From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got a -DS (pentaprism) that I used for about 9 months with a
variety of manual-focus lenses as-is. It was OK, but definately could be
challenging to get the focus right. Since I've installed a split-prism
focus screen, I haven't had anymore
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
In terms of the tones, I probably would have done something like this:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've already made in the neighborhood of 100 prints with my Epson
R2400. I'm using the same setup as described by Godders and others here
-- Photoshop is determining color. All the prints matched my monitor
perfectly. Until today. Suddenly, from one
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once that bunch headed out, I pulled out the laptop and started
poking at some more photos from the NY trip and from my junta to
Nashville, TN. I also pulled out the Pentax 645 and started fooling
with it, framing a composition of the tables and chairs
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I decided to continue with my experiments on various different BW
conversions. This one is a free filter I found on Mark Roberts free
software page. It was one of the simplest methods and seems to work
very well,
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know, we got a little more last night, and now the trees are starting
to lose branches because of the weight of the ice on them.
Hey Gonz,
We got some more up here in DFW and my workplace even closed.
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=360693861size=o
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cool, I mean, Cold...
Were your highways affected/closed? Our major overpasses were closed
because they were too slick and were causing accidents. Any elevated
freeways were quite treacherous. Its been worse however, I visited
Austin once in the mid 90's and
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one was taken heading toward the summit of Tioga
Pass (ele 9945ft) on the way toward Lee Vining and
Mono Lake back in October.
http://www.primelensphoto.com/images/tioga_pass.jpg
67II, 55mm f4, Pentax Red Fliter, Plus-X.
Very nice. Cool tones
Hey Folks,
Mark and Paul's winter shots have prompted me to look at my shooting habits.
I've been a bit reticent to take my *istDs out into the cold. For those
situations, I'll use my film camera.
What do you all do in order to prep your camera for the cold? Any
differences in battery life?
Hey Folks,
Was experimenting some time ago and wanted some opinions on this shot:
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=360184076size=o
Pentax *istDs, SMC A100/2.8 Macro, ISO 200, 1/4sec @ f4, tripod mounted
Thanks,
Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Following in Paul's footsteps here, I took a few shots of the ice storm
on the western part of the state today.
I went for the wide angle landscape which is not too effective at web
size, but is my favorite of the day (some photos just don't work at 600
Here's a tongue in cheek tribute to you snowflake shooters:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/126/356142776_a84a0aa91b_o.jpg
Pentax *istDs, SMC A100/2.8 Macro, f8.0 @ 1/45 (handheld), ISO 200, +.5EV
Enjoy,
Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like this too. Is it really a snowflake? The slight melting makes
it a pretty pioture.
Paul
On Jan 13, 2007, at 7:06 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Cool shot.
Like the blue and silver colurs.
Thanks for the compliments. You're both gonna crack up. It's a
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So how well does TTL work on DS? What does one lose from P-TTL?
P-TTL with the built in flash does pretty well if you are not one of
those people whose eye-blink reflex timing is a problem.
How about with a flash on the hot shoe? How would the DS do
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not exactly ... the DS does support TTL with pre-A lens AFAIK but only
with external flashes. the RTF will do PTTL or full output.
So how well does TTL work on DS? What does one lose from P-TTL?
Mark
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark -
Welcome back. Good to see you posting again.
I wondered where you wound up.
Hey Ken,
Thanks for the welcome back. For the record, I kept up fairly well from the
archive and was able to check out alot of the great photos you posted over
the
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the one thing that bothers me is that they are turned to close
to showing just their backs. It gives me a feeling of having to sneak
up on them, rather than a shot of them enjoying the view. I hope I'm
making sense. When showing people looking
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice shot, Mark. The scene is powerful on its own, but the coujple
takes it up a notch. Nicely exposed: sky tones intact. Good one.
Thanks Paul. Glad you liked it. Here's a similar shot:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/344895922/
Mark
From: Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been reading this list for nearly 8 months now, and I'm aware of
some of your occupations... however some of you are a mystery to me.
I'm not sure if that's on purpose or not... :)
Anyway, just for a starting point, I'm a elementary special
My girlfriend and I were down in Austin to meet a college buddy. We stopped
at Mount Bonnell to check out the view. I came across this couple sitting on
the rock ledge.
