A heads-up for those who use GnuTLS in their Exim: make sure that you
upgrade GnuTLS to deal with this security problem:
URL:http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0645
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-0645
Description: Tiny ASN.1 Library
On 2006-02-17 at 10:28 -, Edward Kay wrote:
relay_hosts is a hostlist defined as:
hostlist relay_hosts = lsearch;/etc/relayhosts : \
lsearch;/etc/relayhosts.omniquad : \
localhost
The two files /etc/relayhosts.omniquad and /etc/relayhosts contain lists of
IP addresses,
On 2006-02-16 at 13:08 +0200, Brent Clark wrote:
dspam_router:
no_verify
check_local_user
condition = ${if and { \
{!def:h_X-Spam-Flag:} \
{!def:h_X-FILTER-DSPAM:} \
{!eq {$received_protocol}{local}} \
{ = {$message_size}{512k}} \
}\
{1}{0}}
headers_add = X-FILTER-DSPAM: by
On 2006-02-16 at 14:33 -0800, John W. Baxter wrote:
I'm rather surprised that in all of Exim's years, no one has written and
contributed a set of SNMP agents (if that's the right SNMP jargon) to
provide this sort of information.
Someone posted details of their set-up a while back; I think
On 2006-02-15 at 11:49 -, Edward Kay wrote:
I want to stop any hosts that I don't explicitly allow from accessing my
SMTP server.
Move the problem out of the Exim configuration logic to keep things
simple. If there is no legitimate reason for any server to directly
contact your host (and
On 2006-02-17 at 14:00 -0500, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
I'm running the current stable version of Debian and the packaged
version of Exim 4. I'm switching from 3 and I have this problem with
lsearch that I just can't figure out.
It's a very simple scenario. I want to block hosts that are
On 2006-02-17 at 11:42 -0800, Doug Jolley wrote:
If I wanted to add a condition to an ACL
statement that would limit application of the
satement to local SMTP processes I would say:
hosts = :
What I'm trying to figure out is how I could do
that same sort of thing in a redirect
On 2006-02-18 at 18:29 -0700, Koa McCullough wrote:
We have a server that hosts multiple sites via IP aliasing so we
would also like Exim to serve the same site/IP pairs that apache does.
At this time I have very little control over the server itself so
setting this up with chroot is
On 2006-02-15 at 23:31 +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Let's take the following router definition:
and a little bit of time for me to notice the email amongst the
exim-users backlog ... sorry for the delay.
fido:
transport = ifmail
driver = manualroute
route_list = \
On 2006-02-23 at 13:42 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
smart_route:
driver = manualroute
domains = ! +local_domains
transport = remote_smtp
route_list = * serverabc
which works pretty good, but now i want one exception from this rule:
If From: of the Mail (not neccessarily the
On 2006-02-23 at 15:26 +0200, Ville Mattila wrote:
would like to create a configuration that accepts messages to this
router/transport only if
a) the SMTP user has authenticated (and if possible, only as a certain user)
b) the SMTP connection comes from a certain domain or domains
What
On 2006-02-24 at 08:18 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My config now looks like:
addresslist senders_to_xyz = [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smart_route_xyz:
condition = ${if match_address{${address:$h_from}}{+senders_to_xyz}
{yes}{no}}
driver = manualroute
transport =
On 2006-02-23 at 14:52 +, Dennis Davis wrote:
Anyone should feel free to shoot my ideas down in flames if they can
think of a better way of doing the following.
Not in flames; the Exim stuff is useful, I can't think of a way to do it
without modifying either Exim or Cyrus and your way
On 2006-02-24 at 11:41 +, Tony Finch wrote:
Doesn't Cyrus's sieve subaddress facility handle this already? We do
unauthenticated delivery to Cyrus over LMTP and have unofficial support
for +subaddresses, which get delivered to the user's inbox unless they
have written appropriate Sieve
On 2006-02-24 at 13:21 +, Tony Finch wrote:
You can do it as a general rule if you have a sufficiently studly sieve
implementation - it needs the variables extension.
