FYI, here is the current list of addresses which can send to the
announce list. I've obfuscated the email addresses somewhat in an
attempt to foil spammers and other forgers. If anyone knows of
someone who should be on this list but isn't, or shouldn't be but is,
or had additional addresses they
On 9/26/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been tweaking on the calendars again, trying to get something a
bit more attractive:
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/OldWebHome
Looks good. I've tweaked it a bit more. Mainly, I dropped the grid
for last month. The page is
Hey all,
I want to move all the content currently in the GNHLUG TWiki web
Organizational to the Www web. A repeated issue has been that
people don't find the Organizational web; I hope to make it easier to
find this way. This separate web has also created one of those
artificial
On 9/29/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the new Twiki have captcha support?
From what I've found with Google, it appears not, although it has
been requested.
The next TWiki release, codenamed Dakar, is supposed to have email
verification, which I suspect would be all a
On 10/3/05, Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 30, 2005, at 9:37 PM, mike ledoux wrote:
Any others I should add to the list?
The Debian Net Installer?
FYI, I'm going to be bringing ISO images of the latest:
- CentOS (RHEL clone)
- Slackware
- Debian Stable
Definitely i386,
On 10/11/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Point of protocol: should we plan on NOT holding regular chapter
meetings that month?
My current, personal opinions:
1. I like the idea of holding occasional state-wide meetings for
exceptionally valuable speakers/presentations.
1. a. I like
On 10/11/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, that doesn't tell us very much. The viewauth URL
you are requesting is *supposed* to request authentication.
When you get the default page, it includes:
@import url(%USERLAYOUTURL%);
@import
On 10/11/05, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I can't reproduce the problem with any of my browsers).
On 10/11/05, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I modified the template file, so it should no longer attempt
authentication unless explicitly requested.
I can confirm that the HTML
On 10/11/05, Greg Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to everyone who has been working hard on the website.
(Me guesses Ben, Bruce, but probably even more)
Mostly Bruce Dawson. While I've done some content editing and
occasionally some trouble analysis, Bruce has been putting in a lot of
On 10/12/05, Kevin D. Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyways, can somebody please just send an email to the list detailing
what the issue is? All I've gotten so far is a vague notion of
bylaws.
I will attempt to summarize the discussion so far. I will try to be
objective, but in the
On 10/12/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was no effort to hide anything. On the contrary.
Again: I am not accusing anyone of hiding anything.
Now, I can only speak for myself, but I don't recall any
announcements regarding incorporation or adoption of bylaws at
recent Nashua
On 10/13/05, T. Warfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the wiki page states directions would be emailed - any chance I can get
directions?
I expect the host will reply privately when they see your message.
I'd like to RSVP (please ;))
I believe you just did. :) You should add your name to
On 10/14/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2005, at 18:27, Ben Scott wrote:
[1] http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/save/Www/AutumnalSummit2005
I get errors here.
Whoops! That's my fault! I must have cut-and-pasted the URL just
after editing the page, and didn't notice
On 10/14/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am currently campaigning to get consensus on moving all our
original content into the Main web. See the recent thread on -org
list with subject starting Website: Merge TWiki web
If that's the only way to get full-site searching to
On 10/14/05, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any volunteers to adapt the existing skin to a GNHLUG
skin (If we have our own skin, then we don't have to worry about it
being clobbered by the next set of changes to the base software).
Ah. That's something we didn't have
On 10/14/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that GNHLUG activities and news and organizational information can
all co-exist in one space.
Not only do I think they can, I think they should. As you pointed
out, ontology is overrated.
Additionally, I find the line between stuff
this in meatspace and netspace.
-- Ben Scott
Plan to throw one out. You will, anyway. -- Fred Brooks
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
On 10/18/05, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| It's not under copyright - you can't copyright pure data, like
| telephone numbers or contact information.
Its probably under a compilation copyright though.
Indeed. This is why, for example, Linux distribution vendors can
prohibit
Hey all,
BACKGROUND
Currently, the GNHLUG websites and mailing lists (and some of the
local LUG stuff) are generously hosted on servers owned and operated
by Bruce Dawson's company, Codemeta. These servers also host
services for paying customers, so we have to be fairly careful to not
screw
On 10/18/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Call for volunteers on -discuss
That's what I'm leaning towards. If almost nobody is interested,
that bypasses a lot of discussion. :) But I want to see what the
rest of the cabal here think before I post to -discuss.
2. Start a
On 10/18/05, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I'd like to get the server up and operational before
announcing it, but that's just how I feel. (There's no credibility gap
for some monkey wrench to weasel into.)
