Re: [Vo]:Asked & Answered

sue. Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter. 19 posted on 7/19/2021, 6:45:09 PM by Sidebar Moderator [ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse] On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:43 PM Kevin O'Malley wrot

Re: [Vo]:Asked & Answered

Moving The Goalposts Skeptopaths constantly move the goalposts for LENR. This doesn't happen in any other area of science. https://www.lenr-forum.com/search-result/66261/?highlight=moving+goalposts On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:23 PM Kevin O'Malley wrote: > I'm growing weary of the s

Re: [Vo]:Outreach for discussion on Znidarsic-Smith genuine UFO reverse engineering using causal reasoning

If you really want to get down to the "natural forces" behind flying saucers, just read ONE book: Renato Vesco's "Intercept UFO". https://www.amazon.com/Intercept-UFO-Renato-Vesco/dp/B0006WI572 It outlines the aerodynamic theories and technology of Ludwig Prandtl and Oscar Schrenk & how those

Re: [Vo]:Asked & Answered: Rossi

Here is an updated example of threadjacking by way of bringing up Rossi. https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3999491/posts?page=41#41 On 1/19/14, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > There seems to be another thing that skeptopaths engage in. They try to > turn any LENR discussion into Andrea Rossi a

[Vo]:New High-Performance Solid-State Battery Surprises the Engineers Who Created It

New High-Performance Solid-State Battery Surprises the Engineers Who Created It TOPICS:Battery TechnologyEnergyNanotechnologyUCSD By UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN DIEGO SEPTEMBER 24, 2021 https://scitechdaily.com/new-high-performance-solid-state-battery-surprises-the-engineers-who-created-it/ New

[Vo]:Physicists Create Long Sought ‘Wigner Crystal’

*Physicists Create a Bizarre ‘Wigner Crystal’ Made Purely of Electrons ... The unambiguous discovery of a Wigner crystal relied on a novel technique for probing the insides of complex materials.* *https://www.quantamagazine.org ^

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

regarding “A “linear BEC” sounds rather like the “hydroton” model of Edmund Storms” https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3981264/posts?page=15#15 -- A Bose Einstein Condensate is when a group of atoms start acting like one atom, in concert. Lots of hints that

Re: [Vo]:Asked & Answered

7426/reply?c=19> | Private Reply <https://freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3977426.19;reftype=comment> | View Replies <https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3977426/replies?c=19> | Report Abuse <https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3977426/abuse?c=19>] On Thu, Jun 17, 20

Re: [Vo]:Thermacore and the missing link to the Kervran effect

That paper is very "vortician". Right up our alley. The possible explaining of some controversial effects by a *vortexial* atom model Volume 4 Issue 2 - 2020 Marius Arghirescu State Office for Inventions and Trademarks, Patents Department, Romania Correspondence: Marius Arghirescu, State

Re: [Vo]:Thermacore and the missing link to the Kervran effect

Thermacore came very close to the big time when they were granted a patent for a solid state thermal diode. Hagelstein was one of the inventors. Yet another mystery in this field. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6396191 Thermal diode for energy conversion Abstract Solid state thermionic

[Vo]:A Super New Theory to Explain Superconductivity

*A Super New Theory to Explain Superconductivity* *Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism ^ *| 5 July 2021 | Hiroyasu Koizumi Posted on *7/11/2021, 7:26:10 AM*

Re: [Vo]:Asked & Answered

om/~kevmo/>(some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. ~Jonathan Karl) [ Post Reply <https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3968011/reply?c=32> | Private Reply <https://freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3968011.32;reftype=comment> | To 31 <https://freerepublic.com/focus/c

Re: [Vo]:How to make money with cold fusion

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2435697/posts How I Made Money from Cold Fusion Exclusive Article for Free Republic | 1/23/10 | Kevmo Posted on 1/23/2010, 12:28:49 PM by Kevmo Freeper gets a fascinating contract listed on Intrade, bets that the experiment will be replicated, and cashes

