phpipam is developed still. I see plenty of commits this month: https://github.com/phpipam/phpipam
It’s just slowed down a bit for actual releases. > On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:49 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm > <[email protected]> wrote: > > phpipam isnt developed anymore > I have an idle racktables server ready for production, its ugly/sexy and has > everything I want except that its got a learning curve I havent sobered up > enough to get a full grasp on, but its got all the documentory and reporting > features I want, would love it if Bertram bought it out and integrated it, id > be so exited Id get the vapors. > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Check out phpipam > > > On Sep 16, 2016 10:39 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > We use Powercode, they ebb and flow. Other than simon who escaped by the skin > of his teeth after murdering the guy before him I think they have gladiator > fights for the lead role because every time a new lead comes in the last one > disappears off the face of the earth. I imagine being in the office up there > looks like something out of mad max. > > But overall, its a satisfying product, the inventory component is absolutely > useless, but the rest is pretty reliable. Customers like the feel of the > portal interface, I would prefer we had the ability to manipulate it more, > but I also want my own pony named Miguel. > Support responsiveness is normally pretty good, occasionally it gets meh, but > I think you have that with any company depending on the work load. > > What I do like about it, is that I dont have to know much to manage it, The > server build is down to a cut and past CLI job if it needs rebuilt. It > performs well in a decent VM host. > > It really appears they are moving away from user driven development (there > used to be constant interaction) toward more of a programmed development > cycle, which is good and bad, but mostly a positive move. > > It would be nice if they had clean IPAM, i still have a set of excel > spreadsheets for master subnet documentation, but I dont think there is such > a beast in IPAM that would satisfy everyone. > > The ticketing system became super useful once they added external email > accounts, it allowed us to decommission a secondary ticketing system. Its > only good for our ISP side, not our contract services side however because it > doesnt offer clean time tracking or multiple tech separation > > My boss is very frugal when it comes to anything that generates a recurring > cost, and he sees Powercode as a beneficial recurring cost, so that does say > something about the product. > > I cuss them every couple months over something or other, its usually 50/50 > whether its something I screwed up, or a bug in their system, but it always > gets resolved. We have an ongoing issue with email fetching that happens, but > they gave me a cli tool to resolve it, and its caused by something external > and outside their control, so I cant hold it against them. > > There is currently no way to easily reset the tracking metrics on tickets and > times, but thats no deal breaker, they will eventually clean it up. > > If youre looking for actual inventory management with any type of valuation, > its definetly not the product. Azotel had that when we were looking into > them, and I think you could tie in crystal reports to get some really amazing > data, but it seems like Azotel went to sleep > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Vlad Sedov <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > We've been running Freeside for the last 10 years. It takes a bit of perl and > linux knowledge to get it running (or just download the VM), but hey, what do > you want for nothing? > > Feature-wise, freeside is on par with the big boys these days.. Can't think > of anything it doesn't have that an ISP billing system should have. > The new version even has tower coverage mapping... very WISP-friendly. > > > peace > > Vlad > > > > On 9/16/2016 12:50 AM, TJ Trout wrote: > > Could I trouble you all for a quick survey / recommendation on billing > systems? > > I've been looking at; > > Power code ( seems like too many red flags with this company) > > Platypus ( good price, but I don't want to become a dev just to bill my > customers) > > Visp seems like a decent option? > > Wisp Mon? Don't know much about them, prices seem high, haven't heard > anything bad so that's a good sign? > > Swift fox? ( Seems like unpopular option maybe because they're new?) > > Sonar? Maybe that's the one? > > > > > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