See my reply to Bill M for why I prefer some advanced planning.
On 10/25/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be reasonable to this group to propose a joint meeting? We
get a central and spacious location and the other groups get their
schedule filled.
Well, as always, I speak only for myself, but:
I think that's a *great* idea. Having a
*BLORF!* (The sound a large mail hairball makes when it finally
gets delivered.)
On 10/25/05, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lets start with this, and if the moderators revolt, then we can become
more of a bloody viking. (We do still have moderators don't we -
they've been omniously
On 10/25/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Main/PublicEditorsGroup
The restriction mentioned on that page is no longer in effect, right?
It appears Bruce re-enabled that feature, restricting use to a
whitelist, rather than trying to maintain an
On 11/4/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lloyd pointed out that some readers (including Firefox) don't respect
the MIME types and require certain DOS-style file extensions to
'recognize' RSS feeds (ick).
Ick is right! E. Who thought that up?
So, updated configuration, with
On 11/14/05, Jeff Kinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know if anyone made changes to the way non-member submissions
to the gnhlug-org list are being handled?
Nope. I've been logging in semi-regularly and dealing with messages
manually; could that be causing you grief? I know
On 29 Nov 2005 03:17:28 -, Bloglines Bounce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There has been an error processing your email. ...
... The email was originally sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
This message just came in to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] alias. I've flagged the
subscriber
[NOTE: I am replying to gnhlug-org not gnhlug-discuss , at least for
now. I don't want to presume on Bill or Lloyd Kvam.]
On 12/2/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The DLSLUG library:
http://dlslug.org/library.html
Cool!
Could we make this work like ILL (Inter-Library Loan)
[added CC to -org]
On 12/12/05, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should at least get this installed at MV before they forget
they offered us the space (or before their capacity becomes filled).
I haven't forgotten about this, I've just been busy with all the
usual year-end
On 12/11/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darn. Rik van Riel ... will not be able to make the previously
announced January quarterly meeting.
Damn is right.
Where are we with this? Tue 24 Jan is fast approaching. Last I
heard, Ken or Ted were discussing contacting Michael
I think Ed intended to send this here. Regardless, I'm copying it
here for those who are sub'ed to this list and not -discuss.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ed Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 20, 2005 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: The next big event?
To: Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 12/28/05, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Looks kinda suspicious to me. yahoo.com.cn? Long way from New
Hampshire...
Yah, I noticed that, too. But that user's webpage contains no links
to any off-site stuff, nor have they done any other edits. Most of
the spam attacks
On 1/4/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please go ahead!
Message sent and approved (mailman queues).
It's not too late to attempt to post to media sites if you have the time:
Submitted to:
- NHPR - http://www.nhpr.org/calendar/
- http://www.nhevents.com/
- Concord Monitor -
On 1/4/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to CC BLU too.
I sent a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but as I'm not a listmember there,
I dunno what will happen to it.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
On 1/4/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/4/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to CC BLU too.
I sent a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but as I'm not a listmember there,
I dunno what will happen to it.
My message was rejected. If someone here is sub'ed
On 5 Jan 2006 00:18:06 -0500, David Marston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm inclined to forward the message to their Executive Director, unless
someone
speaks up and says that they have already done so.
I'd say go ahead and forward it now. Lead time tends to be
important. I doubt anyone else
On 1/12/06, guy Pardoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was out of state for a couple days this week and I got back yesterday and
sent an announcement to the mailing list for our monthly MonadLUG meeting
scheduled for tonight. I realized a short while ago that the announcement
from yesterday never
On 1/13/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming, of course, folks from the group would be interested in
manning a booth. I'll be glad to work one day...
I'll be glad to help, if I can (don't know my schedule yet). If
GNHLUG doesn't have the resources / whatever to do it on our own,
Hi everybody! --- Impression of Dr. Nick from The Simpsons
Okay, so I've been hidously guilty of dragging my feet on the whole
New Internet server thing. Actualy, it's more like I've encased my
feet in concrete. I'm guilty. I'm trying to remedy that.
I've just put some info on the GNHLUG
On 2/8/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List created.
Thanks!
Ben: Please call me at [deleted] so I can give you the list
password.
Mailman mailed me the the list info and admin password when the list
was created.
One of the servers is being replaced - software and hardware -
I'm cross-posting this to gnhlug-org and gnhlug-sysadmin, since
-sysadmin hasn't had a chance to get people subscribed to it yet.
On 2/8/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really would like to get the new server operational (with the old
stuff) before I swap out hive.
