phpipam is developed still. I see plenty of commits this month:

https://github.com/phpipam/phpipam

It’s just slowed down a bit for actual releases.



> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:49 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> phpipam isnt developed anymore
> I have an idle racktables server ready for production, its ugly/sexy and has 
> everything I want except that its got a learning curve I havent sobered up 
> enough to get a full grasp on, but its got all the documentory and reporting 
> features I want, would love it if Bertram bought it out and integrated it, id 
> be so exited Id get the vapors.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com 
> <mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote:
> Check out phpipam
> 
> 
> On Sep 16, 2016 10:39 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> We use Powercode, they ebb and flow. Other than simon who escaped by the skin 
> of his teeth after murdering the guy before him I think they have gladiator 
> fights for the lead role because every time a new lead comes in the last one 
> disappears off the face of the earth. I imagine being in the office up there 
> looks like something out of mad max.
> 
> But overall, its a satisfying product, the inventory component is absolutely 
> useless, but the rest is pretty reliable. Customers like the feel of the 
> portal interface, I would prefer we had the ability to manipulate it more, 
> but I also want my own pony named Miguel.
> Support responsiveness is normally pretty good, occasionally it gets meh, but 
> I think you have that with any company depending on the work load.
> 
> What I do like about it, is that I dont have to know much to manage it, The 
> server build is down to a cut and past CLI job if it needs rebuilt. It 
> performs well in a decent VM host.
> 
> It really appears they are moving away from user driven development (there 
> used to be constant interaction) toward more of a programmed development 
> cycle, which is good and bad, but mostly a positive move.
> 
> It would be nice if they had clean IPAM, i still have a set of excel 
> spreadsheets for master subnet documentation, but I dont think there is such 
> a beast in IPAM that would satisfy everyone.
> 
> The ticketing system became super useful once they added external email 
> accounts, it allowed us to decommission a secondary ticketing system. Its 
> only good for our ISP side, not our contract services side however because it 
> doesnt offer clean time tracking or multiple tech separation
> 
> My boss is very frugal when it comes to anything that generates a recurring 
> cost, and he sees Powercode as a beneficial recurring cost, so that does say 
> something about the product.
> 
> I cuss them every couple months over something or other, its usually 50/50 
> whether its something I screwed up, or a bug in their system, but it always 
> gets resolved. We have an ongoing issue with email fetching that happens, but 
> they gave me a cli tool to resolve it, and its caused by something external 
> and outside their control, so I cant hold it against them.
> 
> There is currently no way to easily reset the tracking metrics on tickets and 
> times, but thats no deal breaker, they will eventually clean it up.
> 
> If youre looking for actual inventory management with any type of valuation, 
> its definetly not the product. Azotel had that when we were looking into 
> them, and I think you could tie in crystal reports to get some really amazing 
> data, but it seems like Azotel went to sleep
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Vlad Sedov <v...@atlasok.com 
> <mailto:v...@atlasok.com>> wrote:
> We've been running Freeside for the last 10 years. It takes a bit of perl and 
> linux knowledge to get it running (or just download the VM), but hey, what do 
> you want for nothing?
> 
> Feature-wise, freeside is on par with the big boys these days.. Can't think 
> of anything it doesn't have that an ISP billing system should have.
> The new version even has tower coverage mapping... very WISP-friendly.
> 
> 
> peace
> 
> Vlad
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/16/2016 12:50 AM, TJ Trout wrote:
> 
> Could I trouble you all for a quick survey / recommendation on billing 
> systems?
> 
> I've been looking at;
> 
> Power code ( seems like too many red flags with this company)
> 
> Platypus ( good price, but I don't want to become a dev just to bill my 
> customers)
> 
> Visp seems like a decent option?
> 
> Wisp Mon? Don't know much about them, prices seem high, haven't heard 
> anything bad so that's a good sign?
> 
> Swift fox? ( Seems like unpopular option maybe because they're new?)
> 
> Sonar? Maybe that's the one?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to