Since draft-ietf-sieve-variables-08.txt only defines scalar variables,
you're not going to be able to validate the
On 2006-02-26 at 17:19 -0500, Jay Rouman wrote:
Is there a simple way to change a username for received mail only?
Block it in a RCPT ACL but still route it normally.
Aliases handle the externally visible value, you route it normally to
the real user, but the real user can't be directly sent to
On 2006-03-01 at 14:10 +0100, Stan Novogroudski wrote:
I'll have a list of mail adresses, which have to be redirected to
another smtp's
---
#File /etc/mail/exim/redirects
[EMAIL PROTECTED] another-smtp-ONE.my-domain.foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-02-28 at 11:51 -0300, Diego Angelini wrote:
Actually, we have restricted the message size that exim can
proccess by message_size_limit directive.
This value is advertised to the sender host in SMTP; you can change it
based upon where someone connects _from_ but not by recipient: it's
On 2006-03-01 at 15:12 +0100, Stan Novogroudski wrote:
Phil Pennock schrieb:
Untested, treat with caution:
smtp_redirect_local:
driver = manualroute
transport = remote_smtp
domains = +local_domains
condition = ${lookup [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED]/etc/mail/exim/redirects
On 2006-03-02 at 09:31 +0100, Luca Bertoncello wrote:
I think I have a problem with local_domains...
domainlist local_domains= mysql;select domainname from domain where
domainname is not null;
deny domains = +local_domains
condition= ${if eq
On 2006-03-02 at 10:59 -, Gareth Hastings wrote:
I am seeing loads and loads of these errors
2006-03-02 10:36:29 1FElAa-000327-00 == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message filter T=smtp defer (-44): retry time not reached for any host
Cached failure; look back to when they started; or remove the
On 2006-03-02 at 15:23 +0100, Felix Brack wrote:
I understand that exim gets the command AUTH LOGIN and then sends
the prompt Username: (VXNlcm5hbWU6 base64 encoded); this is fine
and exactly what exim should do. The next thing exim does is send the
message 501 Invalid base64 data. In between
On 2006-03-02 at 16:14 +0100, Felix Brack wrote:
debugging features, I normally preferre these. Just for clarity: there
is no debug option in exim that would enable showing things like
username and password entered on the remote client during the SMTP
session?
For this particular case: not
On 2006-03-02 at 20:39 +0100, Torben Janssen wrote:
system_aliases:
driver = redirect
allow_fail
allow_defer
domains = +local_domains
data = ${lookup{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/exim/aliases/$domain}}
file_transport = address_file
pipe_transport = address_pipe
but then every mail is
On 2006-03-03 at 10:12 -0800, Christian Gregoire wrote:
The problem is that when A gets a host error from B for some reason,
all messages destined to B are queued. And when retry time has come, A
sends all messages to B at once, whose load average rises, so leading
Sendmail to refuse
On 2006-03-03 at 14:44 -0800, Tracy Phillips wrote:
If someone has thier mail server setup to do sender verification, how
can I get my exim to verify aliases?
By making sure that all handled addresses, including aliases, are used
during verification.
For example, I have an alias setup for
On 2006-03-04 at 00:48 -0800, Christian Gregoire wrote:
Thanks a lot for the hints. I'll give it a try.
The Exim author's hint, lower the retry time, is even better for almost
all circumstances. I should've thought back to why we do things as we
do.
For us, our front-end hosts can also
On 2006-03-09 at 09:30 +0500, Viktor Vislobokov wrote:
Some spam hosts send MY IP address (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) in HELLO. See
following line:
2006-03-07 16:00:57 H=(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) [61.109.9.90]
F=[EMAIL PROTECTED] rejected RCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unknown user
How can I check HELLO and
On 2006-03-11 at 13:45 -0500, My BSD wrote:
I was actually not asking about Maildir names, rather, the names of the
message files that exim saves or writes in the cur subdirectory
of the Maildir.