Re: [Vo]:Planckian dissipation phenomenon

If time is determined by the speed of light, how would you determine which packets were generated first? Would they be going by some other limiting speed agent other than C? On 5/12/19, H LV wrote: > If one can build a transmitter and a receiver to transmit and detect wave > packets travelling

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

g is cheap compared to trying to get some "credible expert " whose career is gonna be over as soon as he announces he found gammas. Those are the 5 elements. , Willingness, time, capability, wherewithal and bullshit. On 5/18/19, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > >&

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

to test gammas and actually finds them will probably find his career over. That's gotta be worth $100k. And that's why no one is stepping forward to overcome the ... bullshit. On 5/18/19, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > Uhh, Jed I proposed explicitly that YOU woul

Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

career-ending bullshit. On 5/18/19, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > >> Jed is >> already posted in as willing to do it for a cool $million. That >> makes me look cheap in comparison. >> > > That was a JOKE. > > > >> Of course

Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

Kevin has not replied to my message, and his intentions are unclear. *** My initial statements were in public rather than in private. To be candid, the paragraph you wrote to me privately right before this one you're quoting , well that paragraph kinda sets the tone. And since it's done in

Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

e word! On 5/18/19, AlanG wrote: > A week ago I wrote this to Kevin O'Malley off-list, regarding his > mention of MFMP: > > "/MFMP always welcomes donations and we have a 501c3 which could make > such contributions tax-deductible in the US. I already have a Gamma > Spect

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

Uhh, Jed I proposed explicitly that YOU would be more suited to go and test but you declined. Alan S said that it would take $1000 for a gamma spectrometer, but he's off by 10X. Let's just apply that coefficient elsewhere, shall we? I think it'll take $5k to train me. Applying Allan's

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

to not accept money then I'll post that little tidbit and decide where else to go. And if anyone has demonstrated mental instability, it is Russ George. So... back to your regularly scheduled programming. On 5/17/19, russ.geo...@gmail.com wrote: > Kevin O'Malley seems to be running under some s

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

to fund LENR through these online sites like > GoFundMe, this effort may not generate much interest - and even if it did, > wouldn’t it be more credible to use an expert in spectrometry to do the > measurements – preferably one associated with the maker of the equipment or > with a Univ

[Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source Inbox Unstarred Kevin O'Malley Sat, May 11, 2019 at 8:30 PM 7 hidden messages – Show Unstarred Kevin O'Malley Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:16 AM Add star AlanG<&&&&&&&&am

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

Budgetary quote request: Gamma Spectrometer and Training Inbox Add star Kevin O'Malley Sun, May 12, 2019 at 11:17 AM To: sa...@kromek.com Bcc: kevmol...@gmail.com Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original Hello Kromek: I'm interested in purchasing one of your gamma ray

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

rably one associated with the maker of the equipment or > with a University? > > Jones > > > From: Kevin O'Malley > > https://www.gofundme.com/8nmynh-geiger?teamInvite=WC66VANcJqCD05UmM6byRPSAQOc6WHY1zMnMFDuwZkswE1QewWCy5ezPYj5IT06O > >> Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

h these online sites like > GoFundMe, this effort may not generate much interest - and even if it did, > wouldn’t it be more credible to use an expert in spectrometry to do the > measurements – preferably one associated with the maker of the equipment or > with a University?

[Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

https://www.gofundme.com/8nmynh-geiger?teamInvite=WC66VANcJqCD05UmM6byRPSAQOc6WHY1zMnMFDuwZkswE1QewWCy5ezPYj5IT06O On 5/11/19, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source > > > I'm setting up a GoFundMe campaign to buy a gamma spectro

[Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source I'm setting up a GoFundMe campaign to buy a gamma spectrometer and go to London to test these cells, per Alan's invitation. It would make sense for someone more qualified to make the visit , take the measurements, and

[Vo]:Google, University of Maryland File Patent based on ‘High Density Electron Clouds’

Google, University of Maryland File Patent based on ‘High Density Electron Clouds’ Posted on February 7, 2019 • 12 Comments Thanks to Max Nozin for referencing a new patent application (published February 7th, 2019) filed by Google Inc. and the University of Maryland, College Park on Aug 3, 2017.

