nfsv4_server_enable=YES: link_elf: symbol svcpool_destroy undefined

2010-06-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I'm trying to start the experimental NFSv4 server in RELENG_8 w/o building it into the kernel, as nfsv4(4) suggests: ... or start mountd(8) and nfsd(8) with the ``-e'' option to force use of the experimental server. The nfsuserd(8) daemon must also be running. This will

Inconsistent checkout results for RELENG_7 at exact date

2009-06-04 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I'm trying to check out the FreeBSD source tree with the tag=RELENG_7 in the same state that it had at the exact date/time, e.g. 2009-05-04 18:00 UTC. So I'm using the following supfile: *default host=cvsup.ua.freebsd.org *default base=/root/sup/base *default delete use-rel-suffix

Re: pppd crashes, was: kde-freebsd] Question about KPPP on FreeBSD

2007-02-18 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: Not that it contradicts anything you said, but it's worth re-emphasizing that there is apparently no-one in the community interested in maintaining pppd on FreeBSD, which is how it got to the current sorry state. I agree that the absence of

Re: pppd crashes, was: kde-freebsd] Question about KPPP on FreeBSD

2007-02-18 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=109277 The problem looks like a lack of proper locking during the operations with clist (specifically, this causes multiple entry to cblock_alloc()). I'm ready to provide further debugging information

Re: [summary] Re: burncd 'blank' not terminating ?

2006-12-27 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Luigi Rizzo wrote: I suggest the following two fixes: 1. change burncd.c as below, so that if CDRIOCGETPROGRESS does not return anything good, it calls CDIOCRESET to determine when the command is complete. This can be improved by calling CDIOCRESET

Re: Duplicate IPFW rules

2006-12-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Vclav Haisman wrote: One example feature is to be able to delete many rules at once. If you know that a specific rule number holds rules (example: time based rules) then the script has less work to do. Now granted since sets where introduced this can be done via

Re: burncd 'blank' not terminating ?

2006-12-25 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Sergey N. Voronkov wrote: just noticed, after upgrading to 6.2RC1, that luigi# burncd -f /dev/acd0 -v blank blanking CD, please wait.. stays there forever. Eventually i gave up and ctrl-C and the application terminates, and i was able to write to

Re: burncd 'blank' not terminating ?

2006-12-25 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Scott Long wrote: P.S.: Don't use burncd. Use cdrecord! IMHO it isn't correct approach to avoid use of the tool _instead_ of fixing it. This way, all your tools will be broken one day ;) Sincerely, Dmitry Since this is a very old and well known issue, and it

Re: g_vfs_done() failures on 6.2-RC1

2006-12-14 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Jan Mikkelsen wrote: I mentioned that I have seen similar problems on machines with ataraid, like this: DOH! ata_alloc_composite failed! (x5) FAILURE - out of memory in ata_raid_init_request (x6) g_vfs_done():ar0s3f[WRITE(offset=113324673024, length=2048)]error =

Re: Browser plugin problems still exist in 6.2

2006-12-08 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote: It still seems to be necessary to patch rtld in order to get the Flash plugin to work (www/linux-flashplugin7) due to the '_dlsym' symbol not being found. I was able to use a smaller patch to do this, see attached (although this may not

Re: sshd. UseDNS no ignored?

2006-12-02 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Nov 29, did you not say: I'm still wondering why OpenSSH is _so_ inferior to SSH.COM's ssh2 (which is also open-source)?...? Yes, I did. And no, I didn't say anything about either licensing or OSI Open Source. David Adam then asked Is

Re: application hangs in STABLE from time to time

2006-12-02 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Ganbold wrote: this. Next time use the -o wchan argument to ps to find out what state the process is blocked in. Ok, Here it is: 573 ?? Is 0:00.02 /usr/sbin/inetd -wW -C 60 78721 ?? I 0:00.01 /usr/local/Radiator-3.15/hooks/PSA

Re: sshd. UseDNS no ignored?

2006-12-01 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: http://www.ssh.com/support/downloads/secureshellserver/non-commercial.html contains both download URLs and Non-commercial license agreement for SSH Secure Shell for Servers link. Right, and the license restriction to non-commercial use only

Re: sshd. UseDNS no ignored?

2006-12-01 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote: And I didn't say that it's the OSI Open Source. I wrote (which is also open-source), not even Open Source. So I didn't mean that you can just copypaste their sources into OpenSSH. [ ... ] I'd really prefer that people not claim a license is

Re: sshd. UseDNS no ignored?