Exim doesn't really touch the cur/ sub-directory[1].
Exim only delivers mails, which for Maildir
On 2006-03-11 at 22:45 -0600, Vincent wrote:
I have successfully configured it to have separate alias files for each
domain for virtual domains. I am using
data = ${lookup{$local_part} nwildlsearch{/etc/exim/virtual/$domain}}
Is there a way to configure exim so I can have something like
On 2006-03-12 at 19:10 +0100, Juergen Edner wrote:
based on a .forward file I try to save a message to a public folder.
Now I wonder why this message appears although the user 'test',
with uid '2006', has write access to the file and why the delivery
process insists on the same uid.
It's the
On 2006-03-13 at 15:04 +, Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 13/03/06, Thad Bryson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or $message_body contains cum
...
or $message_headers contains sex
Have a think for a moment, how many legitimate messages will this match?
Cumulative statistics for the county of Essex
On 2006-03-13 at 09:07 -0600, David Byte wrote:
ah I see the miscommunitcation.. Majordomo is submitting locally and via
port 25.. port 10025 is for the off box amavis process to submit mail
back in to..
I've not looked at majordomo in years, but I've just grabbed 1.94.5 and
the distribution
On 2006-03-14 at 16:54 -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
So ... why not tunnel SMTP through HTTP?
draft-ietf-lemonade-firewall-binding-00.txt
-Phil
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
On 2006-03-16 at 15:23 -0800, Doug Jolley wrote:
I'm trying to compile Exim 4.60 on an FC2 system.
I am upgrading an old 4.43 system and part of
the motivation is to take advantage of the
integrated Exiscan capabilities. However, I
think that is causing me a bit of a problem at
the moment.
On 2006-03-18 at 18:43 +0100, Jürgen Herz wrote:
The server is under almost no traffic, so the server isn't overloaded.
And the log also doesn't show connection attempts right before the error
lines start.
Have you explicitly turned on extra logging, to see connections and not
just rejected
Exim 4.60, most stuff going to smarthost but some stuff going out
directly to MX, based on existence of a flag-file for the domain. I
just added another flag-file for a friend's system and was surprised to
see TLS used.
Whether or not it's a good idea, I do actually disable the automatic use
of
On 2006-03-19 at 19:24 -0800, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
Hmm, gmail will send to them, so I guess they are doing only a IPv4 or
it's working with the v4 address and ignoring the ::1. Is there anything
I can do to get around it?
Use ignore_target_hosts on your dnslookup Router. Put :: in that
On 2006-03-20 at 09:26 -, Gareth Hastings wrote:
I am looking to increase the number of concurrent connections my server
can handle. Currently it's the default limit of 20. Is there any kind of
guide on how high I can set this? The machine it's running on it only a
P3 1Ghz. I don't want to
On 2006-03-20 at 11:34 +, Adam Funk wrote:
I'm fairly certain that for an option that takes a domain list, the
following the correct way to say this option applies if the domain is
in either of the two lists, and that I can use entries like
*.example.com lines as well as example.com in
On 2006-03-21 at 17:22 +0100, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Have I to set anything else to improve perf ?
Local DNS cache, or LDAP slave if using LDAP for lookups.
If doing many file lookups per recipient, consider building the data
into CDB files for faster lookups.
/var/log being a different
On 2006-03-21 at 21:53 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
From time to time, the procmail delivery transports fails because
procmail terminates with a sigsegv. Our problem is that this generates
a permanent error, and the original mail is lost.
How can we change such errors as temporary ones ?
On 2006-03-21 at 18:05 -0500, Hugo Osorio wrote:
also i know that i have to issue the command
#exim4 -bf /path/.forward
or -bF for to be real
i have tried it but nothing happens... as soon as put the command, it stays
forever, without giving to me the shell again..
You need to supply the
On 2006-03-22 at 15:02 +0100, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Does this looks good enough/reliable for you ?