Pentax *istDS, Pentax SMC-F 24-50/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/13
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello MARK,
It has been a long time since I last heard you on the list. Good to
know you are still around.
Hey Bruce,
Yep, it's me. I usually monitor from the archive but figured I'd sign on for
a little while. I
Hey Folks,
My posts seem not to be going through so I hope it works this time. I've got
a couple of lenses for sale.
1) Pentax SMC-F 24-50/4 - KEH Bargain cosmetic condition. Works great. Glass
is clean and clear. Comes with both caps. $75 shipped CONUS.
2) Sigma 70-300/4-5.6 DL Macro KEH EX+
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not seen a better lens than this one.
William Robb
Have you seen a 200mm/f4.0 ED Macro?
Or more importantly, the images produced by it.
Hey Ken,
When I was living in Kalamazoo, I got to see alot of
Cassino's work. The 200/4 is pretty
Hey Folks,
De-lurking to sell a few of my items:
1) SMC-A 100/2.8 Macro yes, that macro lens! You can
go to Stan Halpins website and read the comments on
this excellent macro lens. The lens is in good
condition. It has some wear and tear on the barrel and
just inside the filter ring. Filters
in my freezer but
which I've not tried. Reports on it (the 120)have
been pretty good, although Mark Dalal didn't like the
physical characteristics of the film base, backing,
whatever it's called (the stuff the emulsion is
coated on). He thought it was too thin.
For the record, I've never shot Efke
--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
I seem to recall some discussion about 120 efke a
few years ago. Guess I
was mistaken about the source. Now you've got me
wondering who may have
made the comment well, thanks for the
correction.
I recall you telling me about
Hey Folks,
Unemployment sucks so I've got lotsa stuff for sale.
1) Pentax ZX-7, Excellent condition. Hardly any signs
of use. Mechanically perfect. Comes w/ AF Quantaray
28-90 zoom (some scuffs on the body - glass clean),
55mm skylight filter, 55mm circular polarizer, Cambron
AF 1.4
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am convinced that at this point, the only way to
get a good black
and white print is still the old fashioned way, with
film and a
darkroom.
Indeed. I've tried various methods of digital BW
printing. I had an Epson 860 with the MIS Full
Spectrum
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How are folks
supposed to know what a
truly good print looks like when they are prevented
from seeing them properly.
Oil paintings are not always under glass, but
photographs seem to be. How strange?
Hmmm, well I've been to several exhibits and can
--- Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please tell me something about it's
characteristics and what kind of shooting you find
it best (and maybe not so well)suited for?
I was thinking of using it for shooting a model in
a lot of skin.
Provia 100F is good for several
--- Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not happy with lo-res scans on CDs and the labs want
an outrageous price for
hi-res scans. Thinking about getting a Pacific
Imaging 3650 Pro - Anyone
have any experience or insights into this?
From what I've read, the Pacific Image and SmartDisk
--- Frank Wajer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
just checking, anyone know what a reasonable price
is for an SMC A 100 2.8
macro?
They seem to fetch anywhere from $500-$1000 US on
ebay. I would say that $500-600 is fair non-collector
price.
Mark
--- That Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Faster AF maybe, better image quality NO.
-That Guy
When you compare the same shot in a controlled
situation, the 10D has image quality that is hands
down better. See for yourself:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/page16.asp
Mark
Hey Folks,
I finally managed to get my grubby hands on the *istD.
I have to say, I was alot more impressed with it than
I thought I would be. Very nicely built. I hope Pentax
keeps it up.
Inicidentally, the store I went to had 2 of the DA
16-45 lenses. The place was called Competitive
Cameras.
Hey Folks,
Just switching over to another email address.
Mark
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Hey Folks,
I'm in Dallas for a few days. Anyone have an
recommendation for where I would be able to go and
check out the *istD?
Thanks,
Mark
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
One item for sale this week:
Cambron 1.4X Autofocus Teleconverter. Mint condition.
$25 shipped in the continental US.
Contact me off list if interested.
Mark
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't get it. You didn't see people flocking to stores to buy Nikon
F100s, Canon A3s, or Pentax MZ-Ss, all of which are in about the same
price range as the cheapest DSLRs. People who were buying film PS
cameras ($100-200) or film SLRs ($250-400) are now suddenly
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There were a surprisingly large number of people at the tourist traps in
USA
with film SLRs instead of compacts. Seven or eight americans apporached me
and told me about their plans to swap their film SLR for a digital one.