2006-11-30 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, David Adam wrote: On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: I'm still wondering why OpenSSH is _so_ inferior to SSH.COM's ssh2 (which is also open-source)? Is it really open-source? I couldn't find any reference to source downloads or licensing terms

Re: sshd. UseDNS no ignored?

2006-11-29 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: I remember a discussion about this maybe a few years ago. I recall that it is basically impossible to stop ssh from looking up DNS addresses. The I'm still wondering why OpenSSH is _so_ inferior to SSH.COM's ssh2 (which is also

Re: 5 to 6

2006-10-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Andrew Reilly wrote: How would I be able to tell? tunefs -p lists ACLs and MAC [EMAIL PROTECTED] dumpfs /|head -1 magic 11954 (UFS1)timeThu Oct 26 17:53:53 2006 Yes, this is for RELENG_4 compatibility. multlabel and soft updates, but of those only

Re: out of memory in restore?

2006-10-25 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Yoshihiro Ota wrote: I think you have to extend your user space memory by adding the following to /boot/loader.conf. If 5.4-RELEASE doesn't support these options, adjust your kernel. kern.maxdsiz=2048m kern.maxssiz=1024m Well, the original poster didn't

Possible 40-pin cable misdetection [Re: partioning failed]

2006-10-23 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Carl Johan Gustavsson wrote: System information: Athlon XP 1700+ / 786 MB Asus A7V266 (bios v1.11) Maxtor 60 GB Has anyone any suggestions? Thanks, Freek I'd try a different cable for the drive. If that doesn't fix it the controller on the motherboard is

Re: 6.2-PRE /boot/loader

2006-10-18 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: sysctl: unknown oid 'net.inet6.ip6.auto_linklocal' due to missing inet6 support in my kernel. This looks like a stale entry in your /etc/sysctl.conf or /boot/loader.conf to me. Just remove it (the entry, not the file). No, it

Re: flash7/firefox plugin no longer registers

2006-10-16 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Duane Whitty wrote: Has anyone else lost their flash7 plugin in firefox on 6-STABLE? I use native seamonkey-1.0.5 + linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_6 + linux-flashplugin-7.0r68, and this toolchain worked for simple flash content under RELENG_6 as of 2006.10.09, and

Re: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon

2006-10-11 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: Though I admit RELENG_4 is getting dusty, it is not rusty. I believe it is still used in many places because of its stability and performance. For instance, according to Julian Elischer's posts, it seems he is still working on it. Is it

Re: gmirror warnings

2006-10-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Vivek Khera wrote: Over the weekend and today we got some curious error messages from gmirror providers: Oct 7 03:02:14 dtfe2 kernel: ad6: FAILURE - out of memory in start Oct 7 04:15:58 dtfe2 kernel: ad4: FAILURE - out of memory in start Should I be worried

Small single-user mode limits [Was: fsck_ufs: cannot alloc]

2006-10-07 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Server just crashed, rebooted and trying to do an fsck, reports the above ... Well, allocating 2Gb is a little too much. However I observe a related problem. Has anyone noticed that process limits within single-user shell are _way_ too

Re: kern/103841: [fdc] fdc(4) does not work (regression)

2006-10-05 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! The problem is clearly an I/O port resource misdetection: On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Eugene Grosbein wrote: 4.11-STABLE: fdc0: NEC 72065B or clone at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 ---^ OK. 6.2-PRERELEASE: fdc0: floppy

Re: Recommendations for a serial port card you can actually BUY?

2006-10-05 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Karl Denninger wrote: The problem that is nailing me particularly hard right now is the second one - I have embedded control systems that I speak to over a RS-232 interface (the devices are actually '485 on a common bus but talked to via a 232/485 converter) and it

Re: kern/103841: [fdc] fdc(4) does not work (regression)

2006-10-05 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Eugene Grosbein wrote: fdc0: floppy drive controller port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f0 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 ^ Bad (no 0x3f7, 0x3f0 gets listed twice). Recent revisions of fdc(4) do not use control register at port

Re: Loadable SMBus modules regression in 6-STABLE - 6-BETA

2006-09-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote: It still works here. Since you are using modules, make sure all your modules are in sync. Short of that, you can edit sys/dev/smbus/smb.c and add a Yes, they are (I've followed the standard OS upgrade procedure, including full recompile of

Re: Loadable SMBus modules regression in 6-STABLE - 6-BETA

2006-09-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote: smb_identify() called!!! BUS_ADD_CHILD() = 0x6 6? ENXIO? Why?! I've just found it and fixed it if you upgrade to the newest smbus.c. Thanks, the problem has indeed been fixed. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: [EMAIL

SMBus regression (Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/bktr bktr_i2c.c bktr_i2c.h src/sys/dev/ichsmb ichsmb.c...