The only serious problem is that any Perl going into production use
really should have warnings turned on. warnings + strict. And taint,
if dealing with untrusted data. This especially applies
On 2006-03-22 at 19:24 -0500, Hugo Osorio wrote:
is there any tutorial on this? the information in the official page is so
huge and too much theory... there is not much practical stuff
Absolutely. The book written by the author of Exim is a tutorial.
See:
http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
ISBN
On 2006-03-30 at 16:37 -0500, daniel wrote:
Internet - Firewall/NAT (dallaire) - Mail Server (brazilian)
The firewall has two IP's, the legal, external IP on eth0 and the reservered
192.168.0.1 on the internal interface. The mail server has only a reserved
IP (192.168.0.7).
Now here's
On 2006-03-27 at 15:50 -0700, Ehren Wilson wrote:
I am trying to use NTLM via Cyrus SASL 2.1.19 backed into Windows Server
2003. I have managed to get this working under cyrus imap by adding the
following line into the imapd.conf file
I would like to set the ntlm_server environmental
On 2006-04-04 at 18:25 +0200, Oliver Heesakkers wrote:
In the dev-mailinglist I found mention of such an error at the release
of the RC-1 for Exim-4.61. One solution offered was to add -lutil to
LIBS= in OS/Makefile-FreeBSD. This did not solve my problem.
-lutil should be correct.
Did you run
On 2006-04-26 at 16:11 +0100, John Clement wrote:
How do I go about tracing where his emails are going? At the last place
I worked if I typed 'exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]' it would check through
the aliases until it found where the mail actually gets delivered to,
here though it seems that
I was just checking back over something, and re-reading saw this anomaly
in my replies to you. Cc'ing the list for public humiliation and to
ensure the archives have this corrected.
On 2006-03-22 at 12:32 +0100, Phil Pennock wrote:
If the test message is in a file test-mail.msg, then:
# exim4
On 2006-04-25 at 18:35 +0200, Arjan wrote:
I want to run an bSMTP server for the domainname 'testdomain.com'. After
reading and trying i added this to the exim.conf:
[snip ACL and local delivery BSMTP router/transport]
That seems to work; mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is placed in the
On 2006-04-27 at 14:00 +0100, John Clement wrote:
Phil Pennock wrote:
How about if you specify exim -oMr spam-scanned -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Changing spam-scanned to whichever Received Protocol is actually used
to bypass the spamcheck Router in the configuration?
Does it seem
Please don't respond to this posting with discussion, I really don't
fancy reading an epic flame war over/after a holiday weekend (in NL).
This is purely an informative heads up so that people can silently go
read documents and digest the information. Please?
Four new RFCs have just been
I have a feature request for Exim for consideration, which might be
awkward to integrate.
On an Exim receive (=) line, the ability to log the value of a
specified environment variable.
Rationale: PHP webhosting, which on Unix uses sendmail for submission,
rather than talking SMTP, so the
On 2006-07-17 at 14:00 +1000, Marcus Barczak wrote:
I'm currently doing some performance tuning on a pretty heavily used
exim server we have here. We're running FreeBSD 6.1 and am noticing
the disk loading to be quite high. The filesystems are currently
configured as UFS however i'm
Perhaps I'm having one of my doh-days and I'm just missing something in
the docs.
Is there a way to attempt to verify a remote server's TLS certificate in
the smtp transport, without actually failing it? Something analogous to
tls_try_verify_hosts in the main configuration section for inbound
On 2007-08-12 at 13:17 +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
for mailboxes:
/var/mailboxes/$domain/$local_part/{new,cur,tmp}
for redirections:
/var/mailboxes/$domain/$local_part
(a regular file containing the redirections)
[...]
