One impacted customer wanted me to put back their original pw back
in. Boss can't learn a new one! Sheesh..
That makes me... cry.
Not mail-related: a user of our web app forgot his password today and
was having a ridiculously hard time using our password reset form
(basic
Rory Nimmo wrote:
Hi folks.
My Sniffer rule base is updating every 6 or 7 minutes today. I have
not made any changes at my end. Can you shed any light on this please?
It should be fixed now.
A bug in smb (used internally to populate the delivery servers) causes
datestamp problems when
Hello Andy,
First, let me say thanks for sharing all of this. We don't often get detailed feedback on these things. Your valuable insights will be used to make later releases better.
With that said I will add a few comments here and there to explain why things are the way they are and help
Ouch - 3.0 didn't even last 12 hours. Imail was frozen up because it
apparently couldn't launch any more Sniffer client instances.
Event Log was full with:
Event Type:Information
Event Source:Application Popup
Event ID: 26
Description: Application popup:
Hello Andy,
Saturday, October 4, 2008, 12:28:44 PM, you wrote:
HI Pete,
Thanks for your feedback.
I had to create the UpdateReady.txt file before I was able to test my update script from the command line but I didnt realize that I would be created in the Workspace folder. Without that
with different customer scenarios.
Best Regards,
Andy
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 3:52 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Installed
My best thinking at the moment is to perhaps
: Saturday, October 04, 2008 10:07 PM
To: Andy Schmidt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Froze Mail Server
Hello Andy,
Saturday, October 4, 2008, 9:22:39 PM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
Here the log files.
I can't tell you WHEN the problem was triggered. I
Hello Andy,
Saturday, October 4, 2008, 10:21:31 PM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
Well, I eliminated WeightGate for the time being, just to do my due diligence.
Also, since there is a fix sized buffer, I assume actually LOWERING the 3rdnumber (the allocation for each non-interactive process)
Hello Harry,
Sunday, September 28, 2008, 10:39:42 PM, you wrote:
I have been using Sniffer for several years with Declude and SmarterMail on Windows. I would like to move Sniffer to my IMGate Mail Gateway (Postfix / FreeBSD). Has anyone installed Version 3 of Sniffer on FreeBSD? The
Hi Pete,
Please do send the new FreeBSD control script and doc at your convenience.
Thank you,
Harry
Hello Harry,
Sunday, September 28, 2008, 10:39:42 PM, you wrote:
I have been using Sniffer for several years with Declude and SmarterMail on
Windows. I would like to move
Hello Harry,
Monday, September 29, 2008, 8:11:09 AM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
Please do send the new FreeBSD control script and doc at your convenience.
Our email are crossing in the ether.
Before posting the new distribution prototype I created a README-SETUP file to help pull the
Hello,
As an update, the developer (Alexander N. Telegin) spent a number of
hours on my server and seems to have sorted the bugs out in eWall. At
this time the program is running well and as advertised. It's a nice
little light gateway client that has some easy to use scripting
features
Steve Guluk wrote:
snip
Any suggestions on what I should consider to help with spam and also
use Sniffer.
Steve,
Do you have the ability to add into your current filtering additional
RBLs and/or URI blacklists? I have some good suggestions there!
Rob McEwen
On Jul 1, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
Steve,
Do you have the ability to add into your current filtering
additional RBLs and/or URI blacklists? I have some good suggestions
there!
Rob McEwen
Rob,
If I move away from eWall I will be left with just iMail till I find
something
Steve,
What I'm getting is this... the ultimate in low resource spam protection
is blocking based on the sending IP using a prolific DNSBL like
zen.spamhaus.org that, like zen, has extreme low FPs. Because the
message is blocked at the perimeter using just a single lookup on the
sender's ip.
Steve;
Declude works well, but any comprehensive set of filters will take some
horsepower to run. Declude will do the country filtering I think you
wanted.
Herb
Steve Guluk wrote:
On Jul 1, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
Steve,
Do you have the ability to add into your current
If I move away from eWall I will be left with just iMail till I find
something else (purpose of my email). iMail has URL blacklists. eWall
has URI Blacklists but I'm still looking for that perfect client to
put in-front of my mail server (software based). So you probably have
some good
Steve,
If at all possible, I recommend blocking based on unknown user BEFORE
doing ANY content filtering of the message. But, if you must, it is also
a good strategy to block based on the sender's IP first. (I'm figuring
that you might need to do that since you are trying to reduce mail to
Steve,
Since this hasn't yet been mentioned, try Alligate (www.alligate.com).
It does selective greylisting (only greylists things that look spammy),
and also will validate your users' addresses and do things like country
blocking/tarpitting/greylisting. Only one zombie spammer survives
Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer Helper App?
I MOVED FROM Imail 8 to SmarterMail 4.3 and then 5.1, best thing I ever did
( the cost of an Imail maintenance contract for Enterprise unlimited users
/ domains). SmarterMail has grey listing built in so 90-95% spam gets killed
at source
Make a bat fil like this:
--
@echo off
echo syntax batfilenavn.bat messagefil to test
SNFclient.exe %1
echo %errorlevel%
pause
--
If it display zero the message is clean.
Hello,
I am evaluating Message Sniffer beta version but I am totally confused. :-)
If I am in a
Hello Shawn,
Thursday, January 10, 2008, 2:16:24 PM, you wrote:
Hello,
I am evaluating Message Sniffer beta version but I am totally confused. :-)
snip/
But how do I get the result code for the spam message to output back to the command prompt? If I try to call
Hello Shawn,
Following up a bit...
Most likely you're using a Process object to call the SNFClient.
If I've read the MS docs correctly you will want to get the "exit code" once SNFClient finishes.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.process.exitcode(VS.71).aspx
Pete,
That is exactly what I needed. You rock.
Thanks so much.
Shawn
On Jan 10, 2008 11:56 AM, Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Shawn,
Following up a bit...
Most likely you're using a Process object to call the SNFClient.
If I've read the MS docs correctly you will want
The Ugly value returned by the beta Message Sniffer you're using with
the Good, Bad and Ugly database has a result code of 40, and this code
is missing from your list.
(The White value overlaps with result code 0, which internally to
Message Sniffer will mask any other spam result code on your
on a domain and then forwarding all the mail to a
remote system.
-Jay
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:44 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer as passthrough filter
Yes, it is called email gateway service and many of us do that and it is
fairly straightforward to setup but there are a number of steps.
John T
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of K Mitchell
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:16 PM
Serge, what return value are you using for this snifferwhitelist?
The official and current list of return codes is here:
http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.TechnicalDetai
ls.ResultCodes
If you're using 0, then don't do that, because zero is also used for
no result.
Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:49 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer White List
Serge, what return value are you using for this snifferwhitelist?
The official and current list of return codes is here:
http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title
posted this before getting pete's post
please disregard
- Original Message -
From: Serge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:11 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer White List
I'm using 000, isnt that right
Hello Pete,
Thursday, June 8, 2006, 9:41:55 AM, you wrote:
It does look a little weird. Sometimes it's normal though. I'll see if
I can identify anything odd in the settings.
_M
I've changed the settings. I hope this response works ok.
_M
Testing. Sorry for the extra trafic - only way
Hello Pete,
Thursday, June 8, 2006, 9:42:42 AM, you wrote:
Hello Pete,
Thursday, June 8, 2006, 9:41:55 AM, you wrote:
It does look a little weird. Sometimes it's normal though. I'll see if
I can identify anything odd in the settings.
_M
I've changed the settings. I hope this response
Thunderbird and Netscape just takes the full original source and
attaches it as a message/rfc822 attachment. I forwarded this message
back to the list by just pressing Forward.
Interesting that they include the headers with a simple forward, without
specifying forward as attachment. I haven't
Darin,
Thunderbird allows you to choose the default forwarding method as
either inline or as attachment. It might actually default to inline, I
can't remember, but whenever it does message/rfc822 attachments, it is
as a whole unlike some other clients that edit it down to the bare
minimum of
Hello Andrew,
Thursday, June 8, 2006, 11:32:47 AM, you wrote:
Ditto.
I advise people to use Insert, Item. Far easier than explaining how to
drag and drop (or tie shoelaces).
It might be nice to have a SnagIt of that process to share w/ users.
I've noticed that whether the headers survive
Pete,
My understanding was that Declude treats different arguments to an
executable as just being other forms of that executable so it only
processes it once. I'm not positive one way or another. It's worth
testing though.
Matt
Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello Matt,
Wednesday, June 7, 2006,
Subject: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions
Pete,Regarding suggestions for easing the
reporting process, I would recommend the following possible modifications:
1) An E-mail submission tool similar to the one now, but replies
would be automated2) Send back links or rather an HTML form with
checkboxes
Hi Pete,
Can I interpret this as email address and matching source IP are sufficient
if the correct email address is used to submit?
If not, do you have any suggestions on how you would like to see us
inserting the license ID in the D file?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete
Pete,
An X-Header would be very, very nice to have. I understand the issues
related to waiting to see if something comes through, and because of
that, I would maybe suggest moving on your own.
Sniffer doesn't need to be run on every single message in a Declude
system. Through weight based
- Original Message -
From: Scott
Fisher
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions
For me the pain of false positives submissions is
the research that happens when I get a "no rule found" return.
I then need
(sniff) Aw, cut it out, Matt.
You're making me all weepy.
p.s. Pete, that's pretty darned
amazing!
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent:
Wednesday, June 07, 2006 3:58 PMTo: Message Sniffer
CommunitySubject: Re: [sniffer]Re[2
Awesome. Great job, Pete.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: [sniffer]Re[2]: [sniffer]Re[2]: [sniffer]Re[2]: [sniffer]FP
suggestions
Hello Matt,
Unfortunately, by the time the message gets to us it is sometimes just
different enough that the original pattern cannot be found. There are
some folks who consistently have success, and some who occasionally
have problems, and a few who always have a problem.
Different in what way? Is the mail
ast, within 24 hours.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions
Darin,Outlook will strip many of the headers when
forwarding. Outlook Express needs to forward the messages using &qu
ge -
From: Matt
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]FP suggestions
Darin,Outlook will strip many of the headers when
forwarding. Outlook Express needs to forward the messages using "Forward
As Attachment" in order to in
I only see Sniffer catching about 30% of SPAM and that's the highest it's
ever been.
David
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Michiel Prins
Sent: 06 June 2006 08:11
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer]Concerned about
Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von David Waller
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Juni 2006 11:51
An: Message Sniffer Community
Betreff: Re: [sniffer]AW: [sniffer]Concerned about amount of spam
going through
Of all SPAM identified SNIFFER is finding about 30%. We see an awful
lot of junk
Hello Markus,
Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 3:27:32 AM, you wrote:
Mabe people at Sniffer are already aware of this new type of spam. Not the
malformed mailfrom one but this with the short number and nothing else in
subject and body)
Thanks for those samples... I've coded an additional abstract for
Hi _M,
Do you mean like reverse PTR records, or HELO lookups, etc..?
--Paul R.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer]A design question - how
Hi Pete,
Pete McNeil wrote:
How many DNS based tests do you use in your filter system?
approx 100
How many of them really matter?
depends :)
I generally weight them all very low; its the combination of several
that make each 'matter'. As I review held mail I remove ones that are
Hello Michiel,
Tuesday, June 6, 2006, 3:10:52 AM, you wrote:
Crew,
I'm a bit concerned about the amount of spam that Sniffer's not
getting. It used to be a near 99% catch rate, but now it looks like it's
down to 70%...?
I opened my own mailbox this morning and saw
Hi Markus -
Markus Gufler wrote:
There is also another type of spam (stock spam now with attached png image)
this morning passing our filters.
I am catching these fairly easily -
a combo filter -
#combo-stockspammer-png.txt
SKIPIFWEIGHT26
TESTSFAILEDENDNOTCONTAINS
Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello Nick,
What is your false positive rate with that pattern?
Hmm lets go to the MDLP for yesterday :)
SS HH HS SH SA
SQ
REGEX.STOCK.BODY 331 0 0 66 0.667506 0.445565
COMBO.STOCK_PNG 16 0 0 1 0.882353 0.778547
The regex alone will fp; I
I use about 100 dnsbl/rbl/rhsbl list of varying weights and reliabilities.
How many matter...
I'd have to say the shining star is CBL. Hits 45% of the spam with a very
low false positive rate.
The relay RBLs days are way behind them,
The proxy RBLs most useful days are behind them
The DUL RBLs
We're getting the same and today it started hitting a different account (Domain).What are these things? I thought exploratory, maybe looking for replies to build a DB for a later spam wave? Their not malicious in content and look like someone's virus working incorrectly. But, I doubt they are
your sniffer-id!)
Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von David Waller
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Juni 2006 11:51
An: Message Sniffer Community
Betreff: Re: [sniffer]AW: [sniffer]Concerned about amount
I use just shy of 60 DNS based tests against the sender, both IP4R and
RHSBL.
Perhaps 10-12 matter.
Due to false positives, I rate most of them relatively low and have
built up their weights as a balancing act. That act is greatly assisted
by using a weighting system and not reject on first
]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam topic change to png stock spam
Hi Markus -
Markus Gufler wrote:
There is also another type of spam (stock spam now with attached png
image
On Jun 6, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Steve Guluk wrote:We're getting the same and today it started hitting a different account (Domain).What are these things? I thought exploratory, maybe looking for replies to build a DB for a later spam wave? Their not malicious in content and look like someone's virus
ge Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
GulukSent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:46 PMTo: Message
Sniffer CommunitySubject: Re: [sniffer]Numeric
spam
On Jun 6, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Steve Guluk wrote:
We're
getting the same and today it started hitting a diffe
.
Andrew 8)
_
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Steve Guluk
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:46 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam
On Jun 6, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Steve
this type of junkmail?
Michael SteinComputer House
- Original Message -
From:
Colbeck,
Andrew
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:37
PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam
Both of which are reasonable, particularly given the
recent Blue
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam
I thought that having an SPF record would prevent a
spammer from forging your domain name, but our SPF record did not seem to help
with these odd numeric E-mails which appear to be coming from our
owndomain.
Does anyone
Hi Darin,
Thanks for your reply. Sure wish I understood what
you're saying
Michael SteinComputer House
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:10
PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam
They do
e Sniffer Community
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:30
PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Numeric spam
What do you use for spam filtering? Declude
has the ability to test SPF, for example.
Also, what is your SPF record for the domain in
question?
Darin.
John:
We are able to download updates fine. Could be some routing issues.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 3:23 PM
To: Message
Connecting to www.sortmonster.net[207.97.229.114]:80... connected.
As of 1 minute ago.
Shaun Sturby, MCSE
Manager - Technical Services
Optrics Engineering - Solution Partners Network Specialists
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: www.Optrics.com
United States: 1740 S 300 West #10
Hi John,
I got my Sniffer update at 5:03 pm no problem from Toronto
Goran Jovanovic
Omega Network Solutions
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 5:23 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject:
find!
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 3:57 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Sniffer updates down?
Hi John,
I got my Sniffer update at 5:03 pm no problem
Hello John,
Friday, June 2, 2006, 5:22:45 PM, you wrote:
I am getting errors since late last night that host can not be found.
I checked your license record and finding no problems successfully
downloaded your rulebase file from the expected URL.
Not sure what could be going on but it seems
Hello Ali,
Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 2:44:28 AM, you wrote:
How is everyone managing to deal with the upsurge of viagra spam mail.
Sniffer does not seem to pick it up?
Just so you know we are on this... There are a set of abstracts coded
and we are collecting domain on this one as well. It is
Hi Pete,
Watch out for today's spam storm -- it's a lot bigger than we've seen
in a long while. 48 hour image attached.
This has low priority but. I've tried to find a live version of that
graph you've sent but I cannot find it at
Disregard my last post.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:38 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Possible
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:38 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Possible Paypal Phishing
It's really from PostDirect.com aka YesMail.com ...
You can tell that it's
: Re: [sniffer]Possible Paypal Phishing
The owner of a domain need not authorize a reverse DNS PTR record in any
way, shape or form. If the netblock was owned, or the netblock owner
had delegated rDNS to a malicious customer, they could easily set rDNS
to whatever they wanted. Aol.com
:38 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Possible Paypal Phishing
It's really from PostDirect.com aka YesMail.com ...
You can tell that it's authorized because the reverse DNS which ends in
PayPal.com (ok, that does set off alarm bells when it's someone else's
netblock
: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Possible Paypal Phishing
But how is PayPal's DNS involved in this as at what point are
the Paypal DNS servers queried
Nothing too out of the ordinary here - ~17,000 blocked messages between
10-11 AM EST. Yesterday same time frame was ~16,000.
- greg
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:35 AM
To:
For a couple days I have seen a increase in general spam (lots of male
enhancements), but particularly Nigerian letters.
John C
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:35 AM
To: Message
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:35:01 AM, you wrote:
Dear Sniffer Friends,
Our servers are really getting slammed with spam. Is anyone else seeing a
hugh spam storm right now?
Hello Michael Sniffer Folks,
http://reports.messagesniffer.com/Performance/FlowRates.jsp
Logs since about 0523.0100
Hello steve,
Saturday, May 20, 2006, 4:51:10 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
We are a current Imail/sniffer/declude customer.
We are thinking of moving away from our current Imail setup to one using
postfix.
I downloaded the 30 trial. Is it possible to transfer
We have not noticed any today.
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Jim Matuska Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: [sniffer]Ebay Phishing Emails getting through
Has anyone else
I've gotten one myself.
The pharmacy ones, are still coming through too for that matter.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herb Guenther
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:03 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re
Hello Jim,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 2:46:48 PM, you wrote:
Has anyone else been getting an excess amount of ebay phishing emails making
it through sniffer today? I have personally received a couple of them and
have multiple users reporting the same. I have forwarded them to the
sniffer
: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:53 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: Re: [sniffer]Ebay Phishing Emails getting through
Hello Jim,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 2:46:48 PM, you wrote:
Has anyone else been getting an excess amount of ebay
phishing emails
making it through sniffer today? I have
Pong
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: sniffer@sortmonster.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:12 PM
To: sniffer@sortmonster.com
Subject: Test
Hello sniffer,
Just testing.
--
pong...
Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello sniffer,
Just testing.
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Message received...
Sharon
Portage College
|-+--
| | Pete McNeil|
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | search.com|
| | Sent by: |
| | [EMAIL
On February 9, 2006 Pete wrote:
I expect to be able to accept compressed log files within the next few
days if all goes as planned.
I will announce that ability on this list when we are ready.
Is it possible now?
Roger
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For
Hello Pete,
Friday, May 12, 2006, 1:48:00 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sniffer Folks,
I expect to be able to accept compressed log files within the next
few days if all goes as planned.
I will announce that ability on this list when we are ready.
Is it possible now?
Roger
Sorry for the odd way
Here too.
--
Daniel Bayerdorffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Numberall Stamp Tool Co., Inc.
PO Box 187 Sangerville, ME 04479 USA
TEL 207-876-3541 FAX 207-876-3566
www.numberall.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick
Sent:
buy this
stuff from a spam email like that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Daniel Bayerdorffer
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 9:38 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Lot of Drugs Spam getting through sniffer
Here too
The more interesting fact is that Outlook's generic spam filter is catching
1 to 7 spam messages per day for me.
John Back
Baldwin School
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Chuck Schick
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 10:34 AM
To:
Peter,
I have taken over the network administration for Neptune Chemical Pump Co.
Could I get a manual for the sniffer software. That is how to use set up
and confirm it is still configured correctly.
Thank you,
Jeff Alexander
Neptune Chemical Pump
Network Administrator
- Original
On Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 11:05:15 AM, Jeff wrote:
JA Peter,
JA I have taken over the network administration for Neptune Chemical Pump Co.
JA Could I get a manual for the sniffer software. That is how to use set up
JA and confirm it is still configured correctly.
You can find the root
On Wednesday, April 19, 2006, 7:20:01 PM, Matt wrote:
M
M Pete,
M
M I tried replying to some FP reports and I received back some loop reports
from your gateway:
M
M
M
M
M Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
M mail loop: too many hops (too many 'Received:' header fields)
I'm
-
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Darin Cox sniffer@SortMonster.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] False positive processing
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, 9:38:46 AM, Darin wrote:
DC
DC
DC Hi Pete,
DC
DC
DC
DC Are you getting behind on false positive processing
On Monday, March 20, 2006, 3:58:03 PM, John wrote:
JTL It seems today that updates have been slow to retrieve, the last one being
JTL averaging 54 Kbps. Updates are triggered on the e-mail update notice.
I just retrieved your rulebase at an average of 267K/sec via my DSL.
My DL rate is 3Mbps -
Of Harry Vanderzand
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:15 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] New Web Site!
What is a wiki?
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet Computer Services
519-741-1222
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
What is the purpose of using a WIKI site?
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:07 AM
To: sniffer@sortmonster.com
Subject: [sniffer] New Web
1 - 100 of 1018 matches
Mail list logo
