Chuck, Yeah, We have 6 OLT's and a few hundred ONU's online. I know of several other operators using the same setup now too.
It's stable and just works. The OLT hardware feels solid and quality made unlike some of the other 1U OLT's we've tried. You can even get an outdoor cabinet made for them for about $1500 shipped. I can't find the ZTE link right now, but it is very similar to this Huawei version. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Original- Huawei-MA5608T-ZTE-C320-Outdoors_60442562681.html?spm= a2700.7724838.2017115.1.2d7a50d9frcsQx Gerard On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > That is some scary Bernie Madoff type of pricing. > > You are using this now? > > *From:* Gerard Dupont > *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 2:28 PM > *To:* email@example.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT > > Here's some pricing based on Chinese ZTE with no real support. > > ZTE F601 Indoor ONU 1 GE port. $24 http://sweetplaza.com/zte-gpon > -terminal-ont-zxa10-f601-or-zxhn-f601-ftth-or-ftto-gpon- > onu-with-one-ethernet-port-smaller-size_p1013.html > ZTE F623 Indoor ONU 1GE 3FE 1POTS $29 http://sweetplaza.com/sc-apc-o > riginal-zte-zxhn-f623-gpon-onu-1ge-3fe-lan-ports-1voice-port > -wifienglish-interface_p1206.html > Chinese Splice on connector $0.80 http://sweetplaza.com/c/connector_0391 > 30M Armored simplex pigtail $9.66 from FS https://www.fs.com/products/ > 20745.html > 20M $7.66 > 10M $5.66 > Wall Mount MultiLink/Tii Outdoor NID - $15 (I don't have link) > > ZTE C320 OLT 16 ports of gpon with class c+ optics. $2200 > $2200/16/32=$4.30/per customer at 100% utilization.. > Add another 16 ports with optics for only $590. that's 32*32=1024 > customers potentially. $2.75/per customer at 100% util. > > 32 port rackmount splitter. $84 https://www.fs.com/products/11948.html > 32 port bare splitter for splice case $14 https://www.fs.com/products/ > 11528.html > 8 port bare splitter for splice case $5 > > None of that includes shipping or import duties/fees. So figure in a few > hundred $$$ for shipping/import fees. > > Even if you only put 8 people per OLT port that's $2800/32/8=$11 per > customer. + $1 per port on a 1x8 PLC + $15 for NID + $29 for ONT with POTS > + $10 for 30M pigtail. = ~$65/customer all in for gpon with 8 customers per > port. > > You can use www.SmartOLT.com for web based OLT/ONU management/monitoring > (tell Adrian I sent you for a discount) > > I prefer using GPON for the management capabilities. You can always > overlay 10GPON on top of your regular GPON network when the time comes to > upgrade. Just add/change the card in the OLT and add a 2x1 splitter to > combine both OLT ports into the single fiber. Since they use different > wavelengths they will coexist over the same fiber. Just install new ONT's. > > Gerard > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> ONT Housing (Clam Shell) $ 29.00 >> ONT $ 215.00 >> Unicam $ 15.00 >> Cyber Power $ 81.00 >> Cyber Install $ 110.00 >> House Sub Total * $ 450.00 * >> >> OLT $11K/8/32 $ 42.97 >> OIM $845/32 $ 38.27 >> Splitter $900/32 $ 39.43 >> DLC per Sub Subtotal * $ 120.67 * >> >> >> Electronics/Sub Total Expense * $ 570.67 * >> >> >> *From:* Mark - Myakka Technologies >> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 12:29 PM >> *To:* Chuck McCown >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT >> >> Chuck, >> >> Dug up some of my costs on the GPON. One port with a C+ class laser and >> a 1x32 splitter cost me about $1000. >> >> >> So if I stick with my 50% utilization numbers, that gets me about $62 per >> user. Plus an indoor ONT gets me about $200-$225 per customer for >> electronics. As I increase my utilization, the numbers get better. But, >> we are only talking a different in a few months on the ROI. Remember we >> are debating fiber. I have ONT's out there over 72 months old. I'm sure >> Chuck has some at least 2 or 3 years older than that. I don't plan on any >> type of major upgrade for several years. >> >> But I must stress there is no right answer. AE vs GPON. You need to >> make sure you fully understand both options before making a decision. Not >> to mention, you can run both. We are setup to do AE, We currently have 2 >> customers on the AE side for various reasons vs 2500 on the GPON side. >> >> >> >> *-- Best regards,Mark *mailto:m...@mailmt.com >> >> >> *Myakka Technologies, Inc.*www.MyakkaTech.com >> >> >> >> >> >> *------Monday, February 12, 2018, 1:13:18 PM, you wrote:* >> >> When doing full throttle Calix GPON we have about $570 invested in cpe >> electronics, splitter, ont/olt/onu etc. Everything but fiber and outdoor >> cabinets. >> >> When doing active Ethernet you can come in closer to $100 per customer. >> For non regulated greenfield, I am having a hard time convincing myself >> to do PON. >> >> *From:* Mark - Myakka Technologies >> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 11:09 AM >> *To:* Chuck McCown >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT >> >> Chuck, >> >> PLC splitter in spice case doing full fusion splicing. >> >> >> >> *-- Best regards,Mark *mailto:m...