Hello Bob,
I agree with you that Rossi does NOT use nano sized Ni particles. He has
always said that he use micro sized Ni particles. But can you point
explicitly a sentence from Rossi saying he use the carbonyl process or is it
an assumption? I never haerd such claim by Rossi.
It is clear
I believe BLP has been using something akin to industrial arc welders for
some of the demonstrations they videoed last June 25. However BLP seems to
be using the units in an unusual power configuration. On page 57 of the PDF
file we see:
Ignition current: 10,000 A to
Steven, I certainly agree with Mill's assessment that it isn't an oxidation
process and the expansion and contraction of exotic gases/ plasmas may be the
common thread here between Mills, Rossi, Papp and even sonoluminescence. You
need reversible reactions which oxidation would impede. Axil
Steven,
[Snip] That would suggest to me that a triggered portion of Titanium powder
mixture would not be capable of oxidizing since the enclosure would be totally
immersed within an inert gas mixture. One presumes that high amounts of heat,
light, UV, and soft X-Rays (but very little expansion
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
That would suggest to me that a triggered portion of Titanium powder
mixture would not be capable of oxidizing since the enclosure would be
totally immersed within an inert gas mixture.
That is not exactly the purpose of the argon (which is
One detail worth adding...
Titanium is unique in Mills' CQM insofar as he has identified the parameters
of catalysis. It has 3 potential Rydberg holes, but notably at IP2, the
ionization happens at 13.58 eV. As a metal which is insoluble in water, the
multiple atoms and valence electrons of
One more detail worth adding...
As mentioned, ferrotitanium - which is the standard commercial way that
titanium is bought and sold -is nominally 30% iron and 70% titanium, and is
actually cheaper than nickel, whereas pure titanium is rather dear... but
can ferrotitanium be used in this device
Arnaud,
I don't believe Rossi uses the carbonyl process, I am referring to high
external surface area Ni micro-particles produced through precipitation of
pure Ni particles from nickel tetracarbonyl liquid. This is a common form
of pure, high active external surface Ni powder used in battery
I can't comment too much on the technical side, but personally I think the
work is quite interesting if not a little obscure. I think it's appreciated
by certain people in the field for its novel creation of x-ray like
emissions, and I think it does likely provide an important piece to the
puzzle.
Bob--
You said, “I don't believe Rossi uses the carbonyl process,…”
I assume you mean Rossi DOES use the carbonyl process to make his nickel
particles.
If you send a copy of your paper to Arnaud send me one also please
frobertc...@hotmail.com
Bob Cook
Sent from Windows
What I meant is that Rossi doesn't make is own starting (un-catalyzed) Ni
particles, he buys them. The Ni powder he buys is produced by the
manufacturer from precipitation of liquid nickel tetracarbonyl. The powder
produced by this process is just pure Ni having a high external surface
area in a
I believe Peter Hagelstein is excited about the Karabut result because he
believes that Karabut demonstrates high energy x-ray photons being
synthesized by a collective sum of much lower energy lattice phonons. If
it is possible for this up-conversion to occur, then it lends credibility
to his
Yes, Rossi buys it from a specialist. Here is the web site of Rossi’s supplier
, if anyone are interested.
http://www.gerlimetalli.it/inglese/ihome.htm
AFAIK – they will not sell you the “special Rossi blend” unless they have
changed their policy, now that he has sold the rights…
The manufacture of these particles is a trade secret that is at the
heart of the NiH reactor technology. This nickel particle is a compound
particle which includes nanowires that host the SPP reaction.
The NiH reactor technology has advanced power concentration over what can
be produced by the
FYI, here are some papers by George Egely who first got me interested
in microwave LENR.
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Nano-dust-Fusion.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms411WCBEZk
Is he creating magnetic carbon, or is it fusion?
It does look like Mills have put out a lot of data that verifies the
hydrino. For me, the most interesting is the spectra fingerprint that is
bulls eye with theoretical predictions.
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/TechnicalPresentation.pdf
The question is if we
There is some evidence for it, not all of it altogether unambiguous but
interestingly suggestive. I think theorists have long anticipated some
solution to DM, mostly involving WIMPS, so I suppose there would atleast be
some fertile ground for the idea of a dark ground state to grow. In that
case
Try Occam's Razor, the most straightforward explanation In an attempt to
evade what Mills has written in his postings. Mills will use commercial
equipment to avoid RD costs. Commercial arc welders are overkill but will
reliably deliver high current pulses, which you can measure to determine
what
There is plenty of evidence down-conversion of gammas, but the problem is
that it is never complete nor predictable conversion and it always happens
in a few medium sized steps instead of large packets of energy going to tiny
packet in one step. Proof to follow.
And seldom does gamma conversion
From: Bob Higgins
I believe Peter Hagelstein is excited about the Karabut
result because he believes that Karabut demonstrates high energy x-ray
photons being synthesized by a collective sum of much lower energy lattice
phonons. If it is possible for this up-conversion to occur,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Hagelstein has never been able to find a physical model for his contention,
not even one which is remotely close - and it is amazing that he has not
thrown in the towel on a losing battle. It simply does not happen in the
What parameter is limiting the downshift exactly? Ahern has speculated
that ferromagnetic collective modes, first explored by Ulam, are at play in
LENR. These systems tend to amplify the vibratory modes of a system and
then tend to localize energy in a coherent fashion -- seemingly in
violation of
I wrote:
Even a year ago I was persuaded that there must be some kind of high-energy
gamma downconversion at play ...
Just to clarify -- I do think the full energy of a nuclear transition, when
there is one, is being dissipated to the environment, but not through some
kind of harmonic
The problem is that after the high energy gamma is created, it is not
plausible that 100% of the quanta are downshifted - some will fail in this
post-fusion downshifting and be released as high energy. Since 0% high
energy quanta are seen experimentally, the high energy quanta must not get
Say, we are getting some kind a consensus going today… must be a good sign :-)
I think that for deuterium to helium, the idea of pre-release of energy in a
Mills-like redundancy has logical backing. Helium is documented, and deuterons
are bosons. Tunneling should happen. It would be nice to
BTW guys – for those who see the value in having cosmology as an ally, it makes
sense for us to keep promoting this “dark matter” cross-connection to LENR, and
the Rossi effect, and moreover to try to get anyone who is seeing thermal gain
to look for the 3.5 keV signature.
If that is found
The problem is that after the high energy gamma is created, it is not
plausible that 100% of the quanta are downshifted - some will fail in this
post-fusion downshifting and be released as high energy.
Where dis this assumption come from?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Bob Higgins
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Say, we are getting some kind a consensus going today… must be a good sign J
It won't last.
Marvin (the paranoid android from HHGttU).
I did not think I originated it, but I am convinced of it. This came up in
particular for the proposed shielding effect by WL. It is a similar issue.
Once the atom is excited with high energy to be released very quickly, it
is difficult for pretty much any de-excitation mechanism to be 100%
Downshifting of gammas- all the way to phonons, without going through the x-ray
level (which is detectable) is especially absurd, when one realizes that there
is not a single experiment in all of physics that demonstrates any significant
level of downshifting at all.
It is complete science
Look at this gamma downshifting situation in terms of waves. What happens
when two waves meet while they travel through the same medium? What effect
will the meeting of the waves have upon the appearance of the medium? Will
the two waves bounce off each other upon meeting (much like two billiard
More...
*An example, if we had a explosive that only reacted when water pressure
was 10 psi, then water would always be required to trigger the reaction.
The explosive would always need to be covered by feet of water and the
energy of the reaction would always be added to the water that covered
Jones, please correct me if I've misinterpreted your premise, but it's my
understanding that you are speculating that the BLP SunCell process is
based primarily on a Ti - plus- O oxidation process that Mills doesn't want
potential financial backers catch on to, at least not right away. Granted,
it
Mike Carrell beat me to throwing the Occam's Razor card on the table.
Perhaps both Mike and I are tuned to the same polarized Vort Collective sub
frequency channel. In any case, here's my runner up post. I discuss the
hydrinos saga from a slightly different angle, one that is probably less
http://www.amazingrust.com/Experiments/how_to/Thermite.html
Speaking of the oxygen in water, are any of these thermite reactions a
candidate for Mills chemistry?
Titanium oxide?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Jones, please
The arc voltage is increased significantly, and the temperature of the arc
increases radically—up to 20,000°-30,000°C when combined with plasma,
The blackbody spectrum of such an arc will be bluer that that of the sun.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Egely is on target with pseudo particles. Polaritons are the key concept.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, here are some papers by George Egely who first got me interested
in microwave LENR.
http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Nano-dust-Fusion.pdf
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms411WCBEZk
Is he creating magnetic carbon, or is it fusion?
http://www.materialstoday.com/carbon/news/magnetic-carbon/
The article talks about how proton irradiation can make carbon
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
What parameter is limiting the downshift exactly? Ahern has speculated
that ferromagnetic collective modes, first explored by Ulam, are at play in
LENR. These systems tend to amplify the vibratory modes of a system and
then
In this experiment the possible source of the energy is the electric arc.
***Yup. It's possible that it's the arc that causes the jump to LENR. In
Ed Storms's perspective, it is cracks which force a 1 dimensional string to
form and somehow the laws of thermodynamics don't apply because it's no
In this experiment, BECs absorb X-rays.
*Rydberg excitation of a Bose-Einstein condensate*
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3024348/posts
*arxiv.org ^
http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf * |
March 2012 | M. Viteau1, M. Bason1, J. Radogostowicz2;3, N.
I posted this on another thread recently.
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20140724
In this experiment the possible source of the energy is the electric arc.
***Yup. It's possible that it's the arc that causes the jump to LENR. In
Ed Storms's perspective
Eric--
Why focus on the Coulomb field? Focus on the intense magnetic fields that can
polarize nuclei parallel and antiparallel and cause them to spin in harmony.
Transfer of mass via spin energy is possible, although it is not common in a
plasma or free particle system most are familiar
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
I posted this on another thread recently.
Yes -- I saw that. What you write is interesting. I am still acquainting
myself with the relevance of Luttinger liquids, and I'm no fan of BECs in
the context of LENR,
Wasn't Graneau basically using acoustic principles to time his pulses and
engineer their intensity to break atomic bonds -- thereby producing his
exploding water?
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Kevin O'Malley
45 matches
Mail list logo