Fair enough.
On 2/10/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got a client request yesterday to replace a DOS-based system they
used to have.
You sent this to gnhlug-org. I suspect gnhlug-discuss is much more
appropriate, if not what you actually intended. :)
-- Ben
Hey Ken,
(1) You have too many email addresses. ;-)
(2) According to the website, there is a Nashua meeting this Thursday
about something called WebJob, but I haven't seen any other mention
(announcement, etc.). Is this still on?
-- Ben
___
On 3/28/06, David J Berube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can do tuesday morning, if desired
Thanks! We can use all the help we can get!
- where do I sign up?
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/LWExpo2006BoothSignUpSheet
-- Ben
On 3/29/06, Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently it's convention-hall practice to charge extra for power.
That's a fairly standard practice in the convention industry, from
what I understand.
I suspect it isn't worth it for us. As Bill M points out, it isn't
like there will be a
On 3/29/06, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there are some online places that will run off a couple
thousand for ~$30 or so. We have some artwork on the wiki.
Or I could buy some business card stock and run them off on the
company laser printer. ;-)
How do folks feel about
On 3/29/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been digging around in storage here trying to find previously printed
handouts. Handouts are ~ 3 cents each ...
Hmmm, good point, they're typically cheaper than business cards,
per-unit. I can run off these instead, if you can't find any.
On 4/2/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, its been several weeks, and I'm ready to declare the new server a
success.
So far, so good! :)
Perhaps the discuss list would like to know the
web site is now running on GNHLUG's very own server using donated
equipment and services?
On 4/11/06, Jon maddog Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately I have miscalculated and I will be out in Portland, Oregon
visiting my god-children and performing a wedding ceremony for two friends
of mine.
Unfortunately? Sounds pretty fortunate to me. :-)
I will therefore need a
On 4/16/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd heard that the GNHLUG server had some downtime and wanted to
check to see if we were back online yet.
I'm replying, for much the same reasons. (More of a follow-up check.)
Please ignore.
Ditto.
P.S. Happy Easter, Passover, Astarte or
On 4/18/06, Ed Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not in response to the merits of what Ben has suggested, but only
to point out that one often under appreciated and misunderstood
feature of a democracy is that the majority rules.
Indeed, and not just
On 4/18/06, Jon maddog Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to Ben's input ...
I think that general guidelines of We believe in Free and Open Source
Software and its use is a pretty general idea and leaves lots of room
open for advocacy.
General ideas tend to get bogged down when the details
On 4/19/06, Jon maddog Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is for that reason I believe Ben's thought of more than one organization
has some merit
I hate to split it up into two organizations. It is hard enough to get
people's
time and energy for *ONE* organization.
While I am advocating
Hi peoples,
If I read me calendar right (it happens on occasion), DLSLUG and
SLUG have regular meetings coming up. DLSLUG on Thr 4 May, and SLUG
on Mon 8 May. Does either group have a topic/speaker in mind yet? If
so, and you let me know what it is, I can put out announcements and
update Ye
On 5/2/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting changes to the web front page, extracting the Recent and
Upcoming Events onto their own pages.
Is this case, are you using interesting to mean Ye Gods, why in
the name of Cthulhu did you do *THAT*?, or just to mean
interesting? :-)
On 5/2/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, it seems okay to me. It's a bit confusing to me that the
Edit link on the bottom of the page doesn't let you edit the
events.
Yah, that's the major drawback. I tried to make it as obvious as
possible, as you noticed.
I like the idea
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/UsenixBooth2006
What's our status on this? Do we have the booth?
I assume this will be another Stand there and tell people about the
LUG thing, like LinuxWorld?
I put my name in for Friday and Saturday, but it's tentative at this point.
On 5/2/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Organizational/UsenixBooth2006
Do I need to do anything to register or whatever?
I've taken my name off the list, because I have yet to receive any
instruction on how to register, where to go, what to do
Hi peoples,
Is Nashua having a meeting next week? Thr 15 Jun 2006 would be the
third Thursday of the month, if I read my calendar right. (Which I
often do not, I admit.)
Please respond with what you know, even if it's I don't know yet
or I don't have all the details right now. It's more
The address [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been unsubscribed from the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
Reason: Auto-responder subscribed to a public mailing list.
Example auto-response message follows below.
On 6/8/06, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will be out of the office starting
[replying to list only]
On 6/22/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if all four dates work for you, I'd appreciate hearing
whether or not you would be interested in attending (in general,
we'll confirm closer to the date)
Okay. I'd be interested in attending. All four dates work
and against
the rules unless they deal with Linux.
