Re: [Talk-GB] What is farmland?

-- Original Message -- From: "Dave F via Talk-GB" To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: 14/12/2019 15:54:13 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] What is farmland? On 14/12/2019 15:19, Martin Wynne wrote: Is this "farmland"? http://85a.uk/haws_hill_960x600.jpg I would say yes, as I believe both

Re: [Talk-GB] UK coastline data

-- Original Message -- From: "Devonshire" To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: 12/07/2019 07:44:55 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] UK coastline data On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, at 10:41 PM, Borbus wrote: The Dart cuts the coastline off right at the mouth, which doesn't seem right... I think the

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

-- Original Message -- From: "Mike Evans" To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Cc: "David Groom" Sent: 28/08/2018 19:22:16 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:09:47 + "David Groom" wrote: There is no consensus.

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

t it would be advantageous to have consensus on this matter, and a consistent tagging paradigm in OSM? I am not prejudging what that consensus position might be, just sounding out if there is any point in having the discussion in the first place. On 2018-08-28 13:09, David G

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

There is no consensus. Personally I'm not in favour of the view that any body of water which is tidal should be bounded by a way tagged as coastline. Reasons for this 1) Ask any one who lives in say central London "do you live on the coast" or do you live beside a river", most would I'm

[OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

How about 1) Change "OpenStreetmap Collaborative Mapping" to "OpenStreetmap Distaster Mapping" 2) Link the word "OpenStreetmap" to the OSM web site Regards David -- Original Message -- From: "Blake Girardot HOT/OSM" To: "Christoph Hormann"

[talk-ph] Duplicated highways

In southern Mindanao there are a number of highways which have duplicated ways, but often with different highway classifications (for example one way being marked as trunk, the other as primary). As an indication of where they are see here

Re: [Talk-GB] Select and correct a discovered key duplication of sorts in JOSM

Alternatively in JOSM: File > Download from Overpass API Then put ref:Chiltern_Society = * in the text box next to "Build query", then click "Build Query". Next select download area, and then click "Download" David -- Original Message -- From: "Bob Hawkins"

Re: [talk-ph] landuse = farm

Thanks for showing me those previous discussions -- Original Message -- From: "Eugene Alvin Villar" <sea...@gmail.com> To: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net> Cc: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> Sent: 02/05/201

Re: [talk-ph] Bridges mapped as link roads or ramps

Message -- From: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net> To: "talk-ph" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> Sent: 27/04/2017 16:46:15 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Bridges mapped as link roads or ramps I think it would be OK to re-tag these as the appropriate highway type with &

Re: [talk-ph] landuse = farm

oach 3 as it keeps the field data in OSM (someone might have a use for this) What are your thoughts? Regards David -- Original Message -- From: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net> To: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> Sent: 31/

Re: [talk-ph] Tagging of air conditioning repair/servicing centers

If they also sell air conditioning units then maybe shop=hvac (used 34 times in OSM already https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dhvac) repair=yes This would be similar to tagging for a computer shop, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcomputer David --

Re: [talk-ph] landuse = farm

ot;Eugene Alvin Villar" <sea...@gmail.com> To: "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net> Cc: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <talk-ph@openstreetmap.org> Sent: 30/03/2017 00:56:18 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] landuse = farm On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, David Groom

[talk-ph] landuse = farm

I've just seen this discussion on the main OSM talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-March/077741.html The standard OSM rendering will soon drop the rendering of "landuse = farm". There are : 66 Relations 7,390 ways 71 Nodes (interestingly the wiki did not recommend

Re: [talk-ph] Residential.