All
of them talked about the nikon
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isn't it tedious how someone always has to inject there personal
politics into a thread about images?
But it makes it so much easier to identify them for the kill file. : )
Mark
Hey Folks,
I haven't really been playing close attention to the discussion on
converting RAW files from the *istD. The little bit I have read has given me
the impression that people aren't totally pleased with the Pentax converter
and have been happier with the Photoshop CS converter. Has anyone
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its a bit of a drive, but at least at one point Precision Camera in
Austin had them. I bought mine over the net however, the price
discrepancy was too much to ignore.
That is a drive. Not too bad but still a good 90 minutes. Definitely
important before dropping
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope they'll market their cameras at walmart cause none of the camera
shops in San Antonio are carrying much of Pentax SLR products. I've yet
to
actually see the *istD in person.
Mark
Think you meant neither of the camera shops, Mark
Well, I was being
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm pretty close to wasting some money on a 67II system, despite my better
judgement regarding the future of film.
I'd like some lens recommendations. I know the 105 is a normal lens. I'd
also like at least a wide angle to start. Is there any difference in
Hey Folks,
One more item to sell. I've got a SMC-M 150/3.5 in excellent condition. The
glass is clean with the usual level of dust for a lens of its age. Aperture
blades are clean and operate normally. Cosmetics are really nice. It comes
with the original leather case and front/rear caps. I've
One for the peanut gallery:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2417479
Yes, I'm getting a little stir crazy.
Mark
Joe,
Isn't this is a 4-5.6?
Mark
- Original Message -
From: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 1:59 PM
Subject: FS: Pentax SMC-F 35-105mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom
I neglected to include the SMC designation in the description of this
lens!
For
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just wanted to share my excitement ... today I ordered a new, Nikon
Coolscan ;-))) No more borrowing computer and scanner time. I can
now
annoy you with even more pictures LOL
Congrats Shel! Which one did you get?
Mark
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You mention nothing of your budget, intended use of the camera, or
anything
else, so further suggestions would be difficult. Must you have an SLR?
There are some good rangefinder options out there.
Shel,
Any feedback on how rangefinders cop with
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In initially, I had an entirely different idea of what I was going to
say, but after cogitating on your message content for a while I'll
leave it at this...
This camera was not conceived as a replacement for a Leica M-series
camera, nor was it meant to
Hey Gang,
A few weeks ago, my brother called me up asking for a recommendation on a
digital camera to use for snapshots and for shooting stuff to sell on ebay.
He insisted that it be extremely small. How small? He felt his Canon A40 was
too big. So naturally, I turned him onto the Optio S4 and he
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I rephotographed her in the shade without the flash, at f4.0. This is much
better. And this time I didn't add unsharp mask. Please suggest what else I
should do before I make some prints.
One thing you may consider is creating a second layer in Photoshop and
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am I missing something? Aren't USB cables, well ... universal? There are
four cables here, two that came with different card readers, one that came
with a USB hard drive, one that came with the Sony digicam ... oh, and
another from some strange
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boy, I have to agree with Shel here. My first look at the photo was
very ho-hum. Just didn't see anything in it. This crop that Shel
proposes really changes it into something for me. Now I really do see
the relationship. Is that what you were going
Hey Folks,
Here's one for the peanut gallery (comments appreciated):
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2376602size=lg
Mark
Hey Folks,
So was a decision on what to do with the PUG ever reached? If so, what was
it?
Mark
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To provide a better scan of a bw neg
have you put a filter behind the bw neg
and then had the software remove this
color-cast mask?
I haven't tried it but I'm wondering if there would be any loss in
sharpness.
Mark
Hey Folks,
I'm wondering if anyone has experience using the Autofocus Spotbeam feature
of the Pentax AF-360FGZ. I downloaded the manual from Pentax's website. It
reads that in SB mode, the spotbeam will activate but the flash will not
fire. On page 19, it indicates that the spotbeam will activate
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mark,
Mine does in TTL. Don't know if it turns off.. don't think so..