Thank you.
-- Ben Scott, GNHLUG List Janitor
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
On 8/13/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted: Thanks for writing that up; those of us out in the hinterlands find
your effort and this information priceless.
And those of us who were there, do, too! Not only is my memory not
perfect, I believe a permanent record of our proceedings
Apparently, David Berube has been forced to curtail his involvement
in GNHLUG due to health reasons. This is unfortunately; David is an
enthusiastic and intelligent person who was really into driving
GNHLUG forward. I offer my best wishes for his recovery, and hope he
can someday rejoin the NH
On 8/14/06, Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think because wikis (and mailing lists) LOVE never-ending discussions
about how the law works ...
... as do face-to-face meetings, as I believe our meeting this past
Saturday demonstrated. We burned an hour (plus or minus) speculating
about
On 8/14/06, Ed Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... I don't know why there is a discussion of GNHLUG, LLC ...
The only time I've seen mention of GNHLUG LLC is in Bill Sconce's
post. I suspect this is Bill's error.
I find this matter very tiresome and assume that someone will
simply go file
I tossed out an idea at the meeting which, if not well-received, was
at least not immediately tossed back. For the benefit of those who
weren't there:
I propose incorporating our non-profit under a name other than
GNHLUG. For the sake of discussion, let's call this organization NH
Linux
Hi everybody! (Hi Dr. Nick!)
I note that the Nashua group is supposed to have a meeting this
Thursday. Where'd that come from? :)
I know the Nashua group is in a bit of a transition right now, so
perhaps there's no topic scheduled yet, or maybe I just missed the
announcement.
Anyone know
On 8/15/06, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel that incorporating GNHLUG without their
consent would be something of a betrayal. At the same time, obtaining
their consent would be an administrative nightmare.
Devil's advocate: At this point they have no inalienable right to the
On 8/15/06, Jon maddog Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to see GNHLUG evolve, and not have it the WEENIES go off to
form
a (possibly) competing group.
Well, my intention, at least, is certainly not for duplication of
effort or competition, just stewardship. Indeed, in practice, I
Hi list,
Last night, at the SLUG meeting, I asked Rob Anderson if he would
have me as his alternate for SLUG (UNH/Durham). He agreed. So feel
free to bug me about things like meetings and planning for SLUG now,
too. :)
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/SLUG
-- Ben
On 8/16/06, Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every time the topic gets brought up, there are always some people
that say Why incorporate?.
Doesn't it make anyone a little uneasy that one of them happens to be
the only person we have on this list who can say IAAL?
Eh? Are you
On 8/16/06, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#2 - Delegation for gnhlug.org has to be changed before this offer is of
any use. :) C'mon - like you folks have anything else to do? *grin*
I thought I did that last week?! Is something not working?
Sorry, while it's in the NS records
On 8/16/06, Python [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think WHOIS actually comes into it, other than the fact that
WHOIS is supposed to reflect DNS... :)
whois works against the root servers. Your domain registrar is
responsible for feeding the correct authoritative name servers into the
root
Hi folks,
I see that Software Freedom Day will be at the Hopkinton Library
from 10 AM to 2PM on 16 Sep, and it will also be at the Nashua
Library, but possibly not at the same time.
Can someone who knows more about what we're planning let me in on
it? If I get sufficient info, I'll create a
Adding the -org list, since this transcends technical stuff.
On 8/20/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It expires on 10 Sept. Do we want to move it to a different registrar?
Almost certainly.
If we do want to move it, who to?
FWIW, I've used DomainMonger for the past few years
On 8/23/06, Cole Tuininga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other news, what do was want to set for contact information for the
domain? There are 4 contacts to set: admin, billing, technical, and
owner. It probably makes sense to have me as admin and billing, what do
y'all want to do about technical
On 8/23/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't remember seeing any place in NS to transfer a domain outside of NS
I don't recall there being one, but it's been years since I had to
use their system, so that could have changed. I seem to recall having
to jump through all sorts of
On 9/8/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't believe he'd pass up on an opportunity to hang out at the
fairgrounds and sleep on the dusty earth, but, oh, well.
Wet. Wet, muddy earth.
We've got about a month to figure out what we need to get together.
Geez. Is it that close
This came in to the gnhlug-discuss list. I think we should charge
Network World money for access to the exclusive GNHLUG site ;-)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chrystie Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 12, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Co-Branding Opportunity with LinuxWorld
To:
On 9/12/06, Jim Kuzdrall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to add the announcement for MerriLUG for Heather, but I
was waiting for more information from the speaker to get an informative
and enticing title.
I'm of the opinion that it's better to get something up now and
refine it
Hi everybody,
Like Pavlov's dog, all you have to do is say Hosstraders and I
start packing up my stuff. This fall, Hosstraders is Fri 6 Oct and
Sat 7 Oct, and I plan to be there both days.
As usual, I will bring my portable CD factory, copy of the Internet
on hard disk, and stack of CD
On 9/17/06, mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also as usual, I will be there with at least 3 CD burners, one of
which can burn DVDs ...
That's great. And appreciated.
Maybe I will pick up a spindle of DVD-R's, if we're going to have
that many DVD recorders available. It will prolly
On 9/17/06, mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I will pick up a spindle of DVD-R's, if we're going to have
that many DVD recorders available. It will prolly depend on what
prices I see.
I can bring the remains of a couple spindles that I have on-hand.
How many discs do you think
On 9/17/06, Jon maddog Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While we may be capable of making DVDs, some of the equipment that our
Hosstraders customers have might only have CD readers on them.
Yah, I've got plenty of CDs, too. :)
___
gnhlug-org mailing
As far as the distributions go, I plan on bringing the following.
Except where noted, these include all binary discs (both CD and DVD
formats, where available) and all machine architectures.
- Fedora Core 5
- CentOS 4.4
- SuSE 10.1
- Debian 3.1r3 - As many architectures and discs as I can
On 9/17/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Fedora Core 5
- CentOS 4.4
- SuSE 10.1
- Debian 3.1r3 - As many architectures and discs as I can download
- Slackware 10.2 - Discs 1 and 2
- Knoppix 5.0.1
- Damn Small Linux 3.0.1
- The Open CD 3.1
- Trixbox 1.2 (supersedes [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/18/06, Python [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 22:24 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
http://www.puppyos.com/
I'll add it to the list.
Hmmm, from the Puppy OS blog:
I will be uploading a fixed v2.10 iso file about 22nd september.
if you have an earlier iso file or one from
On 9/18/06, Heather Brodeur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt and I are planning on being there with another carload of um..
great stuff that we just can't bear to part with. Yeah that's it.
Have you gotten the car's shocks replaced since the last time you did that?
I also have a stack of
On 9/18/06, mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many discs do you think that will be, roughly?
I'll check when I get home, but I think I've got a couple of 50 disc
spindles part used, and a couple not opened.
Okay, then. If you're comfortable with bringing those, I won't buy
a DVD
Hi Rob,
On 9/14/06, Robert E. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe I have next months announcement ready for a final proof. Maybe I
can break the curse this month!
Where are we with this?
If it helps, I have my standard meeting template below, filled in
with text stolen wholesale
account. George is part of the
CentraLUGGroup Chapter, according to the email sent to this account.
The web site account in question has been deleted.
-- Ben Scott
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman
For those of you keeping score at home (or have just been talking to Ted)...
My ETA at today's Hosstraders is between 11:00 and 11:30 AM.
See you there!
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
On 10/13/06, Jon maddog Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course I do not know all the people in the Peterborough chapter, and it is
possible
that this guy just went out and incorporated it to save the name while the
rest of
the group wondered what to do next.
Given that is pretty much
On 10/13/06, Home [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might this have happened when Jerry Kubeck was active? I think this is
after that, but a thought.
Oct 2000 would have been around the time Jerry was active. We did
actually sign some paperwork, but the story was it was never
submitted. But these
. Several Peters,
but none with the last name Wells.
Try doing the same thing with Ben Scott or Lembree.
Hey now, don't get Rob in trouble too. ;-)
This is a hoax, and I think all the names on the report are bogus.
It certainly seems that way. But then one has to wonder: Why?
-- Ben
On 10/17/06, Rob Lembree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations everyone. We've been incorporated since 2000.
The articles were signed by Robert Lembree, Ed Lawson, Jerry Kubeck,
and Jeffry Smith. Familiar names, no?
Thanks for checking on that. Oct 4? It appears we just missed an
On 10/17/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So that will probably be at least $500 (probably more with penalties)
out of someone's pockets.
Maybe we can bill it to Peter Wells? ;-)
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
On 10/19/06, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While it's always good to see new members join the wiki, it appears
that AlexBroot is just a bot that joins wikis, according to Google.
Could someone with admin rights send Alex off to the HallOfShame?
I'll take care of it if nobody else does.
On 10/19/06, Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done.
Thanks, Bruce.
___
gnhlug-org mailing list
gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org/
1 - 100 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