I've just forced a refresh of the affected tiles. David -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Morgan" To: Cc: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" Sent: 22/02/2017 03:55:48 Subject: Re: [talk-ph] Residential. Eugene Alvin Villar wrote on Wednesday,

[Talk-GB] any cyclists familiar with Calder Aire link

There seems a lot of duplication in these two route relations: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2171660 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1573805 Both are titled "Calder Aire link" ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Rendering (?) bug at Marble Arch

Rendering OK now, presumably as a result of http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45519828 -- Original Message -- From: "Edward Catmur" To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: 26/01/2017 16:00:22 Subject: [Talk-GB] Rendering (?) bug at Marble Arch

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

Not quite sure what you had in mind by the tags map_type and map_size, but maybe need a tag something along the likes of "sign_type" withn values of "bollard | monolith | finger_post | totem" ( see http://content.tfl.gov.uk/legible-london-product-range.pdf) David -- Original Message

Re: [Talk-GB] beetroot or beet

Although "beet" could also refer to "sugar beet" I think the wiki pages may be confused The wiki page for crop in Japanese http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:crop does seem to have crop = beet translating as sugar beet Whereas the Polish page I think has crop = beet translating a

Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

ot;Robert Norris" <rw_nor...@hotmail.com> To: "Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>; "David Groom" <revi...@pacific-rim.net> Sent: 10/01/2017 00:36:41 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] tag prow_ref If I remember correctly the use of "pro

[Talk-GB] tag prow_ref

Has any one got any instances of any providers of OSM data using the prow_ref on rendering / routing I recently pointed out to a mapper that if the reference numbers he was adding to footpaths were official PROW reference numbers it was recommended to use the "prow_ref" tag rather than the

Re: [Talk-GB] natural=heath

I have came across a similar issue where areas of mainly grass, but with some gorse bushes, on chalk downland had been changed to natural=heath, when I contacted the mapper about it he said something along the lines of, "well I've seen it done like that elsewhere" David -- Original

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

of problems you saw in the IoW? //colin [1] https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5386032,0.6292606,3a,24.7y,277.12h,84.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sMl8cwBlLLuOVtPES_DfkOQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 On 2016-12-11 22:30, David Groom wrote: I suspect that even though much of the coastline is tagged "source

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

I suspect that even though much of the coastline is tagged "source=PGS" is has been amended by reference to Yahoo and after that Bing imagery, but the subsequent editors did not remove the "source=PGS" tag. Certainly comparing your gpx file for the Isle of Wight with the coastline currently

[talk-ph] way ID 353779765

I'm aware that Bing & Mapbox imagery may be out dated, but is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353779765 really a riverbank? David ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [talk-ph] areas of mangrove

hen I do not tag the mangrove at all. Just my opinion... Cheers Totor On April 30, 2016 10:14:43 AM GMT+08:00, David Groom wrote: There are two different approaches used in mapping mangrove areas in OSM 1) Treat the boundary of the mangrove and the openwater sea as the coastline, and then

Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

Hopefully fixing the geometries in this area is now complete David On 19/03/2016 17:53, David Groom wrote: Its now been one month with no major objections to my proopesed cnages, so I have made them, but with the suggestion made by Eugene. However the exisiting geometry of the landuse

Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

nges 2 and 3. For #1, I think it should be landuse=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being meadows. On 2/14/16, David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> wrote: While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come across a number which do not seem to fit

Re: [talk-ph] Various farmed landuses

=farmland instead of meadow. Rice fields are far from being meadows. On 2/14/16, David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> wrote: While looking at existing tagging of landuse areas in Leyte I have come across a number which do not seem to fit the tagging structure on the main OSM wiki, and I ca

[talk-ph] Coastlines - was Forest landcover

Eugene the coastline ways which I am improving seem to derive from an import of IFSAR 2012 data (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33871982) So these are after the 2010 mini project to improve the coaastline David >As for the saw-tooth coastlines, I'm actually surprised they

Re: [talk-ph] Coastlines - was Forest landcover

>Might be good to probe more. Can you give me sample changesets so I >can ask around. As far as I can see its https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33871982 ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org

[talk-ph] Forest landcover

reas . This may result in a large part of Leyte "turning green" on the map. Regards David Groom ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [Talk-GB] Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref=

- Original Message - From: Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 2:43 PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Guidance for adding PRoW to OSM: prow_ref= Arg! We were converging on prow_ref when I last looked at tag info a few months

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Data consumer use cases

- Original Message - From: Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:43 PM Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Data consumer use cases Goal-oriented wiki page, first draft:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data