[Vo]:Rare cosmological events recorded in muscovite mica.

Rare cosmological events recorded in muscovite mica. F. M. Russell, School of Computing and Engineering University of Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, U.K. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2f7ad4fe6232404eca928274d022ca00dbd699f1790550d820b93ccbca7c61a7.png Figure 1. Scan of sheet of muscovite

Re: [Vo]:Energy From Fusion In Two Years, CEO Says, Commercialization In Five

My prediction is that for the next 20 years there will be gigantic fraud scams in Fusion engineering. Like this one. Scientists have discovered how to milk the fear and greed of billionaires and it aint gonna be pretty. On 1/14/19, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > Energy From Fusion In Two Years,

[Vo]:Energy From Fusion In Two Years, CEO Says, Commercialization In Five

Energy From Fusion In Two Years, CEO Says, Commercialization In Five Jeff McMahon https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcmahon/2019/01/14/private-firm-will-bring-fusion-reactor-to-market-within-five-years-ceo-says/#4b64b0591d4a Jeff McMahon Contributor Green Tech >From Chicago, I write about

[Vo]:Claim: Hydrogen powered cars for the masses one step closer to reality

Claim: Hydrogen powered cars for the masses one step closer to reality WUWT ^ | 8/20/17 | Anthony Watts https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/11/20/claim-hydrogen-powered-cars-for-the-masses-one-step-closer-to-reality/ UCLA researchers have designed a device that can use solar energy to

Re: [Vo]:Sound Pulses Exceed Speed of Light

They did. See article below. Physicists Demonstrate Record Breaking Long-Distance Quantum Entanglement in Space Futurism.com ^ Posted on 9/2/2017, 8:35:07 PM by TBP IN BRIEF Chinese physicists managed to demonstrate long-distance quantum entanglement in space, breaking previous records. This

[Vo]:Sound Pulses Exceed Speed of Light

Sound Pulses Exceed Speed of Light Live Science ^ | January 12, 2017 | Charles Q. Choi https://www.livescience.com/1212-sound-pulses-exceed-speed-light.html A group of high school and college teachers and students has transmitted sound pulses faster than light travels—at least according to one

Re: [Vo]:LENR as a superconductor

On 8/12/17, Axil Axil wrote: What we see in that polariton > condensate is how the universe functioned during the first few seconds at > the beginning of the universe before the universe cooled. ***That's disheartening. It would mean there is very little chance of

Re: [Vo]:Large list of Rossi Patents -- Exhibit 29

– go with the coffee. There is a bit of free energy there. > > > > From: Kevin O'Malley > > Exhibit 29 is a large list of mostly unpublished patent applications by > Rossi. The titles might be interesting to some > and probably deserve a dedicated thread. > > https://drive.google.com/drive…Ktdce19-wyb1RxOTF6c2NtZkk > > [snip] > > >

[Vo]:Large list of Rossi Patents -- Exhibit 29

Thanks to LENR Forum https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5177-a-large-list-of-rossi-patents/?postID=52692=patents#post52692 #1 In 207-29 Exhibit 29 there is a large list of mostly unpublished patent applications by Rossi. The titles might be interesting to some and probably deserve a

[Vo]:Thermionic LENR patent 20170213611

Openly mentions LENR and Andrea Rossi... METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY ELECTRICITY GENERATION USING LOW ENERGY THERMAL HEAT GENERATION AND THERMIONIC DEVICES Document Type and Number: United States Patent Application 20170213611 Kind Code: A1

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

The ash-swapping accusation is one of those continental divide/watershed issues. Either he swapped the samples or there was evidence of transmutation. There is no middle ground. These kinds of no-middle-ground issues are good for determining the truth of the scenario, because it is easily

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Eric: Thank you for sending that PM to Kirk. Like I said over there, maybe I'm wrong about you after all. Try to "suffer" through that compliment, ok? On 7/27/17, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