This setup would ensure that no user can have both a
On 2007-08-24 at 14:21 -0500, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
I'm trying to do a conditional file include so that I can roll out the
same exim configs to several hosts. I can't seem to get this to work:
.include /etc/exim/host/${primary_hostname}.conf
---
Starting exim:
On 2007-08-24 at 16:34 -0500, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
Thanks for your RTFM suggestion. Did that. Was hoping someone might
have an architecture recommendation on how I CAN do what I'm trying to
do ...
Sorry, wasn't clear from the post that you had. There are enough people
asking for what's
On 2007-08-29 at 15:28 -0500, D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
It would be nice if Exim included a means of executing queries without
forcing me to use what seems like a side-effect of the 'warn' feature.
I mean, technically it's not a warning, you know.
That would be the continue ACL modifier which
On 2007-09-07 at 22:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have this in ACL DATA:
warn set acl_m_sa = ${run {/etc/domeny/testme $message_exim_id
$acl_m_user} {$value} }
log_message = acl_m_user: $acl_m_user
warn continue = {true}
log_message = Testme result for
On 2007-09-10 at 07:11 +0200, Steen Eugen Poulsen wrote:
I have a mail server thats the front door and a semi hidden real mail
server for it to hand off the mail to.
So I want it to do
accept domains = +gateway_for_domains
endpass
message = unroutable address
verify = recipient
off
On 2007-09-10 at 13:53 +0200, Marcin Krol wrote:
Hmm.. Thanks for answer, that's plausible, I wonder how this dlfunc is
able to deliver the headers, however???
warn continue = ${dlfunc{/usr/sbin/exim-ext.so}{pipe_message}
{/etc/domeny/savestdin}}
It's a dl, its code is being loaded into
It appears that the effectiveness of filtering out known-bad HELO/EHLO
has dropped somewhat in the past few months:
http://people.spodhuis.org/phil.pennock/img/exim-reject.2007-09-19.png
http://people.spodhuis.org/phil.pennock/img/exim-reject.2007-09-19.ylog.png
Of course, this is in absolute
On 2007-09-21 at 00:01 +0200, Peter Thomassen wrote:
I have set up an additional router that determines the target mailbox by
looking up an alias file using lsearch*.
Unfortunately, the recipients that are being routed to a particular user
(root!) are finally also routed to peter, obviously
On 2007-09-21 at 09:56 +0200, Peter Thomassen wrote:
The output of `exim -bt postmaster` shows that Exim recursively tries to
lookup for an alias (have a look at the comments I put in) and finally
finds *:peter, regardless of the fact that root is a Linux user account and
not an alias:
Each
Hi,
Who will be PGP signing future Exim releases please? With which PGP
key?
(And is there a signature by Philip Hazel's key on the new key?)
Thanks,
-Phil
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki
On 2007-10-31 at 15:26 -0700, Yan Seiner wrote:
My policies are as follows:
1. Clients connecting on 25 unauthenticated can send email only to the
local domains.
2. Clients requesting relaying must connect encrypted and authenticate.
3. Clients requesting relaying unencrypted are
On 2007-11-02 at 13:57 -0400, Maykel Moya wrote:
I would like to know if my lookup are cached troughout the session if I
use the same query.
Now I'm doing some ${extract {attrName} {${lookup ldap ... so the lookup
could be exactly the same whenever I need something from LDAP, but if
the
On 2007-11-08 at 00:52 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
I'm having problems getting exim 4.63 to talk to Gmail. What I have done
is set up Exim4 on my Debian GNU/Linux laptop to use smtp.gmail.com as a
smarthost for sending email. This is to avoid narking off my ISP by
trying to send out mail
On 2007-11-11 at 00:58 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
hosts_require_tls = *.google.com
Yeah, the log file said something about that -- unfortunately I couldn't
find in the readme where that hosts_require_tls should be set and a
Fletcher classic find / grep combination of the exim-relevant
On 2007-11-13 at 12:44 -0800, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Which reminds me. There is probably no easy way to avoid a block on
incoming port 25 by an ISP. Except to have an MTA outside the block
which receives your email and sends it to your MTA configured to listen
on a different port?
