Hi all, I wanted to ask you how to best do a test proving LENR.
After following this for a short time I would probably try something like
this,
I would use two teams
1. The testers, people well versed in LENR and know how to make the
classic FP experiment work.
2. The skeptics, a scientific team
Hi Eric,
I'm not up to speed with your emails. The LENR+ type of activities is still
something that if proper tests are
done and affirmative, will be much more interesting, this is clear. But I
would like to keep the discussion to the
original FP experiment.
I think this would be an
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
it seems National instruments asked such doublinded test in 2012,
according to the conference of Concezz in Rome (and Brussels)...
Do you have any better links, I find this test interesting a.t.m.
Of cause when the
Tell me if I'm spaming ...
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
But I would like to keep the discussion to the original FP experiment.
Ah, yes. Sounds good
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that comparative calorimetry is not accpetable, not needed, given
the hysteric level of skepticism and the high COP.
Absolute measurement of heat, not even with blank, should be the only and
best solution.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that comparative calorimetry is not accpetable, not needed, given
the hysteric level of skepticism and the high COP.
I agree, but you do need a good calibration
Hi all,
I am wondering the following. Is it true that we can arrange, at least
theoretically for atoms structurally in a restful structure and achieve
high probability of a nuclear reaction. With restful
I mean in a way that is not magically forcing the atoms unnaturally close
to each other.
I
I'm not after a theory that is true or not but a fact.
E.g. a receipt like
Arrange atoms A1,A2,... acorfing to
From known principles a good approximation of the system is H(...)
Then when we calculate the probabilities of nuclear reaction we get
P(system) P(single atom)
So, I'm after a
hmm, normal decays are of cause not all that interesting, more in line with
what you can find in
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36783/TheoreticalAnalysisReactionMechanisms.pdf?sequence=1
the page with
BEGIN QUOTE
• Important !! The Gamow factor suppression occurs with
ideas about how this charge screening happens. I will go as
far in explanation and you can stand. It is up to you!
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
hmm, normal decays are of cause not all that interesting, more in line
with what you
From a first reading I did not find that the paper mentioned any high
energetic particles at initiation, just normal free e and a couple of slow
d. It's just that when looking at the mathematical solution using a second
order interaction
the first part is e - d, interaction and are supposed to in
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
I'm basing my remarks on what is known to be real. You seem to be
impressed by the social status of the authors and the reputation of QM. I
have great respect for QM but I have great disappointment with how it is
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Tampe: I couldn't agree more, it's very frustrating to learn QM. You tend
to
get a lot of powerful mathematical constructs but really no good mental
model how it all works.
Oh my. This is nonsensical to the max. No one
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Yes, if 4 don't work, try 5. If 5 fail, try 50. As they say, with enough
variables, all data can be fit. It never occurs to these people that their
basic model may be wrong. They just keep adding variables and
Hi all,
Have you realized the connection between the Kalman paper and Kim et al's
optical theorem for LENR.
http://pinky.physics.purdue.edu/people/faculty/yekim/PhysRevC.55.801.pdf
Basically again the origin is that the Gamov factors doesn't describe the
measured reaction rates for low speed
BLP being real or not, here is something that I find intriguing,
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193
QUOTE
The Klein-Gordon equation of the hydrogen atom has a low-lying eigenstate,
called hydrino state, with square integrable wavefunction. The
corresponding spinor solution of Dirac's equation
dynamics from excess proton mass,
but with no fusion.
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
BLP being real or not, here is something that I find intriguing,
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0507193
QUOTE
The Klein-Gordon equation of the hydrogen atom has a low-lying eigenstate,
called hydrino
inside the Casimir geometry..
makes me suspect we are going to find more and more anomalous half lives of
radioactive gas occurring when loaded into skeletal cats and/or nano
powders.
Fran
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe [mailto:stefan.ita...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, January 16, 2014
Hi all,
After skimming Mill's book about how he treats the atom physics, I am
pretty amazed.
Folks, his theory is really accurate, and we should not dismiss it just
because of the hydrino prediction. He actually calculates the g factor to
the same level as QED, but he indicates it took two
cover all the cases perfectly without
exception and the Mills theory leaves many things unexplained.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After skimming Mill's book about how he treats the atom physics, I am
pretty amazed
jef...@gmail.com wrote:
have you looked at my website?
I describe many details of Mills's theory:
http://zhydrogen.com/
Jeff
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
After skimming Mill's book about how he treats the atom
I've continue to read about Randy Mill's theory. What struck me us not
shown to enough detail is if the hydrino states are physically attainable.
It is clear that any such state should not have a solution that radiates,
but given a mathematical state that does not radiate, it can be in such a
axis.
