/proc/dasd/devices

2003-06-06 Thread Jason J. Herne
Can anyone refresh my memory? What do I echo to /proc/dasd/devices to get the kernel to find a new DASD pack? Thanks. - Jason Herne ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: /proc/dasd/devices

2003-06-06 Thread Guillaume Morin
Can anyone refresh my memory? What do I echo to /proc/dasd/devices to get the kernel to find a new DASD pack? Thanks. Yes, just echo add range=xxx-yyy /proc/dasd/devices. -- Guillaume Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Poughkeepsie SAK Kernel Development

Re: /proc/dasd/devices

2003-06-06 Thread Michael MacIsaac
I can never remember either, that's why I like the script, dasd, that's in the Large Scale Deployment redbook: #!/bin/sh # dasd - simple utility for dynamic DASD management if [ $1 = add -a $2 != ]; then echo add range=$2 /proc/dasd/devices elif [ $1 = on -a $2 != ]; then

Re: Error from SYSLOGD

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:39, you wrote: I have recently upgraded my kernel to 2.4.9-38 with the OCO code for the qdio support. Do I also need to upgrade syslogd and other products? I wouldn't go further than applying any official updates: your vendor thinks it should work. I don't think you're

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread Post, Mark K
Daniel, You're welcome, but did it help you to the point you're working now? Mark Post -Original Message- From: Daniel Jarboe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend Thank you

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread Joe Poole
Another reference is SC24-5923, Security Server LDAP Server Administration and Use. All 3 are handy to keep open when trying to figure it out. What one doesn't explain properly, the others do. On Thursday 05 June 2003 11:36, you wrote: Daniel, You're welcome, but did it help you to the

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread Post, Mark K
Joe, You had to know I was going to ask this... :) Do have a pointer to an online version of this? Mark Post -Original Message- From: Joe Poole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread Joe Poole
Go to... http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/public/applications/publications/cgibin/pbi.cgi?CTY=US Click 'search for publications' type 'sc24-5923' in the publication number, and hit Go. The actual link is much too long to paste here without wrapping. On Thursday 05 June 2003 12:02, you wrote:

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread Post, Mark K
Hmm. After all is said and done (and clicked upon), it looks like this is the pot of gold: http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/glda2a21.pdf And a mere 500 pages, too. ;) Thanks for the directions! Mark Post -Original Message- From: Joe Poole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread James Melin
Actually the link is shorter than the link you just posted :) http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/glda2a21.pdf |-+ | | Joe Poole| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | om | | |

moving db2 data

2003-06-06 Thread Noll, Ralph
has anyone moved db2 data from vse to Linux db2?? i have gotten the export to work.. it exports a db2 table to a pc hard disk in ixf format i assume the import will work the same.. what i am needing is the ddl (data def lang) for the table define. i don't want to have to define all my tables

Re: moving db2 data

2003-06-06 Thread Flavien Viollet
Hi, I don't know if the db2 for VM have the external command db2look. The -e generate the DDL of the object. Have a look in the Command Reference. Flavien Noll, Ralph a icrit : has anyone moved db2 data from vse to Linux db2?? i have gotten the export to work.. it exports a db2 table to

DIAG discipline driver/patch for Redhat 7.2

2003-06-06 Thread Charles Kiser
Anyone have a reference as to if and where it is available, to implement VDISK swapping. Thanks, Charles Kiser Qwest Communications begin:vcard n:Kiser;Charles tel;pager:303-852-0433 tel;work:720-540-2002 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.qwest.com org:;QWEST Information Technologies -OI adr:;;5325

GCC Developer's Summit Proceedings

2003-06-06 Thread David Bond
I found this link to the GCC Developer's Summit Proceedings on the GCC web site. The proceedings include an article on Porting GCC to the IBM S/390 platform by Hartmut Penner and Ulrich Weigand which may be of interest to some people on this forum. The summit conference page is

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread Joe Poole
Here's one that works for me. It asks if a userid is connected to a certain RACF group. LDAPSRCH -v -h MVSHOST1 -p 3389 - -D racfid=LDAPBIND,profileType=user,sysplex=BOSCOVS_RACF - -w BINDER - -b profiletype=connect,sysplex=BOSCOVS_RACF - ((racfuserid=tsouser)(racfgroupid=DIALGRP)) On

Re: DIAG discipline driver/patch for Redhat 7.2

2003-06-06 Thread David Holt
Try this link: http://linuxvm.org/Info/HOWTOs/vdiskswp.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/05/03 02:06PM Anyone have a reference as to if and where it is available, to implement VDISK swapping. Thanks, Charles Kiser Qwest Communications

Support for SuSE SLES 8

2003-06-06 Thread Loren Charnley, Jr.
I am looking for additional support for a SuSE SLES 8 distribution. I would like a defect and how to support that I can connect to via phone. If anyone out there has this type support or knows a source of this type of support, could you contact me of list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] TIA, Loren