- Original Message - From: Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:32 AM Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data Hi there, I have a question about imports and the

Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update

- Original Message - From: Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net To: sly (sylvain letuffe) li...@letuffe.org Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update On 19/09/12 at 16:24 +0200, sly (sylvain

[OSM-talk] Mapnik coastline layer

Just wondering if it might be time for the mapnik coastline files to be updated. It seems over two months since this was last done. The number of coastline errors each day is now small. The only reason I can see for not updating is that the redaction bot may have reduced the accuracy of the

Re: [talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature

As others have said , I'd re-use the existing nodes. I'd probably tag this as natural = water David - Original Message - From: Chris Barham To: talk-au Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:21 PM Subject: [talk-au] redaction cleanup - unusual water feature Hi, I'm working

[Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN

islandmonkey seems to have been at it again http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12772095 which just seems to consist of mass deletions, including deleted coastline, and no meaningful changeset comment I also note 4 other changesets by him / her today Can we get this reverted and

Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed

in a while. David - Original Message - From: Paul Norman To: 'osm-talk' Cc: David Groom Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 6:42 AM Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Coastline generation resumed Minor update: I am now running three times a day. Exact upload times depend on runtime

Re: [Talk-GB] PRoW Ref tagging when ROW is also a road

...@systemed.net wrote: David Groom wrote: However at the north end there is a (newly erected) public footpath sign showing a footpath ref of B64, pointing straight down this road, and the definitive map shows this as a footpath. I use admin:ref for refs that are predominantly intended

[Talk-GB] PRoW Ref tagging when ROW is also a road

Longwood Lane when driving a car along it looks pretty much like a normal highway, although it is rather narrow. It has an asphalt surface, and when turning in from the north, or south there is nothing to show there is anything special about this road at all from a vehicles point of view.

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline rendering problems, Richelieu River

- Original Message - From: Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr To: talk-ca talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 11:27 PM Subject: [Talk-ca] Coastline rendering problems, Richelieu River There are also Coastline rendering problems on the Richelieu river around

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council

- Original Message - From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council 2012/6/11 Nick Whitelegg

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council

- Original Message - From: Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:12 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council On 11/06/12 17:16, David Groom wrote: - Original Message - From: Martin

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council

- Original Message - From: Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:12 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council On 11/06/12 17:16, David Groom wrote: - Original Message - From: Martin

[OSM-legal-talk] Hampshire Rights of Way Data released under OSOpenData licence

On talk-gb Nick Whiteleg recently announced what initially seemed to be some good news , that Hampshire County Council have released their Rights of Way data under the OS OpenData licence. However, my initial thoughts, and those of Robert Whittaker, was that this might not seem as good news

Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Rights of Way Data released under OS OpenData licence

- Original Message - From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:01 PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Rights of Way Data released under OS OpenData licence On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 13:29 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote: Hence,

Re: [Talk-GB] Hampshire Rights of Way Data released under OSOpenData licence

I've had some additional thoughts on this, but will now be discussing these on legal talk rather than here David ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Attributing Sources used in OSM

- Original Message - From: Robert Whittaker (OSM) robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 9:08 AM Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Attributing Sources used in OSM I've just been given permission

Re: [Talk-GB] Have you contacted a UK local authority in regards to Rights of Way?

- Original Message - From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:51 PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Have you contacted a UK local authority in regards to Rights of Way? On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 16:22 +,

Re: [OSM-talk] Islands that will vanish in the license change

- Original Message - From: Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 7:14 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] Islands that will vanish in the license change Thanks to Paul Norman's efforts and visualizations based on it[1], I've now added

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Signing of Contributor Terms

- Original Message - From: Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 3:14 PM Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Signing of Contributor Terms Hi All, Would it be possible to have someone sign the

Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines?

- Original Message - From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com To: Simon Poole si...@poole.ch Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 1:10 PM Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines? Ok, is there someone with JOSM expertise that can actually do this? I

Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines?

- Original Message - From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 9:46 PM Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines? - Original Message - From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com To: Simon Poole si...@poole.ch

Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines?