I think you are already aware that skeletal cat geometry
and nano powder geometry are essentially the same even though one is a
leached out of solid and the other formed by bulk packing arrangement of
individual grains.
Fran
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Interesting,
I always thought that the potentials are very fundamental and physical. It
is possible to get a clear picture of what EM is by looking at the
mathematical structure of plane waves for the potentials in Maxwell's
equations (Lorenz gauge). If you haven't done that and are experienced
Hi all,
I was wondering about the higher then expected rates of fusion seen in
accelerator experiments at moderate speeds seen by researcher and explained
by electron screening. The fundamental paper Kim et all i basing his theory
on is in a sense interesting and can be a reality, but I did only
continuation of those experiments is to try
varying the orientations if possible.
Cheers!
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:22 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
The fundamental paper Kim et all i
, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
My thought is the following, if the proton hit the hydrogen atom fast
enough the electron field does not adapt fast enough and I would assume
that the picture is like a bullet penetrating a shield. Here the gamov
.
Bob
Sent from Windows Mail
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:37 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
Over fitting was my feeling when reading about Kim et al. On the other
hand if you can make use of first principles
into acceptance.
Mills theory have a much longer way to travel, it is not right to ask for
one man or his team to do this by himself.
On Jun 29, 2014 7:38 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway how
. That's stupid let PhD get some grants to help that quest.
On Jun 30, 2014 12:26 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 29, 2014, at 14:14, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, mills theory and QED is pretty close in calculating quantities
It does look like Mills have put out a lot of data that verifies the
hydrino. For me, the most interesting is the spectra fingerprint that is
bulls eye with theoretical predictions.
http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/presentations/TechnicalPresentation.pdf
The question is if we
Mills should have spent 5 or 10 minutes introducing the experiment and
listing all of the materials and the potential chemical energy from various
ways of reacting them. That is what McKubre did in his first book about
cold fusion, as I described here on p. 12:
He does have validators saying that
Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't understand that if
true, it came from some other mysterious process.
It match very well with the theoretical lines. It also looks like these
fingerprints have been verified by third parties. But I can't find
their reports for this at the
to up-shift or
down shift light to varied wavelengths.
For example, carbon nanotubes can take on any color base on their
dimensions.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't
was
designed to fit that data. If the production of the nanostructures are
consistent over time, it could then be said that the theory predicts those
lines.
It is the lines that made the theory, not the theory that make the lines.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
there is critiques stemming from not believing in hydrinos
because the feel they must give up on QM, which perhaps is not true.
Perhaps hydrinos and QM are not incompatible; for example, maybe they're
dual, as you have suggested
, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
there is critiques stemming from not believing in hydrinos
because the feel they must give up on QM, which perhaps is not true.
Perhaps
a point.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't understand that if
true, it came from some other mysterious process
I don't think that hydrinos is behind LENR. It do look like in FP
experiment you get a stronger effect if you use deutrium. So then I would
expect that it is a nuclear reaction no? Anyway as people have suggested
and Mills also acknowledge nuclear reactions can probably be triggered via
hydrino
Is not the probable energy density of the TIP1 report, well above those
numbers you get from the first hydrino states. Either Rossi
is producing very small hydrinos, or it is nuclear, heck we don't know what
can happen in these low energy nuclear reactions if so,
total mass to energy
Their theory doesn't make sense, not even as a classical approximation. I
cannot make heads or tails of anything there. For example, any wave
function, time independent, must be a standing wave. If it is a fraction,
and
you want to enforce this, it will be a sum of many waves, possibly
entangelment ...
Just to note, I have a few issues with Mills CQM.
1. Transients seam to not be covered by the theory, only the eigen states
2. I don't know how you do combinations of eigenstates, QM is a linear L^2
theory, I cant't
find any references if Mills can combine solutions as in QM and
equation is not square integrable, and what we are missing in prior
understanding is the metastate permitting both.
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
entangelment ...
Just to note, I have a few issues
I thought I read that the analysis was for the surface of the grain. Also
the result differes
from grain to grain, it would have been nice to see some ranges of the
values found in the surface. I got the feeling that the presented sample
was chooses just to make a statement of how different the
yes, they probably choosed the most extreme sample to make a statement.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote:
--On Thursday, October 09, 2014 5:07 AM -0400 Craig Haynie
cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
It does look like the system ran until its fuel was
I find GoatGuy's comment interesting, how valid is his objection?
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/10/third-party-report-on-32-day-continuous.html?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=feedutm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2Fadvancednano+%28nextbigfuture%29
, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
I find GoatGuy's comment interesting, how valid is his objection?
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/10/third-party-report-on-32-day-continuous.html?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=feedutm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot
If we consider that the granules are different and react diferently, and it
seams to be known
how a particle that react well should look like, couldn't the testers have
picked a biased sample
for their expensive analysis e.g. a particle that have had the time to
saturate in order to ne sure to
get
Jed was talking in watts, W ~ T^4, T is the fourth root of W so it is
logarithmic
not exponential in your jargon.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Jed
The calibration was done at 486 W and and then the cell was run at 790 W
for two days.
If there is a real transparancy issue as GoatGuy suggest then the inner
must be of much higher temperature then the surface.
To get a feeling of this issue I tried to look at the published picture of
the cat and see if there was a region of lower temperature
at the upper part of the ecat in the
Again how serious this is depends on the temperature difference between the
inner and outer shell no. If that was serious you would expect
the top edge of a picture of the hot cat to have unsharp color shade
because the top edge should represent the heat of the outer shell. I have
not find such an
Yes and the thickness of the alumina and the time constants of heat
transfer dTouter/dt = K(Tinner - Touter) or similare suitable equation.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Not scientific -- but a search of google images for alumina transmission
indicates
I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever Ross is,
he is surly is one hell of a man to work with tools so I guess it was
just an easy thing to do and the testers thought that they could monitor it
quite enough still to avoid cheating.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Blaze
...@gmail.com
wrote:
They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to
handle a lab saw?
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever Ross is,
he is surly is one
During the discussion about the first TIP, at energikatalysatorn there was
a huge stir about the applicability of using a heat camera to validate the
output energy until
a heat camera expert enter the discussion and although he was skeptical of
the final result, said and explained thoroughly that
How do we know that iti s resistive heating that is taking place? Bob
Greenyer at MFMP sugested that it is an inductive heater this means that
the wires
get a bit cooler then the heated core.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fig 12b. page 26.
benefit).
On 13 October 2014 00:35, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do we know that iti s resistive heating that is taking place? Bob
Greenyer at MFMP sugested that it is an inductive heater this means that
the wires
get a bit cooler then the heated core.
On Sun
Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
far above curie limit for Ni, magnetic fields won't move powder
magnetically, only ions, but temps are too low for significant Li or H ions
to exist, and no ionising radiation sources in evidence.
On 13 October 2014 00:49, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
radiation sources in evidence.
On 13 October 2014 00:49, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes but in that case the core can be hotter then the cables. We don't
know about the powder, and the changes of magnetic fields inside the core
could stir the powder around
evaporation zone.
On 13 October 2014 01:18, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert I think you make good points, not sure what the inner cylinder
is made of and I guess that if it is metal it has to be thin in order
to not show up on the weight. There is also
I wanted to add that in the dummy run there was a 10% deviation between
measured and output, assume that the
heat is proportional to the Temperature (which it's not, its T^4) you will
get a 10% error in temperature measurement.
(3.5% if you think in T^4). Now state that at the higher temperatures
IThe is no way in nuclear science to convert the reactants seen in the
way seen. T
This is probably true, there might be a dog buried, we need to look in that
direction. But also, it is our current view of nuclear science, all
reaction chains depends heavily on some extra constraints that you
Im staring at p 45, fig 4b / ash and is comparing with p 44, fig 3b, So is
it that much difference?
I don't understand that we can argue about data, we really shouled have
pictures from at least 20 randomly selected particles to say anything, it
is suggested that Rossi have bought the isotope 62
why on earth did they stopped using that method as Jones seam to indicate
with his
correspondence. I don't get it.
was faked. Which means that his secret sauce actually
includes 6Li.
He would have done this to confuse the situation so that his secret was
seen to be the ash, and not the other way around. But it could have
happened either way.
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Im staring at p 45, fig
Thank you Peter, I'll try to answer the critique in the slides for Mills
theory shortly. But, I just wanted to support the rant that you do not need
to explain new
phenomena to develop a new theory and it is advisable to drop that
principle as a lone principle. The reason is, of cause if you
that exists only in his imagination.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Peter, I'll try to answer the critique in the slides for Mills
theory shortly. But, I just wanted to support the rant that you do not need
to explain new
.
I don't understand the situation.
Peter
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Imagination yes, if there was no real quantities calculated. But by
calculated many 100 of experimentally measurements one could just say that
his theory has 100
We most be open that there are mistakes in pro cold fusion results, but
also make sure that they are put into contexts, are the mistakes of a few
outliers, or are they the main part.
That is the question we need to answer. Typically to validate or disprove
cold fusion you make sure to draw a
into that framework?