Re: DIAG discipline driver/patch for Redhat 7.2

2003-06-06 Thread Post, Mark K
Except that is now somewhat out of date, based on what we know now. What you should do now is download this: http://www.sinenomine.net/downloads/SWAPGEN.EXEC Then, make sure your Linux/390 system either does not have FBA support at all, or that it gets loaded _after_ the dasd_diag_mod module so

un- subscribe

2003-06-06 Thread Craig Moody
please un-subscribe me from the list Craig Moody Linux Architect US Linux National Practice Springfield Il 217-793-5880 T/L 747-5880 Mobile Office 217-698-3341 Cellular Phone 217-341-5151 Internet ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ANNOUNCEMENT: Java SDK 1.4.1 is available

2003-06-06 Thread Jim Elliott
The Java SDK v1.4.1 from IBM has been released on all platforms and some are now available for download from developerworks. New Linux platforms supported with this release are 64 bit versions for iSeries, pSeries and zSeries. NOTE that not all the pages on developerworks have yet been updated to

Re: un- subscribe

2003-06-06 Thread Gregg C Levine
Hello from Gregg C Levine Typically following these instructions, except substituting this list for the one on it: -- For IBMTCP-L subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the

Re: pam_ldap to LDAP server on z/OS with RACF backend

2003-06-06 Thread Post, Mark K
Well, there are some other things you might try. In ldap.conf: do you have pam_password clear did you specify binddn did you specify bindpw - this can alternately be put in /etc/ldap.secret with permissions of 600 Mark Post -Original Message- From: Daniel Jarboe [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: SLES8 dasdfmt problem

2003-06-06 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I believe that we have the Ramac Dasd Subsystem model 23 with the B23 drawers. I still rather refuse to believe that it is a problem with the controllers. If you can vary them online, CP can use them so I don't see why Linux would have a problem. Friday, I will take a look at my linux(s) and see

Re: Support for SuSE SLES 8

2003-06-06 Thread Tom Duerbusch
SuSE use to have a full support option. It was called Premier support. They have farmed it out to SuSE Business Partners. Go to the SuSE.DE web page and give them a call. They will give you a Business partner in your area. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting Loren Charnley, Jr. wrote: I am looking

Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
Microsoft Corp chief executive, Steve Ballmer warned his staff in an e-mail on Thursday that cheap Linux-based software is a growing threat to the software titan. http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_273556,0003.htm Peter Webb Technical Support Analyst Toronto Transit Commission IMPORTANT:

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Gwe, 2003-06-06 at 16:36, Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission wrote: Microsoft Corp chief executive, Steve Ballmer warned his staff in an e-mail on Thursday that cheap Linux-based software is a growing threat to the software titan. http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_273556,0003.htm

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Fargusson.Alan
You may have a suspicious mind, but that does not change the fact that the timing is suspicious. Kind of like the old saying: Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean there not out to get you. -Original Message- From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Wolfe, Gordon W
How many more shares did he sell short? Great Minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people. - Admiral Hyman Rickover Gordon Wolfe, Ph.D. (425)856-5940 VM Enterprise Servers, The Boeing Company -- From: Alan Cox Reply To: Linux on 390

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Post, Mark K
The quote that struck me the most was this: IBM's endorsement of Linux has added credibility and an illusion of support and accountability, Ballmer said. My first reaction was _illusion_ of support and accountability? That sounds more like Microsoft to me. Mark Post -Original

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Dave . B . KEETON
Does that mean that folks in this group are just an illusion? I've seen a lot of support come out of this group in the short time I've been lurking. :-) -Original Message- From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 01:43, you wrote: -- From: KEETON Dave B Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:43:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat Auto forwarded by a Rule Does that mean that folks in this group are just an illusion?

More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread Lionel Dyck
This is a worthwhile read http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030605.html Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead Kaiser Permanente Information Technology 25 N. Via Monte Ave Walnut Creek, Ca 94598 Phone: (925) 926-5332

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Steven A. Adams
Linux's weakness, however, was the lack of a central body investing in its development in areas such as engineering, manageability, compatibility and security, Ballmer said. Someone should explain to Mr. Balmer that this weakness is kicking his butt. Especially considering that with all of the

Re: More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread Ken Dreger
Very interesting. Ken At 12:49 PM 6/6/2003 -0700, you wrote: This is a worthwhile read http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030605.html Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead Kaiser Permanente Information

strange sendmail problem

2003-06-06 Thread Michael Lambert
We've been experiencing a strange problem that is baffling our mail and network gurus. Our listserv server is hosted on a linux/390 RH 7.2 image. Aside from some hiccups when the server was first built, listserv has just worked. Recently, however, I moved the listserv image from the RH 2.4.9-38

Re: More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread Steven A. Adams
This is most interesting. Here's a rather funny question that's been kicking around in my pointy head for a couple of weeks: If SCO doesn't own the rights to Unix, as Novell claims, than what was it that Microsoft purchased from SCO? On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 13:15, Ken Dreger wrote: Very

Re: More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission
A proxy in the war against Linux. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Adams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: More on SCO and Linux This is most interesting. Here's a rather funny question that's been kicking

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Rod Furey
Does that mean that folks in this group are just an illusion? Of course it does - didn't you know that all the answers here are generated automatically by a pipe written by Rob, fed over a network link from Alan via an interface written by Neil? Whew, talk about sleeping through the alarm clock. I

Re: More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread Steven A. Adams
I understand that this was the intent but from the looks of it they ended up with beach-front property in Idaho. On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 14:15, Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission wrote: A proxy in the war against Linux. -Original Message- From: Steven A. Adams [SMTP:[EMAIL

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: Rod Furey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat snip To be honest, most of the Windows people that I've had to deal with don't know anything about alternatives and

SCO owns Unix

2003-06-06 Thread Lionel Dyck
New claims by SCO claim they *do* own Unix http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,81887,00.html?nas=PM-81887 Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead Kaiser Permanente Information Technology 25 N. Via

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Just Microslop talking in terms they are familar withthe illusion of support. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06 4:19 PM Does that mean that folks in this group are just an illusion?

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Steven A. Adams
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 14:19, Rod Furey wrote: Does that mean that folks in this group are just an illusion? Of course it does - didn't you know that all the answers here are generated automatically by a pipe written by Rob, fed over a network link from Alan via an interface written by Neil?

Re: SCO owns Unix

2003-06-06 Thread Steven A. Adams
It appears that there is still no evidence to back this claim up. On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 14:36, Lionel Dyck wrote: New claims by SCO claim they *do* own Unix http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,81887,00.html?nas=PM-81887

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 04:17, you wrote: Someone should explain to Mr. Balmer that this weakness is kicking his butt. Especially considering that with all of the money that Microsoft has to invest they still can't seem to produce a manageable, or secure, product. Whew, talk about sleeping through

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Steven A. Adams
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:43, John Summerfield wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 04:17, you wrote: Someone should explain to Mr. Balmer that this weakness is kicking his butt. Especially considering that with all of the money that Microsoft has to invest they still can't seem to produce a

Re: More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 03:49, you wrote: This is a worthwhile read http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030605.html With salt. ... the only version of Linux that includes any IBM authorship claim is for the S/390 mainframes. What about JFS, the IBM OMNI driver project (alright, not kernel),

Re: More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 03:49, you wrote: This is a worthwhile read http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/31086.html -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ Join the Linux Support by Small Businesses list at

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 05:19, you wrote: That's not the point. It's the sheer blindness of people where Windows is concerned that's the problem - quite frankly, I don't think I dropped in to see some people I worked with in a bank. There, I was writing PL/1 code, using an IBM PC running Windows

Re: strange sendmail problem

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 04:42, you wrote: In the course of testing, we found that some RH 9 boxes that we have also refuse to take any mail from the server. A quick glance at the logs and sniff of the traffic shows that the connection is rejected before any mail negotiation takes place, as if the

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread John Summerfield
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 07:02, you wrote: John, It really wasn't intended to be quite so serious. But since you mention it, I am not convinced that they do understand. I'm sure that we have all seen the interviews with x-MS'ers that speak to the fact that they may well be this disconnected. Of

Re: strange sendmail problem

2003-06-06 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 03:42:57PM -0500, Michael Lambert wrote: We've been experiencing a strange problem that is baffling our mail and network gurus. Our listserv server is hosted on a linux/390 RH 7.2 image. Aside from some hiccups when the server was first built, listserv has just worked.

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Steven A. Adams
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 17:12, John Summerfield wrote: On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 07:02, you wrote: John, It really wasn't intended to be quite so serious. But since you mention it, I am not convinced that they do understand. I'm sure that we have all seen the interviews with x-MS'ers that speak to

Re: More on SCO and Linux

2003-06-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Sad, 2003-06-07 at 00:54, John Summerfield wrote: What about JFS, the IBM OMNI driver project (alright, not kernel), Thinkpad other drivers, rs6000, pci hotplug - I've picked a few addresses out of the 2.4 kernel's MAINTAINERS list. Almost certainly there are IBMers involved who are not

Re: Microsoft: Linux is a threat

2003-06-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Gwe, 2003-06-06 at 22:25, McKown, John wrote: I agree. One of our LAN people made a router change which interrupted about 200 CICS users (TCP connected). They entered a problem ticket on it. His question: What's the big deal? It was less than a minute and they're all back working now. This

Re: strange sendmail problem

2003-06-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Gwe, 2003-06-06 at 21:42, Michael Lambert wrote: We immediately began seeing undelivered mail to a few specific sites pile up in the mqueue. Most of the listserv traffic was being delivered but a few sites returned connection refused or connection timed out. These sites, incidentally, also

Re: pgp vs gpg

2003-06-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:33:25AM -0500, Tom Duerbusch wrote: My impression is that gpg is basically the same as pgp with the exception that gpg is fully in the public domain. GnuPG is not in the public domain, it is copyrighted by the Free Software Foundation and licensed under the GPL.

Linux and Mainframes, Part 1: Odd Couple or Perfect Match?

2003-06-06 Thread Ferguson, Neale
See: http://linuxtoday.com/it_management/2003060600326NWHESV; At first glance, Linux and the IBM mainframe are an odd couple. The teenage operating system and senior citizen computer are worlds apart in their origins and pricing philosophies, among other things. Yet they do make a good team,