- Original Message - From: Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com To: Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:53 AM Subject: Re: [talk-au] How to fix the coastlines? A week or so ago there were a group of people working intent on

Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update

- Original Message - From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:58 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: There are no

Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update

Paul A big thank you for providing all of the data. It has helped to greatly reduce the number of error points over the last week. Regards David - Original Message - From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:26 AM Subject:

Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update

- Original Message - From: Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk To: 'Toby Murray' toby.mur...@gmail.com; talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:58 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline Update Toby wrote: Assuming you used the data I supplied this morning, it is actually

Re: [talk-au] Plea to Australian decliners

- Original Message - From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com To: Jack Burton j...@saosce.com.au Cc: talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org; osm-f...@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:32 AM Subject: Re: [talk-au] Plea to Australian decliners On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 1:14 AM,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What licences (other than ODbL) are compatible with OSM after 1st April

- Original Message - From: Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 1:12 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What licences (other than ODbL) are compatible with OSM after 1st April On 23

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines

- Original Message - From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:34 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my server, using the latest data from my jxapi server. Tonight I

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines

- Original Message - From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com To: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines Paul Norman writes: I have been running a nightly coastline generation on my

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines

- Original Message - From: Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 9:21 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL-clean Coastlines Paul Norman writes: It's particularly galling that anonymous users who haven't accepted or declined are

Re: [talk-au] Mapping Coastlines (Was: Re: Boundary removal.)

make it easy as that is your mean high tide mark, but few places have such a wall. On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:43 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote: With the high resolution imagery its usually quite easy to differentiate between permanently dry areas, and areas which was been covered

Re: [Talk-ca] Clean up - natural coastline

- Original Message - From: Andrew Allison andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com To: talk-ca talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 3:33 PM Subject: [Talk-ca] Clean up - natural coastline Hello: I'm in the process of recreating non-ct data. Any gotchas that I should look

[Talk-ca] Coastline Clean Up 2

- Original Message - From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com To: 'James A. Treacy' tre...@debian.org; 'Andrew Allison' andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com Cc: 'talk-ca' talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 3:55 AM Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Clean up - natural coastline From:

Re: [OSM-talk] Big Blue Something in Colombia

- Original Message - From: malenki To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 6:43 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Big Blue Something in Colombia bastien wrote: Have a little look in talk-co, Thanks for the hint, but my knowledge of Spanish consists of three to five

Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in determining tainted ways

- Original Message - From: Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 4:47 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in determining tainted ways Yeah, a healthy chunk of the interstates in Kansas are

Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in determining tainted ways

- Original Message - From: Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] An example of the complications inherent in determining tainted ways On 15/12/2011 12:40, David Groom wrote: - Original

Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication

- Original Message - From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:32 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Who mapped it first with ref to forth coming deletions - implication On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, john whelan

Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 6:33 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture? On Dec 12, 2011, at 8:38 AM, David Groom wrote: I recently made some updates

Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 9:07 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture? On Dec 9, 2011, at 3:29 AM, David Groom wrote: Martin Someone had been tidying

Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com To: Sax-Barnett, Melelani barne...@trimet.org Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture? a similar problem is also observable for

Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture? 2011/12/9 David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net

Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture?

- Original Message - From: Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 2:25 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] What's wrong with this picture? Sax-Barnett, Melelani schrieb: I've actually noticed the same problem over in Portland, Oregon, USA as

[OSM-talk] Coastline errors ( was Argh, Canvec imports)

- Original Message - From: Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com To: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:54 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Argh, Canvec imports On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:40, Michal Migurski

Re: [OSM-talk] Argh, Canvec imports

- Original Message - From: Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Argh, Canvec imports On 17-11-2011 18:13, David Groom wrote: - Original Message - From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com

Re: [Talk-GB] How to tag marine lights on posts

- Original Message - From: Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 3:48 PM Subject: [Talk-GB] How to tag marine lights on posts I've just tagged a row of 18 marine hazard lights, on tall posts,