2006-09-25 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote: jhb 2006-09-22 19:19:16 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_6) sys/dev/bktr bktr_i2c.c bktr_i2c.h sys/dev/ichsmb ichsmb.c sys/dev/iicbus iicsmb.c sys/dev/smbussmb.c

Loadable SMBus modules regression in 6-STABLE - 6-BETA

2006-09-24 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I've upgraded my 6-STABLE (as of 20-Aug) to the fresh (24-Sep) RELENG_6. The only modification of the kernel config file is the removal of the IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED option. Upgrade went successfully, but after booting into the multiuser mode I've found that /dev/smb0 became

Synchronous mount vs NFS exported

2006-09-23 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I've noticed a strange interdependency between FS mount options (RELENG_6 as of 20-Aug). I'm using rw,sync options in my /etc/fstab for the root partition. W/o NFS export of it, 'mount' output looks good: /dev/ad0s4a on / (ufs, local, synchronous) However, when I export this

Re: watchdogd_flags followed by panic watchdog timeout, after reboot my rc.conf disappear

2006-09-22 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Daniel Dvo??k wrote: I saved my rc.conf without any doubt. I believe you, really ;) Answear: Because rc.conf had 0 Bytes !!! -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6174 Sep 1 XX:XX rc.conf , I do not remember time of last modification of file. So the content of

Minidumps in -STABLE and smaller than physical memory

2006-09-21 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I've noticed (with the 2-day old RELENG_6) that I still can't configure my 256Mb swap partition as a dump device for i386 machine with 1Gb RAM despite having minidumps enabled: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sysctl debug.minidump debug.minidump: 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] dumpon -v /dev/ad0s3b

Re: NFS locking: lockf freezes (rpc.lockd problem?)

2006-08-28 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Sun, 2006-Aug-27 22:55:55 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On server, tcpdump -p -s 1500 -w file -i iface host client host ip Recent tcpdumps appear to want the ethernet frame size rather than the MTU: Specifying 1500 appears to truncate

Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade

2006-08-27 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Doug Barton wrote: I've tried to use sysutils/portconf, but found that it still doesn't give an universal solution: I think we need to be careful what our expectations of universal are with a ports tree as large, and a userbase as diverse, as what we have.

Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade

2006-08-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are sysutils/portconf does not have that limitation. If you specify flags using that method, they will always be used. True.

Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA?

2006-08-20 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Aug 19 15:11:20 track ntpd[456]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: ad6: FAILURE - device detached Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: subdisk6: detached Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: ad6: detached I think that's a

Re: gvinum / FreeBSD 6.1 / stale subdisks

2006-08-18 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Steve Peterson wrote: I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE on i386 with a stock kernel, and am trying to build a 4 disk RAID5 array using vinum. The issue is that, once the system is rebooted after initially creating the array, the subdisks come up as stale. 1

Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface

2006-08-16 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Darryl Yeoh wrote: While destroying gif interface, I notice it also removes IPv4 default route. Has anyone else encountered this ? Command: # netstat -rn -f inet Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlagsRefs Use Netif Expire

Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface

2006-08-16 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote: The question is: Do all the routes really need to be flushed upon the destruction of an interface? I've killed devd on my test machine (yesterday's RELENG_6) and done the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ifconfig vlan0 create [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Misleading fdisk: Geom not found in 6.1-RELEASE

2006-07-04 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I've noticed that using fdisk against ad2 drive gives misleading diagnostics at the end of execution (there are no mounted partitions at the drive, OS boot device is ad0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -r 6.1-RELEASE [EMAIL PROTECTED] mount|grep ad2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] fdisk -a ad2 ***

Re: FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ...

2006-06-27 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, M.Hirsch wrote: Yes, the result may be correct. If you're talking about single-bit error, you aren't quite correct. It isn't may be correct, it's _definitely_ correct (in mathematical sense; that it, correcting code proves that we have one and only one error in bit number

Re: FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ...