If you
On 2007-11-12 at 22:06 +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
AND THAT NAILED IT! You were right in the very beginning. The issue was
the port -- I was getting a similarly unhelpful failure in the debug
output on ssl_connect() when I used port 25, but when I switched to port
587, bingo -- my mobile phone
On 2007-11-14 at 17:09 -0800, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
I used xs4all back in NL, they're good imo. Though I never tried if they
blocked port 25 I would assume they don't, they gave a free static IP.
*cough* I used to work for Demon NL until KPN bought it and told the
NOC staff that there were
On 2007-11-16 at 16:32 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
Am Freitag, den 16.11.2007, 16:15 +0100 schrieb Patrick von der Hagen:
Hi all,
I realised that lately messages arrive which cause unnessessary bounces
because they are accepted by exim and rejected by cyrus.
I should have
On 2007-11-22 at 15:25 +0300, Grigoriy S. Gusew wrote:
I`m having problem with exim-4.68 installed on FreeBSD system
I have Exim 4.68 running on FreeBSD 6.2 on one of my systems.
The problem is that exim creates a child process handling incoming
connection, I can input only following SMTP
On 2007-11-26 at 15:27 +, andylockran wrote:
I'm setting up a cluster of servers for the PCI DSS and I've only got one
vulnerability left - which is that SSL/TLS supports weak authentication in
exim. (I managed to set SSLv2 to disabled on exim with the following line:)
On 2007-12-05 at 15:28 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Getting error Too many arguments in command .. in ${run} expansion
Just wondering what the limitations are and how to fix it. Would
eliminating spaces reduce the number of arguments or is it the length of
the strings?
60 parameters.
On 2007-12-05 at 16:41 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I guess one thing I don't understand is why Exim is counting the
parameters and not just passing the string as is.
Because that's how security holes happen. What if one of those strings
contained `cmd` substitution? etc etc.
Exim breaks up to
On 2007-12-06 at 01:42 +1100, Ted Cooper wrote:
If I just use the exim -be command line and type in pretty much anything
over multiple lines it works ok so it's going to boil down to an issue
with shell escaping.
No, the shell leaves those backslashes in.
The problem is that the \\\n
On 2007-12-07 at 10:35 +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
cathlasphere:/etc/exim # cat exim.conf |grep log_file_path; exim -bV
log_file_path = /var/log/exim/%s.log
I cannot get Exim to stop logging to syslog? From what I understood in the
documentation, log_file_path specifies only files that exim
On 2007-12-09 at 12:40 +, Phil White wrote:
I'm trying to store the DECIMAL IP address of a connecting host in
$acl_c*. Do do this, I'm using the following:
set acl_c5= ${eval10: \
(${extract {1}{.}{$sender_host_address}}24) \
+
On 2007-12-09 at 13:56 +, Phil White wrote:
warn
message = X-Info: Return = \
${lookup mysql { SELECT value FROM system WHERE \
ip_addr=$acl_c5 } \ {$value}{0} \
}
Database that I am trying to access
On 2007-12-10 at 16:44 -0600, Craig Jackson wrote:
Often a ehlo is of the the form server23.mx23.domain.com. I would like
to record only domain.com from the ehlo into a database. This is what I
have,
And then you need to deal with UK (example.co.uk, etc, so an extra
level) or US
On 2007-12-10 at 20:33 -0600, Craig Jackson wrote:
I have written a Mysql stored procedure to whitelist $recipients, by
parsing that variable. It did not occur to me to use a stored procedure
for this -- looks a lot harder to do.
I'm not a MySQL user; PostgreSQL is my poison of choice when I
On 2007-12-12 at 03:14 -0500, Daniel Aquino wrote:
I'm looking for a simple way to do recipient checking against my own
external daemon.
I have come up with a few possible way to do this:
1) Get queryprogram to simply query a unix socket instead?