Re: [OSM-talk] Japan coastline errors

- Original Message - From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net To: Kimon Berlin ki...@deepskymarines.org; talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:17 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Japan coastline errors I think I fixed all coastline errors in Japan which showed up

Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure

- Original Message - From: Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 8:14 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure On 05/10/2011 16:36, Serge Wroclawski wrote: The status of Jerusalem as part of

Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure

- Original Message - From: Pieren pier...@gmail.com To: OSM talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 11:47 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Lambert Carsten lhc@solcon.nl wrote: As an

Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure

- Original Message - From: Lambert Carsten lhc@solcon.nl To: talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:07 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Naming dispute over Jerusalem - OSM failure On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:39:16 -0400 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [OSM-talk] There are new coastline shapefiles

- Original Message - From: Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 9:42 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] There are new coastline shapefiles Hi, I've started including new coastline shapefiles with the metro extracts:

Re: [talk-au] OSM Inspector

- Original Message - From: Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:14 AM Subject: [talk-au] OSM Inspector Hi Everyone, I recently found OSM Inspector and Keep Right and have been slowly fixing the problems found

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking For Unconnected Cycleways

- Original Message - From: Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu To: Steve Dobson st...@dobbo.org Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Looking For Unconnected Cycleways Keep right seams to lag a bit behind the current state, just click

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases

- Original Message - From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 7:52 AM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases Hi, On 07/12/11 01:05, David Groom wrote: Well that's what I asked to this list on 17

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases

- Original Message - From: Anthony o...@inbox.org To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org; Richard Weait rich...@weait.com; Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org; David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:29 AM Subject: Re: [OSM

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases

- Original Message - From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 11:39 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases David, David Groom wrote: This seems to be quite

Re: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au

- Original Message - From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com To: talk@openstreetmap.org; talk...@openstreetmap.org Cc: p...@opengeodata.posterous.com Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 8:00 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au [snip] Maybe you have a better option? Yes. Do

[OSM-legal-talk] ODbl and collective databases

The ODbL defines a Collective Database as this Database in unmodified form as part of a collection of independent databases in themselves that together are assembled into a collective whole. Now I had assumed that as far as the above definition was concerned that: Database meant Database

Re: [talk-au] [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au

- Original Message - From: Steve Coast st...@asklater.com To: t...@openstreetmap.org; talk-au@openstreetmap.org Cc: p...@opengeodata.posterous.com Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 8:00 AM Subject: [OSM-talk] Hitting reset on talk-au [snip] Maybe you have a better option? Yes. Do

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

- Original Message - From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 10:04 AM Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways David Murn wrote: I think the biggest problem people in .au had

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

- Original Message - From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways David Groom wrote: Are you sure? ODbL defines 'Collective Database Means this Database in unmodified form

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

- Original Message - From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways David Groom wrote: Which seems to me to that you are agreeing with my point, that these are derivative

Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways

- Original Message - From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 5:19 PM Subject: Re: [talk-au] Going separate ways David Groom wrote: But as I said earlier, the ODbL seems quite clear that you cant make a Collective

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] offering adapted databases

- Original Message - From: Anthony o...@inbox.org To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net Cc: OSM Fork osm-f...@googlegroups.com; openstreetmap t...@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 9:25 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] offering adapted databases On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:27

[OSM-legal-talk] Guidelines on interpretation of section 4.6 od ODbL

One of the main requirements of compliance with ODbL [1] is set out in Section 4.6.As yet there are no community guidelines on how OSM / OSMF interprets this section. There seem to be at least three areas where guidelines might be necessary: A) The term offer as used in the first

[OSM-legal-talk] My recent post to OSM legal talk

Frederick I have just posted a series of questions to the OSM legal talk mailing list. In one point I cite an earlier point you made in an email to the list, and what I inferred from that email. I am in no way meaning to be critical of you, and it may be that I have inferred the wrong

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Guidelines on interpretation of section 4.6 od ODbL

- Original Message - From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:51 PM Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Guidelines on interpretation of section 4.6 od ODbL Hi, David Groom wrote

  1   2   3   4   >