Amazing POV :-)
I'm a complete atheist and still share much of you POV because Brazil
is largely (and my family is) Catholic (so I have some idea of what
these people IMHO-stupid people think. Unfortunately, I don't know
why, intelligent + phylosophical + logicist atheist...)
And I almost ROFL
On Fri, 19 May 2006 21:01:03 +0200
Marien van Westen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe at design time transparency and flat are disabled.
Please run the program under Delphi.
At run-time the speedbuttons have the same behaviour.
I show some screenshots. Note that when transparacy is true
Micha Nelissen napisa(a):
On Fri, 19 May 2006 21:01:03 +0200
"Marien van Westen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe at design time transparency and flat are disabled.
Please run the program under Delphi.
At run-time the speedbuttons have the same behaviour.
I
On Sat, 20 May 2006 10:37:01 +0200
DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transparency work both,
with flat=true button has border only when mouse is over
with transparency=true don't fill inner area
That contradicts Marien's picture
'speedbuttons-panel-delphi-runtime.png' (the first one).
Micha
On 5/20/06, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 May 2006 10:37:01 +0200DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Transparency work both, with flat=true buttonhas border only when mouse is over
with transparency=true don't fill inner areaThat contradicts Marien's
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't know
why, intelligent + phylosophical + logicist atheist...)
Because believing in one and only one CREATOR is intelligent + philosophical
+ logical. see http://www.islam-guide.com for more information.
On 5/19/06, m2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
With a smart/cosmetic name change the same goes probably like this:
9 years ago, FPC changed it's name after being 1 1/2 known to the
internet and it was a lot of work and caused a lot of confusion.
Client What language do you use to implement our system.
Devlpr OpenRAD. It allows me to
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
With a smart/cosmetic name change the same goes probably like this:
9 years ago, FPC changed it's name after being 1 1/2 known to the
internet and it was a lot of work and caused a lot of confusion.
FPC is straight forward, like gcc. No need to change it.
Client
Al Boldi wrote:
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't know
why, intelligent + phylosophical + logicist atheist...)
Because believing in one and only one CREATOR is intelligent + philosophical
+ logical. see http://www.islam-guide.com for more information.
On 5/19/06,
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
With a smart/cosmetic name change the same goes probably like this:
9 years ago, FPC changed it's name after being 1 1/2 known to the
internet and it was a lot of work and caused a lot of confusion.
FPC is straight forward, like gcc. No need to change it.
I fear you
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:37 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Feel free to create OpenRAD based on FPC, gcc and lazarus ;)
Lazarus isn't a language, it's a RAD. And a good one too!
But it would be sad to see this effort being expended towards one language
only.
Lazarus is too good, not to be
Al Boldi a écrit :
Flávio Etrusco wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't know
why, intelligent + phylosophical + logicist atheist...)
Because believing in one and only one CREATOR is intelligent + philosophical
+ logical.
This is overall very restful. The idea of god allows to explain
everything
On 5/20/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That programmers in other languages don't succeed in writing their own
RAD, doesn't mean that we have to provide them with one, imho.
But if someone else want to do that... be my guest. I'm not gonna do it.
But then, people who like
Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very intensive
and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
With recent incuding of Stetic, It is easy to forseen that MonoDevelop will
soon become visual RAD tool
Micha Nelissen napisa(a):
On Sat, 20 May 2006 10:37:01 +0200
DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transparency work both,
with flat=true button has border only when mouse is over
with transparency=true don't fill inner area
That contradicts Marien's picture
On Sat, 20 May 2006 14:54:40 +0200
DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transparency work both,
with flat=true button has border only when mouse is over
with transparency=true don't fill inner area
That contradicts Marien's picture
'speedbuttons-panel-delphi-runtime.png' (the first one).
On 5/20/06, DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micha Nelissen napisał(a):
On Sat, 20 May 2006 10:37:01 +0200DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transparency work both,with flat=true button has border only when mouse is overwith transparency=true don't fill inner area
That
Micha Nelissen napisa(a):
On Sat, 20 May 2006 14:54:40 +0200
DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transparency work both,
with flat=true button has border only when mouse is over
with transparency=true don't fill inner area
That contradicts
Marien van Westen napisał(a):
On 5/20/06, DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micha Nelissen napisał(a):
On Sat, 20 May 2006 10:37:01 +0200
DarekM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transparency work both,
with flat=true button has border only when mouse is
2006/5/20, Zlatko Matić [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very intensive
and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
With recent incuding of Stetic, It is easy to forseen that
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
2006/5/20, Zlatko Matić [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very
intensive
and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
With recent incuding of Stetic, It
I'm a complete atheist and still share much of you POV because Brazil
is largely (and my family is) Catholic (so I have some idea of what
these people IMHO-stupid people think. Unfortunately, I don't know
why, intelligent + phylosophical + logicist atheist...)