@mailmt.com >> >> >> *Myakka Technologies, Inc.*www.MyakkaTech.com >> >> >> >> >> >> *------Monday, February 12, 2018, 12:09:32 PM, you wrote:* >> >> Are you using splitters in splice cases or in cross connect boxes? >> >> *From:* Mark - Myakka Technologies >> *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 9:55 AM >> *To:* Adam Moffett >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT >> >> Adam, >> >> There are some ranging things you have to consider. "The requirement >> when deploying ONTs are the maximum distance between two ONTs cannot >> exceed 20Km." >> >> The way we have done this is to reuse fibers as we travel down long >> stretches of roads between neighborhoods. >> >> We will deploy a 1x32 splitter in the field. We will splice that into the >> last 3 ribbons/tubes of our fiber. Example, if we were using a 144 count >> cable, ribbons 10-12 will be spliced into. After a few miles depending on >> density or distance, we will splice in another 1x32 splitter to ribbons >> 10-12. We just keep doing this until we run out of light budget. >> >> We build to the lots passed, so we are not trying to optimize max usage >> per port. Currently, we average about 50% utilization on our ports. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *-- Best regards,Mark *mailto:m...@mailmt.com >> >> >> *Myakka Technologies, Inc.*www.MyakkaTech.com >> >> >> >> >> >> *------Monday, February 12, 2018, 11:38:39 AM, you wrote:* >> >> Maybe I need to review the math. >> >> I was figuring on several small splitters along the route. I didn't >> compare to a 1x32 in the cabinet because I figured if I brought every fiber >> back to the cabinet then I didn't save anything versus ethernet. >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Mark - Myakka Technologies" <m...@mailmt.com> >> To: "Adam Moffett" <firstname.lastname@example.org> >> Sent: 2/12/2018 11:30:46 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT >> >> >> Adam, >> >> How far are you going? We are pushing almost 20 miles on a 1x32 split. >> Are you using one 1x32 or multiple smaller splitters? >> >> >> >> *-- Best regards,Mark *mailto:m...@mailmt.com >> >> >> *Myakka Technologies, Inc.*www.MyakkaTech.com >> >> >> >> >> >> *------Sunday, February 11, 2018, 10:24:30 PM, you wrote:* >> >> I'm looking at rural areas (like a few houses per mile). As I'm looking >> at hypothetical power budgets for PON, I'm finding that if I run the line >> down the road and put splitters on the pole I can split 5-6 times and then >> I'm getting too low on db to keep going down the road. At 5 or so houses >> per port, a 1U, 8 port ONT is no denser than a 1U switch. >> >> Your stated reasons for PON are all correct. The numbers just aren't >> seeming to work out for me. >> >> I also figure if I install enough fibers for AE, I can still switch to >> PON some day if I want to. >> >> We would never max out the PON port, but looking back on the past 15 >> years of growth in consumption I wonder if I should ever say "never". In AE >> I can put 100Gig in every house if I have to. I'll "never" have to do that >> as far as I can imagine, but my imagination could be limited. >> >> -Adam >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> To: email@example.com >> Sent: 2/11/2018 9:28:34 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT >> >> >> A few reasons... >> >> Port cost is still fairly high. >> >> More splicing. >> >> More fiber required. >> >> Larger chassis required. >> >> More power required. >> >> More battery backup required. >> >> Consumers not even close to using up 1-2 generations back of PON capacity >> in most places. >> >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> So, why do PON and not active in these super cheap optics days? >> >> *From:* Chuck Hogg >> *Sent:* Sunday, February 11, 2018 6:10 PM >> *To: *firstname.lastname@example.org >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT >> >> We are walking away from them and Alphion...I think Mark's product with >> Zhone is different. >> >> Regards, >> Chuck >> >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >> I think Chuck Hogg walked far away from DASAN... or maybe it was DASAN >> that rescued them from the one they walked far away form. I don't remember >> which. ;-) >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> >> *To: *email@example.com >> *Sent: *Tuesday, February 6, 2018 4:35:53 PM >> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Outdoor PON OLT >> >> In light of finding out that Calix's offering is not going to be anywhere >> near within budget, does anyone else have any other suggestions? >> >> I found these guys, but have never heard of them: >> http://www.richerlink.com/en/products.asp?ClassID=116 >> >> It looks like DASAN also has an option - I've at least heard of them: >> http://www.dasannetworks.com/product_images/V5806_20140520174927.pdf >> >> -Jason >> > >