These are the things I want to know.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
It can be fun to tease out responses, here is a rant, take it for what it
is:
All science history shows that if you can express things a magnitude of
order
It can be fun to tease out responses, here is a rant, take it for what it
is:
All science history shows that if you can express things a magnitude of
order more elegantly and easily and less convoluted you have a better
theory, this is what Mills theory does compared to quantum mechanics. That
Orionworks,
Yes experiments is all good, i'm more concerned why we don't get any
replication / debunks and from more independent sources. Is'n there
enough to verify the evidences? Also what if it's too difficult to create
hydrinos, and Mills theory would be better suited to explain for example
permutations and combinations of
interactions that could be experimentally demonstrated involving the
hydrino as a fundamental elementary particle.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Orionworks,
Yes experiments is all good, i'm more
take away n x 27.2 eV
from atom through collision.
Peter van Noorden
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Saturday, January 10, 2015 7:20 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:QM rant
I would like to see a grants and target institution targeted
these stable fractional quantum levels in
his experiments, when he followed his theory
that predicted that the groundstate of a hydrogen atom can be destablized
by using catalyst which can take away n x 27.2 eV
from atom through collision.
Peter van Noorden
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita
at 11:58 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
The hydrino is a variant of the hydrogen atom. It is never claimed by
Mills to be a fundamental particle. Hence it needs so low energy so that
you can maintain the bound
You can't find it using collisions of high energy, which
myself how much knowledge of physics do we know as
compared to that which we do not know nor have any concept about? If we
understand a mere 1% of the total I am in awe of the field of study.
Just my few cents worth.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Just to spam for your fun, the above was quite ok and a freeze of wikipedia
at 2006, no go to the this years edition and enjoy the intelligent
society we are living in,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackLight_Power
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita
, which should have spotted
all this in a sec. And now all is referencing
him lol.
But sure we can agree to disagree, no hard feelings.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote
to say, Nothing. So you are dead wrong, it's the QM folks that are mute.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a shame that we don't have a serious heated debate
, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you look at the address, goes to blacklight power!!!
I have no reason to doubt that the rebuttal came from Blacklight Power.
My
in the long run if space have
a memory.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, this is exactly the problem, you have two incomplete models that same
the same thing
golden stars.
Mark my words, if Einstein worked at the patent office today he would
remain there, do we want such a society.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep
I searched a little in the literature about these hydrinos, They seams to
originate from the wave operator, people have found them in simple
wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains
the wave operator. What is interesting is that if you assume that the
proton have a
I searched a little in the litterature about thise hydrinos, They seams
to originate from the wave operatores, people have found them in simple
wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains
it. What is interesting is that if you assume that the proton have a spatial
to get motion of the
liquid LiH-Al metal.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Heya Vortexuses,
Any thoughts about my shallow thoughts about the parghomov/Ecat setup,
When it comes to steel making, one often has a magnetic stirrer
to issues atm.
Regards
Stefan
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the
implicate power meter
e.g. why the power loss in the cable does not follow the power
I looked at the Lugano report, trying to understand the issue with the
implicate power meter
e.g. why the power loss in the cable does not follow the power measured.
So, people have tried to explain this with some strange temperature
behavior of the resistance.
But isn't it more natural to
Heya Vortexuses,
Any thoughts about my shallow thoughts about the parghomov/Ecat setup,
When it comes to steel making, one often has a magnetic stirrer to even out
the temperature in the mold, hence improving the quality of the final
product. This works by the magnetic varying field induces
spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid
and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the
liquid LiH-Al metal.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Heya Vortexuses,
Any thoughts about
, and then the web of
SOLID spongy Ni is coated with a liquid film of LiH-Al . The Ni is solid
and is not going to stir, however, it may be possible to get motion of the
liquid LiH-Al metal.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Heya Vortexuses,
Any
Hi,
I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result
of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published their
hypothesis there for you to read. Consider reading,
http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/double-slit/
General remark. Quantum
using Mills theory.
He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication,
AFAIK.
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result
of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published
to find any
hint of energy gain using Mills theory.
He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication,
AFAIK.
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result
of the double slit experiment. Turns out
of energy gain using Mills theory.
He is a still a true believer, but has nothing to show for his dedication,
AFAIK.
*From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe
I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the result
of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published
Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Self interference has be shown for neutrons. The double slit deminstates
self interference of particles.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Have the double slit been verified for neutrons? Just curious, Mills
?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rule
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know that people here challenge Randy Mills theory to explain the
result of the double slit experiment. Turns out that BLP has published
their hypothesis
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_integral_formulation
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and
Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment
there is an overlap.
Regards
Stefan
/Path_integral_formulation
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
If you read the link you see that the QM predictions of intensities and
Mills is essentially the same so for this experiment
there is an overlap.
Regards
Stefan
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:50
So they see that a lot of the behavior in 3D is codified in a surface. That
looks like they are onto the link between Mills theory and QM because Mills
codify the information
in a surface as well. Knowing the data at the electron surface and I
speculate that you can deduce the 3D behavior at least
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