Both sides submitted bills to the Court of about $7.5 million each ***I find that surprising, Jones. I expected IH's legal bills to be at least double that of Rossi's. I wonder how they got their top notch firm so cheap? What does this mean: This similarity of bills looks like collusion on

Re: [Vo]:Why Rossi 'won'

You're one to talk, Eric. You are among the most unreasonable moderators over at LENR-Forum with your acknowledged "Yes some farm animals are more equal than others" and other bullshit you throw on top of Pro-LENR enthusiasts and all the outright insults you allow by the skeptopath crowd. You

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

Over at EcatWorld Bob Greenyer • 9 hours ago I am now within a whisker of stating that LENR as in "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" (however they are caused) are real and testable based on specific data. With reference to ECCO, without knowing for certain that it is producing excess heat

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

t; On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> You're saying EXACTLY the same thing I and others were saying on the >> link provided, jerk. >> > > At this point I do not CARE what you have to say: because the bottom line >

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

In any case: I hope this guy and his team make it to Europa -- and to a new > lab. And DON'T start 'pulling a Rossi' on the World. > > > > > >> >> On 7/20/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Kevin O'Malley &

Re: [Vo]:Rossi-Gullstrom paper published on July 18 on Arxiv.org

Maybe whoever is trying to develop the device alongside Rossi next time shouldn't fund his competitors.Don't piss him off. That kind of thing. Let Fred Flinstone keep his job. On 7/20/17, Axil Axil wrote: > This trillion $$ invention only works if Rossi is there at

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

statement projects. And in the link provided, I'm not the only one saying such things. So pipe down, bub. Argue the facts, not personality "types" and pure bullshit. On 7/20/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Kevin O'Malley &

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

What? You're the one who started with the personal bullshit. Buying real estate to help out an experimenter's debt situation is pretty far afield from what MFMP's stated mission is declared. On 7/20/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Kevin

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

7 at 5:03 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Because if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, walks like a >> duck, etc., it's probably a duck. >> > > That's the kind of bullshit, status-quo prevarication we get in Politix all > the

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

Because if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, etc., it's probably a duck. http://e-catworld.com/2017/07/14/mfmp-plan-and-proposal-regarding-ecco-device/ On 7/20/17, Che wrote: > > Why would anyone think this guy is having the World on, as

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

Last I was looking into this, it seemed like there was a scam being run on MFMP. It took all this rigmarole to get the guy to work with you on a replication? On 7/19/17, Che wrote: > So... what do people think about the ECCO cold fusion project from an > Indian

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs. Darden Settlement Agreement Published

://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/settlement-agreement.pdf On 7/18/17, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wouldn't that be fascinating if High Temp Superconductors were > generating linear BECs? I can see they might be Luttinger Liquids, > but let's say it went o

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: >> >> There are no room temperature super

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Brian Ahern wrote: There are no room temperature superconductors. They are theoretically impossible. ***Someone should tell the guys who are working towards that goal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room-temperature_superconductor On

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On 7/17/17, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: Bremsstrahlung is associated with the slowing of a charged > particle which enters a substance at a velocity greater than the speed of > light in the medium. Velocity greater than C? I thought there was nothing that could

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On 7/17/17, Brian Ahern wrote: > > The sad reality is that nobody has succeeded in producing 1.0 watts of > excess energy with a COP > 1.5 on a repeatable and demonstrated platform. > ***What about the NANOR? And also, what about those 153 peer reviewed replications of

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

On 7/16/17, Alain Sepeda wrote: > > multiple independent instruments are also more convincing than just two. ***That is why I criticized MFMP's dropping this line of inquiry due to personal circumstances, not due to lack of promise of earlier results. It turns out that

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

So then a gamma ray detection followed by a replication within 48 hours would be very significant, wouldn't you say? That's why I'm disappointed MFMP didn't pursue this line of inquiry. On 7/15/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmai

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

. Even if there is no excess heat, it MUST be a nuclear phenomena. Even the skeptopath Kirk Shanahan acknowledges this, and he is one to throw out all 153 of those peer reviewed replication papers that you published. On 7/14/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

On 7/14/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What leads you to doubt Hans Biberian's "replication" of finding the >> gamma rays within 48 hours? >> > > Not familiar with that. ***You di

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

What leads you to doubt Hans Biberian's "replication" of finding the gamma rays within 48 hours? On 7/14/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, are you happy with how they handled this gamma ra

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/347-gamma On 7/13/17, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > I updated their blog entry for them. > > http://www.quantumheat.org/#comment-8874 >

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

e you want them to go. > Or find an investor. Right? > > > On 14 July 2017 at 03:43, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I updated their blog entry for them. >> >> http://www.quantumheat.org/#comment-8874 >> >> > > &

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

I updated their blog entry for them. http://www.quantumheat.org/#comment-8874

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

On 7/13/17, Jed Rothwell wrote: > You asked; they answered. What's your problem? ***My problem is that it took them 4 years to do it and they don't address how they prioritize scientific pursuits. It's willy nilly. >> We should see their reasoning for supporting some

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

On 7/13/17, Jed Rothwell wrote: What do you expect them to do? ***I expect them to inform us on the blog they chose to inform us. It would have cost them 10 minutes of their time. They have gone off on 4 or 5 external trips, chasing down chimera that had less chance

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

r > low-energy gamma. This in turn enabled the detection in GS5.2 of > brehmsstralung gamma emission. My current project has a similar goal, > looking for photon emission from prepared samples of Nickel and other > metals exposed to hydrogen, so the work goes on. > > On 7/13/2017 6:59

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

nything that looks unusual or otherwise worth > discussion, let us all know. > > *AlanG / MFMP* > > On 7/12/2017 4:44 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: >> The issue is:What have you been doing with that gamma ray thing. All >> the rest fits into what I called "what

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

The issue is:What have you been doing with that gamma ray thing. All the rest fits into what I called "whatever it is". On Tuesday, July 11, 2017, AlanG <a...@magicsound.us> wrote: > On 7/11/2017 10:24 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > > The gamma ray finding of MFMP was r

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Fusion events, and other nuclear exchanges. On 7/11/17, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gamma's were also seen at reaction shutdown. What produces those gammas? > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >&g

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

e LENR reaction. > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have thought for a long time that there have been multiple LENR >> reactions. When you let loose a gamma inside a lattice and it hits >> those other nickel (or

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

; wrote: > >> If that is true then Rossi either lacks the ability to interpret his own >> data or he intentionally misrepresented his data. >> >> Harry >> >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >&

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

The gamma ray finding of MFMP was replicated within 48 hours by Hans Biberian. And then they just faded away onto whatever it is they've been doing for 4 years. On 7/10/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmai

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

You sound like someone who doesn't want to see LENR succeed. Seems about the right position, for a communist. On 7/11/17, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Mary Yugo said he

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

; data or he intentionally misrepresented his data. > > Harry > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> You're probably right. But there is evidence he had a COP > 1 for >> some length of time according

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

That would be just like him. On 7/11/17, Jones Beene wrote: > > Wait a minute. There is still Randell Mills to deal with, and he says he > can not only heat up a cup of coffee but evaporate it in a burst of > hydrinos in seconds. He has better credentials than any of us, and

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

days. > > > > From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:03 PM > To: Vortex > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled > > > > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com <mailto:kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On 7/10/17, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Unless you took part in the lawyers' negotiations, you do not know that is > the reason. ***You don't have to be involved at that level. If the report was a slam dunk either way it would have compelled the outcome of the case. It wasn't

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

The report was credible enough for IH not to move forward on their case. I'm glad to see you got a start on delineating all the scientific charlatanism in that report and in the case. On 7/10/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wr

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On 7/10/17, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > I cannot judge legal standards. ***Then stop using a legal term. It's like saying that by scientific standards and by common sense standards your neighbor is guilty of armed robbery. If there were "scientific standards" to begin

