 report, among
other things.
The C-tick is required on this kind of WLAN
Bill didn't take over Art's responsibilities. He is currently working with
Art. Neither of them are the source for answers regarding Pt. 15, Pt. 18.
or Pt. 68 though.
For questions relating to Pt. 15 18 contact Ray La Forge rlafo...@fcc.gov
Question relating to Terminal Equipment Attachment
Try Raymond Laforge [rlafo...@fcc.gov].
Desmond A. Fraser
Rhein Tech Labs, Inc.
360 Herndon PKWY, Suite 1400
Herndon, VA 22070
Tel: 703-689-0368
Fax: 703-689-2056
mailto:desm...@rheintech.com
-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com]
Sent:
at the Message-Id: line further down.
I get
Message-Id: 20020424215907.d25ca22...@coer.zju.edu.cn
This one is little more difficult for some hackers to hide.
I suggest not to believe domain name (QFDN part) in Message-ID line.
It is very easy to hide - see Message-ID of this message.
Received
Hello Group:
We recently received a certification granted for a 2.4 GHZ portable wireless
LAN card. The device transmits between 2.4GHz and 2.472 GHz with maximum
EIRP levels of less than 15mW. This device was FCC approved under 15.247,
Specific absorption rate measurements were also
To all,
The recent threads on Country of Origin and Made in xxx brought up many
questions on this subject. So, I did some research. I appeared to get
some answers and also created some more questions. Hopefully, members of
the group can confirm or disagree with the items listed below.
1.
README.TXT
Description: Binary data
One more thing I forgot to mention, that may be useful. Pegasus (the
email program I use at home) has a very nice Selective Download
feature, that allows you to review what is on your server BEFORE
downloading it. Thus, you can screen and delete (at the source!!) all
suspicious messages or
(EDT)
From: jmw j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk
Now, take a look at the Message-Id: line further down.
I get
Message-Id: 20020424215907.d25ca22...@coer.zju.edu.cn
This one is little more difficult for some hackers to hide.
We can see there's some discrepancies in the domain name.
Notably
For what it's worth, an absolutely excellent virus purge program is
F-Prot, available from Frisk Software International at:
http://www.f-prot.com/f-prot/download/
The DOS version is FREE and supported with very frequent (almost weekly)
virus signature file updates. It runs just fine in a DOS
William Hurst took over these responsibilities.
To contact these people the FCC website has a contact us section were you
can access a phone directory and find the numbers you need.
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/findpeople.pl
Best Regards
Lothar Schmidt
Technical Manager EMC/Radio
BQB
CETECOM
No, Art has not retired. He will retire by the end of 2003 I think. He
recently moved his office back to the lab in Columbia. His email address is
unchanged.
BJ
-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:50
You can also search the existing rules interpretation database on the FCC
web site
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/index_ie.html
Under miscellaneous, click on rule interpretations.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Reginald Henry [mailto:rhe...@vicon-cctv.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April
Didn't Art Wall retired a year or so ago.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: am...@westin-emission.no [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: SV: FCC Contact
You can also make contact with Mr. Art Wall on
All of which makes one wonder why one would ever use IE as a mail
reader! Rather like using a wrench as a hammer; sure, it can be made to
work ...but why?
Personally, I use Outlook at work (only because I have to). But at home,
I use Pegasus which I feel is the best email program going, and it
Agreed -- I've received this virus about 50 times in the last few days, but
each time the system (local server) quarantines it..
Mike Hopkins
Thermo KeyTek
-Original Message-
From: Robert Wilson [mailto:robert_wil...@tirsys.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:47 AM
To:
I deleted the file email immediately, but our IS group is asking what the
file name was. Can anyone remember what it was, so I can pass it on to
them.
Thanks
Doug Beckwith
Naftali Shani nsh...@catena.com@majordomo.ieee.org on 04/24/2002 12:06:22
PM
Please respond to Naftali Shani
Some thoughts. Assuming that this was a virus, the warning could be helpful
to some. While I agree with Robert comments in part, in fact a lot of the
viruses that exploit weaknesses in Microsoft Outlook use the sender's
address book. So you WILL get viruses from people you know or correspond
Robert,
You do not have to open the attachment on this one at all if you have
IE! Just preview or open the message.
During virus outbreaks, like this one, I use a great webmail reader
mail2web.com to preview my mail before downloading it.