Ryan,
How low does the light have to be for the spot beam to kick in?
Mark
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mark,
You realize that most of Bryce is red rock formations (grin). I'm not
sure which shot you were remembering, but here is one of the
possibles:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0041-13.htm
Nope, that's not it. This pic was much redder and I
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What didn't your friend like about the Nikon scanner? Which
Nikon scanner(s) did he use? What did he like better about
the Minolta?
Shel,
Each brand has its detractors and within each brand, a few junkers make it
out the door. It's safest to buy new
From: Bill Sawyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hope you're not leaving Pentax, Mark...
Hey Bill,
Nope. Just doin' a swap out.
Mark
Hey Folks,
I've got a Program Plus for sale. It's in excellent condition with some very
light wear. No dents, dings, or scratches. Purchased from Mark Hama but I
still had it checked out by my local shop and the meter and shutter are
right on. It's missing the motor winder cover. Also included is
Hey Folks,
Anyone had a chance to compare these two cameras? Any difference in
autofocus, flash metering, ability to expose with K and M lenses? Opinions
are very appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those of you who didn't read the very long thread about *ist D sensor
and 35mm lens resolution, I have posted shots made made with a Pentax
MZ-S
and different lenses compared to almost identical shots made with a Sony
DSC
F717 - a 5MP camera with a Carl
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peculiar as in unique, special ...
Uhhmmm...special...yeah, that must be
itspecialokay...whatever you say Shel ; )
Mark
Paul,
For a short while, I used a Mac as my personal computer. I found that with
OS X 10.2, I couldn't print centered on the page and I had to use a third
party drivers for my Epson 820. When the 2200 drivers were release, the same
issue existed in terms of being able to print centered on the
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shot this tonight at a high school band concert. Sorry the camera was
tilted, but I like the concentration on his music and the movement of the
sticks.
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=69
Bill,
I really like this
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax K and M lens have no exposure information electronics built in.
I don't think any camera could be more compatible with them than is the
*ist-D.
Hey Paul or anyone else,
I'm pretty ignorant about this issue. So how does the Epson get around the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As somebody whose name is frequently miss-spelled (people feel the need to
add an e for some reason),
Cory,
Be glad people can pronounce your name. You should hear people bungle their
way through my last name.
Mark
From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alright, Dave said he'd find a shot for us to start with, but obviously
hasn't found the time to do it yet.
In the meantime I will provide the following shot and invite any
volunteers to have a go at it and see what you can do.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
So, how's it pronounced? In my mind, it's Dal (as in gal) -al (same
pronounciation), with a slight emphasis on the second syllable.
Hmm, it's more like Dah-lahl.
Mark
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sounds like I did better than DeLong at least! vbg
Much better Frank!
Mark
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was a bit late on week 3. Now I'm a bit early on week 4. Oh well.
The Kiss was taken by Shel (and likely thousands before him), but I
think
it would have been a good title (have I whetted your appetite yet? g).
So, I settled on Haley's Ring, a
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
after they introduced the security patch that prevented opening JPG and
GIF,
it took several months for them to remove that particular part of the
patch.
i saw a lot of support calls go by on the online help forums.
Please continue this discussion without my
Nice Shel,
Great symmetry. Nice balanced exposure. Good show!
Mark
From: Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It just means Mark Dalal's address is in the infected computer's address
book.
Are you sure? I can't seem to find a virus on my computer but I want to be
sure before I go emailing people.
Thanks,
Mark
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just put up the start of the QuikSnap® web page and I'd
like some testers please. Just a few pics for now.
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/
Works fine with Netscape 7.1
Mark
Hey Folks,
Here's one I need some help on. I'm wondering if I should crop it tighter.
There's an element in the middle left side of the photo I'm wondering if I
should clone out. Ditch it altogether and try again?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2167370
Thanks,
Mark
Hey Folks,
One more for the week. This one was inspired by Shel. He sent me a similar
shot and decided to try it also. This shot was taken while driving (with
both hands on the wheel). It's the craziest one of all the frames I took.
Hope you enjoy:
Larry,
Simply gorgeous. Great light and composition.
Mark
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more for the week. This one was inspired by Shel. He sent me a
similar
shot and decided to try it also. This shot was taken while driving (with
both hands on the wheel).
I'm not even going to *ask* what you
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the stores in San Antonio will no longer be carrying anything by
Pentax. The only other stores has minimal stock.
Mark
Which is which, Mark (like I can't guess?)
Camera Exchange told me they are no longer going to be carrying Pentax.
Period. I'm going
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark, are you still in San Antonio these days?
Yup
If so, have you tried checking with Boyd's Camera? Seems to me I've seen a
LOT
of pieces-of-old-cameras around their back room.
They have a back room with stuff? They've never invited me to the back room!
: (
Boyd's
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not great art, but lots of fun; hope you enjoy:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=378621
I like the Pleasantries shot. My brother is infamous for that same salute.
The Centurian outfit is great!
Mark
Hey Folks,
I was going through my negs and slides yesterday and scanned in a couple of
pics. Nothin' fancy, just a couple of flower photos to share with y'all.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2151760
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2154642
Mark
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Definitely #2 (the one you showed for PAW). The narrow dof somehow makes
it
look older to me - as if it's fading into the past (I know, it's corny,
but
it's what I think).
The other one is technically sound, but doesn't have the feel that your
paw
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=007T05
Those are some impressive shots. Beautiful bokeh too!
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because it is too expensive? If so, why do they continue to offer
some really expensive pro glass?
This has always mystified me. Last I looked, Pentax made a 600/4.0,
a 300/2.8, and an 80-200/2.8. Last I looked, the equivalent Nikon and
Canon lenses were CHEAPER.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, why do people feel they have to justify digital.
Regardless of anyone's feelings about it, it's just a
camera, a tool for a job, for the hobbyist or family snap
shooter something that gives one pleasure, maybe makes
getting final prints easier or
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm getting gray where yellow should be when I
print and
when I do nozzle check...
Ann,
The status monitor should tell you if you're low on yellow. If you were out,
it wouldn't let you print. That I discovered the hard way. When I have
stubborn clogs, I
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use Kodak's E200 from time to time as a general walking around
film. Grain is so-so, not on par with ISO 100 emulsions but better than
the Kodak 400 Emulsions. In terms of latitude, it is very easy to work
with - almost like print film. Scan-ability
Hey Folks,
Anyone on the list use 200 speed slide films (sensia 200, Elitechrome 200,
Agfa 200)? I'd like to know how they rate in terms of grain and
scan-ability?
Thanks,
Mark
From: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, do you know why KEH consistently sells Z-1p cameras for
significantly cheaper than PZ-1p cameras, even in the same condition?
They are the exact same camera model, correct?
I don't believe that Pentax USA would repair the Z-1p. That would pose a
From: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think that is true. As far as I can tell, it's the exact same
camera. In fact, I sent an MZ-5n (Europe/Asia version of the
U.S.-labeled ZX-5n) in to Pentax USA for a CLA/repair last year with no
problems.
Well then I'm stumped. I've been eyeing
Hey Folks,
Delurking to post some stuff for sale:
1) SMC-A 200/4 (non-macro) - this lens is in Mint to EX+ condition. Looks
hardly used. Glass is clean and clear. Mechanically perfect. Comes with
original caps. Has a built in hood. $100 + shipping.
2) Vivitar 2X Converter - Mint, used twice.
Hey Folks,
Just popping in to offer up a piece of Pentax gear for sale: It's the SMC-K
135/3.5 (not the M version). It's in EX+ condition. The glass and coatings
are in great condition. Aperture blades are clean, diaphragm is nice and
snappy, and the focus is smooth. Shipping is Priority Mail
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Hicks on the Pure-Silver list said he and others had similar
problems with some early batches of the new D400. He thinks it was a
production problem, and that it's cleared up.
Is there a way to tell if you have one of the early batches. I've got a
couple of
Hey Folks,
Well, I'm adding the elusive A 100/2.8 Macro the lens bag and was wanting to
see what the results are with some of the ulta-slow high resolutions films.
I've got a few rolls of APX 25 but I would like to try a couple rolls of the
Kodachrome 25. I've heard that there can be problems
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Dalal wrote:
Hey Folks,
If you've wanted a 67, you can't pass this one up:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1281821351
Especially with that 28mm.
Well, it's the newer style body with TTL meter, probably a 90/2.8 and what
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