Belief is a wise wager.
On Saturday 20 May 2006 05:46, Zlatko Matić wrote:
Activities around making free open-source alternative to MS .NET (Mono,
dotGNU) and Visual Studio .NET (MonoDevelop,SharpDevelop) are very
intensive and rapidly aproaches to the final goal.
With recent incuding of Stetic, It is easy to forseen
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:37 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Feel free to create OpenRAD based on FPC, gcc and lazarus ;)
Lazarus isn't a language, it's a RAD. And a good one too!
But it would be sad to see this effort being expended towards one language
only.
Lazarus is too good, not
L505 a écrit :
I'm a complete atheist and still share much of you POV because Brazil
is largely (and my family is) Catholic (so I have some idea of what
these people IMHO-stupid people think. Unfortunately, I don't know
why, intelligent + phylosophical + logicist atheist...)
Belief is a wise
m2 wrote:
Certainly not. Not seeing something where there is nothing and where
it is not necessary that there is something is not a belief, it is
a knowledge. I don't not to believe that there is a Rammstein CD in
orbit around Pluto, I do know there is none (but don't ask me to prove
it, I
On 5/20/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That programmers in other languages don't succeed in writing their own
RAD, doesn't mean that we have to provide them with one, imho.
But if someone else want to do that... be my guest. I'm not gonna do it.
But then, people
Being atheist means you beleive that he does not exist.
Certainly not. Not seeing something where there is nothing and where
it is not necessary that there is something is not a belief, it is
a knowledge. I don't not to believe that there is a Rammstein CD in
orbit around Pluto, I do know
I come with a different point of view to Lazarus. I want to build projects
that first feed my family and second please my sense of right.
All of us who think this way should start a group/joint endeavor together
because I am
voting for the same thing, and I'm sick of all the folks out there
On Sat, 20 May 2006 12:31:02 -0600
L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Being atheist means you beleive that he does not exist.
Certainly not. Not seeing something where there is nothing and where
it is not necessary that there is something is not a belief, it is
a knowledge. I don't not to
On Sat, 20 May 2006, L505 wrote:
I come with a different point of view to Lazarus. I want to build projects
that first feed my family and second please my sense of right.
All of us who think this way should start a group/joint endeavor together
because I am
voting for the same
A.J. Venter napsal(a):
I'm trying to extend my tsimple_html component so it can read from a
tstringlist property instead of a URL (which in many [at least of my]
programs could severely reduce overhead).
So I basically just added a tstringlist property exactly as I have always done
it before
Any chance somebody knows what I am doing wrong here ? (code attached)
A.J.
Maybe changing type of FLines and Lines property from TStringList to
TStrings would help.
tombo
It was the first thing I tried :S
A.J.
--
there's nothing as inspirational for a hacker as a cat obscuring a
On 5/20/06, Lord Satan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So everybody wanting to talk about religion please stop spamming this mailing
list and talk somewhere else.
the irony of this request coming from lord satan himself is not to be missed ...
;)
Tony
--
X-SA user ? 0.5.1 is out !
XData 0.1 for
I can't see anything wrong either... Guess we'll need a callstack...
Out of curiosity, if you comment out the body of the SetHtmlStrings
method is the AV still raised?
-Flávio
On 5/20/06, A.J. Venter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance somebody knows what I am doing wrong here ? (code
Hello,
Belief is a wise wager. Granted that faith cannot be proved, what harm will
come to you
if you gamble on its truth and it proves false? If you gain, you gain
all; if you lose,
you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation, that He exists.
-- Blaise Pascal
There is another
Florian Klaempfl a écrit :
m2 wrote:
Certainly not. Not seeing something where there is nothing and where
it is not necessary that there is something is not a belief, it is
a knowledge. I don't not to believe that there is a Rammstein CD in
orbit around Pluto, I do know there is none (but don't
Thanks for enlightening us. But this whole discussion has really nothing to
do with
lazarus/fpc/programming in any sense.
I brought in a quote from Blaise Pascal for the basis of my posts. And you
should
familiarize yourself with Blaise Pascal as some of his quotes are very related
to
Upon your arrival for the final judgement you find yourself standing
in front of Ra, the egiptian god. And he is pretty pissed that you
were worshiping a false god. =) Wouldn´t that be funny??
Another quote from Blaise explains the answer to this..
I think Blaise says that no religions are
39 matches
Mail list logo