2006-06-27 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Paul Allen wrote: The very originating purpose of ECC was to keep the computer going in the face of an alpha particle strike. Alpha particles flip *single* bits. ECC was never intended to detect crummy, failing hardware: that's a use people have shoe-horned it into, but

ATAPICAM in RELENG_6 sometimes swaps drives

2006-06-27 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! My machine (running RELENG_6) has 2 ATAPI drives attached to the second channel of Intel ICH4 built-in ATA controller ata1 (NEC DVD-RW as a master and AOPEN CD-RW as a slave). Of course their ATAPI devices always show up in the fixed order: acd0: DVDR NEC DVD RW ND-3520A/1.04 at

Re: FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ...

2006-06-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Robert Watson wrote: I think this is a useful activity, especially if you've already run extensive memory testing on the box. If you haven't yet done that, I encourage you to take a break from buildworld's and make sure the memory tests pass. I spent several

Re: FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ...

2006-06-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, M.Hirsch wrote: ECC is a way to mask broken hardware. I rather have my hardware fail directly when it does first, so I can replace it _immediately_ You got it backwards. If your data has any value to you, then you don't want to miss any single-error bit in it, do

Re: FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ...

2006-06-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, M.Hirsch wrote: On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, M.Hirsch wrote: ECC is a way to mask broken hardware. I rather have my hardware fail directly when it does first, so I can replace it _immediately_ You got it backwards. If your data has any value to you, then you don't Nope, I am

Re: FreeBSD 6.x CVSUP today crashes with zero load ...

2006-06-26 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, M.Hirsch wrote: If you're using hardware w/o ECC, it just can't tell whether error present or absent. So ECC _is_ the way to detect (not mask) broken hardware. Ok, thanks. I think I understand the meaning of ECC now. So, unlike my supplier claims, ECC is not supposed to

Re: reading process memory

2006-06-08 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: I believe that it is possible to read contents of the memory used/utilized by a process (assuming right privileges). Yes, procfs allows it to user with the process's UID (or root). First i've tried to do this through procfs by reading

Re: HylaFAX port not work but related to sendmail

2006-06-01 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Vladimir Botka wrote: It is hard work to configure sendmail (O'Reilly wrote 1000 pages :). If there It is not if you're familiar with *.mc files. Cheers, -vlado Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nic-hdl:

Re: [patch, try 1] Re: Trouble with NFSd under 6.1-Stable, any ideas?

2006-05-31 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 25 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote: KASSERT(!(debug_mpsafenet == 1 mtx_owned(Giant)), (nfssvc_nfsd(): debug.mpsafenet=1 Giant)); from nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c, line 570. As I understand the problem, kern/vfs_lookup.c:lookup() could aquire

Re: 4.11 snapshots?

2006-05-17 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 16 May 2006, Colin Percival wrote: Personally, since FreeBSD 4.11 will reach its EoL about 8 months from now, and the 4.x-[56].x upgrade path is non-trivial, I recommend installing FreeBSD 6.1 instead. Well, have you seen my simple performance benchmarking RELENG_4 vs 6?

Re: 4.11 snapshots?

2006-05-17 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 17 May 2006, Dimitry Andric wrote: (INVARIANTS removed) RELENG_6 (and 5) _still_ uses = 50% of CPU time for (Intr+Sys), while RELENG_4 doesn't use more than 28% for them. Just as a test for RELENG_6, could you try setting kern.hz=100 in your loader.conf, and repeating your

Re: INVARIANTS (was Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression)

2006-05-16 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 13 May 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert code paths. It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-15 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 13 May 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote: Have you tried putting I586_CPU in there? See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020696.html. Thanks for suggestion. I've just tried it, performance difference is indistinguishable. Also, use the link0 option

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-13 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: %Sys %Intr %Idl RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15 RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20 %Sys %Intr %Idl time md5 -t wall clock time RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43 RELENG_6 + fxp0

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-13 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: So maybe it's time to add, say, options INVARIANTS_EXTENDED for these new and expensive checks, and leave only basic and cheap (yet effective for bug hunting) asserts enabled when only options INVARIANTS is defined? No, they are

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case. I've built another kernel, adding back makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin options QUOTA Results are almost the same as w/o these

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been significantly expanded to test a much larger set of invariants, and also incorporate kernel use-after-free checking,

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-04-28 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: Thanks for your suggestions, they've made a difference (though not as big as one could hope). On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:08:11PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin Non-default option; this may

RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-04-27 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I've done simple (yet, I hope, reality-reflecting) performance benchmarking different STABLE branches (4 vs 5 vs 6) using the following hardware: CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (334.09-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x665 Stepping = 5

Re: panic: softdep_move_dependencies: need merge code (driver mtp(4)?)