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

e the device > in Florida worked as he claimed. If the trial proceeded I think it is very > likely that the preponderance of the evidence would not support his claim. > > Harry > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On 7/9/17, Jed Rothwell wrote: OJ Simpson... > Obviously he was guilty. ***Then obviously Rossi is Not Guilty of Fraud. You just agreed with the legal standard. > All I did was read the Penon report. That's all it takes. ***Bullshit. Plenty of others have read the

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Jed Rothwell 5:36 PM (5 hours ago) Nope. The legal system does not sue scientists for publishing fraudulent or idiotic reports. ***The legal system brings its resources to bear upon scientists who scam others with fraudulent reports. One reason is that no one can tell fools and frauds apart.

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> As soon as they verify a LENR experiment that many who have the means can >> do in our garages, the cat is out of the bag. >> > > That may never happen. It may be tha

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > ​ > > The Penon report?!? > ​***ALL of it. The Penon report, the supposed heat exchanger, all of it. If the Penon report is as fraudulent as you make it out to be, then Rossi would be up on charges for that. All

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If Rossi's report proves he is a thief then he would be up on charges. > > > Only if it were a serious crime. Most crimes are not even investigated, > for lack of police personnel. Also, the police would h

Re: Fw: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

gunpowder. > > > ------ > *From:* Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, July 7, 2017 7:04 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned > > One of the cool things about cold fusion in a 500

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

If Rossi's report proves he is a thief then he would be up on charges. On Friday, July 7, 2017, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Axil Axil > wrote: > > I don't remember writing a post that personally attacked

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

The Gamma Ray thing happened in 2013, that was the link I posted. I am glad to see someone at MFMP taking this seriously. On Friday, July 7, 2017, Mark Jurich wrote: > I wrote: > > Yes, we (MFMP) did pursue the “Gamma Ray Thing” (we made an > unsuccessful replication

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

; On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yup, this is just the first battle in the patent wars. It will last >> decades until some billionaire steps in. >> > > Oligarchic 'Capitalism' (parasitism) does not HAVE decades. > > But maybe none of the rest of us do, either. > > > > >

Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

One of the cool things about cold fusion in a 500 year outlook is that it makes for a very ineffective weapon. Even fire is a more effective weapon. You know why potatoes became a crop of choice in Europe? Because when a king's army sieged your castle and burned your crops, there were still

Re: [Vo]:Picking up the pieces

There is one conclusion that can be drawn. Rossi submitted all kinds of information to the court docket, under oath. The claim against him was fraud. The legal burden of proof in a civil case is "preponderance of the evidence". IH obviously couldn't even meet that level of proof. The legal

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Hagelstein was going to sell NANORs for a few thousand dollars but that appears to have gone nowhere. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

… I am still trying to convince the group to take another crack at it, with a more sophisticated radiation measurement that requires some building and a small amount of funding. ***That means you have not been pursuing it. It's been 4 years and basically no mention on the MFMP blog. Even if

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

e >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >> To: Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Wed, Jul 5, 2017 6:20 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled >> >> Kevin O'Malley <

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

Status Quo Ante Bellum, as I predicted. It is a mystery why IH didn't accept this offer a long time ago. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > The judge issued an "order of dismissal." It says "this matter is > dismissed with prejudice," "all parties

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

ent occurred in the MFMP's apparatus for at > least that short time. > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Celani detected gamma rays when Rossi's reactor got started, and Rossi >> came down hard on him for bringing a

Re: [Vo]:Interest in cold fusion has waned

There was a software package called "cold fusion" which can obscure the results as well as the interest. LENR needs to repackage their name. Maybe something like Anomalous Heating Event.

Re: [Vo]:Picking up the pieces

Abd was speculating just like the rest of us. The most probable outcome was Status Quo Ante Bellum, but Rossi was focused on getting his IP back. So he probably did so, since IH supposedly considered it worthless. That's kind of weird how one side considers something worthless while the other

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >