Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 09/06/2016 à 04:03, Richard Heck a écrit : On 06/08/2016 03:57 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 07/06/2016 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit : Our use of git would make it very easy for us to have a branch in which new features not requiring format changes could also be put.

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 15/06/2016 00:51, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:20:32PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: As for lyx2lyx, I gave one example of a commit which explicitly said that it would not be made round-trip, and another example where it had to be fixed afterwards because a special

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:20:32PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > As for lyx2lyx, I gave one example of a commit which explicitly said > that it would not be made round-trip, and another example where it had > to be fixed afterwards because a special case was not taken into > accountn because it

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 08/06/2016 22:36, Liviu Andronic a écrit : On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 08/06/2016 20:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Here's what I suggest. Let's do, on a trial basis for the duration of 2.3dev, a branch that mirrors master

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/08/2016 03:57 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> Le 07/06/2016 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit : >>> Our use of git would make it very easy for us to have a branch in which >>> new features not requiring format changes could also be put. >>> >> This solution would be fine by me

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Le 08/06/2016 20:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> >> Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> >>> Here's what I suggest. Let's do, on a trial basis for the duration of >>> 2.3dev, a branch that mirrors master but inserts patches to disable

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 08/06/16 à 22:14, Guillaume Munch a écrit : As long as I am allowed to ignore the third branch completely I am fine with that. I think this is the idea. So why not, indeed. JMarc

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 08/06/2016 20:57, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 07/06/2016 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit : Our use of git would make it very easy for us to have a branch in which new features not requiring format changes could also be put. This solution would be fine by me too, if

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 08/06/2016 20:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Here's what I suggest. Let's do, on a trial basis for the duration of 2.3dev, a branch that mirrors master but inserts patches to disable the input and output of new file-format features (as well as layout changes, etc.) after

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 07/06/2016 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit : >> >> Our use of git would make it very easy for us to have a branch in which >> new features not requiring format changes could also be put. >> > > This solution would be fine by me too, if people agree to have three >

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Here's what I suggest. Let's do, on a trial basis for the duration of > 2.3dev, a branch that mirrors master but inserts patches to disable the > input and output of new file-format features (as well as layout changes, > etc.) after each file-format change. We would see if

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 07/06/2016 00:35, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Le 07/06/2016 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit : On 06/06/2016 06:40 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: The point of the proposal is to enabling the early testing and release of *non-file-format* changes. Then for a proper master release only file-format

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 7/06/2016 9:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> >> On 06/06/2016 03:33 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >>> >>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : > > Yet, most of the

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 07/06/2016 00:00, Richard Heck a écrit : On 06/06/2016 06:40 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: The point of the proposal is to enabling the early testing and release of *non-file-format* changes. Then for a proper master release only file-format changes remain to be fully tested. This assumes

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 06:40 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > The point of the proposal is to enabling the early testing and release > of *non-file-format* changes. Then for a proper master release only > file-format changes remain to be fully tested. This assumes these aspects do not interact. Oftentimes,

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 06:10 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 7/06/2016 9:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> On 06/06/2016 03:33 PM, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : > Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 06/06/2016 22:47, Richard Heck a écrit : On 06/06/2016 04:27 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 06/06/2016 20:33, Georg Baum a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether one could

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 7/06/2016 9:50 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: On 06/06/2016 03:33 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether one could introduce a single compilation variable to

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 03:33 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether >>> one could introduce a single compilation variable to disable them, >>> and ask developers to

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 06/06/2016 04:27 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 06/06/2016 20:33, Georg Baum a écrit : >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >>> Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether one could introduce a single

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 06/06/2016 20:33, Georg Baum a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether one could introduce a single compilation variable to disable them, and ask developers to enclose

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether >> one could introduce a single compilation variable to disable them, >> and ask developers to enclose file-format-specific code between the >>

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Liviu Andronic wrote: > We already have nightly builds for Ubuntu Linux: > https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily > > It's been running for couple of years (probably all through the 2.2 > development cycle), though I'm not sure it's made much of an impact in > terms of testing

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Sorry for the late reply, I somehow missed this message. Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 22:26, Georg Baum a écrit : >> We need to decide: Either have a fixed schedule, and an unknown feature >> set of the next release, or a fixed feature set, and an unknown schedule. >> We do not

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 05/06/2016 à 21:05, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Yet, most of the file format changes are very simple. I wonder whether one could introduce a single compilation variable to disable them, and ask developers to enclose file-format-specific code between the corresponding #ifdefs. (For instance in

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 03/06/2016 13:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 31/05/2016 à 22:26, Georg Baum a écrit : In addition I would suggest the following: (Officially) allow new features that do not require a file format change into minor releases. The main reason is again that this allows testing more

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Friday, June 3, 2016 2:02:15 PM WEST Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I prefer the fixed schedule. We never know exactly when starting a > release cycle what features will happen or not. But we can enforce when > the release will happen. +1 -- José Abílio

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 03/06/2016 à 15:03, Liviu Andronic a écrit : We already have nightly builds for Ubuntu Linux: https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/daily It's been running for couple of years (probably all through the 2.2 development cycle), though I'm not sure it's made much of an impact in

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 31/05/2016 à 22:26, Georg Baum a écrit : >> >> We need to decide: Either have a fixed schedule, and an unknown feature >> set >> of the next release, or a fixed feature set, and an unknown schedule. We >> do >>

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 31/05/2016 à 22:26, Georg Baum a écrit : We need to decide: Either have a fixed schedule, and an unknown feature set of the next release, or a fixed feature set, and an unknown schedule. We do not have enough man power for defining both a fixed feature set and a fixed release schedule. I