2006-04-18 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Scott Long wrote: Sorry, my answer to this is to move away from softupdates and towards journalling. I'm working on that, albeit slowly due to the many other NFS and VFS bugs that I have to deal with. Oops, what has happened to softupdates? They have been

Re: bruteforce

2006-04-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:58:48AM +0200, Matteo 'egon' Baldi wrote: Hy, I'm triing to find a solution to bruteforce attack, mostly on port 22, without moving services on different ports. try to use /usr/ports/security/sshit

Re: resolver doesn't see resolv.conf changes

2006-04-08 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: Good idea, but this defeates the hierarchical purpose of DNS. Now my caching DNS is always querying the root DNS servers. Sorry, but what kind of hierarchy does it defeat? If client's query can't be satisfied from provider's DNS cache, and

Re: resolver doesn't see resolv.conf changes

2006-04-08 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DP Sorry, but what kind of hierarchy does it defeat? If client's query DP can't be satisfied from provider's DNS cache, and doesn't refer to DP domain which is hosted on ISP, then provider's DNS server will make DP first query to root DNS

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Julian Elischer wrote: (2) The name space model for system v ipc is flat, so while it's desirable to allow the administrator in the host environment to monitor and control resource use in the jail (for example, delete allocated but unused segments),

Re: Temperature monitoring in FreeBSD 4/5/6

2006-03-16 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Stephan Koenig wrote: Does anyone know of an easy way to get temperature information out of a Dell PowerEdge 1550/1650/1750/1850/2650/2850 running FreeBSD4/5/6? Something that has a very simple CLI that just outputs the temperature without any formatting, or a

Re: swap at beginning of slice - danger?

2006-03-15 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Vadim Goncharov wrote: I have 5.5-PRERELEASE server in production, booting from ad0s1: # BLOCKSIZE=512 swapinfo Device 512-blocks UsedAvail Capacity /dev/ad0s1b209715252872 2044280 3% /dev/ad1s1b209715251952 2045200

Re: swap at beginning of slice - danger?

2006-03-15 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Oliver Fromme wrote: # bsdlabel ad0s1 | fgrep b: b: 20971520 swap Previously, on a 4.11 system, swapinfo said that swap size was less than size of b: partition on a slice - it was ok, as boot sectors are located at beginning of slice. But

Re: Recent 6.1-PRE: burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error

2006-03-15 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Scott Robbins wrote: fixating CD, please wait.. burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error localhost(6.1-P)[23] There was a fair amount of time -- around 15 - 20 seconds -- between the fixating CD, please wait.. message and the whine, during which there was

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-14 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I won't reply to the overcommit part of your letter, since my concern is rather local: I'm just not sure whether FreeBSD does it's best during the DoS-attack in swapless environment. On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Jon Dama wrote: Also, when the system is page-starved it kills the largest

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:04:55 -0500 From: Michael Proto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap I'm running FreeBSD in 64Mb with no swap and it works fine. A few sysctls that I've found helpful for running

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote: the largest RSS - it could e.g. be a vital part of the routing software (zebra/ripd/bgpd), and killing this process will render our router unreachable and unusable! Then, what should kernel do ? It kills the process because it _needs_ the

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: But AFAIK the kernel kills NOT the requesting process but the one with the largest RSS. This selection algorithm seems to be the dumbest one, since process with largest RSS almost always is the process which does some real work. This frees up

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Michael Proto wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ps axu |grep ssh root 20213 0.0 1.3 54724 3356 ?? Is4:00PM 0:00.10 sshd: dmitry [priv] dmitry 20216 0.0 1.3 54724 3356 ?? I 4:00PM 0:00.03

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Michael Proto wrote: My suggestion would then be to utilize resource limits in /etc/login.conf for the sshd user (in your example) or other user accounts for applications that you don't want running out of control. See login.conf(5) and login_cap(3) for more details

