I like to size power supplies around 2x actual radio current draw, to allow for 
inrush current when everything gets powered up at once.

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 6:15 PM
To: AFMUG <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux noob

 

I imagine it would probably be fine, since that's max load, and not what it's 
typically going to be using, but 120 watts on a 120 watt power supply is a bit 
closer than I'd want things to be. 

 

I assume your using a rack injector, which if I remember correctly, lets you 
use any power input on any of the ports (regardless of what card they're on), 
so why not use all three power supplies?

 

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 2:24 PM Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com 
<mailto:ryan...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Would like to tag on this, I've sent this off to packeflux support as well but 
maybe the crowd can tell me if this is good.

 

I would like to power the following.

 

1 – PMP450i (5ghz) 

2 – PMP450m (5ghz)

1 – PTP820S (18ghz)

1 – Mimosa B24 (24ghz)

 

 

I’ve got two “Cambium Sync for 450i / 450m” boards. I’ve also got three 48v 
2.5A 120w,c8 power supplies. 

 

Can I plug in two of the 48v 2.5A power supplies, then configure

 

Card 1 – 1st power supply – pmp450m, pmp450i, mimosa b24

Card 2 – 2nd power supply – pmp450m, PTP820s

 

PMP450m – 70W typical, 80W peak

PMP450i – 15W typical, 25W max

PTP820S – 35W

Mimosa B24 – 19.5W max

 

So looking at the power supply, it can do 120w

 

If I do the way I want we would be looking at 120W for the first power supply 
and then 105W for card two.

 

Would this be enough power do you think? Seems like I'm right up against the 
limits trying to power everything with two power supplies. -48v isn't an option 
at this site.  

 

Just want to make sure I’m not doing anything strange or out of the ordinary 
here.

 

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:50 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com 
<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote:

That's kind of surprising that an old 450 AP ran for a couple of days on 48v 
before it died... I would've expected it to die right away.

 

It would be very nice if everything would just run on either voltage... the 
ePMP 1000 GPS radios do, and an AF5x does (unless it's one of the very first 
ones to ship... then it's 24v only), but I think that's about all that does. 
Pretty much anything that does Gigabit PoE will take either polarity, so that 
at least simplifies things a little bit (but using the wrong PoE pinout can 
screw up sync over power... so there's that). 

 

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:06 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com 
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com> > wrote:

There are lots of choices.

For DIN rail, I keep the Traco 360W units in stock, use them with or without 
the BMU depending on whether it’s an AC or DC site.

For non DIN rail, I keep Mean Well 150W and 300W HRP series in stock.

Most stuff is going to  48V, so I’m building DC sites as 48V now.  Small DC-DC 
for 24V if needed, more and more not needed.

And of course whenever we say 48V, the equipment needs to actually accept up to 
at least 60V.

 

It’s starting to drive me crazy when I want to add a sector at a site and 
realize the existing sectors are 24V but the new one will have to be 48V.  The 
RackInjectors and PowerInjectors handle this nicely, but it’s a recipe for 
disaster and a source of confusion.  I’ve already fried a 450 AP at a tower 
with mixed vintage equipment, because I thought it was a 450i and I powered it 
with 48V.  It ran for a couple days and then died.

 

Techs keep questioning me when I say an AF5x or a Nanostation ac takes 24V.  I 
understand the confusion, you don’t expect 24V on a Gigabit POE.  What would 
really make sense is if equipment would accept either voltage, and either 
polarity.  OK, not possible with high current draw radios like a Medusa or an 
AF11, but it would be nice on a Nanostation.

 

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com> > On Behalf 
Of Forrest Christian (List Account)
Sent: Wednesday, October 3, 2018 10:28 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com> >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Packetflux noob

 

I have the new 3.65 medusa on my mind.... plus I'm a bit tired.

 

The 48V 2.5A power supplies will run 2 non 3.65 medusa radios each. If you 
jumper the boards so 2 radios run off of each power supply you'll be fine (the 
AF24 is a similar quantity of power).

 

But, a bulk supply is probably a better idea if you can find one in your right 
form factor.

 

 

 

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:07 AM Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com 
<mailto:ericm...@gmail.com> > wrote:

I've been using CTM2's for nearly a decade, but they do not support 450m. CMM5 
is waaay to expensive for what it does and is clunky. I've been looking at 
Packetflux's RackInjector's.

 

I'm not familiar with PacketFlux products and need clarity on something. See 
attached. I need to power (3) 450m AP's and a(1) AF24. I also need physical 
spares for each unit. Is the attached parts list correct or am I missing 
something?

 

Thanks!

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com




 

-- 


Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.

Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602

 <mailto:forre...@imach.com> forre...@imach.com |  <http://www.packetflux.com/> 
http://www.packetflux.com

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>   <http://facebook.com/packetflux>   
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux> 



-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> 
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to