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:26:57PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > - Have a build server that does automatic builds on a regular basis for all > three platforms (Linux, OS X, windows) and makes binary packages and build > logs available. This would be a great way to get

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:00:20AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > There are 2 large security holes in ImageMagick (and also GraphicsMagick) > that have been fixed: > (article in German: >

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

There are 2 large security holes in ImageMagick (and also GraphicsMagick) that have been fixed: (article in German: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Luecke-in-ImageMagick-und-GraphicsMagick-ermoeglicht-erneute-Angriffe-3223811.html) I therefore decided to release a new installer for LyX

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:26:57PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > > > Le 26/05/2016 07:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > >> Time to think about the release date of 2.3.0 now ;) > >> > > > > Yes, let's have this discussion :) > > > > I find the interval between

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 26/05/2016 07:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > >> Time to think about the release date of 2.3.0 now ;) >> > > Yes, let's have this discussion :) > > I find the interval between feature releases too high. Having an > interval longer than one year (more than two

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Guillaume Munch wrote: > The schedule could be decided in advance, and be on the website for > clarity. This is more or less decision of release manager and his style. Some releases had that and some did not. > In addition I would suggest the following: (Officially) allow new > features that do

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 26/05/2016 07:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 25/05/2016 19:11, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Thanks to everyone for all the help with the final steps in the release process. Congratulations. And thanks for the excellent management job, Scott. Indeed. You did it much more thoroughly

Re: retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 03:36:28AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 27.05.2016 um 09:20 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > It was more tricky than I thought. However, I solved the problems and > > > uploaded a new version: > > > > > > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ > > Just for information: Today I

Re: retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am 27.05.2016 um 09:20 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: It was more tricky than I thought. However, I solved the problems and uploaded a new version: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ Just for information: Today I tested a lot more and despite minir issues (e.g. 2 residues after uninstalling LyX) they

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 can be found at > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0/ > quickly tested on ubuntu 12.04 & gentoo x86 and seemed ok. p

Re: retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:09:59AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 27.05.2016 um 01:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > I will try to release a new version withing 2 hours or so. > > It was more tricky than I thought. However, I solved the problems and > uploaded a new version: > >

Re: retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am 27.05.2016 um 01:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: I will try to release a new version withing 2 hours or so. It was more tricky than I thought. However, I solved the problems and uploaded a new version: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ sorry and regards Uwe

Re: retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:30:03PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 26.05.2016 um 16:05 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > Here it is: > > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ > > As always a release without testing is very bad. I only had an hour but > fortunately have now time to test it and there are some errors

retracting the installer: was: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am 26.05.2016 um 16:05 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Here it is: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ As always a release without testing is very bad. I only had an hour but fortunately have now time to test it and there are some errors and mistakes if Lyx is installed the first time and without admin

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 25.05.2016 um 00:29 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > > > Despite of the warning the compilation run fine and I have an installer > > ready. > > Here it is: > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ Thanks they are uploaded. > It contains the fresh

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 25.05.2016 um 00:37 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> We have lots of warnings like this. They are usually fixed by doing the >> conversion explicitly, so probably nothing really needs to be done for >> the release. > > This is suspicious to me because usually MSVC has good

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 26/05/2016 15:12, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 25.05.2016 um 00:37 schrieb Richard Heck: We have lots of warnings like this. They are usually fixed by doing the conversion explicitly, so probably nothing really needs to be done for the release. This is suspicious to me because usually MSVC has

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am 25.05.2016 um 00:37 schrieb Richard Heck: We have lots of warnings like this. They are usually fixed by doing the conversion explicitly, so probably nothing really needs to be done for the release. This is suspicious to me because usually MSVC has good reasons for issuing a dataloss

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am 25.05.2016 um 00:29 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Despite of the warning the compilation run fine and I have an installer ready. Here it is: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ It contains the fresh MiKTeX release from yesterday. However, I did not yet have the time to test new installation of

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 7:11:14 PM WEST Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Congratulations. And thanks for the excellent management job, Scott. > > Jürgen I agree. :-) Well done. -- José Abílio

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Le 25/05/2016 19:11, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Thanks to everyone for all the help with the final steps in the release process. Congratulations. And thanks for the excellent management job, Scott. Indeed. You did it much more thoroughly than I would have been able to. Time to think about

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:50:14PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > > As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading > > > the binaries and providing some

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am Montag, den 23.05.2016, 22:32 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > Hi all, > > The tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 can be found at > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0/ > > As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after > uploading > the binaries and providing some time for

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2016 um 21:16:33, schrieb Georg Baum > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 can be found at > > > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0/ > > Builds and runs fine on debian 8.1, except when

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:29:04AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading > > the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors. > > Great job Scott! Many thanks for all your

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

On 05/24/2016 06:29 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading >> the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors. > > Great job Scott! Many thanks for all your patient work. > > I built it

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Am 24.05.2016 um 04:32 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors. Great job Scott! Many thanks for all your patient work. I built it now and noticed 2 things: - There is a dataloss

Re: Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Hi all, > > The tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 can be found at > > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0/ Builds and runs fine on debian 8.1, except when configuring with version suffix: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10159. Since this also happens with 2.1.4 it

Tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 are on FTP

Hi all, The tarballs for LyX 2.2.0 can be found at ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0/ As usual I'll wait before announcing the release until after uploading the binaries and providing some time for the mirrors. Thanks to everyone for all the help with the final steps in the