Re: page fault panices after upgrading 5.4-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE/6.1-PRERELEASE

2006-03-06 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Pavel Gubin wrote: I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only as dialup server. The problem was that this machine was very stable under 5.4-RELEASE, but after upgrading (via buildworld/installworld) to 6.0-RELEASE-p4 and then to

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-04 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: Once swap_pager_full is set (which it has been in your case), the kernel will kill processes if it thinks it's short of memory, defined as (the following are all sysctl names): vm.stats.vm.v_free_reserved + vm.stats.vm.v_cache_min

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-03 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Jeremy Bogan wrote: In other words, does RELENG_4 kernel work stable and robust w/o swap or should I provide a minimum-size swap device? Which configuration (1 or 2) will give more robustness in case of physical memory shortage? I've got 4.11 running on a Geode

Re: RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-03 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Sat, 4 Mar 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: 4.11-RELEASE) such as make buildwolrd. After successful completion of this procedure I issued rm -rf /usr/obj/usr and got the following (single) message from kernel: Mar 3 11:05:32 test3 /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed Does anybody

RELENG_4 on flash disk and swap

2006-03-02 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! Suppose I have machine with 256Mb of RAM and 256Mb flash ATA disk-on-module. What configuration (using RELENG_4) should I select: 1. No swap at all. 2. /dev/md0 (default 10Mb) added as a swap device. In other words, does RELENG_4 kernel work stable and robust w/o swap or should I

Re: i386/87208 : /dev/cuad[0/1] bad file descriptor error during

2005-11-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I'm CCing this follow-up to freebsd-stable because this problem can prevent use of RELENG_6 machines in production (mgetty is quite usual example of such a use). This bug is a regression vs. RELENG_5/4. My analysis shows that it isn't only dup() problem. File descriptor 0 get somehow

Re: vmstat regression (RELENG_4 - RELENG_5)

2004-11-18 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Paul Mather wrote: kernel devstat(9) subsystem only sees my ad0. Under 4.10-RELEASE, sysctl kern.devstat.numdevs gives 3, but under 5.3-RELEASE only 1. How can I enable disk statistics gathering for disks other than HDD in 5.3-RELEASE? The gstat(8) command will display

vmstat regression (RELENG_4 - RELENG_5)

2004-11-17 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! While playing with fresh installation of 5.3-RELEASE (GENERIC kernel) I've noticed that I can only see my HDD in the left lower corner of the systat's vmstat screen. I also have working floppy and CD-RW drives, both are detected and work, but I can't see data transfer stats for them. In

SiI0680 ATA RAID question

2004-11-17 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! In 5.3-RELEASE ERRATA I see the following: (1 Nov 2004) ATA RAID support for the CMD649 and SiI0680 ATA controllers is non-functional in this release. When such a controller is brough up under ata(4) (ataraid) on 5.3, the RAID configuration stored under 5.2 or prior may be

Problem with FTP install of 4.10 (Was: Problems with 4.10 and mysql)

2004-06-01 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 12:26:21 +0200 From: Jaco van Tonder [EMAIL PROTECTED] report, but ever since upgrading to 4.10 from 4.9 I am having several problems with mysql. These manifest as programs occasionally failing to connect to the database. Unfortunately I have been

Re: Problems with 4.10 and mysql

2004-05-27 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Wed, 26 May 2004, Pete French wrote: Which version of MySQL server are you using? Has it been built from port or compiled from sources? What threading library does it use (native or linuxthreads)? How many client applications are trying to connect simultaneously? 4.0.18 -

Re: next release

2004-02-13 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:15:51 -0800, Dave Tweten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Now you see why I recommend that people wait for a month after a release to update and to do it to STABLE, not release. I agree wholeheartedly. I'm surprised your truth was accepted as

Re: -STABLE Frozen for 4.7

2002-09-09 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: If you are experiencing any problems with -STABLE then by all means speak up now! Please, MFC fix for bin/40177 before 4.7-RELEASE, I think memory leak in /bin/sh is a quite serious problem. Please also fix bin/41841 (telnet -s doesn't

Please fix bin/40177 before 4.7 code freeze

2002-08-19 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! Please MFC fix (rev. 1.49 src/bin/test/test.c in -current) for the memory leak in /bin/sh (I'm really curious why such a little but annoying bug still hasn't fixed in -STABLE)! Sincerely, Dmitry Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE To