Hakan: "To condition the cohabitation of a men and a women on if they are married or not?"
"Unmarried cohabitation. Eight states continue to make it a crime for an unmarried man and a woman to cohabit together: Florida, Idaho, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, North Dakota, Virginia and West
Uh oh. I'm cohabitating illegally. Wait'll I tell my GF.
-Mike
Michael Redler wrote:
**
Hakan: To condition the cohabitation of a men and a women on if they are
married or not?
Unmarried cohabitation. Eight states continue to make it a crime for
an unmarried man and a woman to
Mike,
Never heard about it before. LOL
This is fantastic, a long time since I had such a good laugh.
Not since Bush said that they did the best to kill their own military. LOL
In a range of ...so do we statements, he actually said.
They try their best to kill our people, so do we. LOL
Is it
Mike,
Watch it, she might take it as a proposal, or worse, move out.
Hakan
At 15:48 29/08/2005, you wrote:
Uh oh. I'm cohabitating illegally. Wait'll I tell my GF.
-Mike
Michael Redler wrote:
**
Hakan: To condition the cohabitation of a men and a women on if they are
married or
] Robertson et al VS. followers
Mike,
Never heard about it before. LOL
This is fantastic, a long time since I had such a good laugh.
Not since Bush said that they did the best to kill their own military. LOL
In a range of ...so do we statements, he actually said.
They try their best to kill our
: Re: [Biofuel] Robertson et al VS. followers
Mike,
Never heard about it before. LOL
This is fantastic, a long time since I had such a good laugh.
Not since Bush said that they did the best to kill their own military.
LOL
In a range of ...so do we statements, he actually said.
They try
Cliff,
we are all here to discuss learn. Do not be afraid to state a view that is
not widely held. It is only by airing these views that we can either be
convinced by you, or you by us to lead a better, more peaceful existence.
regards Doug (an Aussie...)
On Sunday 28 August 2005 2:17, Clif
Mike,
I did not know of the sedition act of 1918:
...shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal,
profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government
of the United States, or the Constitution of the United States...
This make any talk about freedom of speech
Hello Clif
Hello Keith,
As I am fairly new to this list I should have done some achive research
before posting. My bad .
You obviously have spent quite some time arguing your opinion on these
political issues. I have not. I spoke from my convictions not from my
expertise.
Sorry Clif, it's a
To keep the exercise honest, as inevitably will all attorney's
involved [chuckle, chuckle, snot, smurf.:-], Robertson's words,
mindset and progressive thoughts need to be disected precisely as spoken.
Unfortunately for him, he all too quickly took the excercise from the
realm of ruminating to
As quoted here, what I find interesting about the sedition act is the
very specific phrasing: ..utter...abusive language about the form of
government of the United States, or the Constitution of the United
States...
In its first few lines the 1918 act forbids lying about the government
and
Hi Todd
Dogonnit Keith,
Sorry about that.
If the guy is going to behave in such a fashion, those who have to
suffer it should at least be able to grill him about his generalities
and stereotyping until he's forced to admit that there is a lot more to
the bag of beans than he would care to
And I was so looking forward to see how he would set his own noose in
motion by his own processes.
Oh well.
Keith Addison wrote:
Hi Todd
Dogonnit Keith,
Sorry about that.
If the guy is going to behave in such a fashion, those who have to
suffer it should at least be able to
wait...are talking about Streeter or the Bush administration?
I want my SUV sung to the tune of I want my MTV...
Appal Energy wrote:
And I was so looking forward to see how he would set his own noose in
motion by his own processes.
Oh well.
Keith Addison wrote:
Hi Todd
Keith Addison wrote:
Hello David
Hi Keith:)
I expect that's covered under free speech.
I'd personally rate Robertsons comments as up there with any number
of people who advocate the death of Bush for crimes against humanity
or somesuch. If Bush were assasinated would these people really
Hello David
Either I'm losing my debating touch or you're taking my arguments a
long ways away from where they were aimed.
Not from where they're aimed, but perhaps where they came from. I
think you're sitting in an armchair, and this ain't no armchair.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I don't
Hello Clif
Keith Addison wrote:
My my. And I was just thinking you might be a man who'd do a bit of
checking before he shot his foot off. Again. I do rather wonder what
you mean when you say right here in America when actually where you
are right now is right here on the global Internet, on
David,
What you are saying is that if I officially said that CIA should kill
Bush, before he get US in irreversible trouble, then I am not doing
anything illegal. I do not personally belive that this should be done
or that anyone seriously should suggest this, but I wonder what
happened if I
Non-mythology about the news from Iraq:
Cindy Sheehan speaks to crowd at Camp Casey
Casey was killed by insurgents. He wasn't killed by terrorists. He
was killed by Shiite militia who wanted him out of the country.
Audio and transcript
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9980.htm
Hello Cliff,
I am a former officer in the USAF so perhaps I do
have a fondness for
the fine, exceedingly capable and patriotic men and
women serving to protect and defend a country I
personally feel is a pretty good place to live.
Perhaps I am living under some delusions and if that
is the
Greetings to all, I am an avid alternative fuel
advocate who is building a large home sized processor.
I do hope you will read this and maybe it will help
get us back on track!!All this talk of politics as far
as I am concerned is for the most part way out of
line,and with a lot of
Well done Keith.
So here we are again, stating the obvious,setting the record straight about a war which violates international laws (which the US helped write, then signed onto)related tojustification for war, engagement,torture, detainment and the fabrication of the term "enemy combatant"
ardis streeter wrote:
All this talk of politics as far
as I am concerned is for the most part way out of
line,and with a lot of misconceptions toward a
political adjenda.
Don't go there! Didn't you read the welcome message when you first
subscribed?
robert luis rabello
The Edge
Hallo Folks,
Saturday, 27 August, 2005, 11:51:31, you wrote:
rlr ardis streeter wrote:
All this talk of politics as far as I am concerned is for the most
part way out of line,and with a lot of misconceptions toward a
political adjenda.
rlr Don't go there! Didn't you read the welcome
Well said Gustl,
This list has proven to me how little I know, so many times.
Bright Blessings,
Kim
At 11:34 AM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
Hallo Folks,
Ja, let's not go there. Let us go here instead. Unless people have
all the information they are able they will not be able to make
Greetings to all, I am an avid alternative fuel
advocate who is building a large home sized processor.
I do hope you will read this and maybe it will help
get us back on track!!All this talk of politics as far
as I am concerned is for the most part way out of
line,and with a lot of
If nothing else, these political discussions do get everyone to come
out and talk. I think it is great. Freedom of speech is still alive
here, whether we talk about making alternative fuel, or politics. I
agree that talking is where it's at. Besides, as a newcomer, when I
ask questions about
Dogonnit Keith,
If the guy is going to behave in such a fashion, those who have to
suffer it should at least be able to grill him about his generalities
and stereotyping until he's forced to admit that there is a lot more to
the bag of beans than he would care to recognize.
Just throttling
Dear List,
A bit about the legal ramifications, though there will be none, of
Pat Robertson's statements concerning Chavez.
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20050826.html by
John Dean .
Cheers,
S. Chapin
___
Biofuel mailing list
Thanks: I find that illuminating to say the least. I personally hope that the
US does take this further, otherwise how can they insist foreign powers
prosecute their citizens for similar acts (including for instance statements
by Mullahs)
regards Doug
On Sunday 28 August 2005 8:26, S.
There are any number of people who are calling for Bush to be tried
for treason and war crimes. We certainly don't want him to be
assassinated! God forbid, we don't need any NeoCon martyrs here.
We do expect that he and most of his cabinet will be hung or imprisoned
after the trials
Hello Keith,
As I am fairly new to this list I should have done some achive research
before posting. My bad .
You obviously have spent quite some time arguing your opinion on these
political issues. I have not. I spoke from my convictions not from my
expertise.
As far as /trolling/ I must
Greetings fellow revolutionary alchemists!
The question I have is, How do we help separate the good-hearted
followers from their devious leaders?
For example:
I often forward news and interesting articles (much of which I find on
this list, thanks to you all) to a few friends and family. I
Hi everybody,
I do not know about Robertson, but thereare many so-called 'evangelists' whose sole purpose is to collect money from naive believers. My late mother once donated !R 200 to a well known TV evangelist.and received a hasty letter back from the guy stating that it wasn't enough even for
I once sent them (Oral Roberts?) a brick. They were asking for 25.00 to
buy a brick, so I sent them a letter saying I could get a much better
price and did they want more.
Cost me something like 4.00 for 4th class postage but it was worth it.
Manick Harris wrote:
Hi everybody,
I do not know
BT wrote:
Greetings fellow revolutionary alchemists!
The question I have is, How do we help separate the good-hearted
followers from their devious leaders?
I've found the best thing to do is go back to the scriptures from
whence Christians are supposed to derive standards for their
Robert,
A question,
In many countries death threat and instigation of murdering a person
is against the criminal laws. Is it not the same in US and if, why
have they not arrested and questioned Robertson?
Hakan
At 17:13 26/08/2005, you wrote:
BT wrote:
Greetings fellow revolutionary
--- Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In many countries death threat and instigation of
murdering a person is against the criminal laws.
Is it not the same in US and if, why have they not
arrested and questioned Robertson?
Because he is the darling of the far right Christian
The other night on CNN Christpher Hitchens called Pat Robertson a babbling
idiot and proof of unintelligent design
- Original Message -
From: robert luis rabello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Robertson et
Hakan Falk wrote:
Robert,
A question,
In many countries death threat and instigation of murdering a person
is against the criminal laws. Is it not the same in US and if, why
have they not arrested and questioned Robertson?
At the very least, such a threat would cross the
Amen Robert!
While not a christian, I've read many of the major scriptures of the
world. While reading the Robertson thread, I was thinking how badly we
needed to hear the Who would Jesus hate? Who would Jesus kill?
message.
Your message is so on target. The most important teaching we
as
Satans Little Stooge
- Original Message -
From: Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Robertson et al VS. followers
Robert,
A question,
In many countries death threat and instigation of murdering
Hakan Falk wrote:
Robert,
A question,
In many countries death threat and instigation of murdering a person
is against the criminal laws. Is it not the same in US and if, why
have they not arrested and questioned Robertson?
It's tempting to reply to the effect that he's a supporter of Bush
David,
So it is legal in US to suggest that a man should be assassinated?
What if Chavez is murdered is murdered and CIA is behind it, will he
not be pursued for suggesting it?
I know that it is against US law to have any agency to kill a leader of
an other Nation. This means also that
Wow and to think that I was going to use this list only to figure out
how to titrate WVO correctly.
At the risk at attracting perhaps merited flames ..
Where is the outrage at the coverage of the war in Iraq ?
Have you heard one positive story on NPR or anywhere else ?
Where is the outrage at
Hakan Falk wrote:
David,
So it is legal in US to suggest that a man should be assassinated?
I expect that's covered under free speech.
I'd personally rate Robertsons comments as up there with any number of
people who advocate the death of Bush for crimes against humanity or
somesuch. If
Clif Caldwell wrote:
Wow and to think that I was going to use this list only to figure out
how to titrate WVO correctly.
At the risk at attracting perhaps merited flames ..
Where is the outrage at the coverage of the war in Iraq ?
There's a lot of this kind of discussion in the
Clif Caldwell wrote:
Wow and to think that I was going to use this list only to figure out
how to titrate WVO correctly.
At the risk at attracting perhaps merited flames ..
Where is the outrage at the coverage of the war in Iraq ?
I am a US citizen and I am outraged. I believe we need a
Speaking of outrage, I thought the Mission Accomplished news stunt was
pretty outrageous.
robert luis rabello wrote:
Clif Caldwell wrote:
Wow and to think that I was going to use this list only to figure out
how to titrate WVO correctly.
At the risk at attracting perhaps merited flames
Hello David
Hakan Falk wrote:
David,
So it is legal in US to suggest that a man should be assassinated?
I expect that's covered under free speech.
I'd personally rate Robertsons comments as up there with any number
of people who advocate the death of Bush for crimes against humanity
or
My my. And I was just thinking you might be a man who'd do a bit of
checking before he shot his foot off. Again. I do rather wonder what
you mean when you say right here in America when actually where you
are right now is right here on the global Internet, on a global
discussion group with a
Fred Finch wrote:
Clif,
No flames from me just...
snip
Where is the outrage at the coverage of the war in Iraq ?
Coverage is adequate and the news is not very good.
http://chrenkoff.blogspot.com/2005/07/good-news-from-iraq-part-31.html
http://unix.dfn.org/good_news_iraq.shtml
Keith Addison wrote:
My my. And I was just thinking you might be a man who'd do a bit of
checking before he shot his foot off. Again. I do rather wonder what
you mean when you say right here in America when actually where you
are right now is right here on the global Internet, on a global
Clif,
Do not worry, Guantanamo is full of people who only suggested a
destruction of US, but never did something about it. You have a lot
of people who supports you and think the same. Every day you will
find it in US news media, not to mention US legislation and US
government.
At 21:48
Hakan Falk wrote:
Excuse an ignorant foreigner, but what is NPR? Is it an internationally
accepted shortening, or is it your secret?
NPR stands for National Public Radio. It's a news service
partially funded by the government through the non profit Corporation
for Public
55 matches
Mail list logo