Problem) I doubt it supports
On 2007-12-12 at 19:23 -0500, Daniel Aquino wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 3:48 AM, Phil Pennock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use an accept Router with verify_only on it, with
${readsocket}. Untested:
verify_against_my_funky_daemon:
driver = accept
verify_only
domains
On 2007-12-12 at 21:03 -0500, Daniel Aquino wrote:
Thats cool that it works in real time I would think string expansion
would be a single event that hard wires a value into the config...
That's macros.
Take a look at spec.txt or one of the other format variants of The
Exim Specification (HTML,
On 2007-12-13 at 07:31 +0100, zbigniew szalbot wrote:
zbigniew szalbot pisze:
Thank you Peter - thinking about it, I must admit that at that time
the line must have been pretty choked (time to send some 2K emails
each about 70KB in size). This could have made it difficult to
properly
On 2007-12-13 at 22:20 -0600, Craig Jackson wrote:
But I still have a big problem. Even though this works fine
from the command line as root user, it doesn't do anything at
all when called from Exim. No record is updated. No errors.
Nothing. The Mysql user Exim uses does have Exec
On 2007-12-14 at 11:30 -0600, Craig Jackson wrote:
It wasn't permissions. It was a leading spaces issue that I couldn't see
in the log, but which closer scrutiny of binlog revealed. For some
reason Exim was passing data with leading spaces. Mysql trim() fuunction
fixed it. Whew.
Following up
On 2007-12-12 at 17:39 +0100, a a wrote:
condition = ${if or {{ {$acl_c1} {70} {${lookup {$sender_address} lsearch
{FILE} {0} {1 { {$spam_score_int} {70} {${lookup
{$sender_address_domain} lsearch {FILE} {0} {1}}
It's a conceptual problem; the braces balance but that doesn't matter
On 2007-12-14 at 10:08 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Which test produced log entries no IP address found for host ... during
SMTP connection from
$ fgrep -ir 'no IP address found for host' exim-4.68/
Look over the results.
-Phil, Fishing Instructor
--
## List details at
On 2007-12-18 at 13:41 -0500, Matthew Soccio wrote:
I am testing a new server, which has the same user and auth data as the
production server. I need a way to make sure that mail for my beta
testers stays on the beta server, while everything else goes over to the
production server. Since
[ changed Subject: since this is no longer helping the OP ]
On 2007-12-20 at 09:51 +, Ian Eiloart wrote:
Lots of the considerations below (privacy, for example) also apply in the
UK. You'd expect that, as we're both in the EU. However, none of the
considerations below prevent us from
On 2007-12-19 at 22:46 +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
I have two servers and two more secondary MX.
I want: avoid that the secondary mx accept email that in turn is sent to
the primary and then bounced.
So i would like to set a list of possible address that are accepted.
such list however is
On 2007-12-20 at 14:23 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Look for 'smtp_reserve_hosts'. With this, you can allow the backup MX to
connect to the master even when the master is already 4xx'ing other
hosts because of things like smtp_load_reserve.
Look up Single Point Of Failure.
The point of
On 2007-12-20 at 13:20 +0100, Marcin Krol wrote:
Is there any way to increase verbosity of debugging router condition? It's
not
enough in one complicated case I have - I need (incoming mail) router to skip
one (outgoing) address and can't get it to work:
Ye, this expression doesn't seem
On 2007-12-20 at 16:23 -0600, Matt wrote:
# Slow down fast senders; note the need to truncate $sender_rate
# at the decimal point.
warn ratelimit = 100 / 1h / per_rcpt / strict
delay = ${eval: ${sg{$sender_rate}{[.].*}{}} - $sender_rate_limit
}s
Is there a way I can get it to
On 2007-12-20 at 17:37 +, Terry Burton wrote:
Otherwise, is there a recommended way to obtain such values from a
shell script without having to hardcode the value or grep the Exim
config?
With well-defined data syntaxes and exiting after first match (anchored
to the start of the line) grep
1 - 100 of 1520 matches
Mail list logo