Doug
Robert Wilson wrote:
In spite of the attachment
Hi Chris and the Gang,
It was probably a particularly nasty one called W32/Klez.h@MM which I
have received through other channels several times lately. It is bad
enough that if you actually get infected (McAfee will prevent this if
your DAT files are reasonably new) you have to go into DOS and
Hi Chris, Bill, and all other subscribers:
A message with the subject:
A very nice game
was sent to the IEEE (emc-pstc) for posting by
our listserver.
The original message contained a virus known
as KLEZ.G.
The IEEE computer detected the virus.
This virus was stripped from the
Here is the number for OET EMC division, I've never found them to be much
help, but then again, I've never been much help either.
Electromagnetic Compatibility Division
Electromagnetic Compatibility Division 202-418-2475
Chief
Robert M. Bromery
Deputy Chief
For MRAs, contact Art Wall (located at D.C.) at (202)-418-2442.
For OET services, contact Richard Fabina at (301)-362-3021.
For EMC (eg. Pt15, etc.), contact Tom Phillips at (301) - 362 - 3044.
For Radio Approval (eg.Pt 101, etc.), contact Frank Coperich at 301-362-3023.
I have found they are
Bonjour de Montreal,
Just a few comment about BSMI, MRAs and testing.
The APEC TEL MRA was sign by the DGT in Taiwan, thus allowing foreign
testing lab to the EMC on telecom equipment only. The extension, in USA, of
this MRA to Information Technology Equipment was negotiated separately by
the
Just as a matter of curiosity, regarding the trailing boilerplate on
your message, what could possibly be accomplished by forwarding an
incorrectly delivered email back to the sender? The recipient will still
have the original message. Sounds like someone isn't too clear on the
concepts of
You can also make contact with Mr. Art Wall on e-mail: aw...@fcc.gov
He gave us some advice a year ago regarding FCC interpretation.
Amund
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av John Juhasz
Sendt: 24. april
If I'm not wrong, this is the KLEZ virus (Win32.Klez.I@mm).
Regards,
Naftali Shani, Catena Networks (www.catena.com)
307 Legget Drive, Kanata, Ontario, Canada K2K 3C8
613.599.6430/866.2CATENA (X.8277); C 295.7042; F 599.0445
E-mail: nsh...@catena.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris
In spite of the attachment having been removed by the system, it was
pretty darned obvious what this must have been. It always amazes me that
people are foolish (stupid?) enough to open attachments to obviously
suspicious emails like this one, that are from people they don't know,
and subjects
Try sending an email to oeti...@fcc.gov. I've received responses to
questions within 1 day.
Jim Hulbert
Pitney Bowes
rehel...@mmm.com
http://www.pseinc.com/faq.htm
Try this site !
RH
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:12 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: FCC Contact
Can anyone provide me with phone and/or name contacts for FCC rules
Bob,
You can go to the FCC.gov website and find the phone numbers and the
departments they work in. I would suggest Tom Phillips in OET, but I have been
known to dial randomly and get the answers I need. Although they sometimes seem
surprised and ask me where I got their particular
Was just at a hotel with the replacement circular fluorescent lamps
directly above (2 feet) the hotel provided radio (less cheesy than most).
Turning on the light completely destroyed the signal. AM and FM and all
channels. Turn it off and the radio was nice a clear. Wanted to steal
I may be out of date and I don't have a number at hand, but Art Wall comes
to mind. You can find all the appropriate personnel in the back of ITEM.
on 4/24/02 8:12 AM, rehel...@mmm.com at rehel...@mmm.com wrote:
Can anyone provide me with phone and/or name contacts for FCC rules
Bill,
Do we know which virus it was?
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Bill Ellingford [SMTP:bill.ellingf...@motion-media.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:37 PM
To: 'jmw'; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: A very nice game
Importance: High
URGENT
Please be
Contact the FCC's OET (Office of Engineering and Technology).
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/contact/
GE Interlogix
John A. Juhasz
Fiber Options Div.
Bohemia, NY
-Original Message-
From: rehel...@mmm.com [mailto:rehel...@mmm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:12 AM
To:
Can anyone provide me with phone and/or name contacts for FCC rules
interpretation (Parts 15, 18, and 68)?
Bob Heller
3M Product Safety, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel: 651- 778-6336
Fax: 651-778-6252
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society
Dear All,
Some fluorescent lamps (the bulb) are marked with CE and others are not.
What European Directives and standards should fluorescent lamps have to
comply with?
This e-mail message may contain privileged or confidential information. If
you are not the intended recipient, you